Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in learning by foraging juvenile pumpkinseed and bluegill sunfish in a structured habitat

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

We investigated the ability of two congeneric species of sunfish to learn to forage on a novel prey item in feeding arenas containing structured habitats. Eight bluegill sunfish and eight pumpkinseed sunfish were given the opportunity to forage on whiteworms daily for 10 days. Each day, several behavioural measures were recorded for each fish. Both species of sunfish learned to feed over the 10-day period but the bluegill sunfish learned to feed more quickly than the pumpkinseed sunfish. Pumpkinseeds, however, attained a higher level of foraging efficiency. The differences in learning and foraging efficiency were related to body morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Brown, J.A. 1985. The adaptive significance of behavioural ontogeny in some centrarchid fish. Env. Biol. Fish. 13: 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colgan, P.W. V. Gotceitas & J. Frame. 1991. Individual variation, acquisition, and re-acquisition in a foraging task by juvenile bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). J. Comp. Psych. 105: 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlinger, T.J. 1990. Learning and individual variation in bluegill foraging: habitat-specific techniques. Anim. Behav. 38: 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlinger, T.J. & D.S. Wilson. 1988. A complex foraging polymorphism in bluegill sunfish. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85: 1878–1882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, A.R. 1973. Preliminary comparisons of day and night habits in freshwater fish in Ontario lakes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30: 761–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotceitas, V. & P. Colgan. 1988. Individual variation in learning by foraging juvenile bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). J. Comp. Psych. 102: 294–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R.N. 1979. Optimal diets under the energy maximization premise: the effects of recognition time and learning. Amer. Nat. 113: 209–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A. 1978. Feeding interactions between age groups of pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus and comparisons with the bluegill sunfish (L. macrochirus). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 35: 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, J. D. & P.W. Colgan. 1991. Individual variation in learning by foraging pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus: the influence of habitat. Anim. Behav. (in press).

  • Krebs, J.R., D.W. Stephens & W.J. Sutherland. 1983. Perspectives in optimal foraging. pp. 165–216. In: A.H. Brush & C.A. Clark Jr. (ed.) Perspectives in Ormithology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A.E. 1986. Individual differences in fish behaviour. pp. 338–365. In: T.J. Pitcher(ed.) The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach, G.G. 1981. Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62: 1370–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach G.G. 1984. Predation and resource partitioning in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 65: 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach, G.G. 1986. Predator-mediated habitat use: some consequences for species interactions. Env. Biol. Fish. 16: 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg, C.W., E.E. Werner, G.G. Mittelbach & D.J. Hall. 1988. Growth patterns in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (L. gibbosus) sunfish: environmental variation and the importance of ontogenetic niche shifts. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringler, N.H. 1983. Variation in foraging tactics of fishes. pp. 159–171. In: D.L.G. Noakes, D.G. Linquist, G.S. Hellman & J.A. Ward(ed.) Predators and Prey in Fishes, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.T. 1986. Resources partitioning in fish assemblages: a review of field studies. Copeia 1986: 352–388.

  • SAS Institute 1985. Users guide: Statistics. Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary. 956 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.B. & E.J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa. 966 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, R.B. & C.W. Boylen. 1977. Maximum depth inhabited by aquatic vascular plants. Amer. Midl. Nat. 97: 248–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, D.M. 1973. Risk of epibenthic prey predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30: 787–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P.W. 1984. Body form, locomotion, and foraging in aquatic vertebrates. Amer. Zool. 24: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. 1986. Species interactions in freshwater fish communities. pp. 344–357. In: J. Diamond & T.J. Case(ed.) Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E., D.J. Hall. D.R. Laughlin, D.J. Wagner, L.A. Wilsmann & F.C. Funk. 1977. Habitat partitioning in a freshwater fish community. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 360–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E., G.G. Mittelbach & D.J. Hall. 1981. The role of profitability and experience in habitat use by the bluegill sunfish. Ecology 62: 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T.M. 1987. Comparative retinal organization and visual acuity in four members of the Centrarchidae (Perciformes). M. Sc. Thesis, Queen's University, Kingston. 58 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kieffer, J.D., Colgan, P.W. Differences in learning by foraging juvenile pumpkinseed and bluegill sunfish in a structured habitat. Environ Biol Fish 33, 359–366 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010948

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010948

Key words

Navigation