Advertisement

International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 249–256 | Cite as

Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in a mosaic habitat at the ecotone between two savanna ecosystems in the Neotropical region

  • Renato Portela SalomãoEmail author
  • Lucas Kaique Sousa Gonçalves
  • Rodrigo Ferreira de Morais
  • Lucas Ramos Costa Lima
Scientific Note

Abstract

One of the main issues related to the conservation of native ecosystems involves the availability of data regarding the biodiversity present on them. In northeastern Brazil, the state of Piaui comprises an important area of the ecotone between Cerrado and Caatinga, two savannah ecosystems. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze dung beetle diversity at native grasslands and tree clusters, during rainy and dry periods, in one region located at the ecotone between Cerrado and Caatinga, in the state of Piaui. Inventories were performed in two habitats: grasslands and tree clusters. A total of 945 individuals distributed in five species were collected: Canthon cinctellus Germar, 1824, Dichotomius geminatus (Arrow, 1913), Dichotomius nisus (Olivier, 1789), Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787) and Ontherus appendiculatus (Mannerheim, 1829). Canthon cinctellus was the dominant species, comprising more than 90% of the total dung beetle collected. Species abundance was much higher in grassland than in the tree clusters, and none beetles were obtained during the dry period. The species richness observed in the ecotone between Caatinga and Cerrado was low when compared to other similar ecosystems. With this study, there is a total of 13 species recorded in the state of Piaui.

Keywords

Habitat structure Scarabaeinae Semi-arid Seasonality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Luis Santiago for the aid in the field trips and analyze of data. We also thank Fernando Zagury Vaz-de-Mello for dung beetle identification. We would like to thank the personnel from Fazenda Piquizeiro for authorizing the fieldwork in this site. We thank Luis Javier Fuentes-Jacques for revising the English text. We are grateful to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico for a scholarship granted to LKSG. We also thank Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología for a scholarship granted to RPS over the course of this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

The experimentation was no invasive and complied with Brazilian law. At the end of the experiment, the specimens were deposited in the “Laboratório de Biodiversidade – UESPI” and in the “Seção de Entomologia da Coleção Zoológica da UFMT” following standard procedures and there are no conflicts of interest (financial and non-financial).

Human participants and informed consent

There were no humans participants on the study and thus, no ‘informed consent’ was required.

References

  1. Aidar T, Koller WW, Rodriges SR, Corrêa AM, Silva JCC, Balta OS, Oliveira JM, Oliveira VL (2000) Coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) collected in Aquidauana, MS, Brazil. An Soc Entomol Bras 29:817–820.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0301-80592000000400023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida SSP, Louzada JNC (2009) Community structure of Scarabaeinae (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera) in Brazilian savannah phytophysionomies and its importance for conservation. Neotrop Entomol 38:32–43.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2009000100003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbero E, López-Guerrero Y (1992) Some considerations on the dispersal power of Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius 1787) in the New World (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae Scarabaeinae). Trop Zool 5:115–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03946975.1992.10539184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchin I, Honer MR, Gomes A, Koller WW (1992) Efeitos de alguns carrapeticidas/Insetcidas sobre Onthophagus gazella. EMBRAPA Comunicado técnico 45:1–7Google Scholar
  5. Boonrotpong S, Sotthibandhu S, Pholpunthin C (2004) Species composition of dung beetles in the primary and secondary forests at ton Nga Chang wildlife sanctuary. ScienceAsia 30:59–65.  https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2004.30.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks DR, Mayden RL, McLennan DA (1992) Phylogeny and biodiversity: conserving our evolutionary legacy. Trends Ecol Evol 7:55–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(92)90107-M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavalcanti R, Joly CA (2002) Biodiversity and conservation priorities in the Cerrado region. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (eds) The Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a Neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correa CMA, Puker A, Korasaki V, Ferreira KR, Abot AR (2016) Attractiveness of baits to dung beetles in Brazilian savanna and exotic pasturelands. Entomol Sci 19:112–123.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa CMQ, Silva FAB, Farias AI, Moura RC (2009) Diversity of Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) collected with flight intercept trap in the Charles Darwin ecologic refuge, Igarassu-PE, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 53:88–94.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262009000100021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa FC, Pessoa KKT, Liberal CN, Filgueiras BCK, Salomão RP, Iannuzzi L (2013) What is the importance of open habitat in a predominantly closed forest area to the dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae) assemblage? Rev Bras Entomol 57:329–334.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013000300012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. da Silva PG, Hernández MIM (2015) Spatial patterns of movement of dung beetle species in a tropical forest suggest a newtrap spacing for dung beetle biodiversity studies. PLoS One 10:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126112 Google Scholar
  12. Damborsky MP, Bohle MCA, Polesel MGI, Porcel EA, Fontana JL (2015) Spatial and temporal variation of dung beetle assemblages in a fragmented landscape at eastern humid Chaco. Neotropical Entomology 44:30–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-014-0257-2
  13. Davis ALV (2002) Dung beetle diversity in South Africa: influential factors, conservation status, data inadequacies and survey design. Afr Entomol 10:53–65Google Scholar
  14. Delcourt PA, Delcourt HR (1992) Ecotone dynamics in space and time. In: Hansen AJ, Castri F (eds) Landscape boundaries: consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 19–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Díaz A, Galante E, Favila M (2010) The effect of the landscape matrix on the distribution of dung and carrion beetles in a fragmented tropical rain forest. J Insect Conserv 10:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.8101 Google Scholar
  16. Doube BM (1990) A functional classification for analysis of the structure of dung beetle assemblages. Ecol Entomol 15:371–383.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1990.tb00820.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Endres AA, Creão-Duarte AJ, Hernández MIM (2007) Diversity of Scarabaeidae s. str. (Coleoptera) in the Reserva Biológica Guaribas, Mamanguape, Paraiba, Brazil: a comparison between Atlantic Forest and northeast’s Tabuleiro. Rev Bras Entomol 51:67–71.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262007000100012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farias RRS, Castro AAJF (2004) Phytosociology in parts of vegetation from Campo Maior complex in Campo Maior municipality, Piauí state, Brazil. Acta Bot Bras 18:949–963.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062004000400025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Favila ME, Halffter G (1997) The use of indicator groups for measuring biodiversity as related to community structure and function. Acta Zool Mex 72:1–25Google Scholar
  20. Feer F (2008) Responses of dung beetle assemblages to characteristics of rain forest edges. Ecotropica 14:49–62Google Scholar
  21. Génier F (2009) Le genre Eurysternus Dalman, 1824 (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Oniticellini), revision taxonomique et clés de determination illustrées. Pensoft, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillett CPDT, Gillett MPT, Gillett JEDT, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2010) Diversity and distribution of the scarab beetle tribe Phanaeini in the northern states of the Brazilian northeast (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Insecta Mundi 642:1–20Google Scholar
  23. Greene HW (1994) Systematics and natural history, foundations for understanding and conserving biodiversity. Am Zool 34:48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/34.1.48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grossi PC, Leivas FWT, Arriagada G, Silva AS, Galileo MHM, Souza URM, Pinto JS Jr, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2017) Coleoptera: Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Cetoniidae, Elmidae, Epimetopidae, Geotrupidae, Gyrinidae, Histeridae, Hydrochidae, Hybosoridae, Lampyridae, Limnichidae, Lutrochidae, Melolonthidae, Noteridae, Passalidae e Scarabaeidae. In: Mantovani W, Monteiro RF, Anjos L, Cariello MO (eds) Pesquisa em unidades de conservação no domínio da Caatinga: subsídios à gestão. Edições UFC, Fortaleza, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  25. Guedes RNC, Zanuncio TV, Zanuncio JC, Medeiros AGB (2000) Species richness and fluctuation of defoliator Lepidoptera populations in Brazilian plantations of Eucalyptus grandis as affected by plant age and weather factors. For Ecol Manag 137:179–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00326-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halffter G, Arellano L (2002) Response of dung beetle diversity to human-induced changes in a tropical landscape. Biotropica 34:144–154.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00250.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halffter G, Favila ME (1993) The Scarabaeinae (Insecta: Coleoptera) an animal group for analyzing, inventorying and monitoring biodiversity in tropical rainforest and modified landscapes. Biol Int 27:15–21Google Scholar
  28. Halffter G, Halffter V (2009) Why and where coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) eat seeds, fruits or vegetable detritus. Bol Soc Entomol Aragon 45:1–22Google Scholar
  29. Halffter G, Matthews EG (1966) The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomol Mex 12:1–312Google Scholar
  30. Hanski I, Cambefort Y (1991) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harvey CA, Gonzalez J, Somarriba E (2006) Dung beetle and terrestrial mammal diversity in forests, indigenous agroforestry systems and plantain monocultures in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Biodivers Conserv 15:555–585.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-2088-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hernández MIM (2005) Besouros Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera) da área do Curimataú, Paraíba. In: Araújo FS, Rodal MJN, Barbosa MRV (eds) Análise das variações da biodiversidade do bioma Caatinga. MMA, Brasília, pp 369–380Google Scholar
  33. Hernández MIM (2007) Besouros escarabeíneos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) da Caatinga paraibana, Brasil. Oecolog Bras 11:356–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hernández B, Maes J, Harvey CA, Vílchez S, Medina A, Sánchez D (2003) Abundancia y diversidad de escarabajos coprófagos y mariposas diurnas en un paisaje ganadero en el departamento de Rivas, Nicaragua. Agroforest Am 10:93–102Google Scholar
  35. Hill CJ (1993) The species composition and seasonality of an assemblage of tropical Australian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Aust Entomol 20:121–126Google Scholar
  36. Koller WW, Gomes A, Rodrigues SR, Goiozo PFI (2007) Coprophagous Scarabaeidae and Aphodiidae in implanted pastures from sul-mato-grossense savanna area. Zoociências 9:81–93Google Scholar
  37. Krell F, Krell-Westerwalbesloh S, Weiß I, Eggleton P, Linsenmair KE (2003) Spatial separation of Afrotropical dung beetle guilds: a trade-off between competitive superiority and energetic constraints (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecography 26:210–222.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03278.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larsen TH, Forsyth A (2005) Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies. Biotropica 37:322–325.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00042.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liberal CN, Farias AMI, Meiado MV, Filgueiras BKC, Iannuzzi L (2011) How habitat change and rainfall affect dung beetle diversity in Caatinga, a Brazilian semi-arid ecosystem. J Insect Sci 11:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1673/031.011.11401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Louzada JNC, Lopes FS, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2007) Structure and composition of a dung beetle community (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae) in a small forest patch from Brazilian Pantanal. Rev Bras Zoociências 9:199–203Google Scholar
  41. Lumaret JP, Kirk A (1987) Ecology of dung beetles in the French Mediterranean region (Col. Scarabaeinae). Acta Zool Mex 24:1–55Google Scholar
  42. Marsh CJ, Louzada J, Beiroz W, Ewers RM (2013) Optimising bait for pitfall trapping of Amazonian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). PLoS One 8:e73147.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martínez I, Montes-de-Oca E (1994) Observaciones sobre algunos factores microambientales y el ciclo biológico de dos especies de escarabajos rodadores (Coleoptera, Scarbaeidae, Canthon). Folia Entomol Mex 91:47–59Google Scholar
  44. Matavelli R, Campos AM, Silva FAB (2013) New records of Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in a biogeographical transition zone in the state of Maranhão, Brazil. Check List 9:909–911.  https://doi.org/10.15560/9.4.909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Medina AM, Lopes PP (2014) Seasonality in the dung beetle community in a Brazilian tropical dry forest: do small changes make a difference? J Insect Sci 14:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/14.1.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mesquita-Filho W, Flechtmann CAH, Godoy WAC, Bjornstand ON (2018) The impact of the introduced Digitonthophagus gazella on a native dung beetle community in Brazil during 26 years. Biol Invasions 20:963–979.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1603-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miranda CHB, Santos JC, Bianchin I (2000) The role of Digitonthophagus gazella in pastures cleaning and production as a result of burial of cattle dung. Pastures Trop 22:14–18Google Scholar
  48. Morrone JJ (2006) Biogeographic areas and transition zones of Latin America and the caribbean islands based on panbiogeographic and cladistic analyses of the entomofauna. Annu Rev Entomol 51:467–494.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da-Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neves FS, Oliveira VHF, Espírito-Santo MM, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Louzada J, Sanchez-Azofeifa A, Fernandes GW (2010) Successional and seasonal changes in a community of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in a Brazilian tropical dry Forest. Nat Conservação 8:160–164.  https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.00802009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector S, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vulinec K (2007) The Scarabaeinae research network. Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada J, Larsen T, Amezquita S, Favila ME (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol Conserv 141:1461–1474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Noriega JA, Delgado O, Blanco JI, Gámez J, Clavijo J (2017) Introduction, establishment, and invasion of Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the savannas of Venezuela and Colombia. Nat Resour 8:370–381.  https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2017.85023 Google Scholar
  54. O’Connell MA (1989) Population dynamics of Neotropical small mammals in seasonal habitats. J Mammal 70:532–548.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1381425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pablo-Cea JD, Velado-Cano MA, Fuentes R, Cruz M, Noriega JA (2017) First report of Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787) and new records of Euoniticellus intermedius (Reiche, 1849) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae Latreille, 1802) in El Salvador. Acta Zool Mex 33:527–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodrigues MM, Uchôa MA, Ise S (2013) Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) in three landscapes in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Braz J Biol 73:211–220.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842013000100023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Salomão RP, Iannuzzi L (2017) How do regeneration stages of Caatinga forests influence the structure of dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) assemblage? Coleopt Bull 71:578–588.  https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-71.3.578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Salomão RP, Bezerra BM, Iannuzzi L (2017) Daily activity of Dichotomius geminatus (arrow, 1913) and Deltochilum verruciferum Felsche, 1911 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) facing carrion: from resource perception to feeding. Rev Bras Entomol 61:300–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2017.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sampaio DV, Arzabe C, Castro AAJF, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2009) Considerações sobre a fauna de besouros rola-bosta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) em duas áreas de cerrado litorâneo no Maranhão, Brasil. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279060588_Consideracoes_sobre_a_fauna_de_besouros_rola-bosta_Coleoptera_Scarabaeidae_Scarabaeinae_em_duas_areas_de_cerrado_litoraneo_no_Maranhao_Brasil. Accessed 17 Oct 2018
  60. Scholtz ADL, Davis AL, Kryger U (2009) Evolutionary biology and conservation of dung beetles. Pensoft Publishers, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  61. Silva RJ, Coletti F, Costa DA, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2014) Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of forests and pastures of southwestern Brazilian Amazon: survey of species and feeding guilds. Acta Amaz 44:345–352.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201304472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Silva RJ, Storck-Tonon D, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2016) Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) persistence in Amazonian forest fragments and adjacent pastures: biogeographic implications for alpha and beta diversity. J Insect Conserv 20:549–564.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9885-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Silva JMC, Leal IR, Tabarelli M (2018) Caatinga the largest tropical dry Forest region in South America. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  64. Stoner KE, Timm RM (2011) Seasonally dry tropical Forest mammals: adaptations and seasonal patterns. In: Dirzo R, Young HS, Mooney HA, Ceballos G (eds) Seasonally tropical dry forests ecology and conservation. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tarasov S, Dimitrov D (2016) Multigene phylogenetic analysis redefines dung beetles relationships and classification (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). BMC Evol Biol 16:257.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0822-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tarasov S, Génier F (2015) Innovative bayesian and parsimony phylogeny of dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae) enhanced by ontology-based partitioning of morphological characters. PLoS One 10:e0116671.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Teodoro AV, Sousa-Souto L, Klein AM, Tscharntke T (2010) Seasonal contrasts in the response of coffee ants to agroforestry shade-tree management. Environ Entomol 39:1744–1750.  https://doi.org/10.1603/EN10092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Theuerkauf J, Rouys S, Henegouwen ALB, Krell F, Mazur S, Mühlenberg M (2009) Colonization of forest elephant dung by invertebrates in the Bossematié forest reserve, Ivory Coast. Zool Stud 48:343–350Google Scholar
  69. Tinôco IC, Bezerra BG, Lucio PS, Barbosa LM (2018) Characterization of rainfall patterns in the semiarid Brazil. Anu Inst Geociências – UFRJ 41:397–409.  https://doi.org/10.11137/2018_2_397_409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tissiani ASO, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Campelo-Júnior JH (2017) Dung beetles of Brazilian pastures and key to genera identification (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Pesq Agrop Brasileira 52:401–418.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2017000600004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2000) Present degree of knowledge of the Brazilian Scarabaeidae s. str. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). In: Martín-Piera P, Morrone JJ, Melic A (eds) Trabajos del 1er taller iberoamericano de entomología sistemática. Proyecto Iberoamericano de Biogeografía y Entomología Sistemática (PRIBES 2000). Monografías del Tercer Milenio, Zaragoza, pp 183–195Google Scholar
  72. Velloso AL, Sampaio EVSB, Pareyn FGC (2002) Ecorregiões propostas para o bioma Caatinga ambiental. The Nature Conservancy do Brasil, RecifeGoogle Scholar
  73. Vieira L, Louzada JNC, Spector S (2008) Effects of degradation and replacement of southern Brazilian coastal sandy vegetation on the dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Biotropica 40:719–727.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00432.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© African Association of Insect Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Red de EcoetologíaInstituto de Ecología A. CXalapaMexico
  2. 2.Laboratório de BiodiversidadeCampus Heróis do Jenipapo, Universidade Estadual do PiauíCampo MaiorBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Botânica e EtnoecologiaCampus Heróis do Jenipapo, Universidade Estadual do PiauíCampo MaiorBrazil

Personalised recommendations