Advertisement

Effect of diet, maintenance frequency, and environmental conditions on the rearing of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in Neotropical highlands

  • Marco A. DíazEmail author
  • Jhon Avellaneda
  • Daniel Rodríguez
Original Research Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

To standardize and optimize the mass rearing of Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), an important natural enemy of the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), a method using a production batch system for the rearing of this predator was evaluated. A total of 28 production batches (one batch was defined as a set of cohorts) were evaluated, in which some variables were alternated, such as the rearing conditions (laboratory or greenhouse), type of diet provided (F. occidentalis individuals alone or with Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), and frequency of maintenance (24 or 48 h). Each batch was monitored by recording parameters necessary for rearing, such as the survival of initial individuals, oviposition, time taken for new adult individuals to develop, and the total production of new adults. It was determined that when using a mixed diet, the production of new adult individuals was 8.4 times greater than when only a single food source was provided. Additionally, the constant conditions of the laboratory resulted in 4.9 times greater production than in the greenhouse and reduced the time required to obtain new individuals by 11.8 days. Further, a 48-h feeding frequency produced 4.2 times more individuals than a 24-h frequency. Control of these parameters will allow the standardization of a batch production process for ensuring the continuation of O. insidiosus production for use in biological control programs.

Keywords

Frankliniella occidentalis Mass rearing Factitious prey Oviposition Survival Mixed diet 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the interns of the Horticultural Production Technology program of the Universidad Militar Nueva Granada: Camilo Guijo, Segundo Saganome y Florentino Parada for the execution of this project.

Authors’ contributions

MD, JA, and DR conceived the research idea. MD designed and performed the experiments and took the lead in writing the manuscript. DR verified the methods and performed the analysis. JA contributed to the interpretation of the results. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Funding information

This study was funded by the Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento para La Ciencia, la Tecnología, y la Innovación Francisco José de Caldas de COLCIENCIAS. “Product derived from the Project CIAS-1919 co-financed by Research Vicerectory from Universidad Militar Nueva Granada”.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (Ethical Commite Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Research project CIAS-1919). This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Arijs Y, De Clercq P (2001) Rearing Orius laevigatus on cysts of the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana. Biol Control 21:79–83.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2000.0910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avellaneda J, Diaz M, Acosta D, Rodríguez D, Cantor F (2016) Colecta de antocóridos y determinación de su capacidad depredadora sobre adultos de Frankiniella occidenatils (Pergande) (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Rev Fac Ciencias Básicas 12:8–21.  https://doi.org/10.18359/rfcb.1850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avellaneda Nieto JA, Cantor Rincón F, Rodriguez Caicedo D (2015) Life table of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) feeding on Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) eggs. Rev Fac Nac Agron 69:7773–7782.  https://doi.org/10.15446/rfna.v69n1.54745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baniameri V, Soleiman-nejadian E, Mohaghegh J (2005) Life table and age-dependent reproduction of the predatory bug Orius niger Wolff (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) at three constant temperatures: a demographic analysis. Appl Entomol Zool 40:545–550.  https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2005.545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardo AMG, de Oliveira CM, Oliveira RA, Vacacela HE, Venzon M, Pallini A, Janssen A (2017) Performance of Orius insidiosus on alternative foods. J Appl Entomol 141:702–707.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonte M, De Clercq P (2008) Developmental and reproductive fitness of Orius laevigatus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) reared on factitious and artificial diets. J Econ Entomol 101:1127–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[1127:DARFOO]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosco L, Giacometto E, Tavella L (2008) Colonization and predation of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) by Orius spp. (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in sweet pepper greenhouses in Northwest Italy. 44:331–340. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Branco R, Lavras UF De (2002) Influência do Fotoperíodo na Reprodução e Longevidade de Orius insidiosus ( Say ) ( Heteroptera : Anthocoridae). 31:257–261Google Scholar
  9. Brito JP, Vacari AM, Thuler RT, Antonio S (2009) Aspectos biológicos de Orius insidiosus (SAY, 1832) predando ovos de Plutella xylostella (L., 1758) e Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller, 1879). Hortic Bras 27:951–955Google Scholar
  10. Bueno VHP, Mendes SM, Carvalho LM (2006) Evaluation of a rearing-method for the predator Orius insidiosus. Bull Insectology 59:1–6.Google Scholar
  11. Butler CD, O’Neil RJ (2007) Life history characteristics of Orius insidiosus (say) fed diets of soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura and soybean thrips, Neohydatothrips variabilis (beach). Biol Control 40:339–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Bach P (1964) Biological control of insect pests and weeds. First edit. Chapman & Hall Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. De Clercq P (2005) Culture of natural enemies on factitious foods and artificial diets. In: Capinera JL (ed) Encyclopedia of entomology, first. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 651–652Google Scholar
  14. Díaz MA, Rodríguez D, Cantor F (2019) A scouting method for estimating insect populations in an Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) mass rearing system. Neotrop Entomol 48:476–483.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-018-0664-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gholami Z, Sadeghi A (2016) Management strategies for western flower thrips in vegetable greenhouses in Iran: a review. Plant Prot Sci 52:87–98.  https://doi.org/10.17221/2/2015-PPS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guedes JC, Costa ID da, Castiglioni E (2000) Bases e técnicas do manejo de insetos. Universidade Federal De Sanata Maria. Centro de Ciências Rurais. Departamento de Defesa Fitossanitária, Santa Maria, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  17. Hénaut Y, Alauzet C, Dargagnon D, Lambin M (1999) Visual learning in larval Orius majusculus a polyphagous predator. Entomol Exp Appl 90:103–107.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00427.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Honda JY, Nakashima Y, Hirose Y (1998) Development, reproduction and longevity of Orius minutus and Orius sauteri (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) when reared on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Appl Entomol Zool 33:449–453.  https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.37.3229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Husseini M, Schumann K, Sermann H (1993) Rearing immature feeding stage of Orius majesculus Reut. (Het., Anthocoridae) on the acarid mite Tyrophagus putriscentiae Schr. As new alternative prey. J Appl Entomol 116:113–117.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1993.tb01176.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ito K (2007) A simple mass-rearing method for predaceous Orius bugs in the laboratory. Appl Entomol Zool 42:573–577.  https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2007.573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim DI, Park JD, Kim SG, Kim SS, Paik CH (2004) Biological control of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) with Orius strigicollis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on cucumber in plastic houses in the southern region of Korea. J Asia Pac Entomol 7:311–315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60232-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lefebvre MG, Reguilón, Kirschbaum DS (2013) Evaluación del efecto de la liberación de Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: anthocoridae), como agente de control biológico de trips en el cultivo de frutilla. Rev Investig Agropecu 39:273–280Google Scholar
  23. Leppla NC, De Clercq P (2019) History of the international organization for biological control global working group on mass rearing and quality assurance. J Insect Sci 19.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey125
  24. Mendes SM, Bueno VHP, Carvalho LM (2005) Desenvolvimento e exigências térmicas de Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera, Anthocoridae). Rev Bras Entomol 49:575–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murai T, Narai Y, Sugiura N (2001) Utilization of germinated broad bean seeds as an oviposition substrate in mass rearing of the predatory bug, Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Appl Entomol Zool 36:489–494.  https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2001.489 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parra JR. (2002) Criacao massal de inmigos naturais. In: Parra JRP, Botelho PSM, Correa BS, Bento JM (eds) Controle biológico no Brasil, first edit. Manole Ltda, Sao Paulo. Brasil, pp 143–164Google Scholar
  27. Pilkington LJ, Hoddle MS (2007) Use of life tables to quantify reproductive and developmental biology of Gonatocerus triguttatus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Biol Control 42:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. R Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R A Lang. Environ. Stat. Comput. R Found. Stat. Comput. , Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07-0, URL http//www.R-project.org/
  29. Reitz S (2015) Datasheet report for Frankliniella occidentalis (Western flower Thrips). In: Invasive Species Compend. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/24426#FEF203C0-6B35-4E6C-966C-EF7082C3E530. Accessed 14 Jul 2018
  30. Rutledge CE, O’Neil RJ (2005) Orius insidiosus (say) as a predator of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura. Biol Control 33:56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt J, Richards P, Nadel H, Ferguson G (1995) A rearing method for the production of large numbers of the insidious flower bug, Orius insidiosus (say) (HEMIPTERA: ANTHOCORIDAE). Can Entomol 127:445–447.  https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent127445-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silveira LCP, Bueno VHP, van Lenteren JC (2004) Orius insidiosus as biological control agent of Thrips in greenhouse chrysanthemums in the tropics. Bull Insectology 57:103–109Google Scholar
  33. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 15:281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sørensen JG, Addison MF, Terblanche JS (2012) Mass-rearing of insects for pest management: challenges, synergies and advances from evolutionary physiology. Crop Prot 38:87–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas JMG, Shirk PD, Shapiro JP (2012) Mass rearing of a tropical minute pirate bug, Orius pumilio (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Florida Entomol 95:202–204.  https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tommasini MG, van Lenteren JC, Burgio G (2004) Biological traits and predation capacity of four Orius species on two prey species. Bull Insectology 57:79–93.Google Scholar
  37. van Lenteren JC (2012) The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. BioControl 57:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9395-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Lenteren JC, Bolckmans K, Köhl J, Ravensberg WJ, Urbaneja A (2018) Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. BioControl 63:39–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Lenteren JC, Tommasini MG (1999) Mass production, storage, shipment and quality control of natural enemies. In: Albajes R, Lodovica GM, Van Lenteren JC, Elad Y (eds) Integrated Pest and disease Management in Greenhouse Crops. Springer Netherlands, Netherlands, pp 276–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Lenteren JC, Tommasini MG (2003) Mass production, storage, shipment and quality control of natural enemies. In: van Lenteren JC (ed) Quality control and production of biological control agents: theory and testing procedures. CABI, Wallingford, pp 181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weintraub PG, Pivonia S, Steinberg S (2011) How many Orius laevigatus are needed for effective western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, management in sweet pepper? Crop Prot 30:1443–1448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wong SK, Frank SD (2013) Pollen increases fitness and abundance of Orius insidiosus say (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on banker plants. Biol Control 64:45–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yanik E, Unlu L (2011) Influences of temperature and humidity on the life history parameters and prey consumption of Anthocoris minki Dohrn (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Appl Entomol Zool 46:177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-011-0029-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yano E, Watanabe K, Yara K (2002) Life history parameters of Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Het., Anthocoridae) reared on Ephestia kuehniella eggs and the minimum amount of the diet for rearing individuals. J Appl Entomol 126:389–394.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2002.00598.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© African Association of Insect Scientists 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio de Control Biológico, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas y AplicadasUniversidad Militar Nueva GranadaCajicáColombia

Personalised recommendations