Advertisement

Experimental and Electromagnetic Field Approach for the Development of Modified Building Protection System

  • Irshad UllahEmail author
  • M. N. R. Baharom
  • H. Ahmad
  • B. Das
  • H. M. Luqman
  • Jawad Ali
  • Zainab Zainal
Original Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

During the lightning activities every air terminal has the equal chances to be hit by the lightning flashes and it produce electric field in the surrounding. Therefore, with the passage of time when the lightning air terminals become aged due to acidic rain and chemical contamination, lightning air terminal (LAT) bypasses on side edges takes place which has not been given much attention by the researchers. A modified lightning protection system (LPS) was proposed in this paper using experimental and electromagnetic field approach. One of the LAT on different geometrical structure was selected as sacrificial point in order to reduce the chances of LAT bypasses. The modified protection system can be referred by different standard to make sure buildings protection. All the experimental work was done using high voltage impulse and ANSYS/MAXWELL was used as a simulation tool. The modified protection technique will help different standards to provide comprehensive protective measures against lightning.

Keywords

Lightning air terminal Lightning flash Geometrical structures Modified protection system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors present their gratitude to ORICC UTHM for providing financial support for the article the Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering for their moral support.

References

  1. 1.
    Chung YK, Lee KS, Lee BH (2014) Analysis and test on electric field concentration effect of bipolar conventional air terminal. In: International conference on lightning protection, (ICLP), pp 1545–1548Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szczerbinski MA (2000) Discussion of Faraday cage lightning protection and application to real building structures. J Electrost 48(3):145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NFPA (2006) Standard for the istallation lightning protection system. https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-and-standards/
  4. 4.
    (2008) BS EN/IEC 62305 Lightning protection standard 44: 1–107Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zipse DW (1994) Lightning protection systems: advantages and disadvantages. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 30(5):1351–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hartono ZA, Ibrahim R (2001) A database of lightning damage caused by bypasses of air terminals on buildings in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In: International symposium on lightning protection, Santos, pp 211–216Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zipse DW (2001) Lightning protection methods: an update and a discredited systemvindicated. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 37(2):407–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peppas GD, Zacharakis DA (2014) Lightning protection of airport traffic control towers (ATCT). In: International conference on lightning protection (ICLP), pp 468–473Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bocquet L (2014) Tasting edge effects. Am J Phys 75(2):2006–2008Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beck Y (2008) 3d lightning strikes probability program. Electr Electron Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEI.2008.4736548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mikropoulos PN, Tsovilis TE (2009) Interception probability and shielding against lightning. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 24(2):863–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abu M, Ahmad H (2006) An overview of lightning air terminal : past, present, and future. In: Student conference on research and development (SCOReD), pp 27–28Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zainal M, Ab A, Cooper MA et al. (2010) An overview of the global statistics of lightning fatalities. In: 30th international conference on lightning protection (ICLP), vol 2010, pp 3–6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Becerra M, Cooray V, Roman F (2008) Lightning striking distance of complex structures. IET 1(2):131–138Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nassereddine M, Hellany A (2009) Designing a lightning protection system using the rolling sphere method. In: International conference on computer and electrical engineering, pp 502–506Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Machidon D, Istrate M (2013) A new model based on electro-geometrical theory for estimating the lightning protection zones. In: 8th International Symposium on Advanced Topics in Electrical Engineering (ATEE), Bucharest, Romania, 23-25 May 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ATEE.2013.6563470
  17. 17.
    Alessandro FD (2003) The use of ‘Field Intensification Factors’ in calculations for lightning protection of structures. J Electrost 58(6):17–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Renko T, Janischewskyj W et al (2012) Electric field within lightning protection volume in presence of a descending leader. Electr Power Syst Res 85(3):82–89Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klairuang N, Khatsaeng T, Hokierti J (2005) Lightning electric field in the soil and its effect to buried cables. In: The 7th international on power engineering conference, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Montanya J, Bergas J, Hermoso B (2004) Electric field measurements at ground level as a basis for lightning hazard warning. J Electrost 60(4):241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vahidi B, Farokhi SS (2005) Electromagnetic field inside the building due to lightning stroke. Int Multitopic Conf 1:1–5Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu R, Wang Y, Zhao Z et al. (2014) Magnetic field distribution inside metallic grid-like buildings struck by lightning based on finite element method. In: international conference on lighnting protection system (ICLP), pp 1712–1715Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bermudez JL, Rachidi F, Chisholm A et al. (2003) On the use of transmission line theory to represent a nonuni-form vertically-extended object struck by lightning. In: IEEE international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, pp 501–504Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heller V (2011) Scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering models. J Hydraul Res 49(3):293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Christian HJ (2003) Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the optical transient detector. J Geophys Res 108(D1):4005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Naccarato KP (2006) How ground flash density obtained by lightning location network can be used in lightning protection standards: a case study in Brazil. In: 19th international lightning detection conference, pp 5–7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irshad Ullah
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. N. R. Baharom
    • 1
  • H. Ahmad
    • 1
  • B. Das
    • 1
  • H. M. Luqman
    • 1
  • Jawad Ali
    • 1
  • Zainab Zainal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringCECOS UniversityPeshawarPakistan

Personalised recommendations