Skip to main content
Log in

Use of stream order and biological indices to assess water quality in the Osage and Black river basins of Missouri

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significant variations in four biological measures of water quality with stream order and river basin were demonstrated for streams of the Black and Osage river basins of Missouri. Water quality criteria specific for each order and basin were then developed.

Benthic macroinvertebrates from springs and stream orders 3–8 in the two river basins were sampled quarterly for one year with riffle nets and artificial substrate samplers. A total of 548 samples were taken at 137 stations. The average annual macroinvertebrate density, index of diversity, number of taxa, and number of mayfly and stonefly taxa were determined for each station. These measures showed significant differences (p < 0.05) across stream order within and between the two river basins. Total taxa, total mayfly and stonefly taxa, and diversity were highest in orders 4 and 5 with decreased values in lower and higher stream orders. Maximum organism densities occurred in intermediate order streams. These differences were attributed to the succession of physical changes from headwaters to mouth within each river and to the unique geomorphology of each catchment basin.

Water quality criteria based on three of the four measures described above (with 95% confidence limits) were established for each stream order in each river basin. Criteria for the Osage River basin were then used to identify three streams in the basin affected by environmental disturbances (stream impoundment, channelization and sewage discharge). The use of order- and basin-specific criteria assures that the biological differences between streams caused by environmental disturbance can be distinguished from the natural biological differences between streams of different orders and drainages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barila, T. Y., Williams, R. D. & J. R. Stauffer, 1981. The influence of stream order and selected streambed parameters on fish diversity in Rayston Branch, Susquehanna River drainage, Pennsylvania. J.A. Ecol. 18: 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmuta, L. A. & P. S. Lake, 1982. On the value of the river continuum concept. N.Z.J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 16: 227–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H. A., E. R. Dott & R. F. Fernan, 1988. Fish species richness and stream order in Washington State streams. Envir. Biol. Fishes 22: 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, D. A. & G. W. Minshall, 1984. Seasonal patterns in species diversity and niche parameters of lotic predator guilds. Arch. Hydrobiol. 106: 395–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., 1974. Structure and function of stream ecosystems. Biol. Sci. 24: 631–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp, J. M. & R. W. Davies, 1982. Analysis of longitudinal zonation and the river continuum concept in the Oldman — South Saskatchewan River System. Can. J. Fish. aquat Sci. 39: 1258–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, C. E., C. D. McIntire, K. W. Cummins, G. W. Minshall, R. C. Peterson, L. Sweden, J. R. Sedell & R. L. Vannote, 1983. Relationships among chemical, physical and biological indices along river continua based on multivariate analysis. Arch. Hydrobiol. 98: 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarch, B. G. E., 1976. Spatial and temporal patterns in macrobenthic stream diversity. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33: 1261–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieffenbach, W. H. & F. M. Ryck, 1976. Water quality of the Elk, James, and Spring River basins, 1964–1965. Missouri Department of Conservation Aquatic Series 15, Jefferson City. 25 pp.

  • Duchrow, R. M., 1977. Water quality of the Current, Jacks Fork, Eleven Point, Little Black and Warm Fork of the Spring rivers, Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Mo. 80 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchrow, R. M., 1984. Water quality of the Osage River Basin. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Mo. 356 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. G., 1977. Organic matter processing by a stream segment ecosystem: Fort River Massachusetts, U.S.A. Int. Revue Hydrobiol. 62: 701–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. J., 1978. Diversity as a measure of benthic macroinvertebrate community response to water pollution. Hydrobiol. 57: 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight, C. J., 1973. The use of aquatic macroinvertebrates as indicators of pollution. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 92: 1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrel, R. C., B. J. Davis & T. C. Dorris, 1967. Stream order and species diversity of fishes in an intermittent Oklahoma stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 78: 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrel, R. C. & T. C. Dorris, 1968. Stream order, morphometry, physicochemical conditions, and community structure of macroinvertebrates in an intermittent stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 80: 220–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer, F. R. & J. A. Stanford, 1982. Ecological response of hydropsychid caddisflies to stream regulation. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 39: 1235–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. P. & J. R. Sedell, 1981. Longitudinal and seasonal changes in functional organizations of macroinvertebrate communities in four Oregon streams. Ecology 62: 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenhoff, W. L., 1977. Use of arthropods to evaluate water quality of streams. Technical Bulletin No. 100, Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin. 15 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainages. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 56: 275–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1960. The biology of polluted waters. Liverpool Univ. Press, Liverpool. 202 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. R., B. H. Tracy, J. L. Sebaugh, D. H. Hazelwood & M. M. Smart, 1981. Biotic index tested for ability to assess water quality of Missouri Ozark streams. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 111: 627–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries. 6: 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehne, R. A., 1962. A classification of streams illustrated by fish distribution in an eastern Kentucky creek. Ecology. 43: 608–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuester, D. R., 1964. The benthos of the Meramec River Basin as related to water quality. In Water quality in the Big, Bourbeuse, and Meramec River basins. The Department of Public Health and Welfare, Missouri Water Pollution Board, Jefferson City, Mo. 234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotspeich, F. B., 1980. Watersheds as the basic ecosystem: this conceptual framework provides a basis for a natural classification system. Wat. Res. Bull. 16: 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R., 1957. La teoria de la informacions en ecologia. Mem. R. Acad. Cienc. Artes Barcelona. 32: 373–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. L., 1989. Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: History and present status in Europe. Envir. Pollut. 60: 101–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., 1978. Autotrophy in stream ecosystems. Biol. Sci. 28: 767–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., R. C. Peterson, K. W. Cummins, T. L. Bott, J. R. Sedell, C. E. Cushing & R. L. Vannote, 1983. Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 53: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., K. W. Cummins, R. C. Petersen, C. E. Cushing, D. A. Bruns, J. R. Sedell & R. L. Vannote, 1985a. Developments in stream ecosystem theory. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1045–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., R. C. Petersen & C. F. Nimz, 1985b. Species richness in streams of different size from the same drainage basin. Am. Nat. 125: 16–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R.. & J. R. Sedell, 1980. Relationship between metabolic parameters and stream order in Oregon. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 834–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S., 1979. Relationships among stream order, fish populations and aquatic geomorphology in an Idaho river drainage. Fisheries 4: 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F. & G. W. Minshall, 1977. Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos. 29: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H. & J. D. Unzicker, 1975. Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification. J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed. 47: 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. E., 1963. Stream communities and terrestrial biomes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 59: 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryck, F. M., 1974. Water quality of the southeast Ozark mining area, 1965–1971. Missouri Department of Conservation, Aquatic Series 10. 22 pp.

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1985. SAS users guide: version 5 SAS institute, NC. 1290 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, M. M., 1980. Stream-watershed relationships in the Missouri Ozark Plateau Province. Doctoral dissertation. University of Missouri — Columbia, Columbia, Mo. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B. & B. Higler, 1985. Questions and comments on the river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1038–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B., J. A. Gore & U. H. Resh, 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. J. N. Am. Bentho Soc. 7: 307–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Un. 38: 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. R. & J. C. Roff, 1982. Evaluation of ecological maturity in three headwater streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. 94: 99–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R. & A. G. Hildrew, 1984. Longitudinal pattern in detritivore communities of acid streams: A consideration of hypothesis. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 1953–1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1973. Biological field and laboratory methods measuring the quality of surface effluents. Environmental Monitoring Series EPA-67014–73–001. 1976 pp.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1989. Rapid bio-assessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. U.S. EPA/444/4–89–1001.

  • Usinger, R. L., 1963. Aquatic insects of California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley. 508 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vineyard, J. D. & G. L. Feder, 1974. Springs of Missouri. Missouri Geol. Surv. and Wat. Resour., Rolla, Mo. 267 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, B. G. & R. M. McNatt, 1972. Fish species diversity in relation to stream order and physicochemical conditions in the Plum Creek drainage basin. Am. Midl. Nat. 88: 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhm, J. L., 1967. Comparison of some diversity indices applied to populations of benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream receiving organic wastes. J. Wat. Pollut. Cont. Fed. 39: 1673–1683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterbourn, M. J., B. C. Rounick & B. Cowie, 1981. Are New Zealand stream ecosystems really different? N.Z.J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 15: 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crunkilton, R.L., Duchrow, R.M. Use of stream order and biological indices to assess water quality in the Osage and Black river basins of Missouri. Hydrobiologia 224, 155–166 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008465

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008465

Key words

Navigation