Advertisement

Tutorial: Selection of Cultures and the Role of Recurrent Contingencies and Interlocking Behavioral Contingencies

  • Kalliu Carvalho CoutoEmail author
Regular Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The interplay between a population’s traits and environmental events feeds evolution by natural selection. These traits may vary from innate predispositions to acquire specific behavioral topographies to the ability to learn through local environmental changes (operant behavior). Thus, learning capability is historically inseparable from evolution by natural selection. In humans, besides inheriting behavioral predispositions and the ability to acquire novel behavioral repertoires, learning is dependent on social learning of culturally transmitted practices. Cultural practices are selected by environmental events as a function of their adaptive value to the group and also enhance members’ adaptive capability. Within a verbal community, individuals cooperate and coordinate their behavior, producing environmental changes that would not be possible otherwise. Those cooperative and coordinated responses are under the control of the verbal community’s sets of contingencies (i.e., culture), which also evolve over time. In this paper, the coevolutionary processes involving natural selection, selection of operant behavior, and selection of cultures (environmental settings) will be discussed within a behavior-analytic perspective. A special focus will be given to interlocking behavioral contingencies (IBCs) involved in maintaining and transmitting practices (controlling IBCs) and in the verbal community’s joint efforts (execution IBCs).

Keywords

Selection of cultures Controlling and execution IBCs Metacontingency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Ingunn Sandaker, Lucas de Carvalho, and Gunnar Ree for their support and feedback during the writing process. Tara Grant, the two anonymous reviewers, and the editor also gave valuable comments when revising this manuscript. The present text was adapted from the introduction of the author’s PhD thesis.

References

  1. Alem, S., Perry, C. J., Zhu, X., Loukola, O. J., Ingraham, T., Søvik, E., & Chittka, L. (2016). Associative mechanisms allow for social learning and cultural transmission of string pulling in an insect. PLoS Biology, 14(10), e1002564.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002564.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowman-Perrott, L., Burke, M. D., Zaini, S., Zhang, N., & Vannest, K. (2016). Promoting positive behavior using the good behavior game: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), 180–190.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715592355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Couto, K. C., & Sandaker, I. (2016). Natural, behavioral and cultural selection-analysis: An integrative approach. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 54–60.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. de Carvalho, I. C., & Todorov, J. C. (2016). Metacontingências e produtos agregados na lei de diretrizes e bases da educação: primeiro o objetivo, depois como chegar lá [Metacontingencies and aggregated product in the law and guidelines and basis for education: first the objective, then how to get there]. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 12(2), 75–85.  https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v12i2.4400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden two. Behavior Analysis and Social Action, 5, 2–8.Google Scholar
  7. Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11(2), 161–179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. E. (2004). Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behavior and Social Issues, 13(2), 89–106.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., et al. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology: A systematic text in the science of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Malott, M. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15(1), 31–56.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moffett, M. W. (2012). Supercolonies of billions in an invasive ant: What is a society? Behavioral Ecology, 23(5), 925–933.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moffett, M. W. (2013). Human identity and the evolution of societies. Human Nature, 24(3), 219–267.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9170-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Robinson, G. E. (1992). Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology, 37(1), 637–665.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.37.1.637.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruse, M. (2012). The philosophy of human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sandaker, I. (2009). A selectionist perspective on systemic and behavioral change in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29(3–4), 276–293.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060903092128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmitt, D. R. (1998). Social behavior. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. Boston: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1947-2_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seeley, T. D., & Buhrman, S. C. (1999). Group decision making in swarms of honey bees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45(1), 19–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(1), 351–380.  https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skinner, B. F. (1951). How to teach animals. Scientific American, 185(2), 26–29.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1251-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213(4507), 501–504.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Todorov, J. C. (2005). Laws and the complex control of behavior. Behavior and Social Issues, 14(2), 86–91.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v14i2.360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Todorov, J. C. (2006). The metacontingency as a conceptual tool. Behavior and Social Issues, 15(1), 92–94.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Todorov, J. C. (2013). Conservation and transformation of cultural practices through contingencies and metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 64–73.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Todorov, J. C., Moreira, M., Prudêncio, M. R. A., & Pereira, G. C. C. (2004). O Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente como metacontingência. In M. Z. S. Brandão, F. C. S. Conte, F. S. Brandão, Y. K. Ingberman, V. L. M. Silva, & S. M. Oliani (Eds.), Sobre comportamento e cognição: Contingências e metacontingências, contextos sócio-verbais e o comportamento do terapeuta Vol. 13 (pp. 44–51). Santo André: ESETec.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 327–348.  https://doi.org/10.1086/522809.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson, E. O. (2000). Sociobiology. The new synthesis (25th anniversary ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations