Advertisement

Exogenous Selenium-Instigated Physiochemical Transformations Impart Terminal Heat Tolerance in Bt Cotton

  • Muhammad Farrukh Saleem
  • Muhammad Asif Kamal
  • Muhammad ShahidEmail author
  • Amna Saleem
  • Amir Shakeel
  • Shakeel Ahmad Anjum
Original Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

High temperature during reproductive stages of cotton is a major constraint to achieve potential yield of cotton. The aim of the present study was to determine comparative thermo-sensitivity of squaring and flowering, to optimize exogenous selenium for heat-stressed cotton, and to explore correlation among physiochemical and morphological attributes. The experiment was conducted during 2013 and repeated during 2014. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design under split plot arrangement and replicated thrice. Treatments were comprised of heat stress (H0 = no heat imposition; H1 = heat imposition at squaring; and H2 = heat imposition at flowering) in main plot and varying foliar selenium concentrations (Se0 = water spray/control; Se50 = 50; Se100 = 100; and Se150 = 150 mg L-1 selenium) in split plot. Significantly, more antioxidants, chlorophyll contents, water relation attributes, seed cotton yield, and lesser hydrogen peroxide were recorded with 150 mg L-1 foliar selenium compared with other concentrations under H0. While under H1 and H2, statistically similar and significantly more antioxidants, chlorophyll contents, water relation attributes, seed cotton yield, and lesser hydrogen peroxide were observed for 100 and 150 mg L-1 selenium compared with other selenium concentrations. Conclusively, H2 proved more thermolabile compared with H1, and application of 150 mg L-1 foliar selenium effectively alleviated adverse effects of heat. Moreover, we observed strong and significant associations of all physiochemical attributes with seed cotton yield.

Keywords

Antioxidants Climate| Correlation Oxidative stress Phenology Thermo-sensitivity 

Abbreviations

SOD

Superoxide dismutase

POD

Peroxidase

CAT

Catalase

H2O2

Hydrogen peroxide

CHL

Total chlorophyll contents

RWC

Relative water contents

ΨS

Osmotic potential

SCY

Seed cotton yield

Notes

Acknowledgments

We genially applaud the services provided by Analytical Laboratory, Department of Agronomy, and Plant Medicinal Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan to conduct this research work. Moreover, all authors have read and approved the research article.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

42729_2019_139_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Anjum SA, Saleem MF, Shahid M, Shakoor A, Safeer M, Khan I, Farooq A, Ali I, Nazir U (2017a) Dynamics of soil and foliar applied boron and zinc to improve maize productivity and profitability. Pak J Agric Res 30(3):294–302.  https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2017.30.3.294.302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anjum SA, Ashraf U, Khan I, Tanveer M, Shahid M, Shakoor A, Longchang W (2017b) Phyto-toxicity of chromium in maize: oxidative damage, osmolyte accumulation, anti-oxidative defense and chromium uptake. Pedosphere 27(2):262–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60315-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Li Y, Chen Y, Abidallha EHMA, Hu D, Li Y, Zhang X, Chen D (2017) Planting density and leaf-square regulation affected square size and number contributing to altered insecticidal protein content in Bt cotton. Field Crop Res 205:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding Y, Wang Y, Zheng X, Cheng W, Shi R, Feng R (2017) Effects of foliar dressing of selenite and silicate alone or combined with different soil ameliorants on the accumulation of As and Cd and antioxidant system in Brassica campestris. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 142:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du Q, Zhao XH, Xia L, Jiang CJ, Wang XG, Han Y, Wang J, Yu HQ (2019). Effects of potassium deficiency on photosynthesis, chloroplast ultrastructure, ROS, and antioxidant activities in maize (Zea mays L.). J Integr Agric 18:395-406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)61953-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durán P, Viscardi S, Jacquelinne JA, Cornejo P, Azcón R, Mora MDLL (2018) Endophytic selenobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus for selenium biofortification and Gaeumannomyces graminis biocontrol. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18:1021–1035Google Scholar
  8. Feng R, Wei C, Tu S (2013) The roles of selenium in protecting plants against abiotic stresses. Environ Exp Bot 87:58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleming D, Musser F, Reisig D, Greene J, Taylor S, Parajulee M, Lorenz G, Catchot A, Gore J, Kerns D, Stewart S, Boykin D, Caprio M, Little N (2018) Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis cotton on insecticide use, heliothine counts, plant damage, and cotton yield: a meta-analysis, 1996-2015. PLoS One 13(7):e0200131.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200131 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Giannopoliti CN, Ries SK (1977) Superoxide dismutase: I. occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol 59:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Govt. of Pakistan (2017) Economic survey of Pakistan 2016-17, vol 2. Ministry of Food and Agriculture Islamabad, Pakistan, Chap, pp 19–40Google Scholar
  12. Guilherme EA, Carvalho FEL, Daloso DM, Silveira JAG (2019) Increase in assimilatory nitrate reduction and photorespiration enhances CO2 assimilation under high light-induced photoinhibition in cotton. Environ Exp Bot 159:66–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hafeez A, Ali S, Ma X, Tung SA, Shah AN, Liu A, Ahmed S, Chattha MS, Yang G (2018) Potassium to nitrogen ratio favors photosynthesis in late-planted cotton at high planting density. Ind Crop Prod 124:369–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.006. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Helmke PA, Sparks DL (1996). Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and cesium. In Methods of soil analysis. part 3, eds. Page AL, Sparks DL, 551-601. 3rd Ed. Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America, 5.Google Scholar
  15. Hu W, Ma Y, Lv F, Liu J, Zhao W, Chen B, Meng Y, Wang Y, Zhou Z (2016) Effects of late planting and shading on sucrose metabolism in cotton fiber. Environ Exp Bot 131:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang Y, Huang J, Song Y, Liu H (2017) Use of selenium to alleviate naphthalene induced oxidative stress in Trifolium repens L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 143:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Imran A, Wajid SA, Shakoor A, Shahid M, Irshad N (2017) Nitrogen triggered improvements in growth, net assimilation, allometric traits and yield of Bt. cotton genotypes. J Agric Basic Sci 2(2):37–44Google Scholar
  18. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Technical summary of climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Working group III contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5).Google Scholar
  19. Jackson ML (1962) Soil chemical analysis. Printce Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamal MA, Saleem MF, Wahid MA, Shakeel A (2017a) Effects of ascorbic acid on membrane stability and yield of heat stressed Bt Cotton. The J Anim Plant Sci 27(1):192–199Google Scholar
  21. Kamal MA, Saleem MF, Shahid M, Awais M, Khan HZ, Ahmed K (2017b) Ascorbic acid triggered physiochemical transformations at different phenological stages of heat-stressed Bt cotton. J Agron Crop Sci 203:323–331.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaur N, Sharma S, Kaur S, Nayyar H (2014) Selenium in agriculture: a nutrient or contaminant for crops? Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:1593–1624.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.918258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan HZK, Shabir MA, Akbar N, Iqbal A, Shahid M, Shakoor A, Sohail M (2017) Effect of different tillage techniques on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Agric Basic Sci 2(1):44–49Google Scholar
  24. Kuo S, (1996). Phosphorus. In Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Book Series, Number. 5, eds. Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME 869-919. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  25. Liu D, Zou J, Meng Q, Zou J, Jiang W (2009) Uptake and accumulation and oxidative stress in garlic (Allium sativum L.) under lead phytotoxicity. Ecotoxicology 18:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loreto F, Velikova V (2001) Isoprene produced by leaves protects the photosynthetic apparatus against ozone damage, quenches ozone products, and reduces lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes. Plant Physiol 127:1781–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luo Q, Bange M, Clancy L (2014) Cotton crop phenology in a new temperature. Ecol Model 285:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Makonya GM, Ogola JBO, Muasya AM, Crespo O, Maseko S, Valentine AJ, Ottosen CO, Rosenqvist E, Chimphango SBM (2019) Chlorophyll fluorescence and carbohydrate concentration as field selection traits for heat tolerant chickpea genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem 141:172–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.05.031. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Manzoor N, Akbar N, Anjum SA, Ali I, Shahid M, Shakoor A, Abbas MW, Hayat K, Hamid W, Rashid MA (2017) Interactive effect of different nitrogen and potash levels on the incidence of bacterial leaf blight of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agric Sci 8:56–63.  https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2017.81005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathur S, Agrawal D, Jajoo A (2014) Photosynthesis: response to high temperature stress. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 137:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matin M, Brown JH, Ferguson H (1989) Leaf water potential, relative water content, and diffusive resistance as screening techniques for drought resistance in barley. Agron J 81(1):100–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moodie CD, Smith NW, Mcgreery RA (1959) Laboratory manual for soil fertility development in corn (Zea mays L.) and subsequent grain yield. Crop Sci 11:368–372Google Scholar
  33. Nawaz F, Ahmad R, Ashraf MY, Waraich EA, Khan SZ (2015) Effect of selenium foliar spray on physiological and biochemical processes and chemical constituents of wheat under drought stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niu J, Zhang S, Liu S, Ma H, Chen J, Shen Q, Ge C, Zhang X, Pang C, Zha X (2018) The compensation effects of physiology and yield in cotton after drought stress. J Plant Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramos SJ, Faquin V, Guilherme LRG, Castro EM, Avila FW, Carvalho GS, Bastos CEA, Oliveira C (2010) Selenium biofortification and antioxidant activity in lettuce plants fed with selenite and selenite. Plant Soil Environ 56:584–588.  https://doi.org/10.17221/113/2010-PSE CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rhoades JD (1996). Salinity, electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In Methods of soil analysis Part 3. Soil Sci Soc America. No. 5. eds. Sparks AL, Sparks DL 417-435. Madison, Wisconsin USA.Google Scholar
  37. Saeed MT, Wahid MA, Saleem MF, Cheema MA, Shahid M, Shakoor A, Sattar A (2017) Improving the stand establishment, phenology and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) by various physiological enhancements. Pak J Agric Res 30(3):218–225.  https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2017.30.3.218.225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saleem M, Raza MAS, Ahmad S, Haider KI, Shahid AM (2016) Understanding and mitigating the impacts of drought stress in cotton- a review. Pak J Agric Sci 53(3):609–623.  https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/16.3341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saleem MF, Kamal MA, Anjum SA, Shahid M, Raza MAS, Awais M (2018a) Improving the performance of Bt-cotton under heat stress by foliar application of selenium. J Plant Nutr 41(13):1711–1723.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1459694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saleem MF, Shahid M, Shakoor A, Wahid MA, Anjum SA, Awais M (2018b) Removal of early fruit branches triggered regulations in senescence, boll attributes and yield of Bt cotton genotypes. Ann Appl Biol 172:224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saleem MF, Shakoor A, Shahid M, Cheema MA, Shakeel A, Shahid M, Tahir MU, Bilal MF (2018c) Removal of early fruit branches as potential regulator of Cry1Ac, antioxidants, senescence and yield in Bt. Cotton. Ind Crop Prod 124:885–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sarwar M, Saleem MF, Ullah N, Rizwan N, Ali S, Shahid MR, Alamri SA, Alyemeni MN, Ahmad P (2018) Exogenously applied growth regulators protect the cotton crop from heat-induced injury by modulating plant defense mechanism. Sci Rep 8(1):17086.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35420-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Shahid M, Saleem MF, Khan HZ, Wahid MA, Sarwar M (2015) Improving wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and quality by integration of urea with poultry manure. Soil Environ 34(2):148–155Google Scholar
  44. Shahid M, Saleem MF, Anjum SA, Shahid M, Afzal I (2017a) Effect of terminal heat stress on proline, secondary metabolites and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Philipp. Agric Sci 100(3):278–286Google Scholar
  45. Shahid M, Saleem MF, Anjum SA, Shahid M, Afzal I (2017b) Biochemical markers assisted screening of Pakistani wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars for terminal heat stress tolerance. Pak J Agric Sci 54(4):837–845.  https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/17.6040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Snider JL, Chastain DR, Collins GD, Grey TL, Sorensen RB (2015) Do genotypic differences in thermotolerance plasticity correspond with water-induced differences in yield and photosynthetic stability for field-grown upland cotton? Environ Exp Bot 118:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey D (1997) Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc, New York, pp 352–358Google Scholar
  48. Thomas GW (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. In Methods of soil analysis Part 3. Soil Sci Soc America. No. 5, eds. Page AL, Sparks DL, 475–490. Madison, Winconsin USA.Google Scholar
  49. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2018) Cotton: world markets and trades- USDA Foreign Agricultural Services, March 2018. pp. 4-8.Google Scholar
  50. Wang F, Peng S, Cui K, Nie L, Huang J (2014) Field performance of Bt transgenic crops: a review. Aus J Crop Sci 8(1):18–26Google Scholar
  51. Yi XP, Zhang YL, Yao HS, Han JM, Chow WS, Fan DY, Zhang WF (2018) Changes in activities of both photosystems and the regulatory effect of cyclic electron flow in field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) under water deficit. J Plant Physiol 220:74–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.10.011. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zahoor R, Dong H, Abid M, Zhao W, Wang Y, Zhou Z (2017) Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Environ Exp Bot 137:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang S, Fu W, Zhang Z, Fan Y, Liu T (2017) Effects of elevated CO2 concentration and temperature on some physiological characteristics of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaves. Environ Exp Bot 133:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del Suelo 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgronomyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Agronomic Research StationBahawalpurPakistan
  3. 3.Pesticide Quality Control LaboratoryBahawalpurPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations