Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative cytogenetics of Diphyllobothrium ditremum (Creplin, 1925) and Ligula intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea)

  • Published:
Systematic Parasitology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An investigation carried out on two species of pseudophyllidean cestodes belonging to different families showed very close karyological affinity between them. The karyotypes of Diphyllobothrium ditremum and Ligula intestinalis both consist of 18 bi-armed chromosomes and are almost identical with respect to the relative length and the centromeric indices of corresponding chromosomes. Statistically significant differences exist in the morphology of chromosomes 2 and 4, but they are not striking and may be due in part to errors of measurement. Differences in the absolute length of the chromosomes were noted: the chromosomes of D. ditremum are somewhat larger (from 2.7 to 8.5 μm) than those of L. intestinalis (from 1.9 to 5.4 μm). The results obtained were compared with data existing for other pseudophyllidean cestodes and preliminary conclusions on the karyotypic evolution in that group of helminths were made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, K., Ching, H.L. & Vik, R. (1987) A review of freshwater species of Diphyllobothrium with redescriptions and the distribution of D. dendriticum (Nitzsch, 1824) and D. ditremum (Creplin, 1825) from North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65, 2,216–2,228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.J. & Bickham, J.W. (1980) Karyotype evolution in bats: evidence of extensive and conservative chromosomal evolution in closely related taxa. Systematic Zoology, 29, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazitov, A.A. (1978) Spermatogenesis in the cestode Bothriocephalus scorpii. Biologia Moria, Vladivostok, 2, 87–91 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curini-Galletti, M., Martens, P.M. & Puccinelli, I. (1985) Karyological observations on Monocelididae (Turbelaria, Proseriata): karyometrical analysis of four species pertaining to the subfamily Minoninae. Caryologia, 38, 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curini-Galletti, M.C., Puccinelli, I. & Martens, P.M. (1989) Karyometrical analysis of 10 species of the subfamily Monocelidinae (Proseriata, Platyhelminthes) with remarks on the karyological evolution of the Monocelididae. Genetica, 78, 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinina, M.N. (1966) [Ligulidae (Cestoda) of fauna of USSR.] Leningrad: Nauka, 262 pp. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J.R. (1980) Chromosomal change and rectangular evolution in North America cyprinid fishes. Genetic Research, 35, 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, O. (1970) Studies on the helminth fauna of Norway. XV. On the taxonomy and biology of plerocercoids of Diphyllobothrium Cobbold, 1858 (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) from north-western Europe. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi, 18, 114–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kligerman, A.D. & Bloom, E. (1977) Rapid chromosome preparations from solid tissues of fishes. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 34, 266–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan, A., Fredga, K. & Sandberg, A. (1964) Nomenclature for centromere position on chromosomes. Hereditas, 52, 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Guozhang & He, Lin (1988) G-banding of chromosomes and G-bands quantitative analysis of Spirometra mansoni by microscopic photometer. Annual Bulletin of the Society of Parasitology, Guangdong Province, 10, 137–138 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, H.C. (1981) Big chromosomes and speciation amongst Amphibia. In: Dover, G.A. & Flavell, R.B. (Eds.) Genome evolution. New York: Academic Press, pp. 325–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedeva, I. & Mutafova, T. (1988) To the morphology of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934 (fam. Bothriocephalidae). Khelmintologiya, 26, 39–46. (In Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petkevičiūtė R. (1991) Chromosomes of Cyathocephalus truncatus (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea). In: Abstracts of III International Symposium “Problems of fish parasitology”. Petrozavodsk, USSR, August 14–21, 1991, p. 60.

  • Petkevičiūtė, R. & Ieshko, E.P. (1991) The karyotypes of Triaenophorus nodulosus and T. crassus (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea). International Journal for Parasitology, 21, 11–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petkevičiūtė, R. & Kuperman, B.I. (1991) The karyotype of Eubothrium rugosum (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea). International Journal for Parasitology, 21, 125–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raff, R.A. & Kaufman, T.C. (1986) [Embryos, genes and evolution.] Moscow: Mir, 404 pp. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasada, K. (1978) Studies on the chromosomes of parasitic helminth. II. Triploidy and cytological mechanisms of parthenogenesis in Diphyllobothrium erinacei (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae). Japanese Journal of Parasitology, 27, 547–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, A.C. (1959) Some parasites and their chromosomes. Journal of Parasitology, 45, 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wikgren, B.-J. & Gustafsson, M.K.S. (1965) The chromosomes of somatic cells of three Diphyllobothrium species, with notes on the mode of cell division. Acta Academiae Aboensis, Series B, 25, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, G.B. (1959) The chromosomes of Diphyllobothrium ursi. Journal of Parasitology, 45, 387.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petkevičiūtė, R. Comparative cytogenetics of Diphyllobothrium ditremum (Creplin, 1925) and Ligula intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea). Syst Parasitol 23, 167–173 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010869

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010869

Keywords

Navigation