Skip to main content
Log in

Performance analysis of stereoscopic three-dimensional projection display systems

  • 3D Review
  • Published:
3D Research

Abstract

In this paper, several types of conventional stereoscopic projection display systems including the polarization-based, ZScreen-based, LC shutter-based and wavelength multiplex imaging-based have been reviewed and their performances have also been discussed in terms of light efficiency. The results revealed that 55%, 86% and 70% of light loss occurred in the LC shutter-based, ZScreen-based and wavelength multiplex imaging-based stereoscopic projection system, respectively. Meanwhile, in the polarized stereoscopic display system using the Type-1 LCD with the external polarizer, 50% of light loss occurred, whereas in the polarized stereoscopic display system using Type-2 LCD with the half-wave retarder and external polarizer, no light loss occurred. In addition, in the polarized stereoscopic projection system using the Type-1 LCD projector and the quarter-wave retardation film, no light loss also occurred. But in all of these cases, some additional light loss might be expected because of light absorption through the employed optical components. On the other hand, in the polarized stereoscopic projection system using the rotated Type-1 LCD/Type-2 LCD projector and the modified Type-1 LCD projector without the external polarizer, no light loss occurred because no additional optical components for polarization were needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Iizuka (2006) Welcome to the wonderful world of 3D: introduction, principles and history. Opt. Photon. News, 17: 42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Woods (2001) Optimal usage of LCD projectors for polarized stereoscopic projection. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems VIII, Editors: Andrew J. Woods, Mark T. Bolas, John O. Merritt, Stephen A. Benton, Proc. of SPIE 4297: 5–7

  3. S. Pastoor and M. D. Wöpking (1997) 3-D displays: a review of current technologies. Displays, 17: 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Walworth (1984) Three-dimensional projection with circular polarizers. Optics in Entertainment II, Editors: Chris S. Outwater, Proc. SPIE 462: 64–68

  5. J. Helmut and F. Markus (2005) Infitec — A new stereoscopic visualization tool by wavelength multiplex imaging. Journal of Three Dimensional Images 19: 50–56

    Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.barco.com/entertainment/en/tereoscopic/lumens.asp

  7. V. Elkhov and Y. Ovechkis (2003) Light loss reduction of LCD polarized stereoscopic projection. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems. VIII, Editors: Andrew J. Woods, Mark T. Bolas, John O. Merritt, Stephen A. Benton, Proc. SPIE 5006: 45–48

  8. S. -C. Kim and E. -S. Kim (2005) A new liquid crystal display-based polarized stereoscopic projection method with improved light efficiency. Opt. Commun. 249: 51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. -S. Kim (2006) Three-Dimensional Projection Display System. Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Display, T.-C. Poon. (Springer, 2006): 293–332

  10. S.- C. Kim and E. -S. Kim (2006) A novel configuration of LCD projectors for efficient orthogonal polarization of two projected views. Opt. Commun. 266: 55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. H. Stupp and M. S. Brennesholtz (1999) Projection Displays, John, Wiley & Sons, Ltd

  12. P. Yeh and C. Gu (1999) Optics of Liquid Crystal Displays, John Wiley & Sons

  13. H. Gooch and H. A. Tarry (1975) The optical properties of twisted nematic liquid crystal structures with twist angles ≤90 degrees. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 8: 1575–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun-Soo Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SC., Kim, ES. Performance analysis of stereoscopic three-dimensional projection display systems. 3D Res 1, 1–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/3DRes.01(2010)1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3DRes.01(2010)1

Keywords

Navigation