Advertisement

Sorption Parameters of Carbendazim and Iprodione in the Presence of Copper Nanoparticles in Two Different Soils

  • G. R. TortellaEmail author
  • O. Rubilar
  • M. Cea
  • C. Rodríguez-Rodríguez
  • A. Seguel
  • J. Parada
Short Communication
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Today, metal nanoparticles are being incorporated into soil through several routes, where they could alter the sorption behavior of other contaminants such as pesticides. Therefore, a short assay was carried out through sorption isotherms to evaluate the effect of copper nanoparticles (NCu) and copper sulfate (as the bulk form) at 50, 100, and 200 mg kg−1 on the sorption capacity of two commonly applied fungicides (carbendazim and iprodione) onto two agricultural soils, contrasting in organic matter content (2% and 14%) and texture (sandy and loamy) respectively. The isotherms were well described using the Freundlich model (R2 > 0.95). Interestingly, at low organic matter, the pesticide sorption was notoriously increased in the presence of copper. However, NCu caused a minimal dose-dependent effect compared with their bulk form. Conversely, at high organic matter, the sorption was slightly altered by the presence of NCu. These findings constitute the first evidence that copper nanoparticles applied to agricultural soils can modify the sorption behavior of fungicides, which might increase their permanence in the environment. However, more detailed studies should be carried out in order to understand the interaction mechanisms between NCu/pesticides/soil and consequently their potential environmental risks.

Graphical Abstracts

"."

Keywords

Copper nanoparticles Copper sulfate Iprodione Carbendazim Freundlich isotherms 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by FONDECYT Project 1161713 and partially financed by Universidad de La Frontera project DI18-2024, CONICYT/FONDAP/15130015 and GAP-UFRO .

References

  1. Arias M, Paradelo M, López E, Simal-Gándara J (2006) Influence of pH and soil copper on adsorption of metalaxyl and penconazole by the surface layer of vineyard soils. J Agric Food Chem 54:8155–8162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berglöf T, Tran Van D, Kylin H, Nilsson I (2002) Carbendazim sorption–desorption in Vietnamese soils. Chemosphere 48:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brausch KA, Anderson TA, Smith PN, Maul JD (2010) Effects of functionalized fullerenes on bifenthrin and tribufos toxicity to Daphnia magna: survival, reproduction, and growth rate. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2600–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen R, Zhang Y, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Riviere JE (2016) Quantification of nanoparticle pesticide adsorption: computational approaches based on experimental data. Nanotoxicology 10:1118–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dewey KA, Gaw SK, Northcott GL, Lauren DR, Hackenburg S (2012) The effects of copper on microbial activity and the degradation of atrazine and indoxacarb in a New Zealand soil. Soil Biol Biochem 52:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duhan JS, Kumar R, Kumar N, Kaur P, Nehra K, Duhan S (2017) Nanotechnology: the new perspective in precision agriculture. Biotechnol Rep 15:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2016) Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance iprodione. EFSA J 14:4609Google Scholar
  8. Fang Q, Shi X, Zhang L, Wang Q, Wang X, Guo Y, Zhou B (2015) Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the bioavailability, metabolism, and toxicity of pentachlorophenol in zebrafish larvae. J Hazard Mater 283:897–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farkas J, Bergum S, Nilsen EW, Olsen AJ, Salaberria I, Ciesielski TM, Bączek T, Konieczna L, Salvenmoser W, Jenssen BM (2015) The impact of TiO2 nanoparticles on uptake and toxicity of benzo(a)pyrene in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Sci Total Environ 511:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fijalkowski K, Rorat A, Grobelak A, Kacprzak MJ (2017) The presence of contaminations in sewage sludge – the current situation. J Environ Manag 203:1126–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Funari V, Mantovani L, Vigliotti L, Tribaudino M, Dinelli E, Braga R (2018) Superparamagnetic iron oxides nanoparticles from municipal solid waste incinerators. Sci Total Environ 621:687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galdames A, Mendoza A, Orueta M, de Soto García IS, Sánchez M, Virto I, Vilas JL (2017) Development of new remediation technologies for contaminated soils based on the application of zero-valent iron nanoparticles and bioremediation with compost. Resour Technol 3:166–176Google Scholar
  13. Giese B, Klaessig F, Park B, Kaegi R, Steinfeldt M, Wigger H, von Gleich A, Gottschalk F (2018) Risks, release and concentrations of engineered nanomaterial in the environment. Sci Rep 8:1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Julich D, Gäth S (2014) Sorption behavior of copper nanoparticles in soils compared to copper ions. Geoderma. 235–236:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keizer P, Bruggenwert MGM (1991) Adsorption of heavy metals by clay-aluminum hydroxide complexes. In: Bolt GH, De Boodt MF, Hayes MHB, McBride MB, De Strooper EBA (eds) Interactions at the soil colloid — soil solution interface. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 177–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller AA, Adeleye AS, Conway JR, Garner KL, Zhao L, Cherr GN, Hong J, Gardea-Torresdey JL, Godwin HA, Hanna S, Ji Z, Kaweeteerawat C, Lin S, Lenihan HS, Miller RJ, Nel AE, Peralta-Videa JR, Walker SL, Taylor AA, Torres-Duarte C, Zink JI, Zuverza-Mena N (2017) Comparative environmental fate and toxicity of copper nanomaterials. NanoImpact. 7:28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirchmann H, Börjesson G, Kätterer T, Cohen Y (2017) From agricultural use of sewage sludge to nutrient extraction: a soil science outlook. Ambio 46:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lalah JO, Njogu SN, Wandiga SO (2009) The effects of Mn2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Co2+ and Zn2+ ions on pesticide adsorption and mobility in a tropical soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83(3):352–358Google Scholar
  19. Leistra M, Matser AM (2004) Adsorption, transformation, and bioavailability of the fungicides carbendazim and iprodione in soil, alone and in combination. J Environ Sci Health Part B 39:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li X, Zhou Q, Wei S, Ren W, Sun X (2011) Adsorption and desorption of carbendazim and cadmium in typical soils in northeastern China as affected by temperature. Geoderma 160:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Lü X-M, Xie J-M, Li P-P, Han J-G, Sun C (2013) Influence of copper on transport and dissipation of lambda-cyhalothrin and cypermethrin in soils. Pedosphere 23:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mandzhieva S, Minkina T, Pinskiy D, Bauer T, Sushkova S (2014) The role of soil's particle size fractions in the adsorption of heavy metals. Eur J Soil Sci 3:197–205Google Scholar
  23. Matus F, Garrido E, Hidalgo C, Paz F, Etchevers J, Merino C (2016) Carbon saturation in the silt and clay particles in soils with contrasting mineralogy. Terra Latinoamericana 34:311–319Google Scholar
  24. McBride MB (1982) Cu2+-adsorption characteristics of aluminum hydroxide and oxyhydroxides. Clay Clay Miner 30:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morales J, Manso JA, Cid A, Mejuto JC (2013) Stability study of Iprodione in alkaline media in the presence of humic acids. Chemosphere 92:1536–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olaniran AO, Balgobind A, Pillay B (2013) Bioavailability of heavy metals in soil: impact on microbial biodegradation of organic compounds and possible improvement strategies. Int J Mol Sci 14:10197–10,228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Palma G, Demanet R, Jorquera M, Mora ML, Briceño G, Violante A (2015) Effect of pH on sorption kinetics process of acidic herbicides in a volcanic soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15:549–560Google Scholar
  28. Parada J, Rubilar O, Fernández-Baldo MA, Bertolino FA, Durán N, Seabra AB, Tortella GR (2019a) The nanotechnology among US: are metal and metal oxides nanoparticles a nano or mega risk for soil microbial communities? Crit Rev Biotechnol 39:157–172Google Scholar
  29. Parada J, Rubilar O, Diez MC, Cea M, Sant’Ana da Silva A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez CE, Tortella GR (2019b) Combined pollution of copper nanoparticles and atrazine in soil: effects on dissipation of the pesticide and on microbiological community profiles. J Hazard Mater 361:228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pei Z, Yang S, Li L, Li C, Zhang S, Shan X, Wen B, Guo B (2014) Effects of copper and aluminum on the adsorption of sulfathiazole and tylosin on peat and soil. Environ Pollut 184:579–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qian G, Ao W, Yu L (2011) Combined effect of co-existing heavy metals and organophosphate pesticide on adsorption of atrazine to river sediments. Korean J Chem Eng 28:1200–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qiang L, Pan X, Zhu L, Fang S, Tian S (2016) Effects of nano-TiO2 on perfluorooctanesulfonate bioaccumulation in fishes living in different water layers: Implications for enhanced risk of perfluorooctanesulfonate. Nanotoxicology 10:471–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodríguez-Rubio P, Morillo E, Madrid L, Undabeytia T, Maqueda C (2003) Retention of copper by a calcareous soil and its textural fractions: influence of amendment with two agroindustrial residues. Eur J Soil Sci 54:401–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwab F, Bucheli TD, Camenzuli L, Magrez A, Knauer K, Sigg L, Nowack B (2013) Diuron sorbed to carbon nanotubes exhibits enhanced toxicity to Chlorella vulgaris. Environ Sci Technol 47:7012–7019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silveira MLA, Alleoni LRF (2003) Copper adsorption in tropical oxisols. Braz Arch Biol Technol 46:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sposito G (1980) Derivation of the Freundlich equation for ion exchange reactions in soils1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:652–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strömqvist J, Jarvis N (2005) Sorption, degradation and leaching of the fungicide iprodione in a golf green under Scandinavian conditions: measurements, modeling and risk assessment. Pest Manag Sci 61:1168–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suanon F, Tomètin LAS, Dimon B, Agani IC, Mama D, Azandegbe EC (2016) Utilization of sewage sludge in agricultural soil as fertilizer in the republic of benin (West Africa): what are the risks of heavy metals contamination and spreading? Am J Environ Sci 12:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suresh Y, Annapurna S, Bhikshamaiah G, Singh AK (2014) Copper nanoparticles: green synthesis and characterization. Int J Sci Eng Res 5:156–160Google Scholar
  40. Undabeytia T, Cheshire MV, Mephail D (1996) Interaction of the herbicide glyphosate with copper in humic complexes. Chemosphere 32:1245–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Violante A, Cozzolino V, Perelomov L, Caporale AG, Pigna M (2010) Mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals and metaloids in soil environments. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10:268–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang P, Lombi E, Zhao F, Kopittke PM (2016) Nanotechnology: a new opportunity in plant sciences. Trends Plant Sci 21:699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wigger H (2017) Environmental release of and exposure to iron oxide and silver nanoparticles. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu XM, Li M, Long YH, Liu RX, Yu YL, Fanf H, Li SN (2011) Effects of adsorption on degradation and bioavailability of metolachlor in soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 11:83–97Google Scholar
  45. Wu D, Li H, Liao S, Sun X, Peng H, Zhang D, Pan B (2014) Co-sorption of ofloxacin and Cu(II) in soils before and after organic matter removal. Sci Total Environ 481:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu C, Peng C, Sun L, Zhang S, Huang H, Chen Y, Shi J (2015) Distinctive effects of TiO2 and CuO nanoparticles on soil microbes and their community structures in flooded paddy soil. Soil Biol Biochem 86:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yan XM, Shi BY, Lu JJ, Feng CH, Wang DS, Tang HX (2008) Adsorption and desorption of atrazine on carbon nanotubes. J Colloid Interface Sci 321:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del Suelo 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Tortella
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • O. Rubilar
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Cea
    • 2
  • C. Rodríguez-Rodríguez
    • 3
  • A. Seguel
    • 4
  • J. Parada
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Centro de Excelencia en Investigación Biotecnológica Aplicada al Medio Ambiente (CIBAMA)TemucoChile
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería QuímicaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
  3. 3.Centro de Investigación en Contaminación Ambiental (CICA)Universidad de Costa RicaSan JoséCosta Rica
  4. 4.Departamento de Ciencias Químicas y Recursos NaturalesUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
  5. 5.Doctoral Program in Sciences of Natural ResourcesUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile

Personalised recommendations