, Volume 203, Issue 3, pp 177–190 | Cite as

Stream flow and predation effects on the spatial dynamics of benthic invertebrates

  • Jill Lancaster
  • Alan G. Hildrew
  • Colin R. Townsend


Field experiments were carried out to determine the influence of predation and prey movements on the accumulation of prey in enclosures. Experimental enclosures permitted exchange of prey with the benthos, but not of the large, predatory larvae of the caddisfly, Plectrocnemia conspersa (Curtis). Unseasonally heavy rainfalls during the experiment resulted in high flows and enabled us to examine the effects of a major, abiotic disturbance on invertebrate spatial dynamics. Prey colonization rates of cages without predators were determined in nine 24 h periods. Colonization rates increased exponentially with flow and were species-specific, depending on dispersal behaviour. Prey accumulation and predator impacts were measured in cages, with and without P. conspersa larvae, placed in the stream for 1, 2 or 3 weeks. Prey densities in cages increased with exposure time, but increases were not gradual and depended on flow regime. Flow was reduced within cages and they accumulated large numbers of invertebrates during high discharge. Analogous, naturally occurring refugia in the stream channel could be important for the recovery of lotic communities after major disturbances. Overall, prey densities were lowest in cages with predators. For fast colonizers, predation effects were detectable early in the experiment, but quickly obscured thereafter by continuous exchange of prey. For slow colonists, predation effects were detectable later, but persisted longer. Consumption rates for P. conspersa varied with prey density and flow regime. We suggest that the spatial dynamics of benthic invertebrates, especially as they are influenced by stochastic events, are important in understanding and detecting predation effects in stream communities.

Key words

stream flow predation colonization benthic invertebrates 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allan, J. D., 1975. The distributional ecology and diversity of benthic insects in Cement Creek, Colorado.Ecology 56: 1040–1053.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, J. D., 1984. Hypothesis testing in ecological studies of aquatic insects. In V. H. Resh & D. M. Rosenburg (eds.), Ecology of aquatic insects. Praeger, N.Y.: 484–507.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, N. H. & D. M. Lehmkuhl, 1968. Catastrophic drift of insects in a woodland stream. Ecology 49: 198–206.Google Scholar
  4. Badri, A., J. Giudicelli & G. Prevot, 1987. Effects of a flood on the benthic invertebrate community in a mediterranean river, the Rdat (Morocco). Acta Oecologia 8: 481–500.Google Scholar
  5. Edgington, E. S., 1987. Randomization tests (2nd Edn.). Marcel Dekker, N.Y.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, S. G., L. J. Gray, N. B. Grimm & D. E. Bush, 1982. Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 93–110.Google Scholar
  7. Gore, J. A., 1979. Patterns of initial benthic recolonization of a reclaimed coal strip-mined river channel. Can. J. Zool. 57: 2429–2439.Google Scholar
  8. Hart, D. D., 1986. The adaptive significance of territoriality in filter-feeding larval blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Oikos 46: 88–92.Google Scholar
  9. Hart, D. D. & S. C. Latta, 1986. Determinants of ingestion rates in filter-feeding larval blackflies (Diptera: Simuhidae). Freshwat. Biol. 16: 1–14.Google Scholar
  10. Hassell, M. P. & R. M. May, 1974. Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability. J. anim. Ecol. 43: 567–594.Google Scholar
  11. Hawkins, C. P., M. L. Murphy & N. H. Anderson, 1982. Effects of canopy, substrate composition, and gradient on the structure of macroinvertebrate communities in Cascade Range streams of Oregon. Ecology 63: 1840–1856.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins, C. P. & J. R. Sedell, 1981. Longitudinal and seasonal changes in functional organization of macroinvertebrate communities in four Oregon streams. Ecology 62: 387–397.Google Scholar
  13. Hildrew, A. G. & C. R. Townsend, 1976. The distribution of two predators and their prey in an iron-rich stream. J. anim. Ecol. 45: 41–57.Google Scholar
  14. Hildrew, A. G. & C. R. Townsend, 1977. The influence of substrate on the functional response of Plectrocnemia conspersa (Curtis) larvae (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). Oecologia 31: 21–26.Google Scholar
  15. Hildrew, A. G. & C. R. Townsend, 1980. Aggregation, interference and foraging by larvae of Plectrocnemia conspersa (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). Anim. Behav. 28: 553–560.Google Scholar
  16. Hildrew, A. G. & C. R. Townsend, 1982. Predators and prey in a patchy environment: a freshwater study. J. anim. Ecol. 51: 797–815.Google Scholar
  17. Hildrew, A. G. & C. R. Townsend, 1987. Organization in freshwater benthic communities. In J. H. R. Gee & P. S. Giller (eds.), Organization of communities past and present, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford: 347–371.Google Scholar
  18. Hildrew, A. G., C. R. Townsend & J. Francis, 1984. Community structure in some southern English streams: the influence of species interactions. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 297–310.Google Scholar
  19. Hynes, H. B. N., 1968. Further studies on the invertebrate fauna of a Welsh mountain stream. Arch. Hydrobiol. 65: 360–379.Google Scholar
  20. Irvine, J., 1985. Effects of successive flow perturbations on stream invertebrates. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1922–1927.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, D. M., C. L. Pierce, T. H. Martin, C. N. Watson, R. E. Bohanan & P. H. Crowley, 1987a. Prey depletion by odonate larvae: combining evidence from multiple field experiments. Ecology 65: 1459–1465.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, D. M., C. L. Pierce, T. M. Martin, C. N. Watson, R. E. Bohanan & P. H. Crowley, 1987b. Rerandomization procedures and statistical tests used for testing null hypotheses about prey depletion effects. Ecology 68: supplement.Google Scholar
  23. Kerfoot, W. C. (ed.), 1980. Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, Hanover.Google Scholar
  24. Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih (eds.), 1987. Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, 386 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Lancaster, J., 1988. Invertebrate predation and community structure in an acid stream. Ph. D. Thesis, University of London, England, 174 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Lancaster, J., A. G. Hildrew & C. R. Townsend, 1988. Competition for space by predators in streams: field experiments on a net-spinning caddisfly. Freshwat. Biol. 20: 185–193.Google Scholar
  27. Malmqvist, B. & P. Sjöström, 1984. The microdistribution of some lotic insect predators in relation to their prey and to abiotic factors. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 649–656.Google Scholar
  28. Minshall, G. W., D. A. Andrews & C. Y. Manuel-Faler, 1983. Application of island biogeographic theory to streams: macroinvertebrate recolonization of the Teton River, Idaho. In J. R. Barnes & G. W. Minshall (eds.), Stream ecology. Application and testing of general ecological theory, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Moon, H. P., 1940. An investigation of the movements of freshwater invertebrate faunas. J. anim. Ecol. 9: 76–83.Google Scholar
  30. Müller, K., 1974. Stream drift as a chronobiological phenomenon in running water ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 309–323.Google Scholar
  31. Murdoch, W. W., 1977. Stabilizing effects of spatial heterogeneity in predator-prey systems. Theor. Popul. Biol. 11: 252–273.Google Scholar
  32. Murdoch, W. W., M. A. Scott & P. Ebsworth, 1984. Effects of the general predator, Notonecta (Hemiptera) upon a freshwater community. J. anim. Ecol. 53: 791–808.Google Scholar
  33. Oberndorfer, R. Y., J. V. McArthur, J. R. Barnes & J. Dixon, 1984. The effect of invertebrate predators on leaf litter decomposition in streams. Ecology 65: 1325–1331.Google Scholar
  34. Pearson, R. G. & N. V. Jones, 1987. Short-term movements of chalk-stream invertebrates. Freshwat. Biol. 18: 559–568.Google Scholar
  35. Peckarsky, B. L., 1984. Predator-prey interactions among aquatic insects. In V. H. Resh & D. M. Rosenburg, The ecology of aquatic insects, Praeger, N.Y.: 196–254.Google Scholar
  36. Peckarsky, B. L., 1985. Do predaceous stoneflies and siltation affect the structure of stream insect communities colonizing enclosures? Can. J. Zool. 63: 1519–1530.Google Scholar
  37. Peckarsky, B. L., 1986. Colonization of natural substrates by stream benthos. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 43: 700–709.Google Scholar
  38. Peckarsky, B. L. & S. I. Dodson, 1980. Do stonefly predators influence benthic distributions in streams? Ecology 61: 1275–1282.Google Scholar
  39. Peckarsky, B. L. & M. A. Penton, 1985. Is predaceous stonefly behaviour affected by competition? Ecology 66: 1718–1728.Google Scholar
  40. Perry, S. A. & W. B. Perry, 1986. Effects of experimental flow regulation on invertebrate drift and stranding in the Flathead and Kootenai Rivers, Montana, USA. Hydrobiologia 134: 171–182.Google Scholar
  41. Poole, W. C. & K. W. Stewart, 1976. The vertical distribution of macroinvertebrates within the substratum of the Bazos River, Texas. Hydrobiologia 50: 151–160.Google Scholar
  42. Power, M. E., R. J. Stout, C. E. Cushing, P. P. Harper, F. R. Hauer, W. J. Mathews, P. B. Moyle, B. Statzner & I. R. Wais de Badgen, 1988. Biotic and abiotic controls in river and stream communities. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 456–479.Google Scholar
  43. Reice, S. R., 1985. Experimental disturbanceand the maintenance of species diversity in a stream community. Oecologia 67: 90–97.Google Scholar
  44. Reice, S. R. & R. L. Edwards, 1986. The effects of vertebrate predation on lotic macroinvertebrate communities in Quebec, Canada. Can. J. Zool. 64: 1930–1936.Google Scholar
  45. Resh, V. H., A. V. Brown, A. P. Covich, M. E. Gurtz, H. W. Li, G. W. Minshall, S. R. Reice, A. L. Sheldon, J. B. Wallace & R. Wissmar, 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 433–455.Google Scholar
  46. Reynolds, C. S., 1988. Potamoplankton: paradigms, paradoxes and prognoses. In F. E. Round (ed.), Algae and the aquatic environment: contributions in the honour of J. W. G. Lund. Biopress, Bristol.Google Scholar
  47. Shaw, D. W. & G. W. Minshall, 1980. Colonization of an introduced substrate by stream macroinvertebrates. Oikos 34: 259–271.Google Scholar
  48. Sheldon, A. L., 1977 Colonization curves: application to stream insects on semi-natural substrates. Oikos 28: 256–261.Google Scholar
  49. Sheldon, A. L., 1984. Colonization dynamics of aquatic insects. In V. H. Resh & D. M. Rosenburg (eds.), Aquatic insect ecology. Praeger, N.Y.: 401–429.Google Scholar
  50. Statzner, B., 1987. Characteristics of lotic ecosystems and consequences for further research directions. In E. D. Shultze & H. Zwolfer (eds.), Potentials and limitations of ecosystems analysis. Ecological Studies 61. Springer Verlag, Berlin.: 365–390.Google Scholar
  51. Statzner, B. & R. Müller, 1989. Standard hemispheres as indicators of flow characteristics in lotic benthic research. Freshwat. Biol. 21: 445–460.Google Scholar
  52. Thorp, J. H., 1986. Two distinct roles for predators in freshwater assemblages. Oikos 47: 75–82.Google Scholar
  53. Townsend, C. R., 1989. The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 36–50.Google Scholar
  54. Townsend, C. R. & A. G. Hildrew, 1976. Field experiments on the drifting, colonization, and continuous redistribution of stream benthos. J. anim. Ecol. 45: 759–772.Google Scholar
  55. Townsend, C. R., A. G. Hildrew & J. E. Francis, 1983. Community structure in some southern English streams: the influence of physiochemical factors. Freshwat. Biol. 13: 521–544.Google Scholar
  56. Walde, S. J. & R. W. Davies, 1984. Invertebrate predation and lotic prey communities: evaluation of in situ enclosure/exclosure experiments. Ecology 65: 1206–1213.Google Scholar
  57. Ward, J. V. & J. A. Stanford (eds.), 1979. The ecology of regulated streams. Plenum Press, N.Y., 398 pp.Google Scholar
  58. Wiley, M. & S. L. Kohler, 1984. Behavioral adaptations of aquatic insects. In V. E. Resh & D. M. Rosenburg (eds.), The ecology of aquatic insects. Praeger, N.Y.: 101–133.Google Scholar
  59. Williams, D. D., 1980. Temporal patterns in recolonization of stream benthos. Arch. Hydrobiol. 90: 56–74.Google Scholar
  60. Williams, D. D. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1974. The occurrence of benthos deep in the substratum of a stream. Freshwat. Biol. 4: 233–256.Google Scholar
  61. Williams, D. D. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1976. The recolonization mechanisms of stream benthos. Oikos 27: 265–272.Google Scholar
  62. Young, P. C. & S. G. Wallis, 1987. The aggregated deadzone model for dispersion in rivers. Proceedings of the Conference on Water Quality Modelling in the Inland Natural Environment. B.H.R.A., Cranfield.: 421–433.Google Scholar
  63. Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical analysis (2nd Edn.). Prentice-Hall, N.J., 718 pp.Google Scholar
  64. Zaret, T. M., 1980. Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press, 187 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jill Lancaster
    • 2
  • Alan G. Hildrew
    • 2
  • Colin R. Townsend
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonEngland
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichEngland

Personalised recommendations