Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 225–241 | Cite as

Interspecific relationships of aufwuchs-eating fishes in Lake Tanganyika

  • Kenzi Takamura
Full paper

Synopsis

On a rocky shore of Lake Tanganyika aufwuchs-eating is practiced by 18 fish species: 17 cichlids and 1 cyprinid. The majority takes mostly either filamentous or unicellular algae.Tropheus moorei and its taxonomically related species most closely resemble one another in diet among the species taking mostly filamentous algae, and thePetrochromis species do so among the species taking mostly unicellular algae.Petrochromis polyodon andT. moorei severely interfere with the feeding activities of related species. These two dominant species share both intensive grazing sites and temporal grazing patterns, and there seems to be a symbiotic relationship between them. Symbiotic relationships are also seen in seven cases of associated feeding by carnivorous fishes. Differences in diet or feeding behavior are found between these symbionts. Small but clear differences are found betweenP. polyodon andT. moorei and between the associating and the carnivorous host fishes in the four cases of associated feeding. These small differences seem attributable to morphological differences and may have been effective for the evolution of symbiotic relationships.

Keywords

Diet Feeding behavior Removal Community Associated feeding Competition Symbiotic relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Brichard, P. 1978. Fishes of Lake Tanganyika. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 448 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Connell, J.H. & E. Orias. 1964. The ecological regulation of species diversity. Amer. Natur. 98: 399–414.Google Scholar
  3. Fryer, G. 1959. The trophic interrelationships and ecology of some littoral communities of Lake Nyasa with special reference to the fishes, and a discussion of the evolution of a group of rock-frequenting Cichlidae. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 132: 153–281.Google Scholar
  4. Fryer, G. & T.D. Iles. 1972. The cichlid fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh. 641 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Greenwood, H.G. 1974. The cichlid fishes of Lake Victoria, East Africa: the biology and evolution of a species flock. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Lond., Zool. Suppl. 6: 1–134.Google Scholar
  6. Hixon, M.A. 1980. Competitive interactions between California reef fishes of the genusEmbiotoca. Ecology 61: 918–931.Google Scholar
  7. Hynes, H.B.N. 1950. The food of freshwater sticklebacks, with a review of method used in studies of the food of fishes. J. Anim. Ecol. 19: 36–58.Google Scholar
  8. Kawanabe, H. 1959. Food competition among fishes in some rivers of Kyoto Prefecture, Japan. Mem. Col. Sc., Univ. Kyoto Series B 26: 253–268.Google Scholar
  9. Kawanabe, H. 1981. Territorial behaviour ofTropheus moorei (Osteichthyes: Cichlidae) with a preliminary consideration on the territorial forms in animals. African Study Monographs 1: 101–108.Google Scholar
  10. Lowe-McConnell, R.H. 1969. Speciation in tropical freshwater fishes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1: 51–75.Google Scholar
  11. May, R.M. 1981. Models for two interacting populations. pp. 78–104.In: R.M. May (ed.) Theoritical Ecology, Priciples and Applications, 2nd edition, Blackwell Sci. Publ. Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Nelissen, M. 1977.Pseudosimochromis, a new genus of the family Cichlidae (Pisces) from Lake Tanganyika. Rev. Zool. Afr. 91: 730–731.Google Scholar
  13. Nelissen, M. 1978. Sound production by some Tanganyikan cichlid fishes and a hypothesis for the evolution of their communication mechanisms. Behaviour 64: 137–147.Google Scholar
  14. Nelissen, M. 1979. A taxonomic revision of the generaSimochromis, Pseudosimochromis andTropheus (Pisces, Cichlidae). Ann. Mus. Roy. Afr. Centr., Sc. Zool. 229: 1–54.Google Scholar
  15. Nilsson, N.A. 1963. Interaction between trout and char in Scandinavia. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 92: 276–285.Google Scholar
  16. Pianka, E.R. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 53–74.Google Scholar
  17. Pianka, E.R. 1978. Evolutionary ecology. 2nd edition. Harper & Row, New York. 397 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Poll, M. 1953. Poissons non Cichlidae. Result. scient. Explor. hydrobiol. lac Tanganika (1946–1947) 3, Fasc. 5A: 1–251.Google Scholar
  19. Poll, M. 1956. Poissons Cichlidae. Result. scient. Explor. hydrobiol. lac Tanganika (1946–1947) 3, Fasc. 5B: 1–619.Google Scholar
  20. Sale, P.F. 1974. Mechanisms of co-existing in a guild of territorial fishes at Heron Island. Proc. 2nd Int. Coral Reef Symp. 1: 193–206.Google Scholar
  21. Schoener, T.W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39.Google Scholar
  22. Yamaoka, K. 1982. Morphology and feeding behavior of five species of genusPetrochromis (Teleostei, Cichlidae). Physiology and Ecology Japan 19: 57–75.Google Scholar
  23. Zaret, T.M. & A.S. Rand. 1971. Competition in tropical stream fishes: support for the competitive exclusion principle. Ecology 52: 336–342.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenzi Takamura
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceKyoto UniversitySakyo-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations