Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive responses in Cypridopsis vidua (Crustacea: Ostracoda) to food and shelter offered by a macrophyte (Chara fragilis)

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ostracod Cypridopsis vidua prefers periphyton growing on Chara fragilis to other feeding substrates. This species actively searches for periphyton, scrapes it off from Chara stems and handles it with a well organized feeding technique. When exposed to different quantities of periphyton on Chara stems, C. vidua selects foraging sites according to their nutritional value. When exposed to low quantities of water from tanks containing fish, C. vidua responds to these weak chemical cues moving from uncovered areas into Chara plants. Experiments with juvenile cyprinids (Abramis brama) as predators and C. vidua as prey clearly showed that the presence of Chara reduces fish foraging success and that C. vidua survival rate increases with increasing density of Chara.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, O., 1984. Optimal foraging by largemouth bass in structured environments. Ecology 65: 851–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzie, J. A. H., 1989. The distribution and habitat preference of ostracods (Crustacea: Ostracoda) in a coastal sanddune lake, Loch of Strathbeg, north-east Scotland. Freshwat. Biol. 22: 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, Z. S., 1947. Faune de l'USSR Crustaceans: Ostracodes des eaux douces. Inst. Zool. acad. Sci USSR., N.S. 31: 1–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. L & F. A. Streams, 1984. Fish predation on Notonecta (Hemiptera): relationship between prey risk and habitat utilization. Oecologia 64: 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J. E. & M. E. Hay, 1991. Food and shelter as determinants of food choice by an herbivorous marine amphipod. Ecology 72: 1286–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotceitas, V., 1990. Foraging and predator avoidance: a test of a patch choice model with juvenile bluegill sunfish. Oecologia 83: 346–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotceitas, V. & P. Colgan, 1989. Predator foraging success and habitat complexity: quantitative test of the threshold hypothesis. Oecologia 80: 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, G., 1975. Ostracoda. In: H. G. Bronns (ed.), Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, G. Fischer, Jena. 5, 1, 4, 4: 569–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, K. L. & T. A. Thoman, 1981. Experiments on predator — prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 53: 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, G. R. F., 1986. Distribution and behaviour of meiofaunal copepods inside and outside seagrass beds. Mar. Ecol. 31: 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. & P. Fitzmaurice, 1968. The biology of the bream Abramis brama (L.) in Irish waters. Proc. R. Irish acad. Sci. 67B: 95–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R. V., 1951. The morphology of ostracod molt stages. Illin. Biol. Monogr. 21: 324 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, S. L. & M. A. McPeek, 1989. Predation risk and the foraging behavior of competing stream insects. Ecology 70: 1811–1825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskar, K., 1941. Die Ernährung des Brassens. Fischerei-Zeitung 51/52: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S. L., 1990. Protective cover and the use of space: different strategies in finches. Oikos 58: 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S. L., L. M. Dill, 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupherova, L. A., 1974. Concerning the biology of Cypridopsis vidua (Ostracoda). Transaction 25(28), Academy of Sciences of the USSR Institute of Biology of Inland waters.

  • Marinelli, R. L & B. Coull, 1987. Structural complexity and juvenile fish predation on meibenthos: an experimental approach. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 108: 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbahinzireki, G., F. Uiblein & H. Winkler, 1991. Microhabitat selection of ostracods in relation to predation and food. Hydrobiologia 222: 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino, J. F. & R. A. Stein, 1989. Behavioural interactions between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant density. Anim. Beh. 37: 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A., 1986. Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology 67: 434–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 859 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uiblein, F., 1992. Food searching decisions in four cyprinid species. Envir. Biol. Fishes 33: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uiblein, F., J. Eberstaller, M. Pöckl & H. Winkler, 1992. Effects of differential prey mobility on foraging behaviour of a cyprinid fish, Vimba elongata. Ethology, Ecology & Evolution 4: 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn, G. A. & J. V. Robinson, 1987. Microhabitat selection as an antipredator strategy in the aquatic insect Pachydiplax longipennis Burmeister (Odonata: Libellulidae). Oecologia 71: 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roca, J.R., Baltanas, A. & Uiblein, F. Adaptive responses in Cypridopsis vidua (Crustacea: Ostracoda) to food and shelter offered by a macrophyte (Chara fragilis). Hydrobiologia 262, 127–131 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007513

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007513

Key words

Navigation