Advertisement

Study of Base Segmenting Algorithm of Substation Equipment Based on 3D Point Cloud

  • Pengshuai Wang
  • Yong LuoEmail author
  • Weiying Guo
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Segmenting affiliated facilities from the point cloud is the key of 3D identification of the equipment.

Methods

This paper proposes a method to segment an equipment’s base from the equipment according to the change trend of the horizontally-projected areas of the layers formed by layering the equipment, thereby reducing the workload of manual segmentation of the base and improving the efficiency of intelligent identification of substation equipment. At the same time, the paper improves Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm by using ICP error to jump out early of the iteration process of ICP, to reduce the iteration steps and shorten the matching time.

Results

The experimental results show that the identification rate of substation equipment is greatly improved by the base segmenting algorithm.

Conclusion

The improved ICP algorithm significantly shortens the identification time, and has little impact on the identification rate.

Keywords

Point cloud Base segmenting 3D identification ICP Substation equipment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Industry-Uni.-Research Collaboration Project of Henan province (Grant no. 152107000058), Young Teacher Foundation of Henan province (Grant no. 2015GGJS-148), and the Science and Technology Key Project of Henan province (Grant no. 152102210036).

References

  1. 1.
    Yang T et al (2017) On the modeling and analysis of communication traffic in intelligent electric power substations. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 32(3):1329–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baek H, Chung Y, et al (2017) Segmentation of group-housed pigs using concave points and edge information. In: International conference on advanced communication technology IEEE, pp 563–565Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun L, Suo X, Liu Y et al (2016) 3D modeling of transformer substation based on mapping and 2D images. Math Probl Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9320502 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen D, Zhang L et al (2014) A methodology for automated segmentation and reconstruction of urban 3-D buildings from ALS point clouds. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 7(10):4199–4217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou Y, Wang D et al (2014) A fast and accurate segmentation method for ordered LiDAR point cloud of large-scale scenes. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 11(11):1981–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang Z, Li Y, Wang J (2016) LiDAR point cloud registration based on improved ICP method and SIFT feature. In: IEEE international conference on progress in informatics and computing IEEE, pp 588–592Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yin H, Yang X, He C (2016) Spherical coordinates based methods of ground extraction and objects segmentation using 3-D LiDAR sensor. IEEE Intell Trans Syst Mag 8(1):61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shin MO, Oh GM, Kim SW et al (2017) Real-time and accurate segmentation of 3-D point clouds based on gaussian process regression. IEEE Trans Intell Trans Syst 18(12):3363–3377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhengge H, Chen J et al (2009) Triangulated irregular network based chunk gridding algorithm for terrain rendering. J Zhejiang Univ 43(10):1939–1944Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuan XC, Wu LSH et al (2015) Feature preserving point cloud simplification. Opt Precis Eng 23(9):2666–2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo W, Ji Y, Luo Y, Zhou Y (2017) Substation equipment 3D identification based on KNN classification of subspace feature vector. J Intell Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2017-0272 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demaret L, Iske A (2006) Adaptive image approximation by linear splines over locally optimal Delaunay triangulations. IEEE Signal Process Lett 13(5):281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Besl PJ, Mckay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Mach Intell 14(2):239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen Y, Medioni G (1992) Object modeling by registration of multiple range images. Image Vis Comput 10(3):145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bergevin R et al (1996) Towards a general multi-view registration technique. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 18(5):540–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M (2002) Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. International conference on 3-D Digital imaging and modeling, Quebec City, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang J, Li H, Campbell D, Jia Y (2016) Go-ICP: a globally optimal solution to 3D ICP point-set registration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38(11):2241–2254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical EngineeringZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Avic Xinhang Yubei Steering System (Xinxiang) CO., LTD.XinxiangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations