Advertisement

Managing Environmental Policies: Lessons From Traditional Communities

  • Roberta Freitas LemosEmail author
  • Célia Regina Neves Favacho
  • Kátia Cristina Favilla
  • Fábio Henrique Baia
Original Paper

Abstract

Natural resource conservation concerns have been prevalent around the world, and a range of solutions has been implemented to prevent their depletion. This paper brings together the literature on the commons and on behavioral principles to understand how traditional communities’ management of common pool resources can contribute to this discussion. More specifically, it highlights how these communities can offer lessons to governments on how to develop and manage environmental policies to ensure sustainable development. Whereas Ostrom’s work focuses on investigating how local communities succeed at managing common pool resources without external interference, behavior analysis can explain how cultural practices are selected. Through this combined framework, we investigate the practices of an extractive reserve (RESEX) in Brazil. A RESEX is an area of land, generally state owned, where access and use rights, including natural resource extraction, are allocated to local groups. The RESEX Mãe Grande de Curuçá is an example of common pool resource management that uses governmental tools to benefit the community. Fisherfolks are able to successfully conserve one of their main sources of livelihood: the fiddler crab. Finally, this paper describes and behavioral interactions regarding the conservation of resources that governments may want to consider.

Keywords

Common pool resources Traditional communities Extractive reserve Cultural selection Public policy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants of the Think Tank 5 on Cultural Studies where the proposal of this paper was first discussed, but specially Sigrid Glenn, Maria Malott, Aécio Borba, Angelo Sampaio, Laércia Vasconcelos, and Marcelo Henriques for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. We also thank the RESEX Mãe Grande de Curuçá community members and the ICMBio manager for giving the information we asked for.

Funding Information

This study was not funded.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The second author is a community member at the RESEX Mãe Grande de Curuçá, who cooperated in this study with the description of the cultural practices of the community.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors. The first author conducted two interviews with the second author to characterize the community’s cultural practices. The quotations from the deliberative council member are derived from these interviews.

References

  1. Almeida, M. W. B. (2004). Direitos à floresta e ambientalistmo: Seringueiros e suas lutas [Rights to the forest and to the environment: Rubber tappers and their struggles]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 19(55), 33–52.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092004000200003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baia, F. H., & Vasconcelos, L. A. (2015). Efeitos de consequências culturais concorrentes na seleção de culturantes [Effects of different kinds of cultural consequences on cultural selection]. Revista Brasileira de Análise Do Comportamento, 11(2), 125–134.  https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v11i2.3781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batista, I. M. S., & Simonian, L. T. S. (2013). Implicações políticas, econômicas e socioambientais da RESEX Mãe Grande de Curuçá: Perspectivas de desenvolvimento sustentável no estuário paraense? [Political, economic and socioenvironmental implications of RESEX Mãe Grande de Curuçá: Prospects for sustainable development in the paraense estuary?]. Novos Cadernos NAEA, 16(1), 203–220.  https://doi.org/10.5801/ncn.v16i1.1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borba, A., Tourinho, E. Z., & Glenn, S. S. (2017). Effects of cultural consequences on the interlocking behavioral contingencies of ethical self-control. The Psychological Record, 67(3), 399–411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0231-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Decree No. 4.340. Regulamenta artigos da Lei No. 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000, que dispõe sobre o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza—SNUC, e dá outras providências (August 22, 2002) [Regulates articles of Law No. 9.985 of July 18, 2000, which provides for the National System of Nature Conservation Units—SNUC, and other measures (August 22, 2002)]. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/2002/D4340.htm
  6. Decree No. 8.750. Institui o Conselho Nacional dos Povos e Comunidades Tradicionais (May 9, 2016) [Establishes the National Council of Traditional Peoples and Communities (May 9, 2016)]. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2016/Decreto/D8750.htm
  7. Decree No. . Cria a Reserva Extrativista Mãe Grande de Curuçá, no Município de Curuçá, no Estado do Pará, e dá outras providências (December 13, 2002) [Creates the Extractive Reserve Great Mother of Curuçá, in the municipality of Curuçá, State of Pará, among other measures (December 13, 2002)]. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/DNN/2002/Dnn9774.htm
  8. Federal Law No. 9.605. Dispõe sobre as sanções penais e administrativas derivadas de condutas e atividades lesivas ao meio ambiente, e dá outras providências (February 12, 1998) [Provides for criminal and administrative sanctions arising from conduct and activities harmful to the environment, and other measures (February 12, 1998)]. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L9605.htm
  9. Federal Law No. 9.985. Regulamenta o art. 225, § 1o, incisos I, II, III e VII da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências (July 18, 2002) [Regulates art. 225, § 1, items I, II, III and VII of the Federal Constitution, establishes the National System of Nature Conservation Units and other measures (July 18, 2002)]. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L9985.htm
  10. Chaves, A. T. P. V. (2010). Gestão pública e participação: Uma análise do conselho deliberativo da reserva extrativista Mãe Grande de Curuçá [Public management and participation: An analysis of the deliberative council of the Curuçá Mother’s Extractive Reserve] (Master’s thesis). Programa de Pós Graduação em Gestão de Recursos Naturais e Desenvolvimento Local, Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S. V. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), S/n. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/
  12. Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31(1), 53–70.  https://doi.org/10.1901/2Fjeab.1979.31-53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R., Sandaker, I., Todorov, J. C., et al. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 78–103.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Matos, M. A. (2001). Comportamento governado por regras [Rule-governed behavior]. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 3(2), 51–66.  https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v3i2.135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostrom, E. (2002). Policy analysis in the future of good societies. The Good Society, 11(1), 42–48 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20711048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ostrom, E., & Ostrom, V. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31(2), 203–216.  https://doi.org/10.2307/974676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. The American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404–417.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1964229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinheiro, E., Thomas, S., Almeida, O., & Vergara, W. (2018). Áreas protegidas marinhas no Estado do Pará e direitos das comunidades tradicionais no processo de governança dos recursos comuns [Marine protected areas in the state of Pará and rights of traditional communities in the common resources governance process]. Cadernos de AgroecologiaAnais do VI CLAA, X CBA e V SEMDF, 13(1), s/n.Google Scholar
  26. Ray, J. M., & Ray, R. D. (2008). Train-to-Code: An adaptive expert system for training systematic observation and coding skills. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 673–693.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sidman, M. (1958). By-products of aversive control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1(3), 265–280.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1958.1-265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  29. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  30. Souza, C. B. G. (2010). A gestão dos recursos naturais na Amazônia: A reserva extrativista Mãe Grande de Curuçá [The management of natural resources in the Amazon: The extractive reserve Mãe Grande de Curuçá]. Revista Geografar, 5(1), 83–104.  https://doi.org/10.5380/geografar.v5i1.17783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministério da CidadaniaBrasíliaBrazil
  2. 2.Comissão Nacional de Fortalecimento das Reservas Extrativistas Costeiras e MarinhasMarinhasBrazil
  3. 3.Conselho Nacional dos Povos e Comunidades TradicionaisBrasíliaBrazil
  4. 4.Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  5. 5.Universidade de Rio Verde and Universidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations