Advertisement

Tropical Ecology

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 199–208 | Cite as

Study on land-use and land-cover change dynamics in Eastern Arunachal Pradesh, N.E. India using remote sensing and GIS

  • Jyotishman DekaEmail author
  • Om Prakash Tripathi
  • Mohammed Latif Khan
  • Vijay Kumar Srivastava
Research Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The current study describes the land use and land cover dynamics in Eastern Arunachal Pradesh from 1985 to 2005 using remote sensing and Geographical Information System (GIS). Landsat-MSS, IRS-LISS-I and LISS-III data for the period 1985, 1995 and 2005 were used to prepare the land use/land cover (LULC) map at 1:250K for different periods. Post-classification change detection technique for quantifying the changes for twelve major land use and land cover types was analyzed. The study signifies that the region experiences expansion in crop land and built-up area and decline in forest area. Crop land and built-up area has increased by 665.41 km2 and 16.72 km2, respectively, from 1985 to 2005. On the other hand, forest area has declined by 699.37 km2 during the period. The study showed that topography and increasing population play an important role in shaping the LULC pattern. The study further revealed the importance of satellite remote sensing and GIS as an effective approach for analyzing the direction, rate and spatial pattern of land use dynamics. It is believed that this type of study will help to contribute towards sustainable land-use planning and management in this part of the North East India in the near future.

Keywords

Change detection Change matrix Land-use Population Topography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out as a part of “Land-use/land cover change dynamics and impact of human dimension on Indian river basins” project under the ISRO-Geosphere Biosphere Program. Thanks are due to Dr. P. S. Roy, Project Director, for entrusting us the job of carrying out the project in Brahmaputra river basin covering the study area of this report.

References

  1. Abdullah SA, Nakagoshi N (2007) Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. For Ecol Manag 241:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguirre-Gutierrez J, Seijmonsbergen AC, Duivenvoorden JF (2012) Optimizing land cover classification accuracy for change detection, a combined pixel-based and object-based approach in a mountainous area in Mexico. Appl Geogr 34:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin A, Fazal S (2012) Quantification of land transformation using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Am J Geogr Inf Syst 1:17–28Google Scholar
  4. Areendran G, Raj K, Mazumdar S, Joshi R, Puri K (2018) Land use land cover mapping of Mouling national park in Arunachal Pradesh, India using geospatial tools. Int J Sci Environ 6:696–705Google Scholar
  5. Chakraborty K (2009) Vegetation change detection in Barak Basin. Curr Sci 96:1236–1242Google Scholar
  6. Debnath J, Das N, Ahmed I, Bhowmik M (2017) Chronological change of land use/land cover of the Muhuri River Basin from 1972 to 2016, Tripura, North-East India. Indian J Sci Technol 10:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deka J, Tripathi OP, Khan ML (2011) A multi-temporal remote sensing approach for monitoring changes in spatial extent of freshwater lake of Deepor Beel Ramsar Site, a major wetland of Assam. J Wetl Ecol 5:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deka J, Tripathi OP, Khan ML (2014) Study on land use/land cover change dynamics through remote sensing and GIS—a case study of Kamrup district, North East India. J Remote Sens GIS 5:55–62Google Scholar
  9. Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009) Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl Geogr 29:390–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubovyk O (2017) The role of Remote Sensing in land degradation assessments: opportunities and challenges. Eur J Remote Sens 50:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duraisamy V, Bendapudi R, Jadhav A (2018) Identifying hotspots in land use land cover change and the drivers in a semi-arid region of India. Environ Monit Assess 190:2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Boitani L (2007) Changes in land-use/land-cover patterns in Italy and their implications for biodiversity conservation. Landsc Ecol 22:617–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fanan U, Dlama KI, Oluseyi IO (2011) Urban expansion and vegetal cover loss in and around Nigeria’s Federal Capital City. J Ecol Nat Environ 3:1–10Google Scholar
  14. Gaur MK, Pandey CB, Goyal RK (2016) Remote sensing applications for natural resources management and monitoring. Scientific Publishers, JodhpurGoogle Scholar
  15. Gautam NC, Chennaiah GC (1985) Land-use and land-cover mapping and change detection in Tripura using satellite LANDSAT data. Int J Remote Sens 6:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain SK, Kumar V, Saharia M (2012) Analysis of rainfall and temperature trends in northeast India. Int J Climatol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen JR (2004) Digital change detection. Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  19. Khorram S (1987) Comparison of Landsat MSS and TM data for urban land-use classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote 25:238–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kotoky P, Dutta MK, Borah GC (2012) Changes in landuse and landcover along the Dhansiri River channel, Assam—a remote sensing and GIS approach. J Geol Soc India 79:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kushwaha SPS, Roy PS, Azeem A, Boruah P, Lahan P (2000) Land area change and rhino habitat suitability analysis in Kaziranga National Park, Assam. Tigerpaper 27:9–17Google Scholar
  22. Lakshumanan C, Pradeep Kishore V, Viveganandan S, Krishnakumar P, Muthusankar G (2012) Landuse/land cover dynamics study in Nilgiris district part of Western Ghats, Tamilnadu. Int J Geomat Geosci 2:911–923Google Scholar
  23. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The mesaurment of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 331:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lele NV, Joshi PK, Agarwal SP (2005) Remote sensing for forest cover dynamics in North-East India—a review. Indian J For 28:217–224Google Scholar
  25. Li Z, Liu W, Zhang X, Zheng F (2009) Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China. J Hydrol 377:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2008) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin GCS, Ho SPS (2003) China’s land resources and land-use change: insights from the 1996 land survey. Land Use Policy 20:87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lopez RD, Frohn RC (2017) Remote sensing for landscape ecology: new metric indicators, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ming Z, Xinmin Z (2002) A theoretical analysis on the local climate change induced by the change of landuse. Adv Atmos Sci 19:45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mishra PK, Rai A, Rai SC (2019) Land use and land cover change detection using geospatial techniques in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2019.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niyogi D, Kishtawal C, Tripathi S, Govindaraju RS (2010) Observational evidence that agricultural intensification and land use change may be reducing the Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Water Resour Res 46:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pawe CK, Saikia A (2018) Unplanned urban growth: land use/land cover change in the Guwahati Metropolitan Area, India. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish J Geogr 118:88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, Johnson KA (2011) The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota. Environ Resour Econ 48:219–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rajeshwari D (2006) Management of the urban environment using remote sensing and geographic information systems. J Hum Ecol 20:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reis S (2008) Analyzing land use/land cover changes using remote sensing and GIS in Rize, North-East Turkey. Sensors 8:6188–6202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarma PK, Lahkar BP, Ghosh S, Rabha A, Das JP, Nath NK, Dey S, Brahma N (2008) Land-use and land-cover change and future implication analysis in Manas National Park, India using multi-temporal satellite data. Curr Sci 95:23–227Google Scholar
  37. Sharma L, Pandey PC, Nathawat MS (2012) Assessment of land consumption rate with urban dynamics change using geospatial techniques. J Land Use Sci 7:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharma R, Rimal B, Baral H, Nehren U, Paudyal K, Sharma S, Rijal S, Ranpal S, Acharya RP, Alenazy AA, Kandel P (2019) Impact of land cover change on ecosystem services in a tropical forested landscape. Resources 8:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shrivastava S, Singh TP, Singh H, Kushwaha SPS, Roy PS (2002) Assessment of large scale deforestation in Sonitpur district of Assam. Curr Sci 82:1479–1484Google Scholar
  40. Singh A (1989) Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed data. Int J Remote Sens 10:989–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sreenivasulu G, Jayaraju N, Kumar MP, Prasad TL (2013) An analysis on land use/land cover using remote sensing and GIS—a case study in and around Vempalli, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Sci Res Publ 3:1–4Google Scholar
  42. Sundarakumar K, Harika M, Aspiya Begum SK, Yamini S, Balakrishna K (2012) Land use and land cover change detection and urban sprawl analysis of Vijayawada City using multitemporal landsat data. Int J Eng Sci Technol 4:170–178Google Scholar
  43. Torahil AA, Rai SC (2011) Land cover classification and forest change analysis, using satellite imagery—a case study in Dehdez Area of Zagros Mountain in Iran. J Geogr Inf Syst 3:1–11Google Scholar
  44. Turner BL II, Meyer WB, Skole DL (1994) Global land-use/land-cover change: towards an integrated study. Ambio 23:91–95Google Scholar
  45. Valladares G, Cagnolo L, Salvo A (2012) Forest fragmentation leads to food web contraction. Oikos 121:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young RH (2009) Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy 26:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Tropical Ecology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jyotishman Deka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Om Prakash Tripathi
    • 2
  • Mohammed Latif Khan
    • 3
  • Vijay Kumar Srivastava
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of Science and TechnologyBariduaIndia
  2. 2.Department of ForestryNorth Eastern Regional Institute of Science and TechnologyNirjuliIndia
  3. 3.Department of BotanyDr. Harisingh Gour Central UniversitySagarIndia
  4. 4.Land Use DivisionNational Remote Sensing CenterHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations