Advertisement

Analysis of tribological behavior of Al/Gr/MoS2 surface composite fabricated by friction stir process

  • Manoj Kumar GuptaEmail author
Original Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

The life span of many engineering components depends upon their surface properties. The improved surface properties of the materials are essential for enhancing the mechanical and tribological performance of the material. In many applications, the components required only improved surface properties without changing the entire volume properties of the material. The friction stir process (FSP) is a novel processing technique for the fabrication of such surface composites. In the present investigation, the surface composites were fabricated by incorporating molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and graphite (Gr) as reinforcement on the surface of aluminum alloy (Al 1120) through the friction stir process (FSP) at tool rotational speed of 1400 rpm and tool feed rate of 40 mm/min process parameters using square profile FSP tool. The tribological behaviors of fabricated surface composites were calculated by using a pin on disk tribometer. It was observed that the wear resistance of surface composites improved as compared to the matrix material.

Keywords

Friction stir process Microstructure Reinforcement Surface composites Wear 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Rino JJ, Chandramohan D, Sucitharan KS, Jebin VD (2012) An overview on development of aluminium metal matrix composites with hybrid reinforcement. Int J Sci Res 1(3):196–203Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kok M (2005) Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. J Mater Process Technol 161(3):381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feng H, Ma ZY (2007) Enhanced mechanical properties of Mg-Al-Zn cast alloy via friction stir processing. Scr Mater 56:397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sudhakar M, Rao CS, Saheb KM (2018) Production of surface composites by friction stir processing—a review. Mater Today Proc 5(1):929–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dinaharan I, Murugan N, Thangarasu A (2016) Development of empirical relationships for prediction of mechanical and wear properties of AA6082 aluminum matrix composites produced using friction stir processing. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(3):1132–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu D, Jiang Y, Zhou R (2013) Wear performance of nano-Al2O3 particles and CNTs reinforced magnesium matrix composites by friction stir processing. Wear 305(1):286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhandakkar A, Prasad RC, Sastry SM (2014) Fracture toughness of AA2024 aluminum fly ash metal matrix composites. Int J Compos Mater 4(2):108–124Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loh YR, Sujan D, Rahman ME, Das CA (2013) Sugarcane bagasse—The future composite material: a literature review. Resour Conserv Recycl 75:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ubolluk R, Prinya C, Prasert S (2010) Development of high volume rice husk ash alumino silicate composites. Int J Miner Metall Mater 17(5):654–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lancaster L, Lung MH, Sujan D (2013) Utilization of agro-industrial waste in metal matrix composites: Towards sustainability. In: Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (WASET) 73: 1136–1149Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta MK, Rakesh PK (2019) Application of industrial waste in metal matrix composite. J Polym Compos 4(3):27–34Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta MK (2018) Controlling factors in aluminum matrix composites fabrication. Anusandhan 5(15):141–151Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thangarasu A, Murugan N, Dinaharan I (2014) Production and wear characterization of AA6082-TiC surface composites by friction stir processing. Proc Eng 97:590–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hussain G, Hashemi R, Hashemi H, Khalid A (2016) An experimental study on multi-pass friction stir processing of Al/TiN composite: some microstructural, mechanical, and wear characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 84:533–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eftekharinia H, Amadeh AA, Khodabandeh A, Paidar M (2016) Microstructure and wear behavior of AA6061/SiC surface composite fabricated via friction stir processing with different pins and passes. Rare Met.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-016-0691-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yuvaraj N, Aravindan S (2015) Fabrication of Al5083/B4C surface composite by friction stir processing and its tribological characterization. J Mater Res Technol 4(4):398–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rathee S, Maheshwari S, Siddiquee AN, Srivastava M (2017) Investigating effects of groove dimensions on microstructure and mechanical properties of AA6063/SiC surface composites produced by friction stir processing. Trans Indian Inst Met 70(3):809–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pitchayyapillai G, Seenikannan P, Raja K, Chandrasekaran K (2016) Al6061 hybrid metal matrix composite reinforced with alumina and molybdenum disulphide. Adv Mater Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6127624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gupta MK, Rakesh P (2019) Characterization of pine needle ash particulates reinforced surface composite fabricated by friction stir process. Mater Res Express 6(4):046539.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aafaea CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bansal S, Saini JS (2015) Mechanical and wear properties of SiC/Graphite Reinforced Al359 alloy-based metal matrix composite. Def Sci J 65:330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daniel AA, Murugesan S, Kumar M, Sukkasamy S (2017) Dry Sliding wear behaviour of aluminium 5059/SiC/MoS2 hybrid metal matrix composites. Mater Res 20(6):1697–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rani MG, Rao CVSP, Kotaiah KR (2017) Study on characterization of Al 6061/MoS2 metal matrix composite. Int J Mech Eng Technol 8(8):998–1003Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kanthavel K, Sumesh KR, Saravanakumar P (2016) Study of tribological properties on Al/Al2O3/MoS2 hybrid composite processed by powder metallurgy. Alex Eng Jo 55:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sharma P, Paliwal K, Kumar R, Sharma S (2017) A study on wear behaviour of Al/6101/Graphite composites. J Asian Ceram Soc 5(1):42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Behnagh RA, Besharati GMK, Akbari M (2012) Mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and microstructural changes during friction stir processing of 5083 aluminum rolled plates. Mater Manuf Process 27(6):636–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sert A, Celik ON (2014) Wear behavior of SiC-reinforced surface composite A17075-T651 aluminum alloy produced using friction stir processing. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 21:35–43Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alaneme KK, Olubambi PA, Afolabi AS, Bodurin MO (2014) Corrosion and tribological studies of bamboo leaf ash and alumina reinforced Al–Mg–Si alloy matrix hybrid composites in chloride medium. Int J Electrochem Sci 9:5663–5674Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shafiei-Zarghani A, Kashani-Bozorg SF, Zarei-Hanzaki A (2011) Wear assessment of Al/Al2O3 nano-composite surface layer produced using friction stir processing. Wear 270(5–6):403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mazaheri Y, Karimzadeh F, Enayati MH (2014) Tribological behavior of A356/Al2O3 surface nanocomposite prepared by friction stir processing. Metall Mater Transa 45(4):2250–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parucker ML, Klein AN, Binder C, Ristow Junior W, Binder R (2014) Development of self-lubricating composite materials of nickel with molybdenum disulfide, graphite and hexagonal boron nitride processed by powder metallurgy: preliminary study. Mater Res 17:180–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Carbon Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentH.N.B Garhwal UniversitySrinagar GarhwalIndia

Personalised recommendations