Skip to main content
Log in

Fish faunal ‘breaks’ and stream order in the eastern and central United States

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The distribution of fishes within 23 streams in the eastern and central United States was analyzed for evidence of distinct longitudinal faunal ‘breaks’, and to compare location of the breaks to stream order and longitudinal position of stations within watersheds. On the basis of presence-absence data for fish species, distinct faunal breaks were found in only 8 of the 23 streams. Qualitative faunal breaks were not significantly more common in any particular reach of streams, and the breaks did not correspond to changes in stream order. In 11 of 14 streams for which data on fish abundance were available, quantitative faunal breaks were found, but the locations of these breaks were unrelated to stream order or longitudinal position of stations in streams. Earlier studies have postulated that stream orders may represent distinct biological units for fishes. In contrast, this analysis shows that local fish faunas differ as much within as between adjacent stream orders, and suggests that stream order alone is not a pervasive organizer of lotic fish communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Balon, E.K. & D.J. Stewart. 1983. Fish assemblages in a river with unusual gradient (Luongo, Africa — Zaire system), reflections on river zonation, and description of another new species. Env. Biol. Fish. 9: 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, B.H., B.A. Branson & S.T. Colwell. 1978. Fishes of Paddy's Run Creek and the dry fork of the Whitewater River, Southwestern Ohio. Ohio J. Sci. 78: 144–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binderim, G.E. 1977. Fishes of Mill Creek, a tributary of the Washita River, Johnston and Murray counties, Oklahoma. Proc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci. 57: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, G.W. & E.P. Odum. 1945. The distribution of stream fish in the vicinity of Mountain Lake, Virginia. Ecology 26: 182–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, M.R. & T.E. Moen. 1978. Fishes of the Caddo River, Arkansas after impoundment of DeGray Lake. Arkansas Acad. Sci. Proc. 32: 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echelle, A.A. & G.D. Schnell. 1976. Factor analysis of species association among fishes of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 105: 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.W. & R.L. Noble. 1979. The longitudinal distribution of fishes in an east Texas stream. Amer. Midl. Nat. 101: 333–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C.L. & G.L. Harp. 1974. Ichthyofaunal diversification and distribution in Jane's Creek watershed, Randolph County, Arkansas. Arkansas Acad. Sci. Proc. 28: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, O.T. & J.R. Karr. 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrel, R.C., B.J. Davis & T.C. Dorris. 1967. Stream order and species diversity of fishes in an intermittent Oklahoma stream. Amer. Midl. Nat. 78: 428–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, H.L., 1978. Response of the Devils's River (Texas) fish community to flooding. Copeia 1978: 60–68.

  • Harris, J.L. & N.H. Douglas. 1978. Fishes of the Mountain Provice section of the Ouachita River. Arkansas Acad. Sci. Proc. 32: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, H.A. 1975. River zonation and classification. pp. 312–374.In: B.A. Whitton (ed.) River Ecology, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C.P. & J.R. Sedell. 1981. Longitudinal and seasonal changes in functional organization of macroinvertebrate communities in four Oregon streams. Ecology 62: 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C.H. & J.R. Stauffer. 1975. Influence of gradient on the distribution of fishes in Conowingo Creek, Maryland and Pennsylvania. Chesapeake Sci. 16: 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R.E. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 56: 275–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, R.J. 1978. Temporal variability patterns and the distributional patterns of stream fishes. Ecol. Monogr. 48: 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W.D. & G.L. Harp. 1974. Ichthyofaunal diversification and distribution in an Ozark stream in northcentral Arkansas. Arkansas Acad. Sci. Proc. 27: 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R.E. & C.A. Freeman. 1972. Longitudinal distribution and habitat of the fishes of Mason Creek, an upper Roanoke River drainage tributary, Virginia. Virginia J. Sci. 23: 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehne, R.A. 1962. A classification of streams, illustrated by fish distribution in an eastern Kentucky creek. Ecology 43: 608–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachner, E.A. & R.E. Jenkins. 1971. Systematics, distribution, and evolution of chub genusNocomis Girard (Pisces, Cyprinidae) of eastern United States, with descriptions of new species. Smithsonian Contrib. Zool. 85: 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotrich, V.A. 1973. Growth, production, and community composition of fishes inhabiting a first-, second-, and third-order stream of eastern Kentucky. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 377–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W.J. 1986. Fish faunal structure in an Ozark stream: stability, persistence, and a catastrophic flood. Copeia (in press).

  • Matthews, W.J. & G.L. Harp. 1974. Preimpoundment ichthyofaunal survey of the Piney Creek watershed, Izard County, Arkansas. Arkansas Acad. Sci. Proc. 28: 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W.J. & J.T. Styron, Jr. 1981. Tolerance of headwater vs. mainstream fishes for abrupt physicochemical changes. Amer. Midl. Nat. 105: 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisita, M. 1959. Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. E. Biol. 3: 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B., J.J. Smith, R.A. Daniels, T.L. Taylor, D.G. Price & D.M. Baltz. 1982. Distribution and ecology of stream fishes in the Sacramento-San Joaquin drainage system, California. Univ. California Publ. Zoology 115: 1–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigg, J. & L.G. Hill. 1974. Fishes of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 54: 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.T., W.J. Matthews & A.A. Echelle. 1985. Persistence of stream fish assemblages: effects of environmental change. Amer. Nat. 126: 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A.L. 1968. Species diversity and longitudinal succession in stream fishes. Ecology 49: 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.L. & C.R. Powell. 1971. The summer fish communities of Brier Creek, Marshall County, Oklahoma. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2458. 30 pp.

  • Starrett, W.C. 1950. Distribution of the fishes of Boone County, Iowa, with special reference to the minnows and darters. Amer. Midl. Nat. 43: 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrett, W.C. 1951. Some factors affecting the abundance of minnows in the Des Moines River, Iowa. Ecology 32: 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, J.R., Jr., C.H. Hocutt, M.T. Masnik & J.E. Reed, Jr. 1975. The longitudinal distribution of the fishes of the East River, West Virginia-Virginia. Virginia J. Sci. 26: 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A.N. 1954. Quantitative geomorphology of erosional landscapes. C.R. 19th Int. Geol. Congr., Soc. 13: 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 38: 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surat, E., W.J. Matthews & J. Bek. 1982. Comparative ecology ofNotropis albeolus, N. ardens, andN. cerasinus (Cyprinidae) in the upper Roanoke River, Virginia. Amer. Midl. Nat. 107: 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.H. & F.D. Hunt. 1930. The fishes of Champaign County — a study of the distribution and abundance of fishes in small streams. III. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 19: 5–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tramer, E.J. & P.M. Rogers. 1973. Diversity and longitudinal zonation in fish populations of two streams entering a metropolitan area. Amer. Midl. Nat. 90: 366–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R.L., G.W. Minshall, K.W. Cummins, J.R. Sedell & C.E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, B.G. & R. McNatt. 1972. Fish species diversity in relation to stream order and physicochemical conditions in the Plum Creek drainage basin. Amer. Midl. Nat. 88: 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda, H. 1981. Similarity indices, sample size, and diversity. Oecologia 50: 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, W.J. Fish faunal ‘breaks’ and stream order in the eastern and central United States. Environ Biol Fish 17, 81–92 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001739

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001739

Keywords

Navigation