Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tailings Storage Facilities (TSFs) Dust Control Using Biocompatible Polymers

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mine tailings storage facilities (TSFs) can be a significant source of fine, respirable dust. This dust poses concerns, especially for nearby communities, because of its detrimental impact on respiratory health. To address these concerns, this study examined the effectiveness of commercially available polymers, known for their biocompatible and environmentally friendly features, to prevent dust generation from upstream-type TSFs in active mining operations. It focused on two areas in TSFs: the tailings beach and slope/dike surfaces. Two types of polymers—polyethylene glycol and poloxamer—were selected, and their effectiveness was evaluated in a series of phased laboratory and field tests. The lab tests investigated the moisture-retention capacity of the tailings after treatment with the polymer solutions as well as the ability of these solutions to reduce dust emissions. Polymers were applied to a tailings bed surface in the lab and dust was generated from this surface using a wind tunnel. PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were measured using laser-diffraction dust sensors, and the polymers were found to have reduced dust emissions up to 95%. Small-scale wind-blowing tests were conducted in the field (specifically, in a controlled environment at a TSF) to evaluate polymer effectiveness on the tailings beach and slope/dike areas. The tests revealed that the AP could efficiently suppress approximately 80% of PM10 and PM2.5 dust emissions at both types of areas. Finally, 1000 gallons of AP solution were discharged at the top of tailings beach and slope/dike areas, respectively, and found to be effective. The results of these tests showed the high potential of the biocompatible polymers to be a feasible solution for reducing the respirable dust emissions from upstream TSFs in arid and semi-arid regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harbison RD (2015) Fibrogenic dusts. In Hamilton & Hardy’s industrial toxicology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 935–948

  2. Csavina J, Field J, Taylor MP, Gao S, Landázuri A, Betterton EA, Sáez AE (2012) A review on the importance of metals and metalloids in atmospheric dust and aerosol from mining operations. Sci Total Environ 433:58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reheis MC, Budahn JR, Lamothe PJ, Reynolds RL, (2009) Compositions of modern dust and surface sediments in the Desert Southwest United States. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 114(1)

  4. Van Pelt RS, Zobeck TM (2007) Chemical constituents of fugitive dust. Environ Monit Assess 130(1–3):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ojelede ME, Annegarn HJ, Kneen MA (2012) Evaluation of aeolian emissions from gold mine tailings on the Witwatersrand. Aeolian Res 3(4):477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zota AR, Willis R, Jim R, Norris GA, Shine JP, Duvall RM, Schaider LA, Spengler JD (2009) Impact of mine waste on airborne respirable particulates in northeastern Oklahoma United States. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 59(11):1347–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. US Environmental Protection Agency (2013) National ambient air quality standards for particulate matter; final rule. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 50, 51, 53, and 58. Fed Regist 73(10):3086–3287

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin R, Dowling K, Pearce DC, Florentine S, McKnight S, Stelcer E, Cohen DD, Stopic A, Bennett JW (2017) Trace metal content in inhalable particulate matter (PM 25–10 and PM 25) collected from historical mine waste deposits using a laboratory-based approach. Environ Geochem Health 39(3):549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De La Campa AS, De La Rosa J, González-Castanedo Y, Fernández-Camacho R, Alastuey A, Querol X, Stein AF, Ramos JL, Rodriguez S, Orellana IG, Nava S (2011) Levels and chemical composition of PM in a city near a large Cu-smelter in Spain. J Environ Monit 13(5):1276–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khademi H, Abbaspour A, Martínez-Martínez S, Gabarrón M, Shahrokh V, Faz A, Acosta JA (2018) Provenance and environmental risk of windblown materials from mine tailing ponds. Murcia Spain. Environ Pollut 241:432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Csavina J, Field J, Félix O, Corral-Avitia AY, Sáez AE, Betterton EA (2014) Effect of wind speed and relative humidity on atmospheric dust concentrations in semi-arid climates. Sci Total Environ 487:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ravi S, D’odorico P, Breshears DD, Field JP, Goudie AS, Huxman TE, Li J, Okin GS, Swap RJ, Thomas AD, Van Pelt S (2011) Aeolian processes and the biosphere. Rev Geophys 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000328

  13. Bohn RR, Johnson JD (1983) Dust control on active tailings ponds. Research Contract Report No. J0218024 for U.S. Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC, pp 112–183

  14. Reynolds RL, Yount JC, Reheis M, Goldstein H, Chavez P Jr, Fulton R, Whitney J, Fuller C, Forester RM (2007) Dust emission from wet and dry playas in the Mojave Desert USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. The Journal of the British Society for Geomorphology (BSG) 32(12):1811–1827

  15. Vick SG (1990) Planning design and analysis of tailings dams. BiTech, Vancouver, pp 369

  16. Chen R, Lee I, Zhang L (2014) Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings for dust control. J Geotech Geoenviron 141(2):401–410

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anklam MR, York JD, Helmerich L, Firoozabadi A (2008) A effects of antiagglomerants on the interactions between hydrate particles. AICHE J 54(2):565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seville JPK, Willett CD, Knight PC (2000) Interparticle forces in fluidization: a review. Powder Technol 113(3):261–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hesketh HE, Cross FL (1983) Fugitive emissions and controls. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor Michigan, pp 39–106

    Google Scholar 

  20. Piechota TC, van Ee J, Batista JR, Stave KA, James DE (2004) Potential environmental impacts of dust suppressants: “Avoiding another Times Beach.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  21. Lewis WM (1999) Studies of environmental effects of magnesium chloride deicer in Colorado (No CDOT-DTD-R-99-10). Colorado Department of Transportation Research Branch, Denver, CO, pp 36–53

  22. Parameswaran K, Ekholm J, Zhang L (2014) Evaluation of mine tailings dust control. In: Geotechnical Special Publication, 241 GPS edn. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413432.009

  23. Ding X, Xu G, Zhou W, Kuruppu M (2018) Effect of synthetic and natural polymers on reducing bauxite residue dust pollution. Environ Technol pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1505963

  24. He JJ, Cai QG, Tang ZJ (2008) Wind tunnel experimental study on the effect of PAM on soil wind erosion control. Environ Monit Assess 145(1–3):185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Webster R, Elliott V, Park BK, Walker D, Hankin M, Taupin P (2009) PEG and PEG conjugates toxicity: towards an understanding of the toxicity of PEG and its relevance to PEG related biologicals. In PEGylated Protein Drugs: Basic Science and Clinical Applications. Milestones in Drug Therapy. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, pp 127–146

  26. Schmolka IR (1977) A review of block polymer surfactants. J Am Oil Chem Soc 54(3):110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. NOAA (2018) Climatological report. National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Weather Service. https://w2.weather.gov/climate/index.php?wfo=twc. Accessed 09 Sep 2018

  28. PDEQ (2018) Station air quality report. Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) Envista service. http://envista.pima.gov/. Accessed 18 Sep 2018

  29. Zhang L, Ahmari S, Zhang J (2011) Synthesis and characterization of fly ash modified mine tailings-based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 25(9):3773–3781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ravi S, D’Odorico P, Over TM, Zobeck TM (2004) On the effect of air humidity on soil susceptibility to wind erosion: the case of air-dry soils. Geophys Res Lett 31(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019485

  31. Zazueta FS, Xin J (1994) Soil moisture sensors. Soil Sci 73:391–401

    Google Scholar 

  32. Khojasteh DN, Bahrami HA, Kianirad M, Sprigg W (2017) Using bio-mulch for dust stabilization (case study: Semnan province Iran). Nat Environ Pollut Technol 16(4):1313–1320

  33. Kok JF, Parteli EJ, Michaels TI, Karam DB (2012) The physics of wind-blown sand and dust. Rep Prog Phys 75(10):106901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sanderson RS, Neuman CM, Boulton JW (2014) Windblown fugitive dust emissions from smelter slag. Aeolian Res 13:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qiao J, Adams J, Johannsmann D (2012) Addition of halloysite nanotubes prevents cracking in drying latex films. Langmuir 28(23):8674–8680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Voyutskii SS, Ustinova ZM (1977) Role of autohesion during film formation from the latex. J Adhes 9(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Baddock MC Zobeck TM Van Pelt RS Fredrickson EL (2011) Dust emissions from undisturbed and disturbed crusted playa surfaces: cattle trampling effects. Aeolian Res 3(1):31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research project was financially supported by the Tech Launch Arizona at the University of Arizona.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Junnhyeok Park & Kwangmin Kim

  2. Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Taehee Lee & Minkyu Kim

Authors
  1. Junnhyeok Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kwangmin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Taehee Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Minkyu Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwangmin Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J., Kim, K., Lee, T. et al. Tailings Storage Facilities (TSFs) Dust Control Using Biocompatible Polymers. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 36, 785–795 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-0078-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-0078-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation