Abstract
Soil water extraction (Q) and the corresponding values of matric (Ψm) and osmotic (Ψπ) potentials near single roots of eighteen day old lupin and radish plants, subjected to two levels of transpirational demand and five Na+ soil solution concentration levels, were determined using a combination of computer assisted tomography applied to gamma and X-ray attenuation measurements and Na+-LIX microelectrodes. This data together with leaf water potential (Ψ1) measured by psychrometer, were used to calculate the differences in total water potentials (ΔΨ) and the differences in hydrostatic pressure (ΔP) between the leaves and the total potentials at the root surfaces, and to estimate soil and plant resistances to water movement. The linear relations for ΔΨ(Q) and ΔP(Q) observed, imply that both plant roots acted as near perfect osmometers under the conditions of the experiments. This is further supported by the close agreement between the increases in ΔP and the decreases in Ψπ at the root surface with increasing solute concentration in the treatments. Plant resistances were constant with time of transpiration and increased with increasing Na+ in the treatments. Soil resistances between the root surface and bulk soil increased as the water content decreased remaining lower at the higher solute concentrations due to the lower extraction rates. At the high water potentials used plant resistances were always substantially higher than corresponding soil resistances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrs H D 1970 Controlled environment studies of the effects of variable atmospheric water stress on photosynthesis, transpiration and water status of Zea mays L. and other species. In Plant Response to Climatic Factors. Proc. Uppsala Symp. UNESCO.
Burch G J 1979 Soil and plant resistance to water absorption by plant root systems. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 30, 279–297.
Campbell G S 1985 Soil Physics with Basic Transport Models for Soil-Plant System. Elsevier Science Publisher. Amsterdam. 150 p.
Carbon B A 1973 Water stress in plants in a coarse soil. Aust. J. Soil. Res. 11, 33–42.
Cowan I R 1965 Transport of water in the soil-plant atmosphere system. J. Appl. Ecol. 2, 221–239.
Dalton F N, Raats P A C and Gardner W R 1975 Simultaneous uptake of water and solute by plant roots. Agron. J. 67, 334–339.
Ehlers W, Grimme K, Baeumer R, Stulpnagel R, Kopke U and Bohm W 1981 Flow resistance in soil and plant during field growth of oats. Geoderma. 25, 1–12.
Fiscus E L 1975 The interaction between osmotic and pressure-induced water flow in plant root. Plant Physiol. 55, 917–922.
Fiscus E L, Klute A and Kaufmann M R 1983 An interpretation of some whole plant water transport phenomena. Plant Physiol. 71, 810–817.
Gardner W R 1960 Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants. Soil Science 89, 63–73.
Hainsworth J M and Aylmore L A G 1983 The use of computer assisted tomography to determine spatial distribution of soil water content. Aust. J. Soil Res. 21, 435–443.
Hainsworth J M and Aylmore L A G 1986 Water extraction by single plant roots, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 841–848.
Hainsworth J M and Aylmore L A G 1988 Application of computer assisted tomography (CAT) to gamma attenuation measurement of soil water content. Aust. J. Soil Res. 26, 105–110.
Hamza M and Aylmore L A G 1991 Liquid ion exchanger microelectrodes used to study soil solute concentrations near plant roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 954–958.
Hamza M and Aylmore L A G 1992 Soil solute concentration and water uptake by single lupin and radish plant roots. I. Water extraction and solute accumulation. Plant and Soil 145, 187–196.
Herkelrath W N, Miller E E and Gardner W R 1977 Water uptake by plant. II. The root contact model. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 1039–1043.
Huck M G, Klepper B and Taylor H M 1970 Diurnal variation in root diameter. Pl. Physiol. Lancaster. 45, 529–530.
Hulugall N R and Willatt S T 1983 The role of soil resistance in determining water uptake by plant root system. Aust. J. Soil Res. 21, 571–574.
Janes B E 1970 Effect of carbon dioxide, osmotic potential of nutrient solution and light intensity on transpiration and resistance to flowing of water in pepper plant. Plant Physiol. 45, 95–103.
Katchalsky A and Curran P F 1965 Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in biophysics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 215 p.
Macklon A E S and Weatherley P E 1965 Controlled environment studies of the nature and origin of water deficits in plant. New Phytol. 64, 414–427.
Millar A A, Gardner W R and Golz S M 1971 Internal water studies and water transport in seed onion plants. Agron. J. 63, 779–784.
Munns R and Passioura J B 1984 Hydraulic resistance of plants. III. Effect of NaCl in barley and lupins. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 11, 351–359.
Newman E I 1969a Resistance to water flow in soil and plant. I. Soil resistance in relation to amount of root: theoretical estimates. J. Appl. Ecol. 6, 261–272.
Newman E I 1969b Resistance to water flow in soil and plant. II. A review of experimental evidence on the rhizosphere resistance. J. Appl. Ecol. 6, 261–272.
Nobel P S 1974 Introduction to biophysical plant physiology. W H Freeman, San Francisco.
Nulsen R A, Thurtell G W and Stevenson K R 1977 Response of leaf water potential to pressure changes at the root surface of corn plant (Zea mays L.). Agron. J. 69, 951–954.
Nulsen R N and Thurtell G W 1980 Effect of osmotica around the roots on water uptake by maize plant. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 7, 27–34.
Nulsen R N and Thurtell G W 1978 Osmotically induced changes in the pressure-flow relationship of maize root systems. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5, 469–576.
Oosterhuis D M 1981 Hydraulic conductivity and drought acclimation of cotton root systems. Ph.D. thesis, Utah State University. Logan.
Passioura J B 1980 The transport of water from soil to shoot in wheat seedlings J. Exp. Bot. 31, 333–345.
Passioura J B 1984. Hydraulic resistance of plants. I. Constant or variable? Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 11, 333–339.
Reiscosky D C and Ritchie J T 1976 Relative importance of soil resistance and plant resistance in root water absorption. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40, 293–297.
Richter H 1973 Frictional potential losses and total water potential in plants: A re-evaluation. J. Exp. Bot. 24, 983–994.
Rowse H R and Goodman D 1981 Soil and plant resistance effect on transpirational and leaf water responses to soil water potential. Aust. J. Soil Res. 19, 51–60.
Samui R P and Kar S 1981 Soil and plant resistance effect on transpiration and leaf water responses to soil water potential. Aust. J. Soil Res. 19, 51–60.
Shalhevet J, Maas E V, Hoffman G J and Ogata G 1976 Salinity and the hydraulic conductance of root. Physiol. Plant. 38, 224–232.
So H B, Aylmore L A G and Quirk J P 1976 Measurement of water flux in a single root system. I. The tensiometer-potometer system. Plant and Soil 45, 577–594.
So H B, Aylmore L A G and Quirk J P 1976 Measurement of water flux in a single root system. II. Applications of the tensiometer-potometer system. Plant and Soil 49, 461–475.
Steudle E and Jeschke W D 1983 Water transport in barley roots. Planta 158, 237–248.
Stoker R and Weatherley P E 1971 The influence of the root system on the relationship between rate of transpiration and depression of leaf water potential. New Phytol. 70, 574–584.
Van denHonert T H 1948 Water transport in plants as a catenary process. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 3, 146–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamza, M.A., Aylmore, L.A.G. Soil solute concentration and water uptake by single lupin and radish plant roots. Plant Soil 145, 197–205 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010348
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010348