Advertisement

Optimal Designs for Step-Stress Models Under Interval Censoring

  • Panayiotis Bobotas
  • Maria KateriEmail author
Original Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

This article proposes new approaches for optimal planning of step-stress accelerated life testing models. The experiment considered is time constrained with the tested items not monitored continuously but inspected at particular time points instead. The inspection points are primarily the points of stress level change and the experiment’s termination point, but the inclusion of additional intermediate inspection points is possible. The underlying lifetimes in each stress level follow a general-scale family of distributions having, among others, the exponential and the Weibull as special cases. For this model, the optimal allocation of the inspection points is studied in terms of the classical A-, C-, D- and E-optimality criteria, as well as in the context of minimizing the probability of nonexistence of the maximum likelihood estimators of the model’s parameters. For the determination of the inspection intervals’ length, a deterministic and a hazard rate-based approach are introduced. Simulation study results indicate that these new approaches outperform the standard ones of equal spacing and equal probability. All the considered designs are comparatively evaluated and discussed on the basis of simulation studies.

Keywords

Accelerated life testing C-optimality A-optimality D-optimality E-optimality Equal spacing Equal probability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author was supported by the Seed Fund Project ‘Inference and optimal planning for step-stress accelerated life testing under interval censored sampling’ of the RWTH Aachen University, funded by the Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments. The authors thank the associate editor and the reviewer for their constructive and useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bai DS, Kim MS, Lee SH (1989a) Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life test with censoring. IEEE Trans Reliab 38:528–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bai DS, Kim MS, Lee SH (1989b) Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life tests under periodic observation. J Korean Stat Soc 18:125–134MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bai DS, Kim MS (1993) Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life test for Weibull distributions and type-I censoring. Naval Res Logist 40:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balakrishnan N, Han D (2009) Optimal step-stress testing for progressively type-I censored data from exponential distribution. J Stat Plan Inference 139:1782–1798MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhattacharyya GK, Soejoeti Z (1989) A tampered failure rate model for step-stress accelerated life test. Commun Stat Theory Methods 18:1627–1643MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bobotas P, Kateri M (2015) The step-stress tampered failure rate model under interval monitoring. Stat Methodol 27:100–122MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen Y, Sun W, Xu D (2017) Multi-stress equivalent optimum design for ramp-stress accelerated life test plans based on D-efficiency. IEEE Access 5:25854–25862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gouno E, Sen A, Balakrishnan N (2004) Optimal step-stress test under progressive type-I censoring. IEEE Trans Reliab 53:388–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han D, Ng T (2014) Asymptotic comparison between constant-stress testing and step-stress testing for type-I censored data from exponential distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods 43:2384–2394MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han D, Balakrishnan N, Gouno E, Sen A (2006) Corrections on “Optimal step-stress test under progressive type-I censoring”. IEEE Trans Reliab 55:613–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris SJ, Harris DJ, Li C (2017) Failure statistics for commercial lithium ion batteries: a study of 24 pouch cells. J Power Sources 342:589–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong Y, King C, Zhang Y, Meeker WQ (2015) Bayesian life test planning for log-location-scale family of distributions. J Qual Technol 47:336–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hong Y, Ma H, Meeker WQ (2010) A tool for evaluating time-varying-stress accelerated life test plans with log-location-scale distributions. IEEE Trans Reliab 59:620–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kateri M, Kamps U (2015) Inference in step-stress models based on failure rates. Stat Pap 56:639–660MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kateri M, Kamps U (2017) Hazard rate modeling of step-stress experiments. Annu Rev Stat Appl 4:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kateri M, Kamps U, Balakrishnan N (2011) Optimal allocation of change points in simple step-stress experiments under type-II censoring. Comput Stat Data Anal 55:236–247MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khamis IH (1997) Optimum \(M\)-step, step-stress design with \(K\) stress variables. Commun Stat Simul Comput 26:1301–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khamis IH, Higgins JJ (1996) Optimum 3-step step-stress tests. IEEE Trans Reliab 45:341–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohl C, Kateri M (2019) Bayesian analysis for step-stress accelerated life testing under progressive interval censoring. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 35:234–246MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Limon S, Yadav OP, Liao H (2017) A literature review on planning and analysis of accelerated testing for reliability assessment. Qual Reliab Eng Int 33:2361–2383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin C-T, Chu C-C, Balakrishnan N (2013) Planning step-stress test plans under type-I censoring for the log-location-scale case. J Stat Comput Simul 83:1852–1867MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ma H, Meeker WQ (2008) Optimum step-stress accelerated life test plans for log-location-scale distributions. Naval Res Logist 55:551–562MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McSorley EO, Lu JC, Li CS (2002) Performance of parameter-estimates in step-stress accelerated life-tests with various sample-sizes. IEEE Trans Reliab 51:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meeker WQ (1986) Planning life tests in which units are inspected for failure. IEEE Trans Reliab 35:571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meeker WQ, Escobar LA (1998) Statistical methods for reliability data. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meeter CA, Meeker WQ (1994) Optimum accelerated life tests with a nonconstant scale parameter. Technometrics 36:71–83zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miller R, Nelson W (1983) Optimum simple step-stress plans for accelerated life testing. IEEE Trans Reliab 32:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nelson WB (1990) Accelerated life testing, statistical models, test plans and data analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nelson WB (2015) An updated bibliography of accelerated test plans. In: Annual reliability and maintainability symposium (RAMS), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tang Y, Guan Q, Xu P, Xu H (2012) Optimum design for type-I step-stress accelerated life tests of two-parameter Weibull distributions. Commun Stat Theory Methods 41:3862–3877MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tse S-K, Ding C, Yang C (2008) Optimal accelerated life tests under interval censoring with random removals: the case of Weibull failure distribution. Statistics 42:435–451MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu SJ, Lin YP, Chen ST (2008) Optimal step-stress test under type I progressive group-censoring with random removals. J Stat Plan Inference 138:817–826MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xiong C, Ji M (2004) Analysis of grouped and censored data from step-stress life test. IEEE Trans Reliab 53:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yeo K, Tang L (1999) Planning step-stress life-test with a target acceleration factor. IEEE Trans Reliab 48:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of StatisticsRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations