Advertisement

Investigating the Impact of Caving on Longwall Mine Ventilation Using Scaled Physical Modeling

  • V. GangradeEmail author
  • S. J. Schatzel
  • S. P. Harteis
  • J. D. Addis
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

In longwall mining, ventilation is considered one of the more effective means for controlling gases and dust. In order to study longwall ventilation in a controlled environment, researchers built a unique physical model called the Longwall Instrumented Aerodynamic Model (LIAM) in a laboratory at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Pittsburgh Mining Research Division (PMRD) campus. LIAM is a 1:30 scale physical model geometrically designed to simulate a single longwall panel with a three-entry headgate and tailgate configuration, along with three back bleeder entries. It consists of a two-part heterogeneous gob that simulates a less compacted unconsolidated zone and more compacted consolidated zone. It has a footprint of 8.94 m (29 ft.) by 4.88 m (16 ft.), with a simulated face length of 220 m (720 ft.) in full scale. LIAM is built with critical details of the face, gob, and mining machinery. It is instrumented with pressure gauges, flow anemometers, temperature probes, a fan, and a data acquisition system. Scaling relationships are derived on the basis of Reynolds and Richardson numbers to preserve the physical and dynamic similitude. This paper discusses the findings from a study conducted in the LIAM to investigate the gob-face interaction, airflow patterns within the gob, and airflow dynamics on the face for varying roof caving characteristics. Results are discussed to show the impact of caving behind the shields on longwall ventilation.

Keywords

Mine ventilation Longwall mining Roof caving Physical modeling 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by NIOSH.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Pappas D, Christopher M (1993) Behavior of simulated longwall gob material. Report of investigations, US Bureau of MinesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Esterhuizen E, Mark C, Murphy MM (2010) Numerical model calibration for simulating coal pillars, gob and overburden response. In: Proceedings - 29th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, ICGCM 2010, pp 46–57Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang CTS, Zhao YX (2019) Compaction characteristics of the caving zone in a longwall goaf: a review. Environ Earth Sci 78(1):27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang C, Yu L, Feng R, Zhang Y, Zhang G (2019) A numerical study of stress distribution and fracture development above a protective coal seam in longwall mining. Processes 6(9) art. no. 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brune JF, Sapko M (2012) A modeling study on longwall tailgate ventilation. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual North American Ventilation Conference, 121–126. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UTGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yuan L, Smith AC, Brune JF (2012) Computational fluid dynamics study on the ventilation flow paths in longwall gobs. In: Proceedings of the 11th U.S./North American Mine Ventilation Symposium, University Park, PAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilmore RC (2015) CFD modeling of underground coal longwall gob ventilation systems using a developed meshing approach. Dissertation, Colorado School of MinesGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mishra DP, Kumar P, Panigrahi DC (2016) Dispersion of methane in tailgate of a retreating longwall mine: a computational fluid dynamics study. Environ Earth Sci 75(6):Article number 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lolon SA, Brune JF, Bogin GE Jr, Grubb JW, Saki SA, Juganda A (2017) Computational fluid dynamics simulation on the longwall gob breathing. Int J Min Sci Technol 27(2):185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Juganda A, Brune J, Bogin G, Strebinger C, Fig M, Zurhorst M (2018) Incorporating ventilation network simulation into CFD modeling to analyze airflow distribution around longwall panels. 2018 SME Annual Conference and Expo and 91st Annual Meeting of the SME-MN Section, Volume 2018-February, 2018Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ren T, Wang Z, Liang Y, Zhang J (2018) Numerical investigation of CO2 fringe behaviour on a longwall face and its control. Int J Coal Geol 186:80–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Z, Ren T, Ma L, Zhang J (2018) Investigations of ventilation airflow characteristics on a longwall face—a computational approach. Energies 11:1564.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang Y, Zhang X, Habibi A, Tien JC (2012) Comparison of mine ventilation simulation software. 2012 SME Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2012, SME 2012, Meeting Preprints 2012, pp 670–674Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu G, Huang J, Nie B, Chalmers D, Yang Z (2018) Calibration of mine ventilation network models using the non-linear optimization algorithm. Energies 11:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karacan CÖ, Yuan L (2015) Effect of discrete fracture network representation of gob on. Airflow distribution near the longwall face. In: Proceedings of the 15th North American Mine Ventilation Symposium, Blacksburg, VAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ajayi K, Shahbazi K, Tukkaraja P, Katzenstein K (2019) Estimation of radon diffusivity tensor for fractured rocks in cave mines using a discrete fracture network model. J Environ Radioact 196:104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karacan CO, Esterhuizen GS, Schatzel SJ, Diamond WP (2007) Reservoir simulation-based modeling for characterizing longwall methane emissions and gob gas venthole production. Int J Coal Geol 86:121–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schatzel SJ, Krog RB, Dougherty H (2017) Methane emissions and airflow patterns on a longwall face: potential influences from longwall gob permeability distributions on a bleederless longwall panel. Trans Soc Min Metall Explor 342(1):51–61Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jong EC, Luxbacher KD, Karmis ME, Westman EC (2016) Field test of a perfluoromethylcyclohexane (PMCH) permeation plug release vessel (PPRV) in an underground longwall mine. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect A Min Technol 125(2):65–70Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schatzel SJ, Gangrade V, Hollerich CA, Addis JD, Chasko LL (2017) Tracer gas study to determine face ventilation air and gob gas movement patterns on a bleederless longwall panel. 2017 SME Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Denver, CO, February 19–22, 2017, Pre-print 17–137Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones AD, Lowrie SJ (1993) Applications of aerodynamic scale model simulations to predicting the accumulation of methane gas and airborne pollutants in modem coalmines. Final report on CEC Contract 72621321229108, Edinburgh: Institute of Occupational Medicine, IOM Report TMl93108Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones AD, Lowrie SJ (1994) An aerodynamic scale model for simulations of methane control at the return end of longwall retreat coalfaces. Min Eng 154(395):43–49Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gangrade V, Calizaya F, Nelson MG (2013) Use of a CO2 gas injection system in a laboratory model to study controlled recirculation. In Proceedings of International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC). August 10–14, Montreal, Canada. Preprint No. 321Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Calizaya F, Nelson MG, Bateman C, Jha A (2016) Pressure balancing techniques to control spontaneous combustion. 2016 SME Annual Conference and Expo: the future for Mining in a Data-Driven World. 2016, p 261–264Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pan Y, Jha A, Tukkaraja P, Katzenstein K, Loring D (2019) Experimental investigation of gas dilution strategies in block cave mines. 2019 SME Annual Conference and Expo, Denver, CO, February 2019Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fig MK, Bogin GE Jr, Brune JF, Grubb JW (2016) Experimental and numerical investigation of methane ignition and flame propagation in cylindrical tubes ranging from 5 to 71 cm - part I: effects of scaling from laboratory to large-scale field studies. J Loss Prev Process Ind 41:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gangrade V, Harteis SP, Addis JD (2017) Development and applications of a scaled aerodynamic model for simulations of airflows in a longwall panel. In: proceedings of 16th North American Mine Ventilation Symposium. Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines, pp 6-17–6-24Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gangrade V, Harteis SP, Addis JD (2017) Studying longwall ventilation with physical modeling. Coal Age 123(6):38–39Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Data Translation. QuickDAQ, Data logging and FFT analysis software. https://www.mccdaq.com/Products/Data-Acquisition-Software/QuickDAQ. Accessed February 2019
  30. 30.
    Aitken RJ, Vincent JH, Mark D (1989) Model studies to investigate the nature of air flow in mines. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Ventilation for Contaminant Control, September 20–23, London, England, Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press, pp 327–335Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taylor G (1954) The dispersion of matter in turbulent flow through a pipe. Proc R Soc 223A:446–468Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hall DJ, Barret CF, Ralph MO (1975) Experiments on a model of an escape of heavy gas. Stevenage, Herts: Warren spring laboratory, report LR 2 17 (AP)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peng SS, Chaing HS (1986) Air velocity distribution measurements on four mechanized longwall coal faces. Int J Min Geol Eng 4:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection  2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations