Advertisement

Pressure fluctuation instability in vertical plug formation of coarse particles with a non-mechanical feeder

  • Xingzhong Diao
  • He Yan
  • Tianjin LiEmail author
  • He Zhang
  • Hanliang Bo
Research Article

Abstract

Plug conveying receives attention due to its advantages such as low particle attrition, low pipeline wear, and low energy consumption. Based on the background of pneumatic transportation of absorber spheres in the small absorber sphere system of pebble bed HTGR, a novel non-mechanical feeder for plug formation of coarse particles has been proposed in our previous work. We further investigate the pressure fluctuation instability in the vertical plug formation of coarse particles with the non-mechanical feeder. Experiments for plug formation are conducted with glass beads of three kinds of particle diameter (dp = 6, 4, and 2 mm). The results show that micro-scale instabilities along with macro-scale instabilities are observed for the pressure fluctuations of feeder gas inlet in the vertical plug formation for the three particle diameters. It is interesting to find that the micro-scale instabilities decrease first and then increase with superficial gas velocity increasing for dp = 6 and 4 mm glass beads, respectively. The present study provides a further understanding of the pressure fluctuation instabilities in vertical plug formation of coarse particles with the non-mechanical feeder, which can contribute for on-line monitoring and operation optimization of dense-phase gas–solid flows with coarse particles.

Keywords

flow instability pressure fluctuations plug flow dense-phase pneumatic conveying granular materials high-temperature gas-cooled reactor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51506113), the National S&T Major Project (Grant No. ZX069), and the Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education (No. ARES-2019-08) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Agrawal, K., Loezos, P., Syamlal, M., Sundaresan, S. 2001. The role of meso-scale structures in rapid gas–solid flows. J Fluid Mech, 445: 151–185.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bi, H. T. 2007. A critical review of the complex pressure fluctuation phenomenon in gas–solids fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci, 62: 3473–3493.Google Scholar
  3. Cahyadi, A., Anantharaman, A., Yang, S. L., Karri, S. B. R., Findlay, J. G., Cocco, R. A., Chew, J. W. 2017. Review of cluster characteristics in circulating fluidized bed (CFB) risers. Chem Eng Sci, 158: 70–95.Google Scholar
  4. Cong, X. L., Guo, X. L., Lu, H. F., Gong, X., Liu, K., Sun, X. L., Xie, K. 2013. Flow patterns of pulverized coal pneumatic conveying and time-series analysis of pressure fluctuations. Chem Eng Sci, 101: 303–314.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, N., Briens, L. A., Grace, J. R., Bi, H. T., Lim, C. J. 2003. Characterization of dynamic behaviour in gas–solid turbulent fluidized bed using chaos and wavelet analyses. Chem Eng J, 96: 105–116.Google Scholar
  6. Fullmer, W. D., Hrenya, C. M. 2017. The clustering instability in rapid granular and gas–solid flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 49: 485–510.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Ge, W., Wang, L. M., Xu, J., Chen, F. G., Zhou, G. Z., Lu, L. Q., Chang, Q., Li, J. H. 2017. Discrete simulation of granular and particle-fluid flows: From fundamental study to engineering application. Rev Chem Eng, 33: 551–623Google Scholar
  8. Goldhirsch, I., Zanetti, G. 1993. Clustering instability in dissipative gases. Phys Rev Lett, 70: 1619–1622.Google Scholar
  9. Johnsson, F., Zijerveld, R. C., Schouten, J. C., van den Bleek, C. M., Leckner, B. 2000. Characterization of fluidization regimes by time-series analysis of pressure fluctuations. Int J Multiphase Flow, 26: 663–715.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Klinzing, G. E., Rizk, F., Marcus, R., Leung, L. S. 2011. Pneumatic Conveying of Solids: A Theoretical and Practical Approach, 3rd edn. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  11. Kofu, K. 2016. Pressure loss reduction in horizontal plug conveying of granular particles with ultrasonic vibration. Powder Technol, 294: 202–210.Google Scholar
  12. Konrad, K. 1986. Dense-phase pneumatic conveying: A review. Powder Technol, 49: 1–35.Google Scholar
  13. Lecreps, I., Orozovic, O., Erden, T., Jones, M. G., Sommer, K. 2014. Physical mechanisms involved in slug transport and pipe blockage during horizontal pneumatic conveying. Powder Technol, 262: 82–95.Google Scholar
  14. Li, H. 2002. Application of wavelet multi-resolution analysis to pressure fluctuations of gas–solid two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe. Powder Technol, 125: 61–73.Google Scholar
  15. Li, T. J., Zhang, H., Liu, M., Huang, Z., Bo, H., Dong, Y. 2018. Experimental investigation on vertical plug formation of coarse particles by a non-mechanical feeder. Powder Technol, 338: 692–701.Google Scholar
  16. Li, T. J., Zhang, H., Liu, M. L., Huang, Z. Y., Bo, H. L., Dong, Y. J. 2017. DEM study of granular discharge rate through a vertical pipe with a bend outlet in small absorber sphere system. Nucl Eng Des, 314: 1–10.Google Scholar
  17. Llop, M. F., Gascons, N. 2018. Multiresolution analysis of gas fluidization by empirical mode decomposition and recurrence quantification analysis. Int J Multiphase Flow, 105: 170–184.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Locatelli, G., Mancini, M., Todeschini, N. 2013. Generation IV nuclear reactors: Current status and future prospects. Energ Policy, 61: 1503–1520.Google Scholar
  19. Lu, X. S., Li, H. Z. 1999. Wavelet analysis of pressure fluctuation signals in a bubbling fluidized bed. Chem Eng J, 75: 113–119.Google Scholar
  20. Mallat, S. G. 1989. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11: 674–693.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Mi, B., Wypych, P. W. 1995. Investigations into wall pressure during slug-flow pneumatic conveying. Powder Technol, 84: 91–98.Google Scholar
  22. Nied, C., Lindner, J. A., Sommer, K. 2017. On the influence of the wall friction coefficient on void fraction gradients in horizontal pneumatic plug conveying measured by electrical capacitance tomography. Powder Technol, 321: 310–317.Google Scholar
  23. Pahk, J. B., Vasquez, N. A., Jacob, K., Klinzing, G. E. 2013. Frictional force measurement for multiple plugs in dense phase pneumatic conveying of polymer particles: An industry application. Ind Eng Chem Res, 52: 199–206.Google Scholar
  24. Pan, R., Wypych, P. W. 1997. Pressure drop and slug velocity in low-velocity pneumatic conveying of bulk solids. Powder Technol, 94: 123–132.Google Scholar
  25. Rawat, A., Kalman, H. 2017. Detachment velocity: A borderline between different types of particulate plugs. Powder Technol, 321: 293–300.Google Scholar
  26. Sasic, S., Leckner, B., Johnsson, F. 2007. Characterization of fluid dynamics of fluidized beds by analysis of pressure fluctuations. Prog Energ Combust, 33: 453–496.Google Scholar
  27. Setia, G., Mallick, S. S., Pan, R., Wypych, P. W. 2015. Modeling minimum transport boundary for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying systems. Powder Technol, 277: 244–251.Google Scholar
  28. Shaul, S., Kalman, H. 2014. Friction forces of particulate plugs moving in vertical and horizontal pipes. Powder Technol, 256: 310–323.Google Scholar
  29. Shaul, S., Kalman, H. 2015. Three plugs model. Powder Technol, 283: 579–592.Google Scholar
  30. Strauß, M., McNamara, S., Herrmann, H. J., Niederreiter, G., Sommer, K. 2006. Plug conveying in a vertical tube. Powder Technol, 162: 16–26.Google Scholar
  31. Sturm, M., Wirtz, S., Scherer, V., Denecke, J. 2010. Coupled DEM-CFD simulation of pneumatically conveyed granular media. Chem Eng Technol, 33: 1184–1192.Google Scholar
  32. Sundaresan, S. 2003. Instabilities in fluidized beds. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 35: 63–88.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsuji, Y., Asano, R. 1990. Fundamental investigation of plug conveying of cohesionless particles in a vertical pipe (pressure-drop and friction of a stationary plug). Can J Chem Eng, 68: 758–767.Google Scholar
  34. Tsuji, Y., Tanaka, T., Ishida, T. 1992. Lagrangian numerical simulation of plug flow of cohesionless particles in a horizontal pipe. Powder Technol, 71: 239–250.Google Scholar
  35. Van Ommen, J. R., Sasic, S., van der Schaaf, J., Gheorghiu, S., Johnsson, F., Coppens, M. O. 2011. Time-series analysis of pressure fluctuations in gas–solid fluidized beds—A review. Int J Multiphase Flow, 37: 403–428.Google Scholar
  36. Van Ommen, J. R., Schouten, J. C., vander Stappen, M. L. M., van den Bleek, C. M. 1999. Response characteristics of probe–transducer systems for pressure measurements in gas–solid fluidized beds: How to prevent pitfalls in dynamic pressure measurements. Powder Technol, 106: 199–218.Google Scholar
  37. Welch, P. 1967. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 15: 70–73.Google Scholar
  38. Wu, B. Y., Kantzas, A., Bellehumeur, C. T., He, Z. X., Kryuchkov, S. 2007. Multiresolution analysis of pressure fluctuations in a gas–solids fluidized bed: Application to glass beads and polyethylene powder systems. Chem Eng J, 131: 23–33.Google Scholar
  39. Wu, G., He, Y., Luo, L., Chen, W. 2019. Dynamic characterizations of gas–solid flow in a novel multistage fluidized bed via nonlinear analyses. Chem Eng J, 359: 1013–1023.Google Scholar
  40. Wu, Z. X., Zhang, Z. Y. 2004. The advanced nuclear energy system and high temperature gas-cooled reactor. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  41. Wypych, P. W., Yi, J. L. 2003. Minimum transport boundary for horizontal dense-phase pneumatic conveying of granular materials. Powder Technol, 129: 111–121.Google Scholar
  42. Xiang, J., Li, Q. H., Tan, Z. C., Zhang, Y. G. 2017. Characterization of the flow in a gas–solid bubbling fluidized bed by pressure fluctuation. Chem Eng Sci, 174: 93–103.Google Scholar
  43. Zhang, H., Li, T. J., Huang, Z. Y., Kuang, S. B., Yu, A. B. 2018. Investigation on vertical plug formation of coarse particles in a non-mechanical feeder by CFD-DEM coupling method. Powder Technol, 332: 79–89.Google Scholar
  44. Zhang, H., Liu, M. L., Li, T. J., Huang, Z. Y., Bo, H. L., Dong, Y. J. 2016a. Experimental study on plug formation characteristics of a novel draft tube type feeder for vertical pneumatic conveying of coarse particles. Powder Technol, 301: 730–736.Google Scholar
  45. Zhang, H., Liu, M. L., Li, T. J., Huang, Z. Y., Sun, X. M., Bo, H. L., Dong, Y. J. 2017. Experimental investigation on gas-solid hydrodynamics of coarse particles in a two-dimensional spouted bed. Powder Technol, 307: 175–183.Google Scholar
  46. Zhang, Z. Y., Wu, Z. X., Sun, Y. L., Li, F. 2006. Design aspects of the Chinese modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor HTR-PM. Nucl Eng Des, 236: 485–490.Google Scholar
  47. Zhang, Z. Y., Dong, Y. J., Li, F., Zhang, Z. M., Wang, H. T., Huang, X. J., Li, H., Liu, B., Wu, X. X., Wang, H. et al. 2016b. The Shandong Shidao Bay 200 MWe high-temperature gas-cooled reactor pebble-bed module (HTR-PM) demonstration power plant: An engineering and technological innovation. Engineering, 2: 112–118.Google Scholar
  48. Zhang, Z. Y., Wu, Z. X., Wang, D. Z., Xu, Y. H., Sun, Y. L., Li, F., Dong, Y. J. 2009. Current status and technical description of Chinese 2×250 MWth HTR-PM demonstration plant. Nucl Eng Des, 239: 1212–1219.Google Scholar
  49. Zhao, G. B., Yang, Y. R. 2003. Multiscale resolution of fluidized-bed pressure fluctuations. AIChE J, 49: 869–882.Google Scholar
  50. Zhou, H. Z., Huang, Z. Y., Diao, X. Z. 2002. Design and verification test of the small absorber ball system of the HTR-10. Nucl Eng Des, 218: 155–162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xingzhong Diao
    • 1
  • He Yan
    • 1
  • Tianjin Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • He Zhang
    • 1
  • Hanliang Bo
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy TechnologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations