Skip to main content
Log in

Micro-machining of UHMWPE composites reinforced with carbide fillers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymer matrix composites (PMCs) have become one of the most widely used engineering materials due to both the developments in polymers and advanced fillers. It is expected that polymer composites will take their final shape during the production phase, which means that they are not required to undergo new processes. However, in some applications, machining operations, such as turning, milling, grooving and hole drilling, cannot be avoided and thus, finishing operations must be applied to these materials. Since these materials have complex microstructures, finishing operations may cause situations that adversely affect engineering properties, such as matrix cracking, delamination, debonding, etc. In this study, micro-milling operations were performed for recently developed ceramic reinforced polymer composites. Three different spindle speeds were used while feed rate and cutting depth were kept constant in the operations. The composites were produced from powdered UHMWPE and silicon carbide particles. Several parameters were varied in the production of the composites, such as molding pressure, filler loading and filler size. The investigated outputs were cutting temperature and surface roughness, whereas machined surfaces and chip morphologies were also investigated via microscopy analyses. In the final stage, regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationships between the process parameters. According to the results, ceramic reinforced polymer composites exhibit different machinability properties than fiber-reinforced ones due to hard fillers and low melting point of UHMWPE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CFRP:

Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer

EDS:

Energy-dispersive spectrometry

PMC:

Polymer matrix composite

SEM:

Scanning electron microscopy

SiC:

Silicon carbide

UHMWPE:

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene

References

  1. Jiang Z, Zhao J, Xie H. Microforming technology: theory, simulation and practice. London: Academic Press; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koç M (2020) Micro-manufacturing: design and manufacturing of micro-products. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011. https://www.myilibrary.com/?id=305245. Accessed 19 Mar 2020 (Online).

  3. Razali AR, Qin Y. A review on micro-manufacturing, micro-forming and their key ıssues. Procedia Eng. 2013;53:665–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ratchev S, International Federation for Information Processing, (editors). Precision assembly technologies and systems: 5th IFIP Wg 5.5 International precision assembly seminar, proceedings. Chamonix, Berlin: IPAS 2010, Springer; 2010.

  5. Qin Y, et al. Development of a new machine system for the forming of micro-sheet-products. Int J Mater Form. 2008;1(S1):475–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0098-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma AK, Bhandari R, Aherwar A, Rimašauskienė R. Matrix materials used in composites: a comprehensive study. Mater Today Proc. 2020;21:1559–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar R, Singh S, Sidhu AS, Pruncu CI. Bibliometric analysis of specific energy consumption (SEC) in machining operations: a sustainable response. Sustainability. 2021;13(10):5617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmad J. Machining of polymer composites. Boston: Springer; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68619-6.

  9. Hocheng H, editor. Machining technology for composite materials: principles and practice. Cambridge, Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheikh-Ahmad J, Twomey J, Kalla D, Lodhia P. Multiple regression and committee neural network force prediction models in milling FRP. Mach Sci Technol. 2007;11(3):391–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910340701554873.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gara S, Tsoumarev O. Effect of tool geometry on surface roughness in slotting of CFRP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;86(1–4):451–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8185-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gara S, M’hamed S, Tsoumarev O. Temperature measurement and machining damage in slotting of multidirectional CFRP laminate. Mach Sci Technol. 2018;22(2):320–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2017.1365892.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Azmi AI, Lin RJT, Bhattacharyya D. Machinability study of glass fibre-reinforced polymer composites during end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;64(1–4):247–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4006-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghafarizadeh S, Chatelain J-F, Lebrun G. Finite element analysis of surface milling of carbon fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;87(1–4):399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8482-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He Y, Qing H, Zhang S, Wang D, Zhu S. The cutting force and defect analysis in milling of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;93(5–8):1829–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0613-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pecat O, Rentsch R, Brinksmeier E. Influence of milling process parameters on the surface ıntegrity of CFRP. Procedia CIRP. 2012;1:466–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iskandar Y, Tendolkar A, Attia MH, Hendrick P, Damir A, Diakodimitris C. Flow visualization and characterization for optimized MQL machining of composites. CIRP Ann. 2014;63(1):77–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hintze W, Hartmann D. Modeling of delamination during milling of unidirectional CFRP. Procedia CIRP. 2013;8:444–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Szallies K, Siebert N, Bergmann JP. Low frequency oscillated milling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastics. Procedia CIRP. 2017;66:153–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mishra TK, Kumar A, Verma V, Pandey KN, Kumar V. PEEK composites reinforced with zirconia nanofiller. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72(13):1627–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Agrawal A, Satapathy A. Thermal and dielectric behaviour of polypropylene composites reinforced with ceramic fillers. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2015;26(1):103–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-2370-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ge S, et al. Friction and wear behavior of nitrogen ion implanted UHMWPE against ZrO2 ceramic. Wear. 2003;255(7–12):1069–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00269-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiong D, Ge S. Friction and wear properties of UHMWPE/Al2O3 ceramic under different lubricating conditions. Wear. 2001;250(1–12):242–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00647-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao P, Mackley MR. The structure and rheology of molten ultra-high-molecular-mass polyethylene. Polymer. 1994;35(24):5210–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(94)90471-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuram E. Micro-machinability of injection molded polyamide 6 polymer and glass-fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composite. Compos Part B Eng. 2016;88:85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Campos Rubio JC, Panzera TH, Scarpa F. Machining behaviour of three high-performance engineering plastics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 2015;229(1):28–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414525142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu JJ, Buckley CP, O’Connor JJ. Mechanical integrity of compression-moulded ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: effects of varying process conditions. Biomaterials. 2002;23(17):3773–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00117-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parasnis NC, Ramani K. Analysis of the effect of pressure on compression moulding of UHMWPE. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1998;9(3):165–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008871720389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gürgen S. Wear performance of UHMWPE based composites including nano-sized fumed silica. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;173: 106967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106967.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gürgen S, Çelik ON, Kuşhan MC. Tribological behavior of UHMWPE matrix composites reinforced with PTFE particles and aramid fibers. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;173: 106949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carr JW, Feger C. Ultraprecision machining of polymers. Precis Eng. 1993;15(4):221–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-6359(93)90105-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang S, Ge S. The mechanical property and tribological behavior of UHMWPE: effect of molding pressure. Wear. 2007;263(7–12):949–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.070.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sivasakthivel PS, Sudhakaran R. Optimization of machining parameters on temperature rise in end milling of Al 6063 using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;67(9–12):2313–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4652-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gürgen S, Sofuoğlu MA. Advancements in conventional machining. In: Advanced machining and finishing. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. pp. 143–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817452-4.00015-4.

  35. Çakır FH, Sofuoğlu MA, Gürgen S. Machining of Hastelloy-X based on finite element modelling. Adv Eng Forum. 2018;30:1–7. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.30.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rashed AH. Properties and characteristics of silicon carbide. Poco Graphite Inc.; 2002. p. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Research Fund of Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Project #202015046.

Funding

Research Fund of Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Project #202015046.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: SG; methodology: SG; writing—reviewing and editing: SG; investigation: MAS, data curation: MAS; software: MAS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selim Gürgen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Availability of data and material

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Full set of thermography images are given in Fig. 12.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Thermography images for each specimen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gürgen, S., Sofuoğlu, M.A. Micro-machining of UHMWPE composites reinforced with carbide fillers. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 21, 146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00299-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00299-z

Keywords

Navigation