State-of-the-art in plant component flow-induced vibration (FIV)

  • Shuichiro MiwaEmail author
  • Takashi Hibiki
Review Article


Flow-induced vibration (FIV) continues to be a critical phenomenon for plant safety. Notably, the understanding of FIV generated by multiphase flow is still immature, and various accidents and troubles have been reported for the plant components including a steam generator, natural gas lines, piping systems, and so on. It is because FIV is complicated to be predicted during the plant’s design stage, and usually is first noticed in the operation stage. Hence, a practical solution for new types of FIV has been through post-processing by conducting the laboratory-scale experiment to simulate the prototype. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a powerful tool to assess FIV, but the approach is still under development for multiphase flow case. It is partly due to the lack of experimental data, incomplete interfacial transfer terms included in the two-fluid model, as well as the difficulty to couple two-phase flow dynamics and structural dynamics in the simulation stage. Additionally, inadequate FIV database for the simulation benchmark also needs to be resolved for the advancement of CFD and finite-element-method (FEM) models. The present review summarizes fundamentals of FIV caused by gas-liquid two-phase flow, and recent FIV research activities ranging from experiment to simulation.


flow-induced vibration (FIV) fluid-structure interaction two-phase flow slug flow 


  1. Al-Khalifa, H. A., Oshinowo, L., Al-Saif, O. A. 2016. Transient multiphase simulation in separator vessel internals design in Saudi Aramco. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2016-65250.Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez-Briceño, R., Kanizawa, F. T., Ribatski, G., de Oliveira, L. P. R. 2018. Validation of turbulence induced vibration design guidelines in a normal triangular tube bundle during two-phase crossflow. J Fluid Struct, 76: 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 1998. ASME boiler and pressure vessel code Section III, Nonmandatory Appendix N, Subarticle N-1300, Flow-Induced Vibration of Tubes and Tube Banks 1998 with 2000 Addendum.Google Scholar
  4. Belfroid, S. P. C., Nennie, E., Lewis, M. 2016. Multiphase forces on bends—Large scale 6-inch experiments. In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-181604-MS.Google Scholar
  5. Blevins, R. D. 1990. Flow-Induced Vibration, 2nd edn. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Blevins, R. D. 2018. Nonproprietary flow-induced vibration analysis of San Onofre nuclear generating station replacement steam generators to ASME code section III appendix N. J Pressure Vessel Technol, 140: 034502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabrera-Miranda, J. M., Paik, J. K. 2019. Two-phase flow induced vibrations in a marine riser conveying a fluid with rectangular pulse train mass. Ocean Eng, 174: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Da Silva, B. L., dos Santos, C. M., Bianchi, P., Henry, N., Meier, F., Oliveira, E., Martiganoni, W. P. 2016. Flow simulations solve WHRSG vibration issues. Oil Gas J, 114: 72.Google Scholar
  9. Diwakar, P., Prakash, A., Thomas, C. 2017. Flow induced vibration of equipment internals in a two-phase gas/liquid flow. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2017-65812.Google Scholar
  10. Giraudeau, M., Mureithi, N. W., Pettigrew, M. J. 2013. Two-phase flow-induced forces on piping in vertical upward flow: Excitation mechanisms and correlation models. J Pressure Vessel Technol, 135: 030907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ishii, M., Hibiki, T. 2010. Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow. Springer Science & Business Media.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishii, M., Mishima, K. 1980. Study of two-fluid model and interfacial area. NUREG/CR-1873; ANL-80-111. Argonne National Lab., IL, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME). 2018. Flow Induced Vibrations—Classification and Lessons from Practical Experiences, 3rd edn. Tokyo: Gihodo Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  14. Li, F., Cao, J., Duan, M., An, C., Su, J. 2016. Two-phase flow induced vibration of subsea span pipeline. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE-I-16-333.Google Scholar
  15. Liu, Y., Miwa, S., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Morita, H., Kondoh, Y., Tanimoto, K. 2012. Experimental study of internal two-phase flow induced fluctuating force on a 90° elbow. Chem Eng Sci, 76: 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishima, K., Ishii, M. 1984. Flow regime transition criteria for upward two-phase flow in vertical tubes. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 27: 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miwa, S., Hibiki, T., Mori, M. 2016. Analysis of flow-induced vibration due to stratified wavy two-phase flow. J Fluid Eng, 138: 091302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miwa, S., Liu, Y., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Kondo, Y., Morita, H., Tanimoto, K. 2014a. Study of unsteady gas-liquid two-phase flow induced force fluctuation (Part 2: Horizontal-downward two-phase flow). Trans JSME, 80: TEP0046. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. Miwa, S., Liu, Y., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Kondo, Y., Morita, H., Tanimoto, K. 2014b. Study of unsteady gas-liquid two-phase flow induced force fluctuation (Part 1: Evaluation and modeling of two-phase flow induced force fluctuation). Trans JSME, 80: FE0005. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. Miwa, S., Mori, M., Hibiki, T. 2015. Two-phase flow induced vibration in piping systems. Prog Nucl Energ, 78: 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miwa, S., Yamamoto, Y., Chiba, G. 2018. Research activities on nuclear reactor physics and thermal-hydraulics in Japan afterFukushima-Daiichi accident. J Nucl Sci Technol, 55: 575–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakamura, T., Shiraishi, T., Ishitani, Y., Watakabe, H., Sago, H., Fujii, T., Konomura, M. 2005. Flow-induced vibration of a large-diameter elbow piping based on random force measurement caused by conveying fluid (visualization test results). In: Proceedings of the ASME 2005 Pressure Vessel and Piping, PVP2005-71277.Google Scholar
  23. Olala, S., Mureithi, N. W., Sawadogo, T., Pettigrew, M. J. 2014. Streamwise fluidelastic forces in tube arrays subjected to two-phase flows. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2014-28153.Google Scholar
  24. Ong, Z. C., Eng, H. C., Noroozi, S. 2017. Non-destructive testing and assessment of a piping system with excessive vibration and recurrence crack issue: An industrial case study. Eng Fail Anal, 82: 280–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ortiz-Vidal, L. E., Mureithi, N. W., Rodriguez, O. M. H. 2017. Vibration response of a pipe subjected to two-phase flow: Analytical formulations and experiments. Nucl Eng Des, 313: 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ozar, B., Dixit, A., Chen, S. W., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M. 2012. Interfacial area concentration in gas-liquid bubbly to churn-turbulent flow regime. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 38: 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paidoussis, M. P. 1970. Dynamics of tubular cantilevers conveying fluid. J Mech Eng Sci, 12: 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pettigrew, M. J., Besner, B., Mureithi, N. W., Lafrance, T., Patrick, J. M. 2014. Development of fiber-optic probes to measure two-phase flow dynamic parameters in support of flow-induced vibration studies. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2014-28106.Google Scholar
  29. Saito, Y., Torisaki, S., Miwa, S. 2018. Two-phase flow regime identification using fluctuating force signals under machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2018 26th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE26-81288.Google Scholar
  30. Schulkes, R. 2011. Slug frequency revisited. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, BHR-2011-H1.Google Scholar
  31. Setyawan, A., Indarto, Deendarlianto. 2016. The effect of the fluid properties on the wave velocity and wave frequency of gas-liquid annular two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 71: 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, L., Yang, Y. R., Li, Y. X., Wang, Y. T. 2018a. Dynamic behaviours of horizontal gas-liquid pipes subjected to hydrodynamic slug flow: Modelling and experiments. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 161: 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang, L., Yang, Y. R., Li, Y. X., Wang, Y. T. 2018b. Resonance analyses of a pipeline-riser system conveying gas-liquid two-phase flow with flow-pattern evolution. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 161: 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, L., Yang, Y. R., Liu, C., Li, Y. X., Hu, Q. H. 2018c. Numerical investigation of dynamic response of a pipeline-riser system caused by severe slugging flow. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 159: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu, X. P., Liu, M. Y., Ma, Y., An, M. 2016. Effects of fluidized solid particles on vibration behaviors of a graphite tube evaporator with an internal vapor-liquid flow. Appl Therm Eng, 100: 1229–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.School of Nuclear EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations