Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, 287:215 | Cite as

Gut morphology, feeding rate and gut clearance in five species of caddis larvae

  • Namuron Sangpradub
  • Paul S. Giller
Article

Abstract

Feeding rate, the rate of movement of food through the gut and gut morphology of large larvae of five caddis species (Halesus radiatus, Hydropsyche instabilis, Polycentropus kingi, Rhyacophila dorsalis and Potamophylax cingulatus) were investigated in the laboratory. Following 72 hr starvation, P. cingulatus and H. radiatus larvae became satiated (refused prey offered directly to the mouthparts) after consuming 8–11 and 9–13 mayfly nymphs (Baetis rhodani, 3.5–4.6 mm) respectively. Hunger level affected prey consumption. In P. cingulatus, the number of prey consumed over 24 h (at 9.5–12 °C) increased with starvation periods from 0–72 h, but declined following longer starvation periods.

Six clearly recognisable gut states (defined by the position of food material in various parts of the gut) can be identified at different times since commencement of a meal. As environmental temperature increased (from 8–12 °C to 15–17 °C), the rate of change of the gut state increased and the food retention time decreased in all species. Feeding periodicity (i.e. nocturnal/diurnal activity) in the field was estimated based on the evacuation rate and the gut state and environmental temperature at the known time of collection. Initiation of consumption of prey appeared to coincide with emptying of the foregut and proximal midgut, whereas actual feeding continued until complete satiation when some threshold fullness of the foregut had been reached. The length of time food was held in the foregut was positively correlated with increasing specialisation of the foregut (particularly elaboration of the proventriculus).

Key words

predatory caddis gut morphology feeding biology feeding regulation 

References

  1. Arsuffi, T. L. & K. Suberkropp, 1985. Selective feeding by stream caddisfly (Trichoptera) detritivores on leaves with fungal colonial patches. Oikos 45: 50–58.Google Scholar
  2. Benke, A. C. & J. B. Wallace, 1980. Trophic basis of production among net spinning caddisflies in a southern Appalachian stream. Ecology 61: 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boon, P. J., 1985. Gastric mill structure and its phylogenetic significance in larval Hydropsychidae (Trichoptera). Zool. J. linn Soc. 84: 301–324.Google Scholar
  4. Branch, H. E., 1922. A contribution to the knowledge of the internal anatomy of trichoptera. Annu. Ent. Soc. Am. 15: 257–275.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, K. W., 1973. Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Annu. Rev. Ent. 18: 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummins, K. W. & M. J. Klug, 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott, J. M., 1970. The diel activity patterns of caddis larvae (Trichoptera). J. Zool. 160: 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glasgow, J. P., 1936. Internal anatomy of caddis (Hydropsyche colonica). Quant. J. Mic. Sci. 79: 151–179.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, D. G., 1967. The proventriculus of some trichopterous larvae. J. Zool. Lond. 152: 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giller, P. S., 1980. The control of handling time and its effects on the foraging strategy of a heteropteran predator Notonecta. J. anim. Ecol. 49: 699–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giller, P. S., 1984. Predatorygut state and prey detectability using electrophoretic analysis of gut contents. Ecol. Ent. 9: 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giller, P. S. & N. Sangpradub, 1993. Predatory foraging behaviour and activity patterns of larvae of two species of limnephilid cased caddis. Oikos 67: 351–357.Google Scholar
  13. Heiman, D. R. & A. W. Knight, 1975. The influence of temperature on the bioenergetics of the carnivorous stonefly nymph, Acroneuria californica Banks (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Ecol 56: 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hildrew, A. G. & C. R. Townsend, 1977. The influence of substrate on the functional response of Plectrocnemia conspersa (Curtis) larvae. Oecol. 31: 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holling, C. S., 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 48: 1–86.Google Scholar
  16. Iverson, T. M., 1979. Laboratory energetics of larvae of Sericostoma personatum (Trichoptera). Holarct. Ecol. 2: 1–5.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, D., B. Akre & D. Crowley, 1975. Modelling arthropod predation — wasteful killing by damselfly naiids. Ecol 56: 1081–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Judd, W. W., 1947. The proventriculus of the larva of the caddisfly Macronema zebratum Hagen (Trichoptera: Hydrophychidae). Can. J. Res. 25: 87–90.Google Scholar
  19. Lawton, J. M., 1971. Ecological energetic studies on larvae of the damselfly Pyrrhosoma nymphula (Sutzer) (Odonata: Zygoptera). J. anim. Ecol. 40: 385–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mulla, M. & L. A. Lacy, 1976. Feeding rates of Simulium larvae on particulates in natural streams (Diptera: Simulidae). Envir. Ent. 5: 253–287.Google Scholar
  21. Muthukrishnan, J. & T. J. Pandian, 1987. Insecta. Animal Energetics Vol 1. Protozoa through Insecta. T. J. Pandian & F. J. Vernberg (eds), Academic Press, California: 373–511.Google Scholar
  22. Noyes, A. A., 1915. The proventriculus of hydropsyche larvae. J. Ent. Zool. 7: 251–271.Google Scholar
  23. Otto, C., 1971. Growth and population movements of Potamophylax cingulatus (Trichoptera) larvae in a South Swedish stream. Oikos 22: 292–301.Google Scholar
  24. Otto, C., 1974. Growth and energetics in a larval population of Potamophylax cingulatus (Steph.) (Trichoptera) in a south Swedish stream. J. anim. Ecol. 43: 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Otto, C., 1983. Behavioural and physiological adaptations to a variable habitat in two species of case-making caddis larvae using different food. Oikos 41: 188–194.Google Scholar
  26. Otto, C., 1993. Submersed water lily leaves as feeding patches for limnephilid caddis larvae in a North swedish stream. In Otto, C. (ed.), Proceedings of 7th International Symposium of Trichoptera, 1992. Universal Book Services, Oegstgeest (in press).Google Scholar
  27. Pandian, T. J., S. Mathavan & C. P. Jeyagopal, 1979. Influence of temperature and body weight on mosquito predation by the dragonfly nymph Mesogomphus lineatus. Hydrobiol. 62: 99–104.Google Scholar
  28. Satija, G. A., 1974. Structure of the alimentary canal and mouth-parts of trichoptera larvae with special reference to food and feeding-habits. VI Relationship of alimentary canal, mouth parts and feeding-habits, and phylogeny of the group. Research Bulletin (N.S.) of the Panjab University, 25: 55–70.Google Scholar
  29. Wallace, I. D., B. Wallace & G. N. Philipson, 1990. A key to the case bearing caddis larvae of Britain and Ireland. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication, No. 51.Google Scholar
  30. Williams, N. E. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1973. Microdistribution and feeding of the net spinning caddisflies (Trichoptera) of a Canadian stream. Oikos 24: 73–84.Google Scholar
  31. Willoughby, L. G. & R. Earnshaw, 1982. Gut passage times in Gammarus pulex (Crustacea, Amphipoda) and aspects of summer feeding in a stony stream. Hydrobiologia 97: 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zimmerman, M. C. & T. E. Wissing, 1978. Effects of temperature on gut-loading and gut-clearing times of the burrowing mayfly, Hexagenia limbata. Freshwat. Biol. 8: 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Namuron Sangpradub
    • 1
  • Paul S. Giller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity CollegeCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations