# Isomorphism Check for \(2^{n}\) Factorial Designs with Randomization Restrictions

- 25 Downloads

**Part of the following topical collections:**

## Abstract

Factorial designs with randomization restrictions are often used in industrial experiments when a complete randomization of trials is impractical. In the statistics literature, the analysis, construction, and isomorphism of factorial designs have been extensively investigated. Much of the work has been on a case-by-case basis—addressing completely randomized designs, randomized block designs, split-plot designs, etc. separately. In this paper, we take a more unified approach, developing theoretical results and an efficient relabeling strategy to both construct and check the isomorphism of multistage factorial designs with randomization restrictions. The examples presented in this paper particularly focus on split-lot designs.

## Keywords

Finite projective geometry Multistage factorial designs Split-lot designs \((t-1)\)-Spread Stars## Notes

### Acknowledgements

Ranjan’s research was partially supported by the IIM Indore’s Grant for External Research Collaboration. Mendivil’s research was funded in part by NSERC 2012:238549.

### Compliance with Ethical Standards

### Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

## References

- 1.Addelman S (1964) Some two-level factorial plans with split plot confounding’. Technometrics 6(3):253–258MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 2.André J (1954) Über nicht-desarguessche ebenen mit transitiver translationsgruppe. Math Z 60(1):156–186MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bailey RA (2004) Association schemes: designed experiments, algebra and combinatorics, vol 84. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Batten LM (1997) Combinatorics of finite geometries. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bingham D, Sitter RR (1999) Minimum-aberration two-level fractional factorial split-plot designs. Technometrics 41(1):62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Bingham D, Sitter R, Kelly E, Moore L, Olivas JD (2008) Factorial designs with multiple levels of randomization. Stat Sin 18(2):493–513MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bose RC (1947) Mathematical theory of the symmetrical factorial design. Sankhyā: Indian J Stat 8:107–166MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Butler NA (2004) Construction of two-level split-lot fractional factorial designs for multistage processes. Technometrics 46:445–451MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Cheng CS (2016) Theory of factorial design: single-and multi-stratum experiments. Chapman and Hall/CRC, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Cheng CS, Tang B (2005) A general theory of minimum aberration and its applications. Ann Stat 33(2):944–958. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000001228 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 12.Cheng CS, Tsai PW (2011) Multistratum fractional factorial designs. Stat Sin 21:1001–1021MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Coxeter HSM (1969) Introduction to geometry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.Daniel C (1959) Use of half-normal plots in interpreting factorial two-level experiments. Technometrics 1(4):311–341MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Dean A, Voss D (1999) Design and analysis of experiments. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Eisfeld J, Storme L (2000) Partial t-spreads and minimal t-covers in finite projective spaces. Ghent University, Intensive Course on Finite Geometry and its ApplicationsGoogle Scholar
- 17.Gordon NA, Shaw R, Soicher LH (2004) Classification of partial spreads in PG (4, 2). Available online as http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~leonard/partialspreads/PG42new.pdf
- 18.Hedayat AS, Sloane NJA, Stufken J (2012) Orthogonal arrays: theory and applications. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hirschfeld J (1998) Projective geometries over finite fields. Oxford mathematical monographs. Oxford University Press, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 20.Honold T, Kiermaier M, Kurz S (2019) Classification of large partial plane spreads in PG(6, 2) and related combinatorial objects. J Geom 110(1):5MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lidl R, Niederreiter H (1994) Introduction to finite fields and their applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lin C, Sitter R (2008) An isomorphism check for two-level fractional factorial designs. J Stat Plan Inference 134:1085–1101MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ma CX, Fang KT, Lin DK (2001) On the isomorphism of fractional factorial designs. J Complex 17(1):86–97MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Mateva ZT, Topalova ST (2009) Line spreads of PG (5, 2). J Comb Des 17(1):90–102MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.McDonough T, Shaw R, Topalova S (2014) Classification of book spreads in PG (5, 2). Note di Mat 33(2):43–64MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 26.Mee R (2009) A comprehensive guide to factorial two-level experimentation. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Mee RW, Bates RL (1998) Split-lot designs: experiments for multistage batch processes. Technometrics 40(2):127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Miller A (1997) Strip-plot configurations of fractional factorials. Technometrics 39:153–161MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Mukerjee R, Wu C (2006) A modern theory of factorial design. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 30.Nelder J (1965a) The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. I. Block structure and the null analysis of variance. Proc R Soc Lond A 283:147–162MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Nelder J (1965b) The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. II. Treatment structure and the general analysis of variance. Proc R Soc Lond A 283:163–178MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.R Core Team (2014) R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- 33.Ranjan P (2007) Factorial and fractional factorial designs with randomization restrictions-a projective geometric approach. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science-Simon Fraser UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 34.Ranjan P, Bingham DR, Dean AM (2009) Existence and construction of randomization defining contrast subspaces for regular factorial designs. Ann Stat 37(6A):3580–3599MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Ranjan P, Bingham DR, Mukerjee R (2010) Stars and regular fractional factorial designs with randomization restrictions. Stat Sin 20(4):1637–1653MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 36.Ryan TP (2007) Modern experimental design. Wiley, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Shaw R, Topalova ST (2014) Book spreads in PG (7, 2). Discrete Math 330:76–86MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Soicher L (2000) Computation of partial spreads, web preprintGoogle Scholar
- 39.Speed TP, Bailey RA (1982) On a class of association schemes derived from lattices of equivalence relations. Algebraic structures and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 55–74Google Scholar
- 40.Tjur T (1984) Analysis of variance models in orthogonal designs. Int Stat Rev 52:33–81MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Topalova S, Zhelezova S (2010) 2-Spreads and transitive and orthogonal 2-parallelisms of PG (5, 2). Graphs Comb 26(5):727–735MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Wu CJ, Hamada M (2009) Experiments: planning, analysis and optimization, 2nd edn. Wiley, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar