Advertisement

Tropical Ecology

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 219–229 | Cite as

Modelling of co-occurrence patterns of grassland species: reciprocal shifting between competition and facilitation

  • Manish MathurEmail author
  • S. Sundaramoorthy
Research Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

In plant community, competition and facilitation are widely studied themes across the globe however, their reciprocal shifting, if existed, requires more empirical efforts. In this study, temporal behaviour of co-occurrence patterns with relation to the nature and magnitude of deterministic control of soil, plant community and site quality factors were evaluated in grassland species of Indian arid zone. In this study, co-occurrence patterns during the three seasonal events were detected by using quantitative variable (relative importance value). Results revealed that competition among individuals was the major process during resource condition (rain) that shifted to facilitation during stress condition (summer). Soil organic carbon—soil phosphorus, diversity (Shannon index, evenness)—dominance (Simpson index), community maturity index—bare surface area were identified as major switch on and off points for such shifting, while soil moisture and grazing intensity were non-significant for such patterns. Results demonstrate that grassland species of the Indian arid region requires experimental quantification for the upper limits of significant exploratory variables.

Keywords

Arid zone Competition Controlling factors Co-occurrence Facilitation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Head, Department of Botany, UGC-CAS and DST-FIST for facilities and the first author gratefully acknowledges CAZRI for permission.

References

  1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smit M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  2. Armnas C, Pugnaire FI (2009) Ontogenetic shifts in interactions of two dominant shrub species in a semi-arid coastal sand dune system. J Veg Sci 20:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begossi A (1996) Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany. Econ Bot 50:280–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardillom MM (2012) The phylogenetic signal of species co-occurrence in high-diversity shrublands: different patterns for fire-killed and fire-resistant species. BMC Ecol 12:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesson P, Gebauer RLE, Schwinning S, Huntly N, Wiegan K, Ernest MSK, Sher A, Novoplansky A, Weltzin JF (2004) Resource pulses, species interaction, and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments. Oecologia 141:236–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–444Google Scholar
  7. Frank SJ (2003) Facilitation in multiple life-history stages: evidence for nucleated succession in coastal dunes. Plant Ecol. 168:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gotelli NJ (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81:2606–2621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gotelli NJ, McCabe DJ (2002) Species co-occurrence: a meta analysis of a J. M. Diamond’s assembly rules model. Ecology 83:2091–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh JS (1992) A meta analysis of field experiments on competition. Am Nat 140:539–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Helmus MR, Savage K, Diebel MW, Maxted JT, Ives AR (2007) Separating the determinants of phylogenetic community structure. Ecol Lett 10:917–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar S (1992) Assessment of vegetation degradation, status of methodological research. Ann Arid Zone 31:53–62Google Scholar
  14. Lars GF, Bello KA, Brathen J, Davison A, Dubuis A, Guisan J, Leps R, Lindborg M, Moora P, Meelis L, Pellisser J, Pottier P, Vittoz K, Zobel M (2011) Ecological assembly rules in plants communities- approaches, patterns and prospects. Biol Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00187.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lopez RP, Valdivia S, Monica LR, Rios RS (2013) Co-occurrence patterns along a regional aridity gradient of the subtropical Andes do not support stress gradient hypotheses. PLoS One 8(3):e58518.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058518 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Loreau M, de Mazancourt C (2008) Species synchrony and its drivers: neutral and non-neutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments. Am Nat 172:48–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1999) Statistical ecology. A primary methods and computing. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Massada AB, Qingsong Y, Guochun S, Xihua W (2018) Tree species co-occurrence patterns change across grains: insights from a subtropical forest. Ecosphere 9(5):e02213.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maltez-Mouro S, Maestre FT, Freitas H (2010) Co-occurrence patterns and abiotic stress in sand-dune communities: their relationship varies with spatial scale and the stress estimator. Acta Oecol 36:80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathur M (2014a) Species level phosphorus acquisition and internal utilization efficiency and their relation with bottom-up and top-down factors. Appl Ecol Environ Res 12:123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mathur M (2014b) Attributes of plant spatial analysis. Today and Tomorrow Printer and Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathur M, Sundaramoorthy S (2016) Pattern of herbaceous species richness and productivity along gradients of soil moisture and nutrients in the Indian Thar desert. J Arid Environ 125:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mathur M, Sundaramoorthy S (2018) Appraisal of arid land status: a holistic assessment pertains to bio-physical indicators and ecosystem values. Ecol Process 7:41.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-018-0148-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martınez ML (2003) Facilitation of seedling establishment by an endemic shrub in tropical coastal sand dunes. Plant Ecol 168:333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pandeya SC, Puri GS, Singh JS (1968) Research methods in plant ecology. Asia Publishing House, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Pielou DP, Pielou EC (1968) Association among species of infrequent occurrence: the insect and spider fauna of Polyporus betulinus (Bulliard) Fries. J Theor Biol 21:202–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pitta E, Giokas S, Sfenthourakis S (2012) Significant pairwise cooccurrence patterns are not the rule in the majority of biotic communities. Diversity 4:179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reshi Z, Rashid I, Khuroo AA, Wafai BA (2008) Effect of invasion by Centaurea iberica on community assembly of a mountain grassland of Kashmir Himalaya, India. Trop Ecol 49:147–156Google Scholar
  29. Saxena SK (1977) Vegetation and its succession in the Indian desert. In: Jaiswal PL (ed) Desertification and its control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp 176–192Google Scholar
  30. Schamp BS, Shelley EA, Joslin KL (2015) Dispersal strength influence zooplankton co-occurrence pattern in experimental mesocosms. Ecology 96(4):1074–1083CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schulter DA (1984) Variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications. Ecology 65:998–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shi G, Liu Y, Mao L, Jiang S, Zhang Q (2014) relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes in driving arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal assemblage during the spreading of a toxic plant. PLoS ONE 9:e95672.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095672 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Silva IA, Batalha AM (2009) Woody plant species co-occurrence in Brazilian savannas under different fire frequencies. Acta Oecol 1–7Google Scholar
  34. Solivers S, Maestre FT, Bowker MA, Torices R, Quero JL, García-Gómez M, Cabrera O, Cea AP, Coaguila D, Eldridge DJ, Espinosa CI, Hemmings F, Monerris JJ, Tighe M, Delgado-Baguerizo M, Escolar C, Garcia-Palacios P, Gozalo B, Ochoa V, Blones J, Derak M, Ghilofi W, Gutierrez JR, Hernandez RM, Noumi Z (2014) Functional traits determine plant co-occurrence more than environment or evolutionary relatedness in global drylands. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 16:164–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2014.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stone L, Roberts A (1990) The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia 85:74–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ulrich W, Kryszewski W, Puchalka P, Strona G, Gotelli N (2017) A comprehensive framework for the study of species co-occurrences, nestedness, and turnover. Oikos 126:1607–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ward D, Beggs J (2007) Coexistence, habitat patterns and the assembly of ant communities in the Yasawa islands Fiji. Acta Oecol 32:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang LH, Bastow JL, Spence KO, Wright AN (2008) What can we learn from resource pulses? Ecology 89:621–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang LH, Edwards KF, Byrnes J, Bastow JL, Wright AN, Spence KO (2010) A meta-analysis of resource pulse-consumer interaction. Ecol Monogr 80:125–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang J, Hao Z, Song B, Li B, Wang X, Ye J (2009) Fine scale species co-occurrence patterns in an old-growth temperate forest. For Ecol Manag 257:2115–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Tropical Ecology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Arid Zone Research InstituteJodhpurIndia
  2. 2.Botany DepartmentJNV UniversityJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations