Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution and abundance patterns of rocky intertidal fishes in central California

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

Distribution patterns and relative abundances were determined for rocky intertidal fishes in central California. Distributions were described relative to a categorization scheme of tidepools based on certain biotic and physical criteria. The fishes displayed a variety of distributions over tidepool categories and showed some segregation within categories.

Cottids were the predominant tidepool fishes encountered, withOligocottus snyderi andClinocottus analis comprising 62% of all captures. The cebidichthyidCebidichthys violaceus and the stichaeidAnoplarchus purpurescens were also relatively common and dominated the out-of-water microhabitat.Oligocottus snyderi showed a minor shift in distribution over tidepool categories between seasons, and C. analis showed none, but both species varied substantially in abundance. Temporal changes in abundance of the more common species indicated seasonal trends, but the duration of the census period was insufficient to verify this.

It is concluded that while species interactions may have influenced the observed patterns of habitat partitioning, the roles of predation and competition cannot be unambiguously defined. Presently, neither these nor historical factors can be discounted from having significantly influenced the evolution of the intertidal fish community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Bane, G.W. & A.W. Bane. 1971. Bay fishes of northern California. Mariscos Publications, Hampton Bays, New York, 143 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R.L. 1947. The evolution of the marine cottidae of California with a discussion of the genus as a systematic category. Stanford Ichthyological Bull. 3: 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, T.J. & M.E. Gilpin. 1974. Interference competition and niche theory. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71: 3073–3077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, E.M.P. 1976. A comparison of growth and abundance for tidal pool fishes in California and British Columbia. J. Fish Biol. 8: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L. 1974. Competition and the structure of bird communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 318 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1961a. The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacleChthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42: 710–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1961b. The effects of competition, predation byThais lapillus, and other factors on natural populations of the barnacleBalanus balanoides. Ecol. Monogr. 31: 61–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1972. Community interactions on marine rocky intertidal shores. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3: 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1975. Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. pp. 360–490. In: M.L. Cody & J.M. Diamond (ed.) Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P.K. 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 41: 351–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P.K. 1975. Experimental evaluation of ecological dominance in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol. Monogr. 45: 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, M.S. 1946. Critical tide factors that are correlated with the vertical distribution of marine algae and other organisms along the Pacific Coast. Ecology 27: 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.N. 1967. The use of the anaesthetic quinaldine in fish ecology. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.N. 1972. The vertical distribution and feeding relationships of intertidal fish on the Atlantic Coast of France. J. Anim. Ecol. 4: 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.M. 1971a. Local distribution ofOligocottus maculosus Girard and other tidepool cottids of the west coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 49: 1111–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green. J.M. 1971b. Field and laboratory activity patterns of the tidepool cottidOligocottus maculosus Girard. Can. J. Zool. 49: 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.M. 1971c. High tide movements and homing behavior of the tidepool sculpinOligocottus maculosus. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.M. 1973. Evidence for homing in the mosshead sculpin (Clinocottus globiceps). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30: 129–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.S., A. Gigon, S.L. Gulmon & H.A. Mooney. 1974. Comparative photosynthetic capacities of intertidal algae under exposed and submerged conditions. Ecology 55: 450–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, H.W. 1974. Sensory basis of homing in the intertidal fishOligocottus maculosus Girard. Can. J. Zool. 52: 1023–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. 1972. Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper & Row, New York. 269 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGinitie, G.E. 1935. Ecological aspects of a California marine estuary. Amer. Midl. Nat. 16: 629–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGinitie, G.E. & N. MacGinitie. 1949. Natural history of marine animals. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York. 000 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.J. & R.N. Lea. 1972. Guide to the coastal marine fishes of California. Fish. Bull. Calif. Dep. Fish Game 157: 1–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollick, R.S. 1968. The distribution ofClinocottus analis Girard in tide pools as related to substrate preference. Master's Thesis. San Diego State Collge, San Diego. 86 pp.

  • Moring, J.R. 1970. Use of the anaesthetic quinaldine for handling Pacific Coast intertidal fishes. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 99: 802–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moring, J.R. 1976. Estimates of population size for tidepool sculpins,Oligocottus maculosus, and other interticial fishes, Trinidad Bay, Humboldt County. California. Calif. Fish Game 62: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R.W. 1960. Temperature, salinity, and southern limits of three species of Pacific cottid fishes. Limnol. and Oceanogr. 5: 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R.W. 1962. Distribution and temperature sensitivity of some eastern Pacific cottid fishes. Physiol. Zool. 34: 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura. R. 1971. Food of two cohabiting tide-pool Cottidae. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 928–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura. R. 1976a. Temperature and the vertical distribution of two tidepool fishes (Oligocottus maculosus, O. snyderi). Copeia 1976: 143–152.

  • Nakamura, R. 1976b. Experimental assessment of factors influencing microhabitat selection by the two tidepool fishesOligocottus maculosus andO. snyderi. Mar. Biol. 37: 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, C.P. 1953. The life history of the cabezonScorpaenichthys marmoratus (Ayres). Fish. Bull. Calif. Dep. Fish Game 93: 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine. R.T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. Amer. Nat. 100: 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R. 1975. Niche relations of desert lizards. pp. 292–314. In: M.L. Cody & J.M. Diamond (ed.) Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R. 1976. Competition and nice theory. pp. 114–141. In: R.M. May (ed.) Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka. E.R. & H.D. Pianka. 1976. Comparative ecology of twelve species of nocturnal lizards (Gekkonidae) in the Western Australian Desert. Copeia 1976: 125–141.

  • Richkus, W.A. 1968. Aspects of the ecology of the wooly sculpin (Clinocottus analis, Girard).Master's Thesis. University of California. San Diego. 75 pp.

  • Ricketts, E.F. & J. Calvin. 1968. Between Pacific tides. Fourth edition (revised by J.W. Hedgpeth). Stanford University Press, Stanford. 614 pp.

  • Schoener. T.W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York. 312 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 776 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson. T.A. & A. Stephenson. 1972. Life between tidemarks on rocky shores. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 425 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1957. Homing behavior of California rocky shore fishes. Berkeley Publ. Zool. 59: 249–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshiyama. R.M. 1980. Food habits of three species of rocky intertidal sculpins (Cottidae) in central California. Copeia 1980: 515–525.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshiyama, R.M. Distribution and abundance patterns of rocky intertidal fishes in central California. Environ Biol Fish 6, 315–332 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005760

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005760

Keywords

Navigation