Advertisement

Enhanced rhizoremediation of crude oil–contaminated mangrove swamp soil using two wetland plants (Phragmites australis and Eichhornia crassipes)

  • Monday UboguEmail author
  • Lucky O. Odokuma
  • Ejiro Akponah
Environmental Microbiology - Research Paper
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Comparative studies of enhanced rhizoremediation with biostimulation and bioaugmentation techniques in remediation of oil-contaminated mangrove environment were investigated. Contaminated soils at 7190 mg/kg of oil were subjected to the following treatments: soil (S), soil + oil (SO), soil + oil + fertilizer (NPK) (SOF), soil + oil + fertilizer + microorganisms (SOFM), soil + oil + fertilizer + microorganisms + solarization (SOFMS) (triplicates): two sets planted with P. australis, E. crassipes, and one unplanted. These were studied comparatively for 120 days for culturable (aerobic, mesophilic) heterotrophic and hydrocarbon-utilizing microbial populations, and soil residual TPH. Results showed culturable heterotrophic and hydrocarbon-utilizing microbial populations and TPH loss in planted soils were consistently higher than those in unplanted receiving corresponding treatments (P ˂ 0.05). There were 44.4, 71.8, 74.7, and 67.5, and 50.5, 71.8, 82.3, and 71.8% reduction in residual TPH in soil planted with P. australis and E. crassipes respectively for treatments PSO, PSOF, PSOFM, and PSOFMS as against 20.0, 62.6, 67.5, and 67.5% losses in SO, SOF, SOFM, and SOFMS. Treatments PSOFM and SFOM recorded the highest TPH loss with daily residual TPH loss in the order as follows: E. crassipes (49.20 mg/kg/day) ˃ P. australis (44.64 mg/kg/day) ˃ unplanted soil (40.32 mg/kg/day). Enhanced rhizoremediation was more effective than biostimulation and bioaugmentation techniques.

Keywords

Oil contamination Bioremediation Mangrove soil Aquatic macrophyte Rhizoremediation 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ajibola MO, Oni SA, Awodiran OO (2015) Assessing wetland service in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Int J Humunity Soc Sci 5(1):268–277Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nandy S, Mitra S (2004) Features of India Sunderbans mangrove swamps. Environ Ecol 22:339–334Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United Nation Environmental Program (UNEP) (2011) Environmental impact assessment of Ogoniland. DEP/1337/GE. www.unep.org/Nigeria
  4. 4.
    Mensah SI, Okonwu K, Yabrade M (2013) Effect of crude oil application on the growth of seedlings of Rhizophora racemosa G. Meyer. Asian J Biol Sci 6(2):138–141Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duke NC (2016) Oil impacts on mangroves: recommendations for operational planning and action based on a global review. Mar Bull 108:700–715Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Federal Ministry of Environment (2006) Niger Delta Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Project. Conservation Foundation Lagos, WWF UK and CEESP-IUCN Commission on Environmental, Economic, and Social PolicyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kadafa AA (2012a) Environmental impacts of oil exploration and exploitation in the Niger Delta of Nigeria. Global J Sci Frontier Res Environ Earth Sci 12(3):1–11Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kadafa AA (2012b) Oil exploration and spillage in the Niger Delta of Nigeria. Civil Environ Res 2(3):38–51Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg JJ (2004) Rhizoremediation: a beneficial plant-microbe interaction. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 17(1):6–15Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dixon B (1996) Bioremediation is here to stay. ASM New 62:527–528Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niti C, Sunita S, Kamlesh K, Rakesh K (2013) Bioremediation: an emerging technology for remediation of pesticides. Res J Chem Environ 17(4):88–105Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chaudhry Q, Bloom-Zandstra M, Gupta S, Joner EJ (2005) Utilizing the synergy between plants and microorganisms to enhance breakdown of organic pollutants in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12:34–48Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pilon-Smits E (2005) Pytoremediation. Ann Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh OV, Jain RK (2003) Phytoremediation of toxic aromatic pollutants from soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:128–135Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cook RL, Hesterberg D (2013) Comparison of trees and grasses for rhizoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Int J Phytoremed 15:844–860Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olson PE, Castro A, Joern M, DuTeau NM, Pilon-Smits EAH, Reardon KF (2007) Comparison of plant families in a greenhouse phytoremediation study on an aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil. J Environ Qual 36(5):1461–1469Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muratova AY, Dmitrieva T, Panchenko L, Turkovskaya O (2008) Phytoremediation of oil-sludgecontaminated soil. Int J Phytoremed 10(6):486–502Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Odokuma LO, Ubogu M (2014) Phragmitis australis growth and tolerance to crude oil contamination in mangrove swamp soil. Bioremed Biodegrad 5(7):256–262Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Judy CR, Graham SA, Lin Q, Hou A, Mendelssohn IA (2014) Impact of Macondo oil from Deepwater Horizon spill on the growth response of the common reed Phragmites australis: a mesocosm study. Mar Pollut Bull 79(1–2):69–76Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lopes A, Maciel da Rosa-Osman S, Piedade MTF (2009) Effects of crude oil on survival, morphology, and anatomy of two aquatic macrophytes from the Amazon floodplains. Hydrobiologia 636:295–305Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ochekwu E, Madagwa B (2013) Phytoremediation potentials of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (mart.) Solms) in crude oil polluted water. J Appl Sci Environ Mgt. 17(4):503–507Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ubogu M (2017) Analysis of the efficiency of enhanced remediation of crude oil contaminated soils using rhizoremediation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation techniques. Ph. D Thesis, University of Port Harcourt, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uddin MN, Robinson RW, Caridi D, Harun MAY (2014) Is phytotoxicity of Phragmites australis residue influenced by decomposition condition, time and density? Mar Freshw Res 65:505–516Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Srivastava J, Kalra SJS, Naraian R (2014) Environmental perspectives of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex. Steudel. Appl Water Sci 4:193–202Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amsberry LM, Baker A, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2000) Clonal intergration and the expansion of Pragmites australis. Ecol Appl 10:1110–1118Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kobbing J, Thevs N, Zerbe S (2013) The utilisation of reed (Phragmites australis): a review. Int Mire Conserv Group Int Peat Soc 13:1–14Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ojeifo MPA, Ekokotu NFO and Ekelemu JK (2000) A review of the utilization of water hyacinth control measures for noxious weed. Proceedings of the International Conference on Water Hyacinth, October 27-November 1, New Bussa, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Malik A (2007) Environmental challenge vis a via opportunity: the case of water hyacinth. Environ Int 33:122–138Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mary LPN, Madhu G (2010) Removal of heavy metals from waste water using water hyacinth. Proceedings of the International Conference of on Advances in Civil Engineering. DOI.02.ACE. 2010.01.39Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aboul-Enein AM, Al-Abd AM, Shalaby EA, Abul-Ela FF, Nasr-Allah AA, Mahmoud AM, El-Shemy HA (2011) Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms from water parasite to potential medicine remedy. Plant Signal Behav 6(6):834–836Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Odokuma LO, Dickson AA (2003) Bioremediation of a crude oil polluted tropical mangrove environment. J Appl Sci Environ Mgt 7(2):23–29Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Okoro CC (2010) Enhanced bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated mangrove swamp in the Nigerian oil rich Niger Delta using seawater microbial inocula amended with crude biosurfactants and micronutrients. Nat Sci 8(8):195–206Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ruiz-Marin A, Zavala-Loria JC, Canedo-Lopez Y, Cordova-Quiroz AV (2013) Tropical bacteria isolated from oil-contaminated mangrove soil: bioremediation by natural and attenuation and bioaugmentation. Rev Mex Ing Quim 12(3):553–560Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Orji FA, Ibiene AA, Dike EN (2012) Laboratory scale bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-polluted mangrove swamps in the Niger Delta using cow dung. Malaysian J Microbiol 8(4):226–235Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Orji FA, Ibiene AA, Okerentugba PO (2013) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-polluted mangrove swamps using nutrient formula produced from water hyacinth (Eicchornia crassipes). American J Environ Sci 9(4):348–266Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ezekoye CC, Amakoromo ER, Ibiene AA (2015) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon polluted mangrove swamp soil from the Niger Delta using organic and inorganic nutrients. Brit Biotechnol J 6(2):62–78Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Márquez-rocha FJ, Hernandez-Rodriguez V, Lamela MAT (2001) Biodegradation of diesel oil in soil by a microbial consortium. Water Air Soil Pollut 128:313–320Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tanee FBG, Kinako PDS (2008) Comparative studies of biostimulation and phytoremediation in the mitigation of crude oil toxicity in tropical soil. J Appl Sci Environ Mgt 12(2):143–147Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chikere CB, Okpokwasili GC, Chikere BO (2009) Bacteria diversity in a tropical crude oil polluted soil undergoing bioremediation. African J Biotechnol 8(11):2535–2540Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chorom M, Sharifi HS, Motamedi H (2010) Bioremediation of a crude oil-polluted soil byapplication of fertilizers. Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng 7(4):319–326Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Syafruddin S, Wieshammer G, Puschenreiter M, Langer I, Wieshammer-Zivkovic M, Wenzel WW (2010) Effect of N and P fertilisation and aeration on biodegradation of crude oil in aged hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Plant Soil Environ 56(4):149–155Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chang LK, Ibrahim D, Omar IC (2011) A laboratory scale bioremediation of Tapis crude oil contaminated soil by bioaugmentation of Acinetobacter baumannii T30C. African J Microbiol Res 5(18):2609–2615Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ibiene AA, Orji FA, Ezidi CO, Ngwobi CL (2011) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil in the Niger Delta using spent mushroom compost and other organic waste. Nigerian J Agric Food Environ 7(3):1–7Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Acuna AJ, Pucci OH, Pucci GN (2012) Effect of nitrogen deficiency in the biodegradation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons in Patagonian contaminated soil. IJRRAS 11(3):470–476Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roy AS, Yenn R, Singh AK, Boruah HPD, Saikia N, Deka M (2012) Bioremediation of crude oil contaminated tea plantation soil using two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains AS 03 and NA 108. African J Biotechnol 12(19):2600–2610Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Turner DA, Pichtel J, Rodenas Y, McKillip J, Goodpaster V (2014) Microbial degradation of gasoline in soil: comparison by soil type. J Bioremed Biodegerad 5(2):1–7Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ataikiru TL, Okerentugba PO, Iheanacho CC (2018) Bioremediation of bonny light crude oil polluted soil by bioaugmentation using yeast isolates (Candida adriatica ZIM 2468 and Candida taoyuanica MYA-4700). Int J Public Environ Health 5(4):52–61Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jussila MM (2006) Molecular biomonitoring during rhizoremediation of oil-contaminated soil. Ph. D Desertation, University of Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gaskin BSE (2008) Rhizoremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil using Australian grasses. PhD Thesis, Flinders University of South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Soleimani M, Afyuni M, Hajabbasi MA, Nourbaksh F, Sabzalian MR, Christensen JH (2010) Phytoremediation of an aged petroleum contaminated soil using endophyte infected and non-infected grasses. Chemosphere 81:1084–1090Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tang JC, Wang RG, Niu XW, Wang M, Chu HR, Zhou QX (2010) Characterization of petroleum-contaminated soil: effect of different influencing factors. Biogeoscience 7:3961–73969Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ogbulie TE, Nwigwe HC, Okpokwasili GC, Iwuala MOE (2011) Comparative study on the effect of symbiotic interaction between plants and non-indigenous isolates on crude oil remediaton. Analele Universităţii din Oradea - Fascicula Biologie 28(1):15–22Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zand AD, Khodaei HR, Nabibidhendi GR and Mehrdadi N (2011) Rhizoremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHS) under the effect of plant species in Iran. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Enviromental Science and Technology. Rhodes, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Moreira ITA, Oliveira OMC, Triguis JA, dos Santos AMP, Queiroz AFS, Martins CMS, Silva CS, Jesus RS (2011) Phytoremediation using Rizophora mangle L. in mangrove sediments contaminated by persistent total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH’s). Microchem J 99:376–382Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kuo HC, Juang DF, Yang L, Kuo WC, Wu YM (2014) Phytoremediation of soil contaminated by heavy oil with plants colonized by mycorrhizal fungi. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:1661–1668Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Omotayo AE, Shonubi OO, Towuru EG, Babalola SE, Ilori MO, Amund OO (2014) Rhizoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by Paspalum vaginatum (Sw.) and its associated bacteria. Int Res J Microbiol 5(1):1–7Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gouda AH, El-Gendy AS, El-Razek TMA, El-Kassas HI (2016) Evaluation of phytoremediation and bioremediation for sandy soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Int J Environ Sci Dev 7(7):490–493Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Aliyu MB, Oyeyiola GP (2011) Rhizosphere bacterial flora of groundnut (Arachis hypogeae). Adv Environ Biol 5(10):3196–3202Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    van Reeuwijk LP (2002) Procedures for soil analysis: technical paper 9. International Soil Reference and Information Centre, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hendershot WH, Lalande H, Duquette M (2006) Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity. In: Soon YK, Hendershot WH (eds) Soil chemical analysis. LLC, Taylor and Francis Groups, pp 3–8Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    United State Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2007) Method 8015C: nonhalogenated organics using GC/FID. US EPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA (2006) Total and organic carbon. In: Soon YK, Hendershot WH (eds) Soil chemical analysis. LLC, Taylor and Francis Groups, pp 3–8Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ezzati S, Najafi A, Rab MA, Zenner EK (2012) Recovery of soil bulk density, porosity and rutting from ground skidding over a 20-year period after timber harvesting in Iran. Silva Fennica 64(4):521–538Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Elmore CL, Stapleton JJ, Bell CE, Devay JE (1997) Soil solarization, a nonpesticidal method for controlling diseases, nematodes, and weeds. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources PublicationGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Head IM, Swanell PJR (1999) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in marine habitat. Curr Opin Biotechnol 10:234–239Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chaudhry S, Luhach J, Sharma V, Sharma C (2014) Assessment of diesel degrading potential of fungal isolates from sludge contaminated soil of petroleum refinery, Haryana. Res J Microbiol 7(3):182–190Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Garrity G, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JR (2005) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: the Proteobacteria, part B: the Gammaproteobacteria, vol 2, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Vos PD, Garrity GM, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (2009) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: the Firmicutes, vol 3, 2nd edn. Sringer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cheesebrough M (2006) District laboratory practice in tropical countries part 2. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Barnett HL, Hunter BB (1998) Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi, 4th edn. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Humber RA (2005) Entomopathogenic Fungal Identification. USDA-ARS Plant Protection Research Unit US Plant, Soil & Nutrition Laboratory, Tower Road Ithaca, NY 14853–2901, USAGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ellis D, Davis S, Alexiou H, Handke R and Bartley R (2007) Descriptions of medical fungi. Mycology Unit Women’s and Children’s Hospital North Adelaide 5006 AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Dutta S, Singh P (2016) Hydrocarbon degradation potential of indigenous fungal isolates from Indian oil refinery, Haldia, (W.B) India. Sci Res Rep 6(1):4–11Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Oyeyiola GP (2010) Rhizosphere bacteria of Amaranthus hybridus. Res J Microbiol 5:137–143Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Oyeyiola GP, Arekemase MO, Sule I, Agbabiaka TO (2013) Rhizosphere bacterial flora of okra (Hibiscus esculentus). Sci Int 25(2):273–276Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Al-Nur E, Abdulmoneim MAS (2007) Contribution to knowledge of soil fungi in Sudan rhizosphere mycoflora of sugarcane at Kenana Sugar Estate. Int J Bot 3(1):97–102Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Oyeyiola GP, AJokpaniovo H, Aliyu MB (2012) Bacterial flora of the rhizosphere of Capsicum frutescens. World J Biol Res 5(2):61–65Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Patkowska E (2002) The role of rhizosphere antagonistic microorganisms in limiting the infection of underground parts of spring wheat. Electronic J Polish Agric Uni 5:1–10Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zhang L, Song L, Shao H, Shao C, Li M, Liu M, Brestic M, Xu G (2013) Spatio-temporal variation of rhizosphere soil microbial abundance and enzyme activities under different vegetation types in the coastal zone, Shandong, China. Plant Biosyst.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2013.770804
  80. 80.
    Atlas RM, Bartha R (1987) Interaction between microorganisms and plants. 2ndEdition. The Benjamin/Curnings Publishing Comp. inc., USAGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Shirley AM, Sheridon C, Michael PS, Adán C (2009) Plant age and the genotype impact the progression of bacterial community succession in Arabidopsis rhizosphere. Plant Signal Behavior 4(8):777–780Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Obire O, Anyanwu EC (2009) Impact of various concentrations of crude oil on fungal populations of soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6(2):211–218Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Obayori OS, Ilori MO, Adebusoye SA, Amund OO, Oyetibo GO (2008) Microbial population changes in tropical agricultural soil experimentally contaminated with crude petroleum. African J Biotechnol. 7(24):4512–4520Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kołwzan B, Adamiak W, Grabas K, Pawełczyk A (2006) Introduction to environmental microbiology. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, WrocławGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Madigan MJ, Martinko JM, Parke J (2000) Brock biology of microorganisms, 9th edn. Parentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Jordhal JL, Foster L, Schnoor JL, Alvarez PJJ (1997) Effect of hybrid popular trees on microbial populations important to hazardous waste boiremediation. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1318–1321Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ikuesan FA (2017) Microbial response to varying crude oil concentrations of crude oil pollution of agricultural soils in Ondo State, Nigeria. Microbiol Res J Int 22(4):1–8Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Read DB, Bengough AG, Gregory PJ, Crawford JW, Robison D, Scrimgeour CM, Young IM, Zhang K, Zhang X (2003) Plant roots release phospholipid surfactants that modify the physical and chemical properties of soil. New Phytol 157:315–326Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Schnoor JL, Licht LA, McCutcheon SC, Wolfe NL, Carreira LH (1995) Phytoremediation of organic and contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 29:318–323Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Euliss K, Ho CH, Schwab AP, Rock S, Banks AK (2008) Greenhouse and field assessment of phytoremediation for petroleum contaminants in a riparian zone. Bioresour Technol 99:1961–1971Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Shirdam R, Zand AD, Bidhendi GN, Mehrdadi N (2008) Phytoremediation of hydrocarbon- contaminated soils with emphasis on the effect of petroleum hydrocarbons on the growth of plant species. Phytoprotection. 89:21–29Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Nesterenko MA, Kirzhner F, Zimmels Y, Armon R (2012) Eichhornia crassipes ability to remove naphthalene from waste water in the absence of bacteria. Chemosphere. 87:1186–1191Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Saleh HM (2016) Biological remediation of hazardous pollutants using water hyacinth: a review. J Biotechnol Res 2(11):80–91Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Mishra S, Maiti A (2017) The efficiency of Eichhornia crassipes in the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from wastewater: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:7921–7937Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gupta A, Balomajumder C (2018) Simultaneous phytoremediation of Cr (VI) and phenol using aquatic macrophyte water hyacinth: effect of pH and concentration. Int J Sci Res Chem 3(2):60–69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monday Ubogu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lucky O. Odokuma
    • 2
  • Ejiro Akponah
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyFederal University of Agriculture MakurdiMakurdiNigeria
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of Port HarcourtPort HarcourtNigeria
  3. 3.Department of MicrobiologyDelta State UniversityAbrakaNigeria

Personalised recommendations