Synopsis
Parental care in the brown bullhead is characterized by variation in the participation of each sex. Most broods are attended by both sexes, but some are attended by a male alone, or rarely, a female alone. Two care-givers were more successful than one alone in fostering offspring survival. However, there was no significant difference between two care-givers and one alone in the proportion of time that broods were unattended. Potential brood predators were chased less frequently by one adult alone than by adults aided by their mate. This difference may be unimportant since two adults simultaneously attended their brood only 19% of the time. Males alone attended their broods a significantly greater proportion of time than did either males or females aided by their mates. This difference suggests that males alone sustain a greater cost of care-giving (starvation and therefore reduced future reproduction) than do males aided by their mates. Thus, males alone may more often leave broods (and not return) than males that are aided in care-giving. The differential success observed may be due to a difference in the likelihood that the male (the principal care-giver) leaves the brood permanently, rather than differences in the quality of care one or two adults provide. I suggest that two care-givers are more successful than one because the net benefits of care-giving exceed the net benefits of leaving for males when aided by their mates.
References cited
Barlow, G.W. 1974. Contrasts in social behavior between Central American cichlid fishes and coral-reef surgeon fishes. Amer. Zool. 14: 9–34.
Baylis, J.R. 1974. The behavior and ecology of Herotilapia multispinosa (Teleostei, Cichlidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 34: 115–146.
Baylis, J.R. 1981. The evolution of parental care in fishes, with reference to Darwin's rule of male sexual selection. Env. Biol. Fish. 6: 223–251.
Blumer, L.S. 1979. Male parental care in the bony fishes. Q. R. Biol. 54: 149–161.
Blumer, L.S. 1982a. A bibliography and categorization of bony fishes exhibiting parental care. Zool. J. Linnean Soc. Lond. 75: 1–22.
Blumer, L.S. 1982b. Parental care and reproductive ecology of the North American catfish, Ictalurus nebulosus. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 160 pp.
Conover, W.J. 1971. Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley, New York. 462 pp.
Dawkins, R. & T.R. Carlisle. 1976. Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262: 131–133.
Emlen, J.M. 1973. Ecology: an evolutionary approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading. 493 pp.
Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1978. Parental care behavior in fishes and birds. pp. 3–29. In: E.S. Reese & F.J. Lighter (ed.) Contrasts in Behavior, Wiley, New York.
Perrone, M. 1975. The relation between mate choice and parental investment patterns in fish who brood their young: theory and a case study. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle. 143 pp.
Perrone, M. & T.M. Zaret. 1979. Parental care patterns of fishes. Amer. Nat. 113: 351–361.
Williams, G.C. 1975. Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 200 pp.
Wourms, J.P. 1977. Reproduction and development in chondrichthyan fishes. Amer. Zool. 17: 379–410.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blumer, L.S. The significance of biparental care in the brown bullhead, Ictalurus nebulosus . Environ Biol Fish 12, 231–236 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005153
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005153