Sufficient or insufficient: Assessment of the intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) of the world’s major greenhouse gas emitters
- 1 Downloads
The recent Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has resulted in the submission of the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) of 190 countries. This study aims to provide an analysis of the ambitiousness and fairness of the mitigation components of the INDCs submitted by various parties. We use a unified framework to assess 23 INDCs that cover 50 countries, including European Union (EU)-28 countries as parties to the Convention, which represent 87.45% of the global greenhouse gas emissions in 2012. First, we transform initial INDC files into reported reduction targets. Second, we create four schemes and six scenarios to determine the required reduction effort, which considers each nation’s reduction responsibility, capacity, and potential, thereby reflecting their historical and current development status. Finally, we combine the reported reduction target and the required reduction effort to assess INDCs. Evaluation results of the 23 emitters indicate that 2 emitters (i.e., EU and Brazil) are rated as “sufficient,” 7 emitters (e.g., China, the United States, and Canada) are rated as “moderate,” and 14 emitters (e.g., India, Russia, and Japan) are rated as “insufficient.” Most pledges exhibit a considerable distance from representing a fair contribution.
KeywordsIntended Nationally Determined Contributions mitigation responsibility capacity potential
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71871022, 71471018, 71521002, and 71828401), the Social Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. 16JDGLB013), the Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education, the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (No. 161076), the National Key R&D Program (Grant No. 2016YFA0602603), the International Clean Energy Talent Program of the Chinese Scholarship Council, and the Key Technology Partnership Visiting Fellow Program from University of Technology Sydney and Beijing Institute of Technology.
- ReferencesGoogle Scholar
- BP (2016). Statistical review of world energy. https://doi.org/http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-worldenergy/downloads.html
- Climate Action Tracker (2016). Assessment of mitigation contributions to the Paris Agreement. https://doi.org/http://www.climateactiontracker.org/indcs.html, 2016–10–3
- Davide M, Vesco P (2016). Alternative approaches for rating INDCs: A comparative analysis. FEEM Working Paper No. 018.2016. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2745816,2016–11–5Google Scholar
- den Elzen M, Admiraal A, Roelfsema M, van Soest H, Hof A F, Forsell N (2016). Contribution of the G20 economies to the global impact of the Paris agreement climate proposals. Climatic Change, 137(3-4): 1–11Google Scholar
- DESAUN (2015). World population prospects, the 2015 revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/Google Scholar
- Joint Global Change Research Institute (2015). Global Change Assessment Model v4.2. https://doi.org/http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/archived-models/gcam/download/, 2016–9-28
- Meinshausen M, Smith S J, Calvin K, Daniel J S, Kainuma M L T, Lamarque J F, Matsumoto K, Montzka S A, Raper S C B, Riahi K, Thomson A, Velders G J M, van Vuuren D P P (2011). The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change, 109(1-2): 213–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moss R H, Edmonds J A, Hibbard K A, Manning M R, Rose S K, van Vuuren D P, Carter T R, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl G A, Mitchell J F, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith S J, Stouffer R J, Thomson A M, Weyant J P, Wilbanks T J (2010). The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463(7282): 747–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ott H E, Winkler H, Brouns B (2004). South–north dialogue on equity in the greenhouse: A proposal for an adequate and equitable global climate agreements. https://www.mysciencework.com/publication/show/9551e6d8e3f764394790c3a2829ce94b, 2016–4-10Google Scholar
- UNDP (2015). Human Development Data (1990–2012). http://hdr.undp.org/en/dataGoogle Scholar
- UNEP (2015). The Emissions Gap Report 2015: A UNEP Synthesis Report. http://uneplive.unep.org/media/docs/theme/13/EGR_2015_-Technical_Report_final_version.pdf, 2016–11–17Google Scholar
- UNFCCC (1997). Proposed elements of a protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. http://unfccc.int/cop4/resource/docs/1997/agbm/misc01a3.htm, 2016–3-10Google Scholar
- UNFCCC (2015). Synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/07.pdf?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss, 2016–12–25Google Scholar
- UNFCCC (2016). Intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs). https://doi.org/http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx, 2016–12–13
- van Vuuren D P, Stehfest E, den Elzen M G J, Kram T, van Vliet J, Deetman S, Isaac M, Klein Goldewijk K K, Hof A, Wang K, Xian Y J, Zhang J M, Li Y, Che L N (2016). Potential carbon emission abatement cost recovery from carbon emission trading in China: an estimation of industry sector. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(3): 842–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Bank (2015). World Bank Open Data-GDP. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KDGoogle Scholar
- WRI (2016). CAIT Climate Data Explore. http://cait.wri.org/indc/Google Scholar