Advertisement

A Modified Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control for 3L−NPC Grid−Connected Inverters Using Virtual Voltage Vectors

  • Jianguo LyuEmail author
  • Binghui Ma
  • Han Yan
  • Zhendong Ji
  • Jinyong Ding
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

In order to improve the performance of a 3−level neutral point clamped (3L−NPC) grid−connected inverter with finite control set model predictive control (FCS−MPC), this paper proposes a modified FCS−MPC algorithm based on the rearranged control set (MFCS−MPC). By adding synthetic virtual voltage vectors to rearrange the finite control set (FCS) of the 3L−NPC inverter, the frequency spectrum of output leg voltage becomes concentrated, which is benefited for decreasing total harmonic distortion (THD) of grid currents and makes it easier to design output filters for the grid−connected inverter. Moreover, based on switching state sequences of virtual voltage vectors, the modified predictive model of the proposed method is established considering capacitor voltage difference. Besides, according to the location of the reference output voltage vector, a preselection step is incorporated into MFCS−MPC to narrow the control set for predictions, which avoids evaluating all candidate voltage vectors in the control set, and hence, the online computational burden is significantly reduced. A prototype of 3L−NPC grid−connected inverter is established to validate the proposed MFCS−MPC method and the experimental results show that this method has excellent static and dynamic performance, with a low THD for a wide range of modulation indexes.

Keywords

Current distortion Finite control set model predictive control Three-level inverter Virtual voltage vector 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research work was supported in part by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (51707097), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (30917011331).

References

  1. 1.
    Rodriguez J, Cortes P (2012) Predictive control of power converters and electrical drives. Wiley-IEEE Press, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang L, Chai S, Yoo D, Gan L, Ng K (2015) PID and predictive control of electrical drives and power converters using MATLAB/simulink. Wiley-IEEE Press, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vazquez S, Leon JI, Franquelo LG et al (2014) Model predictive control: a review of its applications in power electronics. IEEE Trans Ind Electron Magazine 8(1):16–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vazquez S, Rodriguez J, Rivera M, Franquelo LG, Norambuena M (2017) Model predictive control for power converters and drives: advances and trends. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(2):935–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yaramasu V, Wu B, Alepuz S, Kouro S (2014) Predictive control for low-voltage ride-through enhancement of three-level-boost and NPC-converter-based PMSG wind turbine. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(12):6832–6843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calle-Prado A, Alepuz S, Bordonau J, Nicolas-Apruzzese J, Cortés P, Rodriguez J (2015) Model predictive current control of grid-connected neutral-point-clamped converters to meet low-voltage ride-through requirements. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(3):1503–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Calle-Prado A, Alepuz S, Bordonau J, Cortes P, Rodriguez J (2016) Predictive control of a back-to-back NPC converter-based wind power system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(7):4615–4627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rivera M, Wilson A, Rojas CA, Rodriguez J et al (2013) A Comparative Assessment of Model Predictive Current Control and Space Vector Modulation in a Direct Matrix Converter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 60(2):578–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cortes P, Vattuone L, Rodriguez J (2011) A comparative study of predictive current control for three-phase voltage source inverters based on switching frequency and current error. In: Proceedings of the 2011 14th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Birmingham, United Kingdom, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geyer T (2011) A comparison of control and modulation schemes for medium-voltage drives: emerging predictive control concepts versus PWM-based schemes. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 47(3):1380–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cortes P, Rodriguez J, Quevedo DE, Silva C (2008) Predictive current control strategy with imposed load current spectrum. IEEE Trans Power Electron 23(2):612–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tarisciotti L, Lei J, Formentini A, Trentin A et al (2017) Modulated predictive control for indirect matrix converter. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 53(5):4644–4654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donoso F, Mora A, Cárdenas R, Angulo A, Sáez D, Rivera M (2018) Finite-set model-predictive control strategies for a 3L-NPC inverter operating with fixed switching frequency. Trans Ind Electron 65(5):3954–3965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassine IM, Naouar MW, Mrabet-Bellaaj N (2017) Model predictive-sliding mode control for three-phase grid-connected converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(2):1341–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang Y, Xie W (2014) Low complexity model predictive control—single vector-based approach. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29(10):5532–5541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, Xie W, Li Z, Zhang Y (2014) Low-complexity model predictive power control: double-vector-based approach. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(11):5871–5880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xue C, Song W, Wu X, Feng X (2018) A constant switching frequency finite-control-set predictive current control scheme of a five-phase inverter with duty-ratio optimization. IEEE Trans Power Electron 33(4):3583–3594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gonzalez-Prieto I, Duran MJ, Aciego JJ, Martin C, Barrero F (2018) Model predictive control of six-phase induction motor drives using virtual voltage vectors. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(1):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou Z, Xia C, Yan Y, Wang Z, Shi T (2017) Torque ripple minimization of predictive torque control for PMSM with extended control set. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(9):6930–6939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xia C, Liu T, Shi T, Song Z (2014) A simplified finite-control-set model-predictive control for power converters. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(2):991–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kwak S, Park J (2014) Switching strategy based on model predictive control of VSI to obtain high efficiency and balanced loss distribution. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29(9):4551–4567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lyu J, Hu W, Wu F, Yao K, Wu J (2015) Variable modulation offset SPWM control to balance the neutral-point voltage for three-level inverters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(12):7181–7192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Caseiro LMA, Mendes AMS, Cruz SMA (2019) Dynamically weighted optimal switching vector model predictive control of power converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 66(2):1235–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cortes P et al (2009) Guidelines for weighting factors design in Model Predictive Control of power converters and drives. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Victoria, Australia, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Akagi H, Watanabe EH, Aredes M (2007) Instantaneous power theory and applications to power conditioning. Wiley–IEEE Press, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AutomationNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations