Skip to main content
Log in

The role of aquatic moss on community composition and drift of fish-food organisms

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macroinvertebrate density, biomass and drift were studied from moss-covered and moss-free channels in the South Fork Salmon River, Idaho. Insect densities were compared for 10 different substrate types and locations involving moss (Fontinalis neo-mexicana), sand, pebbles and cobbles. An ANOVA test demonstrated that insect densities varied significantly with substrate type (P < 0.05), and that total insect density in moss clumps differed significantly from densities in mineral substrates. Insect densities were 4–18 times greater in moss clumps than in mineral substrates under and adjacent to moss; sands under moss supported the lowest densities. During most tests, densities in pebble and cobble substrates adjacent to moss clumps were not significantly different from those found in similar substrates in the moss-free channel. The 20% moss-covered channel had 1.6 to 7.2 greater insect density and 1.4 to 6.1 greater biomass than did the moss-free channel for the tests conducted. Generally, midges (Chironomidae) made up over 50% of the insect community; annelids were the principal non-insect invertebrates.

In spite of greater insect density and biomass in a moss-covered than in the moss-free channel, we did not demonstrate universally increased drift of the immature stages from the moss-covered channel, at least during daylight hours. As a consequence, we infer that salmonid fishes, feeding primarily on drifting insects during the daytime, may not derive increased caloric benefit from moss habitats until the insects emerge as adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjornn, T. C., M. A. Brusven, M. R. Molnau, T. H. Milligan, R. A. Klamt, E. Chacho & C. Schaye, 1977. Transport of granitic sediment in streams and its effect on insects and fish. Univ. of Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 17, 43 pp.

  • Brusven, M. A., 1970. Drift periodicity and upstream dispersion of stream insects. J. Ent. Soc. Brit. Columbia 67: 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusven, M. A. & K. V. Prather, 1974. Influence of stream sediments on distribution of macrobenthos. J. Ent. Soc. Brit. Columbia 71: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., 1966. A review of stream ecology with special emphasis on organism-substrate relationships. Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, Special Publication 4: 2–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. W. & M. Brooker, 1984. In Whitton, B. A. (ed.), Ecology of European Rivers. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, London: 51–82.

  • Egglishaw, H. J., 1969. The distribution of benthic invertebrates on substrata in fast-flowing streams. J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, W. E., 1942. River Liffey, Survey IV. The fauna of the submerged ‘mosses’ in an acid and an alkaline water. Proc. R. In Acad. 47B: 293–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, W. & A. E. J. Went, 1940. River Liffey Survey III. The growth and food of young salmon. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 46B: 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glime, J. M. & R. M. Clemons, 1972. Species diversity of stream insects on Fontinalis spp. compared to diversity on artificial substrates. Ecology 53: 458–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1961. The invertebrate fauna of a Welsh mountain stream. Arch. Hydrobiol. 57: 344–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. University of Toronto Press. Toronto. 555 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillehammer, A., 1966. Bottom fauna investigations in a Norwegian river: the influence of ecological factors. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 13: 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leudtke, R. L. & M. A. Brusven, 1976. Effects of sand sedimentation on colonization of stream insects. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33: 1881–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, M. A. & M. A. Brusven, 1983. Insect abundance and colonization rate in Fontinalis neo-mexicana (Bryophyta) in an Idaho Batholith stream, USA. Hydrobiologia 98: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins, 1984. An Introduction to Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co., Dubuque, Iowa. 722 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minckley, W. L., 1963. The ecology of a spring stream: Doe Run, Meade County, Kentucky. Wildlife Monographs 11: 1–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., 1984. Aquatic insect-substratum relationships. In Resh, W. H. & D. M. Rosenberg (eds), The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. Praeger, New York, N.Y., 358–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K., 1954. Investigations on the organic drift in North Sweden streams. Report Drottingholm Inst. for Freshwater Res. 35: 133–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival, E. & H. Whitehead, 1929. A quantitative study of the fauna of some types of stream-bed. J. Ecol. 17: 282–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, F. W. & F. Gibson, 1984. The effects of macrophyte removal on the distribution of selected invertebrates in a littoral environment. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 2: 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooke, J. B., 1984. The invertebrate fauna of four macrophytes in a lotic system. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 507–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, O. E., Jr., S. R. Reice & R. W. Andrews, 1977. The effects of density, sediment particle size and velocity on drift of Acroneuria abnormis (Plecoptera). Oikos 28: 291–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F., 1962. Diurnal periodicity in the drift of stream invertebrates. Ecology 43: 316–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F., 1972. The drift of stream insects. Ann. Rev. Ent. 17: 253–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. J. & S. L. Kohler, 1981. An assessment of biological interactions in an epilithic stream community using time-lapse cinematography. Hydrobiologia 78: 183–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brusven, M.A., Meehan, W.R. & Biggam, R.C. The role of aquatic moss on community composition and drift of fish-food organisms. Hydrobiologia 196, 39–50 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008891

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008891

Key words

Navigation