Advertisement

Tropical Ecology

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 281–287 | Cite as

Heightened nest loss in tropical forest fragments despite higher predator load in core forest

  • Christopher M. Fernandez
  • Maria D. Vera Alvarez
  • Michael V. CoveEmail author
Research Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Tropical understory birds have declined due largely to habitat loss and fragmentation. Here, we revisited a study conducted three decades ago and used artificial nests to examine depredation rates in a Costa Rican biological corridor. Using camera trap data, we compared potential nest predator detection rates at experimental tinamou ground nests in La Selva Biological Station and at sites in five local forest fragments. Nest predator detections were positively associated with landscape-scale core forest and distance away from forest edge, as well as with local-scale human trails, and negatively associated with primary forest compared to secondary growth. Twenty-two of 52 artificial nests were depredated, which was similar to previous research in the area. Mammalian and avian predators were common nest predators, but unknown predators (presumably snakes) were responsible for half of nests lost. Nests within La Selva core forest had lower probability of nest loss compared to fragments despite exhibiting higher predator detection rates. Yet other fragmentation covariates such as distance from forest edge, nest occurrence on human trails, or forest age were not associated with nest loss. We suggest that concentrated foraging is the underlying mechanism behind the community interactions that we observed. Community members exist in concentrated use areas within forest fragments, which results in heightened predator foraging rates and thus stronger interactions in fragments despite more predators encountering the nests in core forest. Fragmentation is a global phenomenon and we suspect that concentrated community use of limited resources is driving species to interact more strongly than in natural ecosystems.

Keywords

Community ecology Forest fragmentation Nest predation Predator–prey Strong interactions Understory birds 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP). Thanks to the Organization for Tropical Studies (OTS) and to Selva Verde Lodge, particularly Carlos de la Rosa, Orlando Vargas, Bernal Matarrita, Danilo Brenes, Ivan Castillo, and Gerardo Alvarez for their continued support. Thanks to Carissa Ganong and Adriana Baltodano for managing the REU program. Finally, thanks to S. Bird, D. Jones, and other REUs for assisting with fieldwork, and G. Keating and M. Fagan for GIS assistance.

References

  1. Arango-Vélez N, Kattan GH (1997) Effects of forest fragmentation on experimental nest predation in Andean cloud forest. Biol Cons 81:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold S, Stunkel A, Wasko DK, Visco DM (2012) Factors influencing nest predation rates by bird-eating snakes (Pseustes poecilonotus) on simulated chestnut-backed antbird (Myrmeciza exsul) nests. Organization for Tropical Studies (Unpubl.) REU, pp 32–42Google Scholar
  3. BirdLife International (2017) Tinamus major (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN red list of threatened species 2017: e.T22678148A110915916. http://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T22678148A110915916.en. Downloaded on 27 July 2019
  4. Boyle WA, Sigel BJ (2015) Ongoing changes in the avifauna of La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica: twenty-three years of Christmas Bird Counts. Biol Cons 188:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton M, Burton R (2002) International wildlife encyclopedia. Marshall Cavendish, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  7. Chalfoun AD, Thompson FR III, Ratnaswamy MJ (2002) Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. Conserv Biol 16:306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cove MV, Spínola RM, Jackson VL, Sáenz JC, Chassot O (2013) Integrating occupancy modeling and camera-trap data to estimate medium and large mammal detection and richness in a Central American biological corridor. Trop Conserv Sci 6:781–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cove MV, Spínola RM, Jackson VL, Saénz JC (2014) The role of fragmentation and landscape changes in the ecological release of common nest predators in the neotropics. PeerJ.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.464 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cove MV, Fernandez CM, Vera Alvarez MD, Bird S, Jones D, Fagan ME (2017a) Toucans descend to the forest floor to consume the eggs of ground-nesting birds. Food Webs 10:2–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cove MV, Kuhn KM, Foster P (2017b) Micrurus alleni (Allen’s coral snake) predation and scavenging. Herpetol Rev 48:453–454Google Scholar
  12. Fahrig L (2013) Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr 40:1649–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbs JP (1991) Avian nest predation in tropical Wet forest: an experimental study. Oikos 60:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Peres CA, Bradshaw CJA, Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Sodhi NS (2011) Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1(2):e1500052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Harmsen BJ, Foster RJ, Silver S, Ostro L, Doncaster CP (2010) Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera-trap studies: a case study from Belize. Biotropica 42:126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchinson J, Waser PM (2007) Use, misuse and extensions of “ideal gas” models of animal encounter. Biol Rev 82:335–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. IUCN, Species Survival Commission (2016) IUCN red list of threatened species. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission. <iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 27 July 2019Google Scholar
  19. Layman CA, Giery ST, Buhler S, Rossi R, Penland T, Henson MN, Bogdanoff AK, Cove MV, Irizarry AD, Schalk CM, Archer SK (2015) A primer on the history of food web ecology: fundamental contributions of fourteen researchers. Food Webs 4:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazerolle MJ (2011) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q) AIC (c). R Package Version 1Google Scholar
  21. Meyers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newmark WD, Stanley TR (2011) Habitat fragmentation reduces nest survival in an Afrotropical bird community in a biodiversity hotspot. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:11488–11493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pardo Vargas LE, Cove MV, Spinola RM, de la Cruz JC, Saenz JC (2016) Assessing species traits and landscape relationships of the mammalian carnivore community in a neotropical biological corridor. Biodivers Conserv 25:739–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR (2015) A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526:569CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  26. Reider KE, Carson WP, Donnelly MA (2013) Effects of collared peccary (Pecari tajacu) exclusion on leaf litter amphibians and reptiles in a Neotropical wet forest, Costa Rica. Biol Cons 163:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Romero A, O’Neill BJ, Timm RM, Gerow KG, McClearn D (2013) Group dynamics, behavior, and current and historical abundance of peccaries in Costa Rica’s Caribbean lowlands. J Mammal 94:771–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sekercioglu CH, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC, Aygen D, Goehring D, Sandi RF (2002) Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:263–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Small MF, Hunter ML (1988) Forest fragmentation and avian nest predation in forested landscapes. Oecologia 76:62–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Thornton DH, Branch LC, Sunquist ME (2012) Response of large galliforms and tinamous (Cracidae, Phasianidae, Tinamidae) to habitat loss and fragmentation in northern Guatemala. Oryx 46:567–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vera Alvarez MD, Fernandez CM, Cove MV (2019) Assessing the role of habitat and species interactions in the population decline and detection bias of Neotropical leaf litter frogs. Neotrop Biol Conserv 14:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Visco DM, Sherry TW (2015) Increased abundance, but reduced nest predation in the chestnut-backed antbird in Costa Rican rainforest fragments: surprising impacts of a pervasive snake species. Biol Cons 188:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Visco DM, Michel NL, Boyle WA, Sigel BJ, Woltmann S, Sherry TW (2015) Patterns and causes of understory bird declines in human-disturbed tropical forest landscapes: a case study from Central America. Biol Cons 191:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Young BE, Sherry TW, Sigel BJ, Woltmann S (2008) Nesting success of Costa Rican lowland rain forest birds in response to edge and isolation effects. Biotropica 40:615–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Tropical Ecology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  3. 3.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  4. 4.Smithsonian Conservation Biology InstituteFront RoyalUSA

Personalised recommendations