Skip to main content
Log in

Hybridization of two forms of ninespine stickleback, Pungitius pungitius and P. platygaster, under experimental conditions and an attempt to predict the consequences of their contact in nature

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

In aquaria and in ponds crosses were made between two closely related allopatric forms of ninespine stickleback of the genus Pungitius (P. pungitius and P. platygaster). There were no ethological isolation mechanisms; F1, F2 and F3 hybrids are fertile; experimental hybrid stocks as well as backcrosses maintain themselves for at least three generations. F1 hybrids are readily distinguishable from parental forms by a combination of morphological characters; F2 hybrids grown in the north near the Arctic circle, are morphologically similar to P. pungitius. The southern form P. platygaster does not survive in northern conditions; eggs of the northern form P. pungitius die at a temperature of 28°C, normal for the spawning of the southern form. By 9 out of 19 studied morphological characters there are distinctions between the two forms. Therefore, ecologically and morphologically the two forms have diverged rather significantly. On the other hand, ethologically and genetically (as judged by the absence of postmating isolating mechanisms) the forms have diverged only slightly. As a result, the differences between the two forms are considered not to exceed the subspecies or at least semispecies rank.

In recent years, due to a disturbance of the ranges of both these forms in Eurasia, a tendency for a secondary contact between P. pungitius and P. platygaster appeared in the basins of the rivers Volga and Irtysh. In the immediate future the two forms are expected to come into contact. From our data we predict possible introgressive hybridization between the northern and sourthern forms in natural conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Berg, L.S. 1949. Freshwater fishes of the USSR and adjacent countries. Vol. 3. Izd. Akad. Nauk USSR, Moscow-Leningrad. 1381 pp. (In Russian).

  • Bertin, L. 1925. Recherches bionomiques, biométriques et systématiques sur les Epinoches (Gasterosteidae). Ann. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco 2: 1–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T.R. & H.M. Reisman. 1970. A comparative chromosome study of the North American species of sticklebacks (Teleostei: Gasterosteidae). Cytogenetics 9: 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J.R. 1977. The role of breeding behavior and habitat preferences on the reproductive isolation of three allopatric populations of ninespine stickleback, Pungitius pungitius. Can. J. Zool. 55: 1601–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomeluk, V.E. 1978. The reproductive behavior of sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae) (populational aspect). Author's Abstr. of Candidate's Dissertation. Inst. Evol. Morph. and Ecol. Animals, USSR Acad. Sci., Moscow. (In Russian).

  • Kessler, K. 1859. Auszuge aus dem Berichte über eine an die nordwestlichen Kusten der Schwarzen Meeres and durch die westliche Krym unternommene Reise. II. Stachelflosser. Byull. Mosk. Obshch. Ispyt. Prir. 32: 199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J.A. 1969. The courtship behaviour of the male brook stickleback Culaea inconstans (Kirtland). Can. J. Zool. 47: 1281–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J.A. & M.H.A. Keenleyside. 1970. Reproductive behaviour of ninespine stickleback Pungitius pungitius L. in South Bay, Manitoulin Island, Ontario. Can. J. Zool. 48: 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, J.D. 1963. Geographic variation in North American ninespine sticklebacks Pungitius pungitius. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 20: 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mina, M.V.1979. The analysis of the consequences of genetical contacts between populations of animals. pp. 48–57. In: Problems of Ecological Monitoring and Modelling of the Ecosystems, Vol. 2, Gidrometeoizdat, Moscow. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. 1958. The reproductive behaviour of the ten-spined stickleback (Pygosteus). Behaviour, Suppl. 6: 1–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munzing, J. 1969. Variabilitat, Verbreitung and Systematik der Arten and Unterarten in der Gattung Pungitius Coste 1848 (Pisces, Gasterosteidae). Zeit. Zool. Syst. Evol. 7: 206–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolsky, G.V. 1980. The species structure and regularities of fish' variation. Pisch. Prom., Moscow. 182 pp. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shtuilko, B.A. 1934. A Neogene fauna of fresh-water fishes from Western Siberia. Trans. Unit. Geol. Prosp. Serv. USSR. 359: 1–93. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindachner, F. 1889. Über das Vorkommen von Gasterosteus platygaster Kessl. im Stromgebiete der Donau. Sitz. ber. Akad. Wiss., Wien 108: 539–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. 1951. The study of instinct. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 228 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, R.J. 1976. The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic Press, London. 387 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziuganov, V.V. 1983. Genetics of osteal plate polymorphism and microevolution of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 65: 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziuganov, V.V., Gomeluk, V.Y. Hybridization of two forms of ninespine stickleback, Pungitius pungitius and P. platygaster, under experimental conditions and an attempt to predict the consequences of their contact in nature. Environ Biol Fish 13, 241–251 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002908

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002908

Keywords

Navigation