Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrodynamic modeling of gas influx migration in slim hole annuli

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Existing well control prediction techniques have not yet found wide acceptance in slim holes. This study investigates the two-phase transient pressure behavior when a gas kick occurs in slim holes. This paper presents an improved two-phase model that will account for the change in annular pressure transients. The two-phase model is based on the drift-flux model. Newly developed drift-flux correlations with specific target to narrow annuli are applied. An explicit scheme is adopted to solve the two-phase model. Results show the high inaccuracies that occur from using conventional models instead of this new model. The velocities of each phase are seen to increase tremendously with assumption of slim holes. This in turn causes significant increase in the equivalent circulating densities (ECDs) and underestimation of bottom hole pressures. On the other hand, the hydrostatic pressures are seen to decrease as well leading to a counterbalance. Pressure signatures for slim holes are seen to shift to the right consequently affecting the void fraction distribution and other fluid properties. Case studies are performed in the simulations to examine the effect of varying annulus ratio on results for constant influx and mud rate. From the results, as annulus ratio goes beyond 0.8, the changes in bottom hole ECDs become much more substantial. The understanding of hydraulics in narrow annuli is vital for real-time pressure prediction during a gas influx. This study provides an improved simulation tool for more accurate prediction of influx behavior in slim holes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Avelar, C. S., Ribeiro, P. R., Sepehrnoori, K. 2009. Deepwater gas kick simulation. J Petrol Sci Eng, 67: 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, H. D., Brill J. P. 1973. A study of two-phase flow in inclined pipes. J Petrol Technol, 25: 607–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestion, D. 1990. The physical closure laws in the CATHARE code. Nucl Eng Des, 124: 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bode, D. J., Noffke, R. B., Nickens, H. V. 1991. Well-control methods and practices in small-diameter wellbores. J Petrol Technol, 43: 1380–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe, J. 2001. Advanced two-phase well control analysis. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 40: 774–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., Pereyra, E., Sarica, C., Park, C., Kang, J. 2012. An efficient drift-flux closure relationship to estimate liquid holdups of gas–liquid two-phase flow in pipes. Energies, 5: 5294–5306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delwiche, R. A., Lejeune, M. W. D., Mawet, P. F. B. N., Vighetto, R. 1992. Slimhole drilling hydraulics. In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition: SPE-24596-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis, D., Augis, D., Sagot, A., Delahaye, T., Cartalos, U., Burban, B. 1995. Validation of kick control method and pressure loss predictions on a slim hole well. In: Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference: SPE-29348-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R. X., Chen, Y. H., Waltrich, P. J., Williams, W. C. 2018. An experimental investigation on flow pattern map and drift-flux model for co-current upward liquid–gas two-phase flow in narrow annuli. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 51: 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, M. 1977. One-dimensional drift-flux model and constitutive equations for relative motion between phases in various two-phase flow regimes (No. ANL-77-47). Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowitt, D., Cooper, C. A., Pearson, K. G. 1984. The THETIS 80% blocked cluster experiment. Part 5: Level swell experiments (No. AEEW-R—1767). UKAEA Atomic Energy Establishment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, J. L., Lewis, R. L. 1968. A mathematical model of a gas kick. J Petrol Technol, 20: 888–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickens, H. V. 1987. A dynamic computer model of a kicking well. SPE Drilling Engineering, 2: 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, P. K., Cowell, E. E. 1993. Slimhole well kill: A modified conventional approach. In: Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference: SPE-25707-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, O. L. A. 1991. Well-control operations in horizontal wells. SPE Drilling Engineering, 6: 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks II, F. E., Williams, K. R. 1993. Slimhole exploration requires proper technical preparation. In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition: SPE-26337-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. H., Peden, J. M., Lemanczyk, R. Z. 1994. Gas kick simulation study for horizontal wells. In: Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference: SPE-27498-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. Y., Sun, B. J. 2009. Annular multiphase flow behavior during deep water drilling and the effect of hydrate phase transition. Petrol Sci, 6: 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuber, N., Findlay, J. A. 1965. Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems. J Heat Transf, 87: 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanhang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nwaka, N., Liu, J., Kunju, M. et al. Hydrodynamic modeling of gas influx migration in slim hole annuli. Exp. Comput. Multiph. Flow 2, 142–150 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-019-0038-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-019-0038-6

Keywords

Navigation