Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of some non-pathogenic micro-organisms on the growth of gnotobiotic barley plants

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Mated cultures of Blakeslea trispora, which produce trisporic acid, inhibited root and shoot extension of barley plants grown in gnotobiotic cultures, where the carbon from roots was the sole source of carbon available to the microorganism. Unmated cultures of B. trispora and Mucor hiemalis, which do not synthesize trisporic acid, inhibited root extension only. Azotobacter chroococcum had a variable effect in different experiments on both root and shoot extension but could at least partially relieve the inhibitory effect of B. trispora on root growth. Plant growth regulators, applied to roots exogenously, produced effects on plants which, although comparable with some of the inhibitory effects of the micro-organisms, were not comparable with the stimulatory effects of A. chroococcum. re]19751127

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson J. P. E. and Domsch K. H., Quantification of bacterial and fungal contribution to soil respiration. Arch. Mikrobiol. 93, 113–127 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin D. J., Bu'Lock J. D. and Gooday G. W., Trisporic acids: sexual hormones from Mucor mucedo and Blakeslea trispora. Nature 223, 1178–1179 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber D. A., The effect of micro-organisms on the absorption of inorganic nutrients by intact plants. I. Apparatus and culture technique. J. Exp. Bot. 18, 163–169 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barber D. A. and Martin J. K., The release of organic substances by cereal roots into soil. New Phytol. 76, 69–80 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown M. E., Plant growth substances produced by micro-organisms of soil and rhizosphere. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 35, 443–451 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown M. E., Seed and root bacterization. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 12, 181–197 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown M. E., Burlingham S. K. and Jackson R. M., Studies on Azotobacter species in soil. III. Effects of artificial inoculation on crop yields. Plant and Soil 20, 194–214 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown M. E. and Burlingham S. K., Production of plant growth substances by Azotobacter chroococcum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 53, 135–144 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bu'Lock J. D. and Winstanley D. J., Trisporic acid production by Blakeslea trispora and its promotion by barbiturate. J. Gen. Microbiol. 69, 391–394 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Collocott T. C. Dictionary of Science and Technology. W. & R. Chambers Ltd., Edinburgh (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Domsch K. H., The action of physiologically active substances in the root region. In Plant Microbes Relationships, pp. 201–208. Edited by J.Macura and V.Vančura. Prague: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Domsch K. H. and Gams W., Die Bedeutung vorfruchtabhängiger Verschiebungen in der Bodenmikroflora. I. Der Einfluss von Bodenpilzen auf die Wurzelentwicklung von Weizen, Erbsen und Raps. Phytopathol. Z. 63, 64–74 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Domsch K. H. and Gams W., Fungi in agricultural soils. London: Longman (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feofilova E. P., Lozhnikova V. N., Bekhtereva M. N., Samokhvalov G. I. and Chailakhian M. Kh., The influence of trisporic acids on the growth, pigment formation and respiration of pea sprouts. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 208, 483–486 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenneth J. H., A dictionary of scientific terms. 7th edn. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leelavathy K. M., Effect of some common rhizosphere fungi on root growth of seedlings. Plant and Soil 30, 335–338 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lynch J. M. and Harper S. H. T., Ethylene formation by a soil fungus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 80, 187–195 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marchant R., The root surface of Ammophila arenaria as a substrate for micro-organisms. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 54, 479–482 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mehrotra C. L. and LehriL. K., Effect of Azotobacter inoculation on crop yield. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 19, 243–248 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Merriman P. R., Price R. D. and Baker K. F., The effect of inoculation of seed with antagonists of Rhizoctonia solani on the growth of wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 25, 213–218 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merriman P. R., Price R. D., Kollmorgen J. F., Piggott T. and Ridge E. H., Effect of seed inoculation with Bacillus subtilis and Streptomyces griseus on the growth of cereals and carrots. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 25, 219–226 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mishustin E. N., The importance of non-symbiotic nitrogen-fixing micro-organisms in agriculture. Plant and Soil 32, 545–554 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Otto G., The influence exerted by fungi in the rhizosphere on the density of ramification of Cucumber roots. In Plant Microbes Relationships, pp. 209–219. Edited by J.Macura and V.Vančura. Prague: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parkinson D., Techniques for the study of soil fungi. Bull. Ecol. Res. Comm., Stockholm 17, 29–36 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pidoplichko N. M., Moskovets N. S. and Zhdanova N. N., Influence of some fungi from the maize rhizosphere on the growth of its seedlings. In Plant Microbes Relationships, pp. 220–227. Edited by J.Macura and V.Vančura. Prague: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Patel J. J., Micro-organisms in the rhizosphere of plants inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum. Plant and Soil 3, 209–223 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Remacle J., Evolution d'une population d'Azotobacter chroococcum dans la rhizosphere de l'orge en presence d'un Bacillus pectinolytique. Ann. Inst. Pasteur Paris 111, 149–154 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Remacle J., Mixed culture of micro-organisms in the rhizosphere of ivy (Hedera helix L.). Plant and Soil 36, 199–203 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Remacle J. and Rouatt J. W., Culture mixte de Azotobacter chroococcum et de germes pectinolytiques dans la rhizosphere de l'orge. Ann. Inst. Pasteur Paris 115, 545–754 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ridge E. H. and Rovira A. D., Microbial inoculation of wheat. Transactions of the 9th International Congress of Soil Science, Adelaide 3, 470–481 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith K. A. and Robertson P. D., Effect of ethylene on root extension of cereals. Nature 234, 148–149 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Spalla C. and Biffi G., Abscisic acid-like activity of trisporic acids. Experientia 27, 1387–1388 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Srivastava V. B., Effect of some rhizospheric fungi on seedling growth. An. Edafol. Agrobiol. 31, 787–789 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tchan Y. T. and Jackson D. L., Studies of nitrogen fixing bacteria. IX. Study of inoculation of wheat with Azotobacter in laboratory and field experiments. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 90, 290–298 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Youssef Y. A., Studies on the rhizosphere microflora of broad bean and cotton. Effect of fungal filtrate on plant growth. Folia Microbiol. 19 381–385 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynch, J.M., White, N. Effects of some non-pathogenic micro-organisms on the growth of gnotobiotic barley plants. Plant Soil 47, 161–170 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010377

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010377

Keywords

Navigation