Skip to main content
Log in

Conserving fish genomes: philosophies and practices

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alstad, D.N. & G.F. Edmunds, Jr. 1983. Selection, outbreeding depression, and the sex ratio of scale insects. Science 220: 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E.K. & M.N. Bruton. 1986. Introduction of alien species or why scientific advice is not heeded. Env. Biol. Fish. 16: 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. 1984. So excellent a fische. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York. 280 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. & H. Hirth. 1962. The ecology and migrations of sea turtles 5. Comparative features of isolated green turtle colonies. Amer. Mus. Novit. 209: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzmann, R.G., M.M. Ferguson, F.W. Allendorf & K.L. Knudsen, 1986. Heterozygosity and developmental rate in a strain of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Evolution 40: 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O.H. & M.L. Soule, 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press. New York 327 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, I.R. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. pp. 135–139.In: M.E. Soulé & B.A. Wilcox (ed.) Conservation Biology: an Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J.L. 1983. The distribution of genetic variation within and among natural plant populations, pp. 335–348.In: C.M. Schonewald-Cox et al. (ed.) Genetics and Conservation, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Menlo Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilhish, T.J. & R.K. Koehn. 1985. The physiological basis of natural selection at the LAP locus. Evolution 39: 1302–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217: 624–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. & T. Ohta. 1971. Theoretical aspects of population genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton 219 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, B. 1980. Gene expression 2. Eucaryotic chromosomes. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffe, G.K. 1986. Conservation genetics and the management of endangered fishes. Fisheries 11 (1): 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, J.B. & M.C. Grant. 1984. Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Svst. 15: 479–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., T. Maruyama & R. Chakraborty. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pister, E.P. 1985. Desert pupfishes: reflections on reality. desirability, and conscience. Env. Biol. Fish. 12: 3–11. (reprinted in Fisheries 10:10–15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox, C.M., S.M. Chambers, B. MacBryde & L. Thomas (ed.). 1983. Genetics and conservation. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Menlo Park 722 pp.

  • Schopf, T.J.M. 1981. Evidence from findings of molecular biology with regard to the rapidity of genomic change: implications for species durations. pp. 135–192.In: K.J. Niklas (ed.) Paleobotany, Paleoecology and Evolution. Vol. 1. Praeger Publishers. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senner, J.W. 1980. Inbreeding depression and the survival of zoo populations, pp. 209–224.In: M.E. Soulé & B.A. Wilcox (ed.) Conservation Biology: an Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E. 1980. Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. pp. 151–169.In: M.E. Soulé & B.A. Wilcox (ed.) Conservation Biology: an Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E. 1985. What is conservation biology? BioScience 35: 727–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E. (ed.). 1986. Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland. 584 pp.

  • Soulé, M.E. & B.A. Wilcox (ed.). 1980. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

  • Stahl, G. 1981. Genetic differentiation among natural populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in northern Sweden. pp. 95–105.In: N. Ryman (ed.) Fish Gene Pools, Ecol. Bull. 34, Stockholm.

  • Stuart, H. & J.E. Johnson. 1981. A refuge for southwestern fish. New Mexico Wildlife 26: 2–5.29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R. 1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression pp. 105–116:In: M.E. Soulé (ed.) Conservation Biology, The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 1985. The biological diversity crisis. BioScience 35: 700–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijenhoek, R.C. 1985. Animal population genetics and disturbance the effects of local extinctions and recolonizations on heterozygosity and fitness, pp. 265–285.In: S.T.A. Pickett & P. White (ed.) The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijenhoek, R.C., M.E. Douglas & G.K. Meffe. 1985. Conservation genetics of endangered fish populations in Arizona. Science 228: 400–402.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Invited Editorial

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meffe, G.K. Conserving fish genomes: philosophies and practices. Environ Biol Fish 18, 3–9 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002323

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002323

Keywords

Navigation