Advertisement

SN Applied Sciences

, 1:1444 | Cite as

Analysis of different factors affecting a liquid chromatographic chiral separation of some imino-hesperetin compounds

  • Mohammed El Amin Zaid
  • Nasser Belboukhari
  • Khaled Sekkoum
  • Jose Carlos Menendez Ramos
  • Hassan Y. Aboul-EneinEmail author
Research Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. 1. Chemistry (general)

Abstract

An investigation was reported concerning the chiral analysis of some Imino-4-Hesperetin and the impact of different factors on their chiral high-performance liquid chromatographic separation. Using Schiff bases reactions, new Imino-4-Hesperetin derivatives had been elaborated by the reaction of Hesperetin with various diamines differ only in their carbon chain length which ranged between 4, 8 and 10 carbons; Yields were very acceptable and ranged between 77 and 89%. A chiral separation was then employed by a conventional HPLC with six different polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases. The resolution, capacity and separation factors obtained were good (2.11 ≤ Rs ≤ 4.5); (1.25 ≤ k′ ≤ 8.71) and (1.16 ≤ α ≤2.57). Flow rate was about 0.3–0.5 mL/min. The factors affected the chiral resolution including the role of the carbon chain length which did have an impact on the resolution of these derivatives were discussed.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Flavonoid Carbon chain length HPLC Polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases Hesperetin Diamine 

1 Introduction

Flavonoids are a group of polyphenolic compounds of low molecular weight, they are categorized into various subclasses including flavones, flavonols, flavanones, isoflavanones, anthocyanidins, and catechins. Among the classes of flavonoids, flavanones have been defined as citrus flavonoids due to their almost unique presence in citrus fruits. In addition, within the large family of flavonoids, flavanones present a unique structural feature: a chiral center, which distinguishes them from all other classes of flavonoids [1].

Hesperetin (3′,5,7-trihydroxy-4′-methoxyflavanone—Fig. 1) is one of aglycone flavonoids extracted from citrus fruits, with various pharmacological effects for the treatment of colds, stomachaches and coughs in traditional Chinese medicine [2, 3]. It could reduce neuronal cell death through antioxidant properties [4]. It can be also possess a potential prevention of Alzheimer’s disease progression, antidepressant activities, anti-inflammatory properties and the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular diseases [5].
Fig. 1

Chemical structure of hesperetin

About 20–25% of the optically active pharmaceuticals are sold and administrated as pure enantiomers. US FDA, European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products and other drug controlling agencies have issued marketing guidelines for optically active pure drugs so, the demand for chiral separation techniques has increased greatly. Many pharmaceutical companies are manufacturing these pure forms of drugs by enantiomeric separations [6]. Enantiomers differ in their pharmacological and toxicological activities and only one of the enantiomers may be active whereas the other(s) can be inactive, toxic or ballast. For example, it has been reported that the (+)-threo-methylphenidate is 5–38 times more active than the (−)-threo-antipode, S-(−)-beta-adrenergic blockers are pharmacologically effective showing about 50–500-fold higher activities than their R-(+) antipode [6, 7, 8]. Therefore, the request for pure enantiomer of drugs is increasing rapidly because of the need for safe medications since racemic drugs cause side effects, toxicity or other problems in the human body. Some analytical techniques have been developed to monitor the chiral ratio of drugs and to increase throughput and reduce [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19], liquid chromatography (LC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) are the most used techniques because of their high efficiency, speed, preparative capability, wide range of applications, and reproducibility. Liquid chromatography, especially high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), has achieved a good reputation and considered as the backbone of chiral separation science, as it is being used in almost all industries. The development of the chiral stationary phases (CSPs) in HPLC has proved to be an effective modality in the resolution of racemic compounds; Using various chiral selectors in HPLC columns include polysaccharide, macrocyclic glycopeptide antibiotics, cyclodextrin, proteins, crown ethers and ligand exchanges [12, 20, 21, 22]. Several chiral columns have been used for the enantiomeric resolution of a wide variety of racemates among these, polysaccharide-based derivatives are currently the most useful and considered as the leaders in the chiral separation field thanks to their remarkable recognition capabilities and their wide range of applications [22, 23, 24, 25, 26]. The existence of a chiral selector is crucial for enantiomeric resolution as it reacts with the enantiomers in a specific way to be resolved. Chiral selectors issues chiral surfaces, which is indispensable for enantiomeric resolution. Enantiomers bind on this chiral surface to different extents. This binding is carried out by multiple types of fixings [27, 28]. Many factors affect the chiral separation’s mechanisms and the chiral recognition between analytes and the CSPs; multiple researchers and scientists in literature gave some structural factors affecting chiral separation but a lot of other phenomenon can also affect the chiral separation and recognition mechanism, Interaction forces, mobile phase compositions and either the carbon chain length and some thermodynamic factors [29, 30]. The comprehension of chiral recognition mechanisms at molecular level is very importance in the chiral chromatographic domain. Moreover, search of literature divulge that some approaches have been done to find out the chiral recognition mechanism of different chiral stationary phases CSPs. Attempts have been made by NMR and computational methods to discuss the chiral recognition mechanism which have been developed for cyclodextrins Pirkle types and polysaccharides CSPs. Various rational models of interactions between CSP and enantiomers have been proposed. The interaction energies between CSPs and enantiomers have been calculated by quantum mechanical calculations and the chiral recognition mechanisms have been proposed based on these calculations and molecular simulation dynamics [31, 32, 33]. Although attempts have been made to predict the chiral recognition mechanism of these stationary phases at molecular level while the exact mechanism is still not known. NMR spectroscopy is the powerful and main technique for revealing the chiral recognition mechanism but the polysaccharide-based CSPs are soluble in the spectroscopic solvents. These solvents interact with the carbamate moieties, which is considered an essential adsorption sites for chiral recognition of the polysaccharide based CSPs and hence, the chiral recognition cannot be studied using these solvents. Amylose tris 3,5-dimethyl phenyl carbamate is a semi synthetic polymer which contain a polymeric chain of derivatized D-(+) glucose residues in apha-1,4 linkage. These chains lie side by side in a helical fashion. The three-dimensional structures of cellulose and amylose-based CSPs were determined and compared using computational chemistry. Reports show that the possible structures were 3/2 helical chain conformation for cellulose tris phenyl carbamate and 4/1 helical chain conformation for amylose tris phenyl carbamate. The amylose CSP is more helical in nature and has well-defined cavities, making it considerably different from the corresponding cellulose analogue, which appear to be more linear and rigid in nature [26, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42].

Schiff bases represent an important class of ligands in coordination chemistry, by producing very stable complexes; Thus, they have been extensively investigated regarding their electronic properties, catalytic activity in several chemical and photochemical reactions [43]. Schiff bases became a favored way for synthesis of new chemical compounds and have been used widely for pharmacological effects in different uses: antimicrobial, anticancer, antifungal, antiviral, antimalarial, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antioxidant, antihypertensive and lipid-lowering activities [44]. Imines; a very important class of nitrogen entities due to their high reactivity. In different types of transformations, they have been used as nitrogen sources that can be further utilized in many fields. Hugo Schiff was the first who employed this kind of reactions since then lots of works have been started on Imine synthesis. Imines or iminium ions containing the reactive C=N moiety are also a key intermediate in multi-component reactions, asymmetric organo-catalysis, cross-dehydrogenative couplings and so on. Therefore, synthesis and applications of imines are essentially ever-appealing topics in chemistry. Imines, which are commonly referred to as Schiff bases or azomethines are important for many serious organic syntheses. Therefore, imine synthesis processes have lots of significance in organic and pharmaceutical chemistry. Imines are also known as biologically significant compounds because of their anti-inflammatory nature as well their applicability as anticancer agent, they also possess antibacterial and antifungal behavior [45, 46].

To reach our objectives new n-alkyl-imino-4-hesperetin compounds are synthetized from the condensation of hesperetin and several diamines vary among themselves in the length of their carbon chain, using Schiff bases reaction to form the wanted imines; Then achiral separation was set up by HPLC on several polysaccharide stationary phases under polar and normal isocratic mode.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Reagents

Synthesis of proposed compounds required the hydrolysis hesperidin to obtain hesperetin. Hesperedin was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany), primary diamines used in the reactions: A (1,4-diaminobutane); B (1, 8-diaminooctane); C (1,10-diaminodecane) had been purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). All other solvents and reagents including HPLC solvents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) and Riedel-deHaën (Sleeze, Germany).

2.2 UV–VIS

UV spectra were obtained in several solvents with UNICAM UV300 spectrophotometer assisted to desktop computer.

2.3 IR

IR-Spectra were recorded with an AGILENT Cary 630 FTIR spectrophotometer with a diamond ATR accessory for solid and liquid samples, requiring no sample preparation; wavenumbers are given in cm−1.

2.4 Melting point

Melting points were determined by Büchi® melting point apparatus Model B-545 with capillary tubes, temperature range up to 400 °C.

2.5 Synthesis of hesperetin derivatives

One mmol of hesperetin (0.302 g) and 2 mmol of each suitable primary diamine were refluxed in methanol (7 mL) for 15 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, 10 mL of diethyl ether was then added to the mixture, a solid precipitate was formed, filtered and recrystallized from ethanol and water to give the desired products (Fig. 2). The completion was monitored by TLC.
Fig. 2

Structures and yields of imino-hesperetin derivatives

2.6 HPLC

The HPLC employed was a SHIMADZU Scientific Instruments’ system LC-20A (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with an injector of 20 µl Rheodyne 1907 sample loop, a pump LC-20A, a vacuum degasser DGU-20A5, and a Shimadzu SPD-20 with variable wavelength ultraviolet (UV) detector. Chromatographic data were acquired, stored, and analyzed by the LC Lab solution software (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The injection volume was 20 µL and the UV wave length was changed according to λmax of each compound. Chromatographic separations were carried out under isocratic mode at different flow rates at ambient temperature.

2.7 HPLC operating conditions

Flow rate ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 mL/min; several mobile-phase systems were used in this study. The mobile phases were prepared in a volume/volume relation, and before delivering into the system, it was filtered through a Millipore membrane filter (0.5 µm; Millipore, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA) and degassed daily before use.

2.8 Stationary and mobile phases

In this work seven analytical stationary phases were employed: an Exsil C-18 ODS stationary phase (250 × 4.6 mm ID, particle size5 µm) as achiral stationary phase, six polysaccharide based CSPs were also used, namely cellulose derivatives: Chiralpak®IB [cellulose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) immobilized on 5 µm silica-gel], Chiralcel®OD [cellulose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) coated on 10 µm silica-gel], Chiralcel®OD-H [cellulose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) coated on 5 µm silica-gel] Chiralcel®OZ-3 [cellulose tris (3-chloro-4-methylphenylcarbamate) coated on 3 µm silica-gel] Chiralcel®OJ [cellulose tris (4-methylbenzoate) coated on 10 µm silica-gel)] and amylose derivatives: Chiralpak®IA [amylose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) immobilized on 5 µm silica-gel] and Chiralpak®AD [amylose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) coated on 10 µm silica-gel] purchased from Chiral Technologies Europe (Illkirch, France) (Fig. 2). HPLC-grade solvents used were: isopropanol (ISP) and hexane (HEX) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Structures of the polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases used in this study

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Synthesis of hesperetin derivatives

Schiff bases are typically formed by the condensation of primary diamines with the carbonyl group of hesperetin. The synthesis of imino-hesperetin was carried out by refluxing hesperetin with the appropriate primary diamines in methanol. The results showed that the yields depend on the primary diamine and its carbon chain length, yields ranged between 77 and 89%.

Reactions were confirmed by IR we can easily notice the disappearance of (C = 0) and the formation of (C=N).

3.2 Spectroscopic data

4-((4-aminobutyl)imino)-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chromane-5,7-diol (Product 1) yellow, yield

89%, MP: 220–221 °C, UVmax (MeOH, nm): 283 (band I); 335 (band II), IR (neat, cm−1): (O–H), 3276 (C–H arom), 3089 (C=N), 1633 (NH2), 1603 (C=C arom), 1491 (C–N), 1147.

4-((8-aminooctyl)imino)-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chromane-5,7-diol (Product 2) dark yellow, yield

81%, MP: 225–226 °C, UVmax (MeOH, nm): 287 (band I); 340 (band II), IR (neat, cm−1): (O–H), 3319 (C–H arom), 3011 (C=N), 1678 (NH2), 1601 (C=C arom), 1520 (C–N), 1133.

4-((10-aminodecyl)imino)-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chromane-5,7-diol (Product 3) dark yellow, yield

77%, MP: 227–228 °C, UVmax (MeOH, nm): 287 (band I); 341 (band II), IR (neat, cm−1): (O–H), 3121 (C–H arom), 3053 (C=N), 1642 (NH2), 1549 (C=C arom), 1427 (C–N), 1183.

3.3 Chiral separation

We tried to optimize the HPLC conditions by changing the chromatographic parameters to have the best possible results to better understand the chiral recognition mechanism. During this investigation, two possible chiral separation modes were used namely, normal and polar organic phase under isocratic elution technique. The commonly used mobile phases for this type of CSPs are pure alcohols, and mixtures of alcohols with hexane. Several types of mobile phase compositions were investigated by changing the nature and percentage of the mixture components. To simplify the presentation, only the chromatographic results with the optimal mobile phase composition and/or conditions that gave the best resolution on different (CSPs.) are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Chromatographic parameters of the chiral separation of the imino-hesperetin

Chiral stationnary phases

Products

Mobile phase

Flow rate (mL/min)

T1 (min)

T2 (min)

k1

k2

α

Rs

Chiralpak®IB

1

100% ISP

0.5

07.14

12.47

2.07

5.34

2.57

3.29

2

85% ISP 15% HEX

0.4

11.06

12.76

4.52

5.38

1.19

3.02

3

100% ISP

0.5

07.10

07.95

2.54

2.98

1.17

2.83

Chiralcel®OD-H

1

100% ISP

0.5

07.11

07.97

2.59

3.01

1.16

3.05

2

70% ISP 30% HEX

0.5

10.90

12.46

4.50

5.23

1.16

2.76

3

70% ISP 30% HEX

0.5

11.42

12.53

4.47

5.27

1.18

2.57

Chiralcel®IA

1

70% ISP 30% HEX

0.5

13.85

19.42

5.93

8.71

1.47

2.11

2

0.3

3

Chiralcel®OJ

1

85% ISP 15% HEX

0.3

07.21

12.80

1.25

2.60

2.07

4.50

2

100% ISP

0.5

08.16

9.03

1.86

2.01

1.08

0.93

3

Chiralpak®OD

1

100% ISP

0.5

07.15

13.30

2.58

5.65

2.19

3.96

2

100% ISP

0.5

09.24

11.12

3.61

4.56

1.26

2.54

3

Chiralpak®AD

1

2

3

3.4 Mechanism of reaction

Mechanism of the transformation of Aldehydes or Ketones to Imines via Schiff bases reaction relies on a set of steps, nucleophilic attack of a primary amine on carbonyl carbon will take place that affords hydroxyl compound which on dehydration gives Schiff bases. So, the Schiff bases formation is really a sequence of two types of reactions: addition followed by elimination. The formation of Schiff bases in this method is largely depends on the rate of removal of water from the reaction mixture. Originally, the classical synthetic route for preparation of Schiff bases was reported by Schiff which involves the condensation of primary amines with carbonyl compounds under azeotropic distillation with the simultaneous removal of water [2, 29, 47, 48, 49] (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Simple schematic representation of the reaction

3.5 HPLC analysis

The preliminary separation with a conventional C18-bonded achiral stationary phase gave us conclusive evidence of the purity of the compounds. The chiral separation of these imino-hesperetin derivatives has been attempted by HPLC using various polysaccharide CSPs. These compounds have one chiral center so only two enantiomers are expected to be resolved.

The majority of the compounds were base- line separated with Rs > 1.5 (2.11–4.50) on cellulose based CSPs; while poor resolution or no resolution could be achieved on amylose derivatized CSPs.

For compound 1; It was well separated on all CSPs except Chiralpak®AD the best separation was obtained using Chiralcel®OJ with a mixture of (85% isopropanol–15% hexane) under 0.3 mL/min flow rate; while the shortest retention time was observed on Chiralpak®IB with 100% isopropanol.

Compound 2 could not be separated on the amylose CSPs namely, Chiralcel®IA and Chiralpak®AD; but is well separated on almost all cellulose based CSPs.

Compound 3 was separated on 50% of the CSPs where Chiralpak®IB and Chiralcel®OD-H were the most powerful phases for all the chiral separation. Although these phases possess the same chiral selector is coated onto silica in case of Chiralcel®OD-H, while it is immobilized onto silica in case of Chiralpak®IB. However, the retention times and separation factors of these enantiomers on both CSPs. Under the same conditions were different, even with the similarity in structure of the chiral selector in both CSPs. The immobilization of the cellulose tris-(3, 5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) on silica did affect the chiral recognition ability possibly due to the change of the polysaccharide configuration during the immobilization process (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

HPLC chromatograms of the enantiomeric separation of compounds 1, 2 and 3 on CSP Chiralcel®OJ, Chiralpak®IB and Chiralpak ®IB; Mobile phases were 85%ISP–15%HEX, 100% ISP and 85%ISP–15%HEX, flow rates were 0.3 mL/Min, 0.5 mL/Min and 0.5 mL/Min respectively. Temperature 25 °C, UV detector set at 283 nm

3.6 The study of separation

Several combinations were employed, different mobile-phases compositions and various CSPs listed previously were all pulled together to have the best chiral separation possible. Baseline separations with good resolutions were observed for the majority of products. The best results were obtained using Chiralcel®OJ which gave a very high resolution values with Rs = 4.50 for compound 1 as the maximum value, and Rs = 0.93 for compound 3 as the minimum value under flow rate 0.3 mL/min using 85% isopropanol–15% hexane and 0.5 mL/min using 100% isopropanol respectively. The poorest separations ware observed on amylose CSPs namely Chiralpak®AD and Chiralpak®IA which gave unsatisfactory results for the compounds under study. These differences in chiral recognition mechanism between the amylose and cellulose derivatives are due to the different configurations of the glucose residues (and linkages) and higher-order structures of CSPs of cellulose and amylose CSPs. It seems clear in this case that the amylose derivatives, which possesses a more helical configuration, did not effectively contribute to the separation of these imino-hesperetin enantiomers compared to the cellulose derivatives, which has a more rigid and linear configuration resulting in its ability to resolve all the enantiomers. Cellulose and amylose-based CSPs are different in nature that changes the capability of separation of the CSPs by influencing the formation of transient diastereomeric complexes between the analytes and CSPs. The discrimination power of these polysaccharide-based CSPs stems from complex interactions with the solutes. The chiral grooves sited in the chiral selectors provide a stereoselective environment to the enantiomers; thus the enantiomers fit in these chiral grooves to different extents as glove and hand arrangement. These polysaccharide CSPs has many of chiral active sites and thus have a relative high probability of interaction with the solutes, leading to the separation of the stereoisomers. In summary, a combination of hydrophobic interactions, Van der Waals forces and attractive forces (e.g., hydrogen bonding, dipole–dipole interactions and charge transfer (π–π) formation) are believed to explain the molecule recognition process [50, 51, 52, 53]. It is of interest to mention that elution under normal phase mode is more efficient that the polar phase mode in achieving the separation of the imino-hesperetin compounds. It seems that the hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions of the aromatic moieties of the CSPs with the aromatic rings of the analytes are preferred in the normal phase mode separation system [30, 54, 55, 56].

3.7 Effect of carbon chain length

The chiral separation mechanism on polysaccharide CSPs was affected also by the length of the carbon chain of the compounds; The addition of (–CH2–) groups seems to change the chiral recognition and the resolution capacity between the solutes and the CSPs; That can be explained by the augmentation of hydrophobicity of compounds when (–CH2–) groups increases, where the hydrophobic interactions plays a major role in the product’s resolution from one another; By looking at the Rs values, one notice that shorter the carbon chain length is (low hydrophobicity) higher is the resolution. The carbon chain length variation affects also the polarity of the products, which it decreases by adding (–CH2–) groups; these differences in polarity affects the chiral separation mechanism, therefore, resulted in achieving high resolution and separation values of products 1 and 2 compared to product 3. The carbon chain length has an effect on the volume of molecules, which creates a steric effect which makes the chiral separation of large molecule difficult compared to small ones. This explains the graduation in ease of the chiral separation of the compounds; one can notice that smaller molecules are easily resolved and chiral separated than the larger ones [57, 58]. It is well known that the variation of carbon chain length affects enthalpy and entropy compensation of molecules; which affects in turn the intermolecular forces in binding, so Van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in first place then the other interaction forces between CSPs and solutes. It was concluded that smaller is the carbon chain length, fewer are the interaction forces which cause a shorter is the retention time. This explains why small molecules elutes faster than larger molecules [59, 60].

4 Conclusion

Three new imino-hesperetin derivatives were synthetized from hesperetin and several diamines. Chiral separation of these derivatives were carried out using HPLC under polar and normal phase modes with various cellulose and amylose derivatized polysaccharide-based CSPs. The cellulose derivatives showed efficient and more performant capabilities in resolving the racemic imino-hesperetin compounds. The chiral recognition mechanism was affected by several factors where the carbon chain length has great impact on the resolution of these derivatives.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Yanez JA, Andrews PK, Davies NM (2007) Methods of analysis and separation of chiral flavonoids. J Chromatogr B 848:159–181Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kong R, Wang N, Luo H, Lu J (2018) Hesperetin mitigates bile duct ligation-induced liver fibrosis by inhibiting extracellular matrix and cell apoptosis via the TGF-β1/Smad pathway. Curr Mol Med 18:15–24Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samie A, Sedaghat R, Baluchnejadmojarad T, Roghani M (2018) Hesperetin, a citrus flavonoid, attenuates testicular damage in diabetic rats via inhibition of oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. Life Sci 1:132–139Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kwon JY, Jung UJ, Kim DW, Kim S, Moon GJ, Hong J, Jeon MT, Shin M, Chang JH, Kim SR (2018) Beneficial effects of hesperetin in a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Med Food (in press).  https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2018.4183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gong Y, Qin XY, Zhai YY, Hao H, Lee J, Park YD (2017) Inhibitory effect of hesperetin on-glucosidase: molecular dynamics simulation integrating inhibition kinetics. Int J Biol Macromol 101:32–39Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ali I, Saleem K, Gaitonde VD, Aboul-Enein HY, Hussain I (2010) Chiral separations of some β-adrenergic agonists and antagonists on AmyCoat column by HPLC. Chirality 22:24–28Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I (2002) Normal phase chiral HPLC of methylphenidate: comparison of different polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases. Chirality 14:47–50Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmid MG, Gecse O, Szabo Z, Kilár F, Gübitz G, Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY (2001) Comparative study of the chiral resolution of β-blockers on cellulose tris (3, 5-dimethyl-phenylcarbamate) phases in normal and reversed phase modes. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 24:2493–2504Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Othman ZA, Al-Warthan A, Alam SD, Ali I (2014) Enantio-separation of drugs with multiple chiral centers by chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. Biomed Chromatogr 28:1514–1524Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY (2007) Immobilized polysaccharide CSPs: an advancement in enantiomeric separations. Curr Pharm Anal 3:71–82Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saleem K, Ali I, Kulsum U, Aboul-Enein HY (2013) Recent developments in HPLC analysis of β-blockers in biological samples. J Chromatogr Sci 51:807–818Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I (2000) Macrocyclic antibiotics as effective chiral selectors for enantiomeric resolution by liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. Chromatographia 52:679–691Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I (2001) Enantiomeric resolution of some imidazole antifungal agents on chiralpak WH chiral stationary phase using HPLC. Chromatographia 54:200–202Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY, Gaitonde VD, Singh P, Rawat MSM, Sharma B (2009) Chiral separations of imidazole antifungal drugs on AmyCoat RP column in HPLC. Chromatographia 70:223–227Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ali I, Gaitonde VD, Aboul-Enein HY, Hussain A (2009) Chiral separation of β-adrenergic blockers on CelluCoat column by HPLC. Talanta 78:458–463Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I, Hoenen H (2006) Rapid determination of haloperidol and its metabolites in human plasma by HPLC using monolithic silica column and solid-phase extraction. Biomed Chromatogr 20:760–764Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ali I, Gupta VK, Saini VK, Aboul-Enein HY (2006) Analysis of phenols in wastewater using capillary electrophoresis and solid phase extraction. Int J Environ Pollut 27:95–103Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ali I, Gupta VK, Singh P, Pant HV, Aboul-Enein HY (2008) Fast screening of chloramphenicol in wastewater by high performance liquid chromatography and solid phase extraction methods. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 31:2862–2878Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanagi MM, Muhammad SS, Hussain I, Ibrahim WAW, Ali I (2015) Novel solid-phase membrane tip extraction and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry methods for the rapid analysis of triazine herbicides in real waters. J Sep Sci 38:433–438Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I (2001) Studies on the effect of alcohols on the chiral discrimination mechanisms of amylose stationary phase on the enantioseparation of nebivolol by HPLC. J Biochem Biophys Methods 48:175–188Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ali I, Alam SD, Al-Othman ZA, Farooqi JA (2013) Recent advances in SPE–chiral-HPLC methods for enantiomeric separation of chiral drugs in biological samples. J Chromatogr Sci 51:645–654Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ali I, Kulsum U, Al-Othman ZA, Saleem K (2016) Analyses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in human plasma using dispersive nano solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography. Chromatographia 79:145–157Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ali I, Saleem K, Hussain I, Gaitonde VD, Aboul-Enein HY (2009) Polysaccharides chiral stationary phases in liquid chromatography. Sep Purif Rev 38:97–147Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ali I, Gaitonde VD, Aboul-Enein HY (2009) Monolithic silica stationary phases in liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr Sci 47:432–442Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY (2006) Impact of immobilized polysaccharide chiral stationary phases on enantiomeric separations. J Sep Sci 29:762–769Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ali I, Singh P, Aboul-Enein HY, Sharma B (2009) Chiral analysis of ibuprofen residues in water and sediment. Anal Lett 42:1747–1760Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Al-Othman ZA, Al-Warthan A, Ali I (2014) Advances in enantiomeric resolution on monolithic chiral stationary phases in liquid chromatography and electrochromatography. J Sep Sci 37:1033–1057Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chong MH, Sanagi MM, Endud S, Ibrahim WAW, Lau SC, Alharbi OM, Ali I (2018) Determination of N-nitrosamines in water by nano iron-porphyrinated poly (amidoamine) dendrimer MCM-41 generation-3 through solid phase membrane tip extraction and HPLC. Environ Technol Innov 10:102–110Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bounoua N, Sekkoum K, Gumustas M, Belboukhari N, Ozkan SA (2018) Development of stability indicating HPLC method for the separation and validation of enantiomers of miconazole. Chirality 30:807–815Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kraimi A, Belboukhari N, Sekkoum K, Cheriti A, Aboul-Enein HY (2017) Liquid chromatographic chiral separation of acenocoumarol and its hemiketal form. J Chromatogr Sci 55:989–991Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I, Gübitz G, Simons C, Nicholls PJ (2000) HPLC enantiomeric resolution of novel aromatase inhibitors on cellulose-and amylose-based chiral stationary phases under reversed phase mode. Chirality 12:727–733Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I (2002) Comparative study of the enantiomeric resolution of chiral antifungal drugs econazole, miconazole and sulconazole by HPLC on various cellulose chiral columns in normal phase mode. J Pharm Biomed Anal 27:441–446Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I (2001) Comparison of the chiral resolution of econazole, miconazole, and sulconazole by HPLC using normal-phase amylose CSPs. Fresenius’ J Anal Chem 370:951–955Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY (2003) Enantioseparation of some clinically used drugs by HPLC using cellulose Tris (3, 5-dichlorophenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phase. Biomed Chromatogr 17:113–117Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I (2005) Determination of tadalafil in pharmaceutical preparation by HPLC using monolithic silica column. Talanta 65:276–280Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ali I, Naim L, Ghanem A, Aboul-Enein HY (2006) Chiral separations of piperidine-2, 6-dione analogues on Chiralpak IA and Chiralpak IB columns by using HPLC. Talanta 69:1013–1017Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ali I, Kumerer K, Aboul-Enein HY (2006) Mechanistic principles in chiral separations using liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. Chromatographia 63:295–307Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ali I, Gupta VK, Aboul-Enein HY, Hussain A (2008) Hyphenation in sample preparation: advancement from the micro to the nano world. J Sep Sci 31:2040–2053Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Nagae N, Gaitonde VD, Dutta KK (2012) Recent trends in ultra-fast HPLC: new generation superficially porous silica columns. J Sep Sci 35:3235–3249Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Al-Warthan A, AsninL Chudinov A (2014) Advances in chiral separations of small peptides by capillary electrophoresis and chromatography. J Sep Sci 37:2447–2466Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Hussain A, Saleem K, Aboul-Enein HY (2011) Chiral separation of β-adrenergic blockers in human plasma by SPE-HPLC. Chromatographia 73:251–256Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ali I, Suhail M, Alothman ZA, Badjah AY (2018) Stereoselective interactions of profen stereomers with human plasma proteins using nano solid phase micro membrane tip extraction and chiral liquid chromatography. Sep Purif Technol 197:336–344Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    De Araújo EL, Barbosa HF, Dockal ER, Cavalheiro ÉT (2017) Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) complexes of biopolymeric Schiff bases of salicylaldehydes and chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 95:168–176Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Salve PS, Alegaon SG, Sriram D (2017) Three-component, one-pot synthesis of anthranilamide Schiff bases bearing 4-aminoquinoline moiety as Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 27:1859–1866Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jiang L, Jin L, Tian H, Yuan X, Yu X, Xu Q (2011) Direct and mild palladium-catalyzed aerobic oxidative synthesis of imines from alcohols and amines under ambient conditions. Chem Commun 47:10833–10835Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Baruah S, Fisyuk A, Kulakov IV, Puzari A (2017) An atom economic acid catalyzed synthetic method for aromatic imines. Asian J Chem Pharm Sci 2:6–9Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    El-Gohary NS (2014) Arylidene derivatives as synthons in heterocyclic synthesis. Open Access Libr J 1:1–47Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bouanini M, Belboukhari N, Menéndez JC, Sekkoum K, Cheriti A, Aboul-Enein HY (2018) Chiral separation of novel iminonaringenin derivatives. Chirality 30:484–490Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Xavier A, Srividhya N (2014) Synthesis and study of Schiff base ligands. IOSR J Appl Chem 7:06–15Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang T, Schaeffer M, Franco P (2005) Optimization of the chiral separation of a Ca-sensitizing drug on an immobilized polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phase: case study with a preparative perspective. J Chromatogr A 1083:96–101Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rebizi MN, Sekkoum K, Belboukhari N, Cheriti A, Aboul-Enein YH (2016) Chiral separation and determination of enantiomeric purity of the pharmaceutical formulation of cefadroxil using coated and immobilized amylose-derived and cellulose-derived chiral stationary phases. Egypt Pharm J 15:88–97Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I (2003) Chiral separations by liquid chromatography and related technologies. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ravikumar M, Narasimhanaidu M, Srinivasulu K, Satyanarayana Raju T, Raja MSR, Yadagiri SP (2009) Enantiomeric separation of docetaxel starting material by chiral LC using amylose based stationary phase. Chromatographia 69:163–167Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rahou I, Sekkoum K, Belboukhari N, Cheriti A, Aboul-Enein HY (2016) Liquid chromatographic separation of novel 4-amino-flavanes series diastereomers on a polysaccharide-type chiral stationary phase. J Chromatogr Sci 54:1787–1793Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rahou I, Sekkoum K, Belboukhari N, Cheriti A, Aboul-Enein HY (2014) Chiral separation of 4-iminoflavan derivatives on several polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases by HPLC. Chromatographia 77:1195–1201Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wistuba D, Trapp O, Gel-Moreto N, Galensa R, Schurig V (2006) Stereoisomeric separation of flavanones and flavanone-7-O-glycosides by capillary electrophoresis and determination of interconversion barriers. Anal Chem 78:3424–3433Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rizvi SA, Shamsi SA (2005) Polymeric alkenoxy amino acid surfactants: IV. Effects of hydrophobic chain length and degree of polymerization of molecular micelles on chiral separation of beta-blockers. Electrophoresis 26:4172–4186Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Buszewski B, Noga S (2012) Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)—a powerful separation technique. Anal Bioanal Chem 402:231–247Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chen LJ, Lin SY, Huang CC (1998) Effect of hydrophobic chain length of surfactants on enthalpy-entropy compensation of micellization. J Phys Chem A 102:4350–4356Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Qin P, Liu R, Pan X, Fang X, Mou Y (2010) Impact of carbon chain length on binding of perfluoroalkyl acids to bovine serum albumin determined by spectroscopic methods. J Agric Food Chem 58:5561–5567Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed El Amin Zaid
    • 1
  • Nasser Belboukhari
    • 1
  • Khaled Sekkoum
    • 1
  • Jose Carlos Menendez Ramos
    • 2
  • Hassan Y. Aboul-Enein
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Bioactive Molecules and Chiral Separation Laboratory, Faculty of Science and TechnologyTahri Mohamed UniversityBécharAlgeria
  2. 2.Departamento de Química Orgánica y Farmacéutica, Facultad de FarmaciaUniversidad ComplutenseMadridSpain
  3. 3.Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry Department, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research DivisionNational Research CenterDokki, CairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations