Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging in surfperches: resource partitioning or individualistic responses?

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

On Naples Reef off southern California, five sympatric species of surfperch (Embiotocidae) eat small animal prey associated with algal turf and other benthos. Although they tend to select different foods in different microhabitats, their different foraging traits are probably ‘individualistic responses’ (non-interactive or autecological species responses to resources) because the species' pairwise resource overlaps are neither uniformly small nor generally complementary. Mean overlap in both food and foraging microhabitat was significantly greater than ‘random’ as most species converged in resource use. Only two exploiters of extremes in the available spectra of prey types and microhabitats had significantly narrow overlap. Thus, resource overlaps may simply reflect similarities and differences in the species' independently evolved foraging traits, which were rendered more or less inflexible as different morphological specializations for picking, crunching, or winnowing prey. Therefore, any one species may occur about the reef to its best advantage independently of the others. Its distribution and abundance may simply reflect its tolerance of the local environment. The evidence indicates that the surfperches are not concertedly partitioning resources on Naples Reef, i.e., that the five species had not all coevolved to avoid interspecific competition in the past nor have they all mutually ‘shifted their niches’ to minimize it in the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Abrams, P.A. 1981. Comparing randomly constructed and real communities: a comment. Amer. Nat. 118: 776–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alevizon, W.S. 1975a. Spatial overlap and competition in congeneric surfperches (Embiotocidae) off Santa Barbara, California. Copeia 1975: 352–356.

  • Alevizon, W.S. 1975b. Comparative feeding ecology of a kelpbed embiotocid (Embiotoca lateralis). Copeia 1975: 608–615.

  • Brown, J.H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Amer. Nat. 124: 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R.K. & D.S. Winkler. 1984. A null model for null models in biogeography. pp. 344–359. In: D.R. Strong Jr., D. Simberloff, L.G. Abele & A.B. Thistle(ed.) Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35: 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1983. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Amer. Nat. 122: 661–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, E.F. & D. Simberloff. 1983. Interspecific competition and species co-occurrence patterns on islands: null models and the evaluation of evidence. Oikos 41: 455–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A.W. & R.N. Bray. 1976. Day versus night activity of reef fishes in a kelp forest off Santa Barbara, California. U.S. Fish. Bull. 74: 703–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A.W., R.J. Larson & W.S. Alevizon. 1980a. Habitat groups and island-mainland distribution of kelp-bed fishes off Santa Barbara, California. pp. 403–431. In: D.M. Power(ed.) Multidisciplinary Symposium on the California Islands, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A.W., R.J. Larson, W.S. Alevizon & R.N. Bray. 1980b. Annual variability of reef-fish assemblages in kelp forests off Santa Barbara, California. U.S. Fish. Bull. 78: 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A.W., & D.R. Laur, 1982. Does resource partitioning have a descriptive null hypothesis? pp. 158–165. In: G.M. Cailliet & C.A. Simenstad(ed.) Proc. Third Pacific Workshop Fish Food Habits Studies, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A.W. & D.R. Laur. 1985. The influence of plant cover on surfperch abundance at an offshore temperate reef. Env. Biol. Fish. 12: 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A.W., D.R. Laur & R.J. Rowley. 1985. Severe storm disturbances and reversal of community structure in a Southern California kelp forest. Mar. Biol. 84: 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, J.P., C. Terry & J.S. Stephens Jr. 1979. Food resource utilization among five species of embiotocids at King Harbor, California with preliminary estimates of caloric intake. Mar. Biol. 52: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger, P., E.E. Spears & R.W. Poole. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladfelter, W.B. & W.S. Johnson. 1983. Feeding niche separation in a guild of tropical reef fishes (Holocentridae). Ecology 64: 552–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H.A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torrey Botanical Club (N.Y.) 53: 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D. 1985. Division of food resources among fishes of the rocky intertidal zone. J. Zool. (Lond.) (in press).

  • Haldorson, L. & M. Moser. 1979. Geographic patterns of prey utilization in two species of surfperch (Embiotocidae). Copeia 1979: 567–572.

  • Hixon, M.A. 1979. Competitive interactions and spatiotemporal patterns among California reef fishes of the genus Embiotoca. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara. 213 pp.

  • Hixon, M.A. 1980. Competitive interactions between California reef fishes of the genus Embiotoca. Ecology 61: 918–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J. 1983. Copepod parasites of Japanese surfperches: their inference on the phylogeny and biogeography of Embiotocidae in the Far East. Ann. Rep. Sado Mar. Biol. Sta. Niigata Univ. 13: 31–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, S.J. & R.J. Schmitt. 1986. Food acquisition by competing surfperch on a patchy environmental gradient. Env. Biol. Fish. 16: 135–146 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, M.H. & L.G. Allen. 1978. A distributional analysis of California coastal marine fishes. J. Biogeogr. 5: 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F.C., R.F. Johnston, N.O. Wamer, G.J. Niemi & W.J. Boecklen. 1984. The Grinnellian niche of the wood thrush. Amer. Nat. 124: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, K.F. & P.H. Greenwood. 1981. A functional approach to the phylogeny of the pharyngognath teleosts. Amer. Zool. 21: 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, L.R., R.W. Davies & F.J. Wrona. 1981. Resource utilization indices: an assessment. J. Animal Ecol. 50: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laur, D.R. & A.W. Ebeling. 1983. Predator-prey relationships in surfperches. Env. Biol. Fish. 8: 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1978. Optimization theory in evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics 9: 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.J. & J.J. Geibel. 1973. Summary of blue rockfish and lingcod life histories: a reef ecology study; and giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, experiments in Monterey Bay, California. Calif. Dep. Fish Game, Fish Bull. 158: 1–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R., R.B. Huey & L.R. Lawlor, 1979. Niche segregation in desert lizards. pp. 67–115. In: D.J. Horn, G.R. Stairs & R.D. Mitchell(ed.) Analysis of Ecological Systems, Ohio State University Press, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quast, J.C. 1968a. Estimates of the populations and the standing crop of fishes. pp. 57–79. In: W.J. North & C.L. Hubbs (ed.) Utilization of Kelp-bed Resources in Southern California, Calif. Dep. Fish Game, Fish Bull. 139.

  • Quast, J.C. 1968b. Observations on the food of the kelp-bed fishes. pp. 109–147. In: W.J. North & C.L. Hubbs (ed.) Utilization of Kelp-bed Resources in Southern California, Calif. Dep. Fish Game, Fish Bull. 139.

  • Ricklefs, R.E. & M. Lau. 1980. Bias and dispersion of overlap indices: results of some Monte Carlo simulations. Ecology 61: 1019–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.T. 1986. Resource partitioning in fish assemblages: a review of field studies. Copeia (in press).

  • Roughgarden, J. 1976. Resource partitioning among competing species — a coevolutionary approach. Theoret. Pop. Biol. 9: 388–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. 1983. Competition and theory in community ecology. Amer. Nat. 122: 583–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusterholz, K.A. 1981. Competition and structure of an avian foraging guild. Amer. Nat. 118: 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, P.F. 1974. Overlap in resource use, and interspecific competition. Oecologia 17: 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I.J. & L.A. Toth. 1984. Niche relationships and population ecology of rainbow (Etheostoma caeruleum) and fantail (E. flabellare) darters in a temporally variable environment. Oikos 42: 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J. & J.A. Coyer. 1982. The foraging ecology of sympatric marine fish in the genus Embiotoca (Embiotocidae): importance of foraging behavior in prey size selection. Oecologia 55: 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J. & J.A. Coyer. 1983. Variation in surfperch diets between allopatry and sympatry: circumstantial evidence for competition. Oecologia 58: 402–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J. & S.J. Holbrook.1985. Patch selection by juvenile black surfperch (Embiotocidae) under variable risk: interactive influence of food quality and structural complexity. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. (in press).

  • Schoener, T.W. 1968. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49: 704–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Amer. Nat. 122: 240–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J.S. & K.E. Zerba. 1981. Factors affecting fish diversity on a temperate reef. Env. Biol. Fish. 6: 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouder, D.J. 1983. Effects of a severe weather disturbance on foraging patterns of a guild of surfperches. M.A. Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara. 48 pp.

  • Strauss, R.E. 1979. Reliability estimates for Ivlev's electivity index, the forage ratio, and a proposed linear index of food selection. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 108: 344–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D.R. Jr. 1983. Natural variability and the manifold mechanisms of ecological communities. Amer. Nat. 122: 636–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.D. & K.A. Rusterholz. 1982. Overlap summary indices and the detection of community structure. Ecology 63: 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, C.A. 1985. Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles. Copeia 1985: 1–21.

  • Werner, E.E. 1977. Species packing and niche complementarity in three sunfishes. Amer. Nat. 111: 553–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E., D.J. Hall, D.R. Laughlin, D.J. Wagner, L.A. Wilsmann & F.C. Funk. 1977. Habitat partitioning in a freshwater fish community. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 360–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1977. On competition and variable environments. Amer. Sci. 65: 590–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshiyama, R.M. 1980. Food habits of three species of rocky intertidal sculpins (Cottidae) in Central California. Copeia 1980: 515–525.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebeling, A.W., Laur, D.R. Foraging in surfperches: resource partitioning or individualistic responses?. Environ Biol Fish 16, 123–133 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005165

Keywords

Navigation