Skip to main content
Log in

An electrophoretic analysis of the Etheostoma variatum complex (Percidae: Etheostomatini), with associated zoogeographic considerations

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The Etheostoma variatum complex is comprised of five species (E. euzonum, E. kanawhae, E. osburni, E. tetrazonum, E. variatum) distributed from the Allegheny River, New York, to the White River, Arkansas. Electrophoretic data provide evidence of a division of the complex into two geographic units: E. variatum, E. kanawhae, and E. osburni in the Appalachian region, and E. euzonum and E. tetrazonum in the Ozarks. Genic variation exists also between the Sac and Big river populations of E. tetrazonum. Genic variation and present faunal distributions suggest that an ancestral stock was widely distributed in Teays and Old Mississippi rivers but separated by a Pleistocene ice advance. Some populations survived in an Ozarkian refugium, while more eastern populations, such as the precursor to E. variatum, may have evolved in a southern refuge of the developing Ohio River. The Teays (New) River gorge, including Kanawha Falls, has prevented E. variatum from invading territory occupied by E. osburni and E. kanawhae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Avise, J.C. 1974. Systematic value of electrophoretic data. Syst. Zool. 23: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, J.C. 1983. Introduction to the zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. In: C.H. Hocutt ded.) Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes, J. Wiley & Sons, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashner, R.C. & R.D. Suttkus. 1977. Ambloplites constellatus, a new species of rock bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a review of western rock bass populations. Amer. Midl. Nat. 98: 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, F.B. 1970. Pleistocene and recent environments of the central Great Plains. In: W. Dort, Jr. & J.K. Jones, Jr. (ed.) Pleistocene and Recent Environments of the Great Plains, Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Special Publication 3.

  • Farris, J.S. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Amer. Nat. 106: 645–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W.M. & E. Margoliash. 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155: 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C.R. 1980. Etheostoma variatum (Kirtland), the variegate darter. p. 706. In: D.S. Lee, C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, R.E. Jenkins, D.E. McAllister & J.R. Stauffer, Jr. ded.) Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, N.C. State Mus. Nat. Hist. Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C.H. 1979. Drainage evolution and fish dispersal in the central Appalachians. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. Part II, 90: 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C.H., R.F. Denoncourt & J.R. Stauffer Jr. 1978. Fishes of the Greenbrier River, West Virginia, with drainage history of the central Appalachians. J. Biogeog. 5: 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C.H., R.F. Denoncourt & J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1979. Fishes of the Gauley River, West Virginia. Brimleyana 1: 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C.H., R.E. Jenkins & J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980a. Etheostoma osburni (Hubbs and Trautman), the finescaled saddled darter. p. 678. In: D.S. Lee, C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, R.E. Jenkins, D.E. McAllister & J.R. Stauffer, Jr. ded.) Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, N.C. State Mus. Nat. Hist., Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C.H., R.E. Jenkins & J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980b. Etheostoma kanawhae (Raney), the Kanawha darter. p. 659. In: D.S. Lee, C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, R.E. Jenkins, D.E. McAllister, J.R. Stauffer, Jr. ded.), Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, N.C. State Mus. Nat. Hist., Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, C.L. & V.D. Black. 1940. Percid fishes related to Poecilichthys variatus, with descriptions of three new forms. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 416: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, C.L. & M.B. Trautman. 1932. Poecilichthys osburni, a new darter from the upper Kanawha River system in Virginia and West Virginia. Ohio J. Sci. 32: 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R.E., E.A. Lachner & F.J. Schwartz. 1972. Fishes of the central Appalachian drainages, their distribution and dispersal. pp. 43–117. In: P.C. Holt, R.A. Paterson & J.P. Hubbard (ed.) The Distributional History of the Biota of the Southern Appalachians, Part III: Vertebrates, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Resources Division Monograph 4.

  • Lachner, E.A. & R.E. Jenkins. 1971. Systematics, distribution and evolution of the chub genus Nocomis Girard (Pisces, Cyprinidae) of eastern United States, with descriptions of new species. Smith. Contrib. Zool. 85: 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, B. 1975. Electrophoretic variation in the genus Oncorhynchus: The methodology, genetic basis, and practical applications of research and management. M.Sc. Thesis, Washington State University, Pullman. 96 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.V. 1968. A systematic study of the greenside darter Etheostoma blennioides Rafinesque (Pisces: Percidae). Copeia 1968: 1–40.

  • Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Amer. Nat. 106: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 70: 3320–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, L.M. 1981. The genera and subgenera of darters (Percidae, Etheostomatini). Occ. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas 90: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W.L. 1971. A distributional study of Missouri fishes. Univ. Kans. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. 20: 225–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prager, E.M. & A.C. Wilson. 1976. Congruency of phylogenies derived from different proteins. A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of cracid birds. J. Mol. Evol. 9: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raney, E.C. 1941. Poecilichthys kanawhae, a new darter from the upper New River system in North Carolina and Virginia. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 434: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R.D. & B.D. Perkins. 1959. Drainage evolution and distribution of fishes of the New (Upper Kanawha) River system in Virginia, Part III, records of fishes of the New River. Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 145: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R.K., M.H. Smith, S.Y. Yang, W.E. Johnson & J.B. Gentry. 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus sp. 1. Variation in the old field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics IV. Univ. Tex. Publ. 7103: 49–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A. & R.R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, J.R., C.H. Hocutt & C.R. Gilbert. 1980. Etheostoma euzonum (Hubbs & Black), Arkansas saddled darter. p. 645. In: D.S. Lee, C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, R.E. Jenkins, D.E. McAllister & J.R. Stauffer, Jr. (ed.) Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, N.C. State Mus. Nat. Hist., Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D.L. 1981. On the utility of the distance Wagner procedure. pp. 25–43. In: V.A. Funk & D.R. Brooks (ed.) Advances in Cladistics: Proc. First Meeting Willi Hennig Soc., N. Y. Botanical Garden, New York.

  • Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and genetics of populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 580 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1982. Character change, speciation, and the higher taxa. Evol. 36: 427–443.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKeown, P.E., Hocutt, C.H., Morgan, R.P. et al. An electrophoretic analysis of the Etheostoma variatum complex (Percidae: Etheostomatini), with associated zoogeographic considerations. Environ Biol Fish 11, 85–95 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002257

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002257

Keywords

Navigation