Abstract
Brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) and sculpin (Cottus gobio L.) predation on the cased limnephilid larvae Glyphotaelius pellucidus (Retz.) (weak, broad leaf case), Limnephilus pantodapus McLachl. (weak, long cylindrical leaf case), L. rhombicus (L.) (rigid, ‘hedgehog’ case) and Potamophylax cingulatus (Steph.) (rigid, cylindrical mineral case) was studied in the laboratory. The proportion of larvae ingested was significantly higher in brown trout than in sculpin for all four prey species. Brown trout captured larvae of all four species with equal success, but the higher number of unsuccessful captures resulted in a higher survival rate for P. cingulatus. It was significantly more difficult for sculpin than for brown trout to capture L. pantodapus larvae and to ingest all species except L. rhombicus. P. cingulatus larvae were never ingested by sculpins, and had the highest survival rate after capture by both fish species. In brown trout, the handling time of L. pantodapus was significantly longer than that of P. cingulatus. Sculpin had a significantly longer handling time of G. pellucidus than brown trout. L. pantodapus and L. rhombicus larvae feigned dead significantly longer than did those of G. pellucidus and P. cingulatus upon attacks from sculpins. L. rhombicus larvae also feigned dead for a long time upon attacks from brown trout. The survival rate of a larva attacked by sculpin or brown trout depends on both case rigidity as well as its behaviour. Brown trout was a more successful predator of cased caddis larvae than sculpin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, J. F., 1983. Predator — prey relationships in streams. In: Barnes, J. R. & G. W. Minshall (eds), Stream ecology, applications and testing of general ecological theory. New York, pp. 191–229.
Allan, J. F., A. S. Flecker & N. L. McClintock, 1987. Prey preference of stoneflies: sedentary vs mobile prey. Oikos 49: 329–331.
Andersen, T. & P. Wiberg-Larsen, 1987. revised check-list of NW European Trichoptera. Ent. scand. 18: 165–184.
Andreasson, S., 1971. Feeding habits of a sculpin (Cottus gobio L. Pisces) population. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm No. 51.
Blois, C., 1985. The larval diet of three Anisopteran (Odonata) species. Freshwat. Biol. 15: 505–514.
Blunck, H., 1916. Die Art-individuellen biologischen Charaktere des Dytiscus semisulcatus Müller (= punctatus Fabr.). Zool. Anz. 46: 225–231.
Brönmark, C., B. Malmqvist & C. Otto, 1984. Anti-predator adaptations in a neustonic insect. Oecologia (Berlin) 61: 189–191.
Copeland, J. & S. Crowell, 1937. Observations and experiments on the case-building instinct of two species of Trichoptera. Psyche 44: 125–131.
Edmunds, M., 1974. Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences. Longman group, New York.
Elliott, J. M., 1967. The food of trout (Salmo trutta) in a Dartmoor stream. J. appl. Ecol. 4: 59–71.
Fankhauser, C. & L. E. Reik, 1935. Experiments on the case building of the caddisfly larvae, Neuronia postica Walker. Physiol. Zool. 8: 337–359.
Gislason, G. M., 1981. Predatory exclusion of Apatania zonella (Zett.) by Potamophylax cingulatus (Steph.) (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) in Iceland. In: Moretti, G. P. (ed.), Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. of Trichoptera. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, pp. 93–98.
Hanna, H. M., 1961. Selection of materials for case-building larvae of caddis flies (Trichoptera). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 36: 37–47.
Healey, M., 1984. Fish predation on aquatic insects. In: Resh, V. H. & D. M. Rosenberg (eds), The ecology of aquatic insects. New York, pp. 255–288.
Henriksson, B. I., 1988. The absence of antipredator behaviour in the larvae of Leucorrhinia dubia (Odonata) and the consequences for their distribution. Oikos 51: 179–183.
Hickin, N. E., 1967. Caddis larvae. Larvae of the British Trichoptera. Hutchinson & Co LTD, London.
Holomuzki, J. R., 1983. Predatory behaviour of larval ambystoma Tigrinum nebulosum on Limnephilus (Trichoptera) larvae. Great Basin naturalist 43(3): 475–476.
Hughes, R. N., 1979. Optimal diets under the energy maximization premise. The effects of recognition time. Am. Nat. 113: 209–221.
Hyslop, E. J., 1982. The feeding habits of O + stone loach, Noemacheilus barbatulus (L.), and bullhead, Cottus gobio L. J. Fish. Biol. 21: 187–196.
Ivlev, V. S., 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Jeffries, M., 1988. Individual vulnerability to predation: the effect of alternative prey types. Freshw. Biol. 9: 49–56.
Krebs, J. R., 1978. Optimal foraging: Desicion rules for predators. In: Krebs, J. R. & N. B. Davies (eds), Behavioural ecology, an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates Ltd, Sunderland, pp. 22–63.
Leclair, R. Jr, Y. Alaire & J. P. Bourassa, 1986. Prey choice in larval Dytiscus harisii Kirby and D. verticalis Say. Entomologica basil. 11: 337–342.
Lepneva, S. G., 1971. Fauna of the USSR Trichoptera 2:1. Larvae and pupae of the Integripalpia. Israel Progr. Sci. Transl., Jerusalem.
Nielsen, A., 1942. Über the Entwicklung und Biologie der Quele Trichopteren Himmerlands. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 17: 255–631.
Ormerod, S. J., 1985. The diets of breeding Dippers Cinclus cinclus and their nestlings in the catchment of the River Wye, mid-Wales; a preliminary study by fecal analysis. Arch. Hydrobiol. 127: 316–331.
Otto, C., 1975. Energetic relationships of the larval population Potamophylax cingulatus (Trichoptera) larvae in a South Swedish stream. Oikos 26: 159–169.
Otto, C., 1982. Habitat, size and distribution of Scandinavian limnephilid caddisflies. Oikos 38: 355–360.
Otto, C., 1985. Prey size and predation as factors governing the distribution of lotic polycentropodid caddis larvae. Oikos 44: 439–447.
Otto, C. & B. S. Svensson, 1980. The significance of case material selection for the survival of caddis larvae. J. anim. Ecol. 49: 855–865.
Peckarsky, B. L., 1980. Predatory-prey interactions between stoneflies and mayflies: behavioural observations. Ecology 61: 932–943.
Peckarsky, B. L., 1982. Aquatic insect predatory-prey relations. BioScience 32: 261–266.
Peckarsky, B. L., 1984. Predatory-prey interactions among aquatic insects. In: Resh, V. H. & D. M. Rosenberg (eds), The ecology of aquatic insects. New York, pp. 196–254.
Pritchard, G., 1964. The prey of dragonfly larvae (Odonata: Anisoptera) in ponds in Northern Alberta. Can. J. Zool. 42: 785–800.
Pyke, G. H., H. T. Pulliham & E. L. Charnov, 1977. Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. Quart. Rev. Biol. 52: 137–154.
Ringler, N. H., 1979. Selective predation by drift feeding brown trout (Salmo trutta). Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 36: 392–403.
Scott, D., 1958. Ecological studies on the Trichoptera of the River Dean, Chesire. Arch. Hydrobiol. 54: 340–392.
Sih, A., 1987. Predators and prey lifestyles: An evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih (eds), Predation. Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Hannover.
Stenson, J. A. E., 1979. Predatory-prey relations between fish and invertebrate prey in some forest lakes. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 58: 166–183.
Ware, D. M., 1972. Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the influence of hunger, prey density and prey size. J. Fish Res. Bd Can. 29: 1193–1201.
Wichard, W. & H. Reichel, 1970. Zur Trichopteren fauna periodischer Gewässer; Trichopteren studien zur Duisburger Sechs-Seen-Platte II. Nachr. Bl. Bayer Ent. 18(4–6): 57–58.
Wienterbourn, M. J., 1971. The life-history and trophic relationships of the Trichoptera of Marin lake, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 49: 23–635.
Williams, D. D., A. F. Tavares & E. Bryant, 1987. Respiratory device or camoflage? — A case for the caddisfly. Oikos 50: 42–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, A. Caddis larvae cases (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae) as anti-predatory devices against brown trout and sculpin. Hydrobiologia 211, 185–194 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008534
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008534