Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 134, Issue 1, pp 107–114 | Cite as

Calcium magnesium imbalance in clovers: A cause of negative yield response to liming

  • R. A. Carran
Article

Abstract

Three pot experiments, in which causes of negative yield responses to liming were investigated, are reported. The soil used, Waimumu silt loam (Fragiochrept), differed from others that have been reported to show negative yield response to liming, in that it is only moderately weathered and leached, only moderately acid and has previously shown positive yield responses to liming. Deficiencies of Zn and Mg were identified, but limed (pH 6.8) soils still showed a 40% yield depression even where all nutrients were supplied daily. Phosphorus availability was little affected by liming, and despite Mg and Zn addition, yields were depressed at high lime (pH 6.4) and high P while plants showed leaf symptoms of Mg deficiency. Neither plant nor soil analyses indicated low Mg levels but Ca: Mg ratios in soil were 22:1. When a pH range 5.2–6.1 was produced by liming with CaCO3 and MgCO3 at ratios between 100:0, and 50:50 on an equivalent basis, negative yield response was eliminated at Ca:Mg of 50:50. There was no evidence that Mg was fixed or rendered unavailable at the higher pH levels. A Ca induced Mg deficiency arising when exchangeable Ca:Mg>20 is suggested as the cause. The role of variable surface charge in converting soils that respond positively to lime to a negative response condition is discussed.

Key words

calcium carbonate Mg deficiency Trifolium repens Trifolium subterraneum variable surface change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams F and Henderson J B 1962 Magnesium availability as affected by deficient and adequate evels of potassium and lime. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 26, 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amarasiri D L and Olsen S R 1973 Liming as related to solubility of P and plant growth in an acid tropical soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 716–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christenson D R, White R P and Doll E C 1973 Yields and magnesium uptake by plants as affected by soil pH and Ca levels. Agron. J. 65, 205–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis M R 1981 Growth and nutrition of legumes on a highly country yellow-brown earth subsoil. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 24, 339–348.Google Scholar
  5. During C 1984 Fertilizers and Soils in New Zealand Farming. P.D. Hasselberg, Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand. 361 p.Google Scholar
  6. Edmeades D C, Smart C E, Wheeler D M and Rhys G 1983 Effects of lime on the chemical composition of ryegrass and white clover grown on a yellow-brown loam. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 26, 473–481.Google Scholar
  7. Floate M G S and Cossens G C 1985 Pasture responses to lime in the South Island, New Zealand. In Proceedings of Workshop on Lime in New Zealand Agriculture. Eds. B L J Jackson and D CEdmeades. pp 7–9. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  8. Grove J H and Sumner M E 1985 Lime induced magnesium stress in corn: Impact of magnesium on phosphorus availability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, 1192–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grove J H, Sumner M E and Syers J K 1981 Effect of lime on exchangeable magnesium surface charge soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45, 497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Juo H S R and Uzu F O 1977 Liming and nutrient interactions in two Ultisols from southern Nigeria. Plant and Soil 47, 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lowther W L and Adams A F R 1970 The interaction of lime and phosphorus on the nodulation and growth of white clover. N. Z. J. Agric. 13, 252–262.Google Scholar
  12. McNaught K J 1970 Diagnosis of mineral deficiencies in grass-legume pasture by plant analysis. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Grassland Congress. Ed. M J J Norman. pp 334–338. University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Metson A J 1974 Magnesium in New Zealand soils. I. Some factors governing the availability of soil magnesium. N. Z. J. Exp. Agric. 2, 277–319.Google Scholar
  14. Middleton K R and Toxopeus M R J 1973 Diagnosis and measurement of multiple soil deficiencies by a subtractive technique. Plant and Soil 38, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muchovej R M C, Borges A C, Novais R F and Thiebaut J T L 1986 Effect of liming levels and Ca:Mg ratios on yield, nitrogen content and nodulation of soybeans grown in acid Cerrado soil. J. Soil Sci. 37, 235–240.Google Scholar
  16. Munns D N and Fox R L 1976 Depression of legume growth by liming. Plant and Soil 45, 701–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pleysier J L and Juo A S R 1980 A single-extraction method using silver-thiourea for measuring exchangeable cations and effective CEC in soils with variable charges. Soil Sci. 129, 205–211.Google Scholar
  18. Pringle R M, Edmeades D C, Shannon P W and Mansell G P 1985 Predicting lime response on pastures. In Proceedings of a Workshop on Lime in New Zealand Agriculture. Eds. B L TJackson and D CEdmeades. pp 20–22. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  19. Searle P L 1986 The measurement of soil cation exchange properties using the single extraction, silver thiourea method: An evaluation using a range of New Zealand soils. Aust. J Soil Res. 24, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sumner M E, Farina P and Hurst V J 1978 Magnesium fixation-a possible cause of negative yield responses to lime application. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 9, 995–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wallace T 1944 The Diagnosis of Mineral Deficiencies in Plants by Visual Symptoms: A Colour Atlas and Guide. HMSO, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Carran
    • 1
  1. 1.Grassland DivisionDSIRPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations