Skip to main content
Log in

Food selection by a sit-and-wait predator, the monkfish, Lophius upsicephalus, off Namibia (South West Africa)

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

We investigated prey selection by the monkfish, Lophius upsicephalus. This sit-and-wait predator preferentially selected prey types that would be expected to react to the lure of the illicium. Prey size selection was dependent on predator size, with larger predators feeding on a wider range of prey sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Bence, J.R. & W.W. Murdoch. 1986. Prey size selection by the mosquitofish: relation to optimal diet theory. Ecology 67: 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, J. 1978. Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59: 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, W.H. & R.J. Livingston. 1984. Prey selectivity of the fringed filefish, Monacanthus ciliatus (Pisces: Monacanthidae): role of prey accessibility. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 16: 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J.L. & M.V. Moore. 1987. Interpreting selectivity indices calculated from field data or conditions of prey replacement. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 1529–1533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, N.G. Jr., K.T. Li & J.J. Easter, Jr. 1982. Fish vision and the detection of planktonic prey. Science 218 (4578) 1240–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1979. Diversity and adaptation in fish behaviour. Springer-Verlag, New York. 208 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kislalioglu, M. & R.N. Gibson. 1976. Some factors governing prey selection by the 15-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia (L.). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 25: 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, C.C. & J.J. Ney. 1982. A comparison of methods for quantitative analysis of feeding selection of fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 7: 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechowicz, M.J. 1982. The sampling characteristics of electivity indices. Oecologia (Berlin) 52: 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K.T., J.K. Wettener & N.G. Hairston, Jr. 1985. Fish size, visual resolution, and prey selectivity. Ecology 66: 1729–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luczkovich, J.J. 1988. The role of prey detection in the selection of prey by pinfish Lagodon rhomboides (Linnaeus). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 123: 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, E. 1979. Ecological overlap between macrourids in the western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Biol. 53: 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, E. 1981. Resource partitioning in a Mediterranean demersal fish community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 4: 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, E. 1983. Trophic ecology of fishes of the Namibian coast. I. Feeding behavior. Res. Exp. Cient. 11: 81–137. (In Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen, C. & A. Wiederholm. 1982. Food selectivity versus prey availability: a study using the marine fish Pomatoschistus microps. Oecologia (Berlin) 55: 311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, K.L. 1985. The influence of prey identity and size on selection of prey by two marine fishes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 88: 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, K.L. 1987. Predator avoidance in seagrass meadows: prey behavior, microhabitat selection, and cryptic coloration. Ecology 68: 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, M.J. 1978. Development, distribution and relative abundance of the larvae and early juveniles of the pelagic goby Sufflogobius bibarbatus (von Bonde) off South West Africa 1972–1974. Invest. Rep. Sea Fish. Branch S. Afr. 116: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst, N.W. 1987. Intra- and interspecific changes in retinal morphology among mesopelagic and demersal teleosts from the slope waters of New Zealand. Env. Biol. Fish. 19: 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietsch, T.W. & D.B. Grobecker. 1978. The compleat angler: aggressive mimicry in an antennariid anglerfish. Science 201: 369–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, P. 1982. Some biological aspects of the squid Todarodes sagittatus (Lamarck) in Namibian waters. Coll. scient. Pap. int. Comm. SE Ad. Fish. 9: 319–322. (In Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J. & S.J. Holbrook. 1984. Gape-limitation, foraging tactics and prey size selectivity of two microcarnivorous species of fish. Oecologia (Berlin) 63: 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderploeg, H. & D. Scavia. 1979. Calculation and use of selectivity coefficients of feeding: zooplankton grazing. Ecol. Model. 7: 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinyard, G.L. 1980. Differential prey vulnerability and predator selectivity: effects of evasive prey on bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (L. gibbosus) predation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 2294–2299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. & D.J. Hall. 1974. Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by bluegill sufish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 55: 1042–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. & D.J. Hall. 1977. Species packing and niche complementarity in three sunfishes. Amer. Nat. 111: 553–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, TM. 1980. The effect of prey motion on planktivore choice. pp. 594–603. In: W.C. Kerfoot (ed.) Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities, University Press of New England, Hanover.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordoa, A., Macpherson, E. Food selection by a sit-and-wait predator, the monkfish, Lophius upsicephalus, off Namibia (South West Africa). Environ Biol Fish 27, 71–76 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004906

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004906

Key words

Navigation