Advertisement

Optimal Placement of Automatic Switching Equipment in Radial Distribution Networks Based on Protective Coordination

  • Masoud AmohadiEmail author
  • Mahmud Fotuhi-Firuzabad
Original Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Automatic switching equipment and protection devices (AS/PDs) play a fundamental role in radial power distribution networks. In this paper, a new hybrid method is presented to determine the optimal number, types, and locations of AS/PDs based on protective coordination. When a short circuit fault occurs in a medium voltage distribution network (MV feeder), AS/PDs such as relays, fuses, auto-reclosers and sectionalizers can be employed to disconnect the faulty part from the healthy area. The use of automatic switches at proper locations can significantly decrease system interruptions. The costs of investment, maintenance, and unsupplied energy are considered in the cost function. This function must be minimized in order to obtain the optimal automatic switches, using particle swarm optimization. Furthermore, ant colony optimization is utilized to specify the main branch of MV feeder. The protection equipment determined in this branch is coordinated to protect the feeder against probable faults. If coordination of PDs is not achieved completely, the sizes and locations of AS/PDs are recalculated. The proposed technique is implemented on a feeder of Isfahan power distribution network, as a sample feeder. The obtained results indicate that the proposed technique is acceptable and efficient.

Keywords

Reliability parameters Cost/worth analysis PSO algorithm ACO technique Protective coordination Automatic switches placement 

Abbreviations

Indices and Sets

i, n

Index and set of feeder’s buses

j, m

Index and set of feeder’s loads

Parameters and Constants

N

Number of feeder buses

QL

Load reactive power (KVAR)

PL

Load active power (kW)

L

Length of section (km)

R, X

Line impedance (Ω)

Pk

Power losses (kW)

V

Section voltage (V)

I

Section current (A)

Isc/Ief

Short circuit/earth fault current (KA)

Is

Current setting (A)

Ts

Time setting (S)

IntR

Annual interest rate

InfR

Annual inflation rate

X, Y

Load location

λ

Failure rate (f/year)

U

Average annual interruption time (h/year)

Functions and Variables

AS/PDs

Automatic switches/protection devices

SAIDI

System average interruption duration index

SAIFI

System average interruption frequency index

PSO

Particle swarm optimization

ACO

Ant colony optimization

ENS

Energy not supplied

Fn

Objective function

MV

Medium voltage

CINV

Cost of investment

CENS

Cost of energy not supplied

CM

Cost of maintenance

VOLL

Value of lost load

OC/EF

Over current/earth fault

CB-R

A breaker controlled with an OC/EF relay

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson PM, Chintaluri GM, Magbuhat SM, Ghajar RF (1997) An improved reliability model for redundant protective systems—Markov Models. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12(2):573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Billinton R, Man RN (1990) Basic power system reliability concepts. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 27:365–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soudi F, Tomsovic K (1999) Optimal distribution protection design: quality of solution and computational analysis. Int J Eletr Power Energy Syst 21:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moradi A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Rashidi-Nejad M (2005) A reliability cost/worth approach to determine optimal switching placement in distribu-tion systems. In: Proc. IEEE/PES trans. distribution conference exhibit, Asia Pac, Dalia, China, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dehghani N, Dashti R (2011) Optimization of recloser placement to improve reliability by genetic algorithm. Power Eng 3:508–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levitin G, Mazal-Tov S, Elmakis D (1995) Genetic algorithm for optimal sectionalizing in radial distribution systems with alternative supply. Electr Power Syst Res 35:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tippachon W, Rerkpreendapong D (2009) Multiobjective optimal placement of switches and protective devices in electric power distribution systems using ant colony optimization. Electr Power Syst Res 79(7):1171–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moradi A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2008) Optimal switch placement in distribution systems using trinary particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 23(1):271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ranjan A, Rai JN (2014) Optimal switch placement in radial distribution system using GA and PSO. Int J Sci Eng Res 5(5):1356–1361Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chuang HJ, Li CS, Huang MY, Huang CW (2006) Optimal placement of line switches for distribution automation systems using immune algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(3):1209–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilvanejad M, Askarian Abyaneh H, Mazlumi K (2012) Fuse cutout allocation in radial distribution system considering the effect of hidden failures. Electr Power Energy Syst 42:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    da Silva LGW, Pereira RAF, Mantovani JRS (2004) Optimized allocation of sectionalizing switches and control and protection devices for reliability indices improvement in distribution systems. In: IEEE/PES Transmission and distribution conference and Exposition, Latin AmericaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nojavan M, Seyedi H, Mahari A, York KZ, Dekker M (2014) Optimization of fuse–recloser coordination and dispersed generation capacity in distribution systems. Majlesi J Electric Eng 8(3):15–24Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guarda FGK, Cardoso G, de Morais AP, Bezerra UH, Vieira JP (2017) Hybrid method for protective devices placement, sizing and coordination in electric distribution systems. IEEE Latin Am Trans 15(2):257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu B, Kun S, Zou J, Duan X, Zheng X (2006) Optimal feeder switches location scheme for high reliability and least costs in distri-bution system In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress on intelligent control and automation, Dalian, China, June, pp 21–23Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    da Silva LGW, Pereira RAF, Mantovani JRS (2004) Allocation of protective devices in distribution circuits using nonlinear programming models and genetic algorithms. Electric Power Syst Res 69:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang GW, Chu SY, Wang HL (2015) Review of forward and backward sweep method for load flow analysis of radial distribution system. IJAREEIE 4(6):5595–5599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hashemi SM, Barati S, Talati S, Norri H (2016) A genetic algorithm approach to optimal placement of switching and protective equipment on a distribution network. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 11(3):1395–1400Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wojczynski E, Billinton R, Wacker G (1984) Interruption cost methodology and results: a Canadian Commercial and Small Industry Survey. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 103(2):437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghajar RF, Billinton R (2006) Economic costs of power interruptions: a consistent model and methodology. Electr Power Energy Syst 28:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, Piscataway, NJ, vol 4, pp 1942–1948Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1991) Positive feedback as a search strategy. Dipartimento Di Elettronica, Politecnico Di Milano Technical Report. Tech. pp 91–106Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1996) Ant system optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. Syst Man Cybern B Cybern IEEE Trans 26:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chaitusaney S, Yokoyama A (2005) Impact of protection coordination on sizes of several distributed generation sources. In: The 7th international power engineering conference, vol 2, pp 69–74Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringIslamic Azad University, Science and Research BranchTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations