Abstract
The effect of Al on the growth of plants derived from the F3 generation of a cross between Al tolerant (Waalt) and Al sensitive (Warigal) wheat cultivars, grown in low ionic strength nutrient solutions, were assessed by a number of methods viz; root length and haematoxylin stain after 3 days exposure to Al and plant top and root yields, and root length and visual assessment for Al damage after 4 weeks growth.
Of these methods haematoxylin stain (3 days) and visual assessment at 4 weeks identified the same plants as being sensitive or tolerant to Al and clearly segregated the 2 populations. Consequently these 2 methods were used as ‘standard’ techniques to determine the ability of the other methods to distinguish between tolerant and sensitive plants.
The ratio of plant top: root yields clearly segregated the 2 populations. The 2 populations could not be clearly distinguished based on plant top or root yields, or on root length either after 3 days or 4 weeks exposure to Al.
Within the population of tolerant plants, root length was significantly correlated with root weight (r2=0.86) and top weight (r2=0.71). None of these relationships were significant for the population of sensitive plants.
These techniques were applied in a number of separate experiments on the F2 and F3 populations from a Waalt × Warigal cross. The results indicate that Al tolerance in wheat is inherited by a single gene and that this gene has incomplete dominance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aniol A 1990 Genetics of tolerance to aluminium in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Thell). Plant and Soil 123, 223–227.
Blamey F P C, Edmeades D C, Asher C J, Edwards D G and Wheeler D M 1990 Evaluation of solution culture techniques for studying aluminum toxicity in plants. In Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH. Eds. R J Wright, V C Baligar and R P Murrmann. pp 905–912. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Campbell L G and Lafever H N 1978 Heritability and gene effects for aluminium tolerance in wheat. Proc. Fifth Int. Wheat Genet. Symp. Ed. S Ramarujan. Indian Society of Genetics and Plant Breeding. New Delhi, India. pp 963–977.
Edmeades D C, Wheeler D M and Christie R A 1991 The effect of aluminium and pH on the growth of a range of temperate grass species and cultivars. In Plant-Soil Interactions at low pH. Eds. R J Wright, V C Baligar and R P Murrmann. pp 913–924. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Foy C D 1988 Plant adaptation to acid, aluminium-toxic soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 19, 959–987.
Kerridge P C and Kronstad W E 1968 Evidence of genetic resistance to aluminium toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum Vill. Host.). Agron. J. 60, 710–711.
Kinraide B K, Arnold R C and Baligar V C 1985 A rapid assay for aluminium phytotoxicity at submicromolar concentrations. Physiol. Plant. 65, 245–250.
Larkin P J 1987 Calmodulin levels are not responsible for aluminium tolerance in wheat. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 14, 377–385.
Polle E, Konzak C F and Kittrick J A 1978 Visual detection of aluminium tolerance levels in wheat by haematoxylin staining of seedling roots. Crop Sci. 18, 823–827.
Putterill J J, Richards K D, Boyd L, Konigstorfer A, Richardson T E and Gardner R 1991 Molecular approaches to aluminium tolerance in plants. Curr. Top. Plant Biochem. Physiol. 10, 142–147.
Wheeler D M, Edmeades C D and Christie R A 1991 Effect of aluminium on yield and nutrient concentrations on 18 cultivars of cereals grown in a low ionic strength solution. J. Plant Nutr. 15, 403–418.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wheeler, D.M., Edmeades, D.C., Christie, R.A. et al. Comparison of techniques for determining the effect of aluminium on the growth of, and the inheritance of aluminium tolerance in wheat. Plant Soil 146, 1–8 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011989
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011989