Skip to main content
Log in

Wheat genotypes differ in Zn efficiency when grown in chelate-buffered nutrient solution

I. Growth

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ten Triticum aestivum and two Triticum turgidum conv. durum genotypes were grown in chelate-buffered nutrient solution at Zn supplies ranging from deficient to sufficient (free Zn activities from 2 to 200 pM, pZn from 11.7 to 9.7). The critical level of Zn ion activity in solution for healthy growth of wheat plants was around 40 pM. Genotypes differed in the growth response: those classified as Zn-efficient suffered less reduction of shoot growth and did not change the rate of root growth at a Zn supply quite deficient for Zn-inefficient genotypes. Root growth of Zn-inefficient genotypes increased at deficient Zn supply. The shoot/root ratio was the most sensitive parameter of Zn efficiency; Zn-efficient genotypes showed less reduction in the ratio when grown at deficient compared to sufficient Zn supply. Classification of wheat genotypes into Zn-efficient and Zn-inefficient groups after screening in chelate-buffered nutrient solution corresponded well with classification obtained in field experiments on Zn-deficient soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell P F, Chaney R L and Angle J S 1991 Free metal activity and total metal concentrations as indices of micronutrient availability to barley [Hordeum vulgare (L.) ‘Klages’]. Plant and Soil 130, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell R W, Kirk G J, Plaskett D and Loneragan J F 1990 Diagnosis of zinc deficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogea) by plant analysis. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21, 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakmak I and Marschner H 1988 Increase in membrane permeability and exudation in roots of zinc deficient plants. J. Plant Physiol. 132, 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakmak I, Marschner H and Bangerth F 1989 Effect of zinc nutritional status on growth, protein metabolism and levels of indole-3-acetic acid and other phytohormones in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Exp. Bot. 40, 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney R L, Bell P F and Coulombe B A 1989 Screening strategies for improved nutrient uptake and utilization by plants. HortScience 24, 565–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang Y P, Edwards D G, Dalal R C and Tiller K G 1993 Identification of an index tissue to predict zinc status of wheat. Plant and Soil 154, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden A L, Rao I M and Terry N 1989 Influence of phosphorus nutrition on growth and carbon partitioning in Glycine max. Plant Physiol. 89, 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • GENSTAT 5 Committee 1989 GENSTAT 5. Reference Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham R D, Ascher J S and Hynes S C 1992 Selecting zinc-efficient cereal genotypes for soils of low zinc status. Plant and Soil 146, 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham R D and Rengel Z 1993 Genotypic variation in zinc uptake and utilization by plants. In Zinc in Soils and Plants. Ed. A DRobson. pp 107–118. Kluwer Academic Publishers, dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundon N J 1987 Hungry Crops: A Guide to Nutrient Deficiencies in Field Crops. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane 242p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M B 1993 Are plant hormones involved in root to shoot communication? Adv. Bot. Res. 19, 103–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurie S H, Tancock N P, McGrath S P and Sanders J R 1991 Influence of complexation on the uptake by plants of iron, manganese, copper and zinc. I. Effect of EDTA in a multi-metal and computer simulation study. J. Exp. Bot. 42, 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loneragan J F, Grunes D L, Welch R M, Aduayi E A, Tengah A, Lazar V A and Cary E E 1982 Phosphorus accumulation and toxicity in leaves in relation to zinc supply. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNair M R 1993 The genetics of metal tolerance in vascular plants. New Phytol. 124, 541–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nable R O and Webb M J 1993 Further evidence that zinc is required throughout the root zone for optimal plant growth and development. Plant and Soil 150, 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norvell W A, Dabkovska-Naskret H and Cary E E 1987 Effect of phosphorus and zinc fertilization on the solubility of Zn2+ in two alkaline soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 584–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norvell W A and Welch R M 1993 Growth and nutrient uptake by barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Herta): Studies using an N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenedinitrilotriacetic acid-buffered nutrient solution technique. I. Zinc ion requirements. Plant Physiol. 101, 619–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivoke A 1983 The long term effect of zinc on growth and development, chlorophyll content and nitrogen fixation in the garden pea. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 20, 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker D R 1993 Novel nutrient solutions for zinc nutrition research: buffering free zinc2+ with synthetic chelators and P with hydroxyapatite. In Plant Nutrition-from Genetic Engineering to Field Practice. Ed. N JBarrow. pp 677–680. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker D R, Aguilera J J and Thomason D N 1992 Zinc-phosphorus interactions in two cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) grown in chelator-buffered nutrient solutions. Plant and Soil 143, 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker D R, Norvell W A and Chaney R L 1995 GEOCHEM-PC-A chemical speciation program for IBM and compatible personal computers. In Chemical Equilibrium and Reaction Models. Eds. R HLoeppert, A PSchwab and SGoldberg. ASA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. pp 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z 1990 Competitive Al3+ inhibition of net Mg2+ uptake by intact Lolium multiflorum roots. II. Plant age effects. Plant Physiol. 93, 1261–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z and Graham R D 1995a Importance of seed Zn content for wheat growth on Zn-deficient soil. I. Vegetative growth. Plant and Soil 173, 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z and Graham R D 1995b Wheat genotypes differ in Zn efficiency when grown in the chelate-buffered nutrient solution. II. Nutrient uptake. Plant and Soil 176, 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z and Jurkic V 1992 Genotypic differences in wheat Al tolerance. Euphytica 62, 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter D J and Robinson J B 1986 Plant Analysis. An Interpretation Manual. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillanpää M and Vlek P L G 1985 Micronutrients and the agroecology of tropical and Mediterranean regions. Fert. Res. 7, 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb M J and Loneragan J F 1988 Effect of zinc deficiency on growth, phosphorus concentration, and phosphorus toxicity of wheat plants. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 1676–1680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb M J and Loneragan J F 1990 Zinc translocation to wheat roots and its implications for a phosphorus/zinc interaction in wheat plants. J. Plant Nutr. 13, 1499–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch R M and Norvell W A 1993 Growth and nutrient uptake by barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Herta): Studies using an N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenedinitrilotriacetic acid-buffered nutreint solution technique. I. Role of zinc in the uptake and root leakage of mineral nutrients. Plant Physiol. 101, 627–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Römheld V and Marschner H 1994 Application of chelatorbuffered nutrient solution technique in studies on zinc nutrition in rice plant (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Soil 163, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rengel, Z., Graham, R.D. Wheat genotypes differ in Zn efficiency when grown in chelate-buffered nutrient solution. Plant Soil 176, 307–316 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011795

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011795

Key words

Navigation