Advertisement

SN Applied Sciences

, 1:400 | Cite as

Femtosecond nonlinear absorption and optical limiting action in nanoplatelet CuFe2O4-decorated rGO nanocomposites

  • T. C. Sabari GirisunEmail author
  • M. Saravanan
  • S. Venugopal Rao
Research Article
  • 106 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. 5. Physics (general)

Abstract

Using 800 nm infrared, 150 femtosecond (fs), 80 MHz high repetition rate laser pulse excitation, intensity-dependent (Io = 245–735 MW/cm2) measurements on the nonlinear absorption of copper ferrite hetero-architecture functionalized with three rGO contents (15, 25 and 40 wt%) were performed. Copper ferrite–rGO nanocomposite demonstrated a peculiar W-pattern [a peak (saturable absorption) with two valleys [reverse saturable absorption (RSA)] at extreme] in the open aperture Z-scan data for the decorated (15 wt%) rGO systems recorded at a low peak intensity (Io = 245 MW/cm2). The Z-scan traces were dominated by RSA characteristics due to two-photon absorption process at high peak intensities. The variation in intensity-dependent nonlinear absorption coefficient and ground-state absorption at laser excitation wavelength revealed the presence of excited-state absorption (ESA). The maximum two-photon absorption coefficient was recorded for CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO at 735 MW/cm2 excitation, which is attributed to the combined contribution of rGO and CuFe2O4 that is four times higher than pure rGO and CuFe2O4. The presence of layer like CuFe2O4 nanoplatelets upon the layer-structured rGO offers an added advantage in enhancing the nonlinear absorption coefficient. Near-resonant ESA-based optical limiters comprising CuFe2O4–rGO can possibly be used as a versatile optical limiting material for eye safety against intense, high repetition rate fs laser pulses.

Keywords

Reduced graphene oxide Nonlinear absorption Nonlinear refraction Optical limiting 

1 Introduction

Lasers these days are unavoidable tools in cutting edge technologies such as optics/photonics, and in particular, intense, femtosecond (fs)/picosecond (ps) laser pulses are in high demand in automobile, micro-fabrication and ultrafast measurement areas [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Such fs lasers, with capacity of delivering high intensities at short intervals of time, are capable of damaging the optical components, and therefore, numerous attempts are being made in preventing these laser-based accidents damaging the human eyes and precious sensors. The desideratum of ideal optical power limiters to delicate optical components (including the human eyes) with a low damage threshold due to deliberate or unintentional exposure to these high power lasers is one of the ultimate challenges for the optics community [8, 9, 10, 11]. Consequently, the development of optical limiting devices has shown tremendous advancement due to its possible utility in photonic application like laser safety devices, optical shutter, pulse shaping and light stabilizing sources [12, 13, 14]. However, the development of such materials (transparent at low intensity and translucent at high intensity) in ultrashort (fs) pulse time scale is still a work in progress. Several nonlinear mechanisms such as nonlinear absorption (NLA), nonlinear refraction (NLR) and nonlinear scattering (NLS) have been studied extensively in a variety of materials and have been engaged for achieving superior optical limiters [15, 16]. Among these diverse phenomena, materials that possess nonlinear absorption can yield effective energy-absorbing optical limiter for various laser pulses. Since the intensity-dependent NLA measurements can provide additional information on the nature of nonlinear absorption, Z-scan experiments with different input intensities of excitation were performed to measure the nonlinear transmissivity of the sample. Graphene possesses interesting nonlinear absorption and refraction properties because of the interband transitions that are independent of the broad wavelength. To improvise the nonlinearity with tunability, graphene oxides (cheaper alternates of graphene) are often decorated with noble metal atom, porphyrin, phthalocyanine or covalent functionalization groups [17, 18, 19, 20]. The remarkable light absorption and broad band emission of oxide derivatives of graphene (GO—graphene oxide, rGO—reduced graphene oxide) due to extended π-conjugate system have shown significant interest in laser damage protecting units. Here, the sp2 hybridization from oxygen-containing groups left out after exfoliation varies which leads to change in NLO properties of rGO. Also, these residual functional groups upon the surface of rGO prevent aggregation and percolate various metal oxides such as Fe2O3, ZnFe2O4, TiO2, ZnO and BBO [21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Extensive efforts by various research groups have been extended toward understanding the nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of carbon-based graphene and graphene nanocomposites like graphene/epoxy resin [26], carbon black/epoxy resin [27], functionalized graphene fluoride [28], graphene families [29], graphene oxide [30], cobalt phthalocyanine [31], layered GO [32], polymer–GO [33], GO–Fe2O3 [21] and graphene [34]. Most of these materials have demonstrated superior NLO coefficients, which is essential for photonic applications. Particularly, metals incorporated in graphene nanocomposites depict impressive NLO and optical limiting performance owing to the combination of different mechanisms. Among metal oxide loading, ferrite stands high and recent work on ferrite-decorated rGO showed remarkable ultrafast nonlinearity characteristics. With intensity-dependent high repetition rate fs laser excitation, CdFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite illustrated a shifting of RSA to SA because of the involvement of various molecules with respect to excitation intensity [35]. Impressed by this factor, we have extended our earlier investigations on ferrite-decorated rGO systems. Earlier reports showcase that the combination of rGO with CuFe2O4 can yield potential systems with strong nonlinearity [36]. Also ferrites are investigated in different optoelectronic applications as it possess the advantages of (a) owning 3d10 4 s1 configuration in the valence shell, (b) available at low cost and (c) environmentally benign [37, 38, 39]. So using the different intensities (Io = 245, 490 and 735 MW/cm2) of Ti:Sapphire (150 fs, 800 nm and 80 MHz) laser pulses, NLO activities of a series of CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposites were measured. It is well known that inclusion of copper ferrite can induce excited states near the excitation wavelength, and thus, there is a possibility to demonstrate ESA-based optical limiters. Therefore, the motivation of the work is to demonstrate a near-resonant excited-state absorption-based optical limiter comprising CuFe2O4–rGO with improved NLO performance for eye safety against intense, high repetition rate fs laser pulses. Interesting transition of nonlinear absorption mechanism (SA, W-pattern, sequential 2PA) with respect to the composition of samples was observed. Thus, the basic of understanding the influence of elemental composition (Cu) and morphology in altering the nonlinear optical performance of the material is analyzed.

2 Experimental details

2.1 Preparation of solar exfoliated reduced graphene oxide

Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) that resembles the internal structure of graphene is chosen as host element since graphene is expensive to be produced in bulk quantities. Using inexpensive graphite as a starting precursor, graphene oxide was prepared by modified Hummer’s method [40]. The process of oxidation was achieved by reacting graphite (1 g, Alfa Aeser) with sodium nitrate (1 g, EMPLURA) in the presence of sulfuric acid (4 ml). The process of oxidation was continued by the addition of potassium permanganate (6 g, EMPLURA), and the reaction being exothermic excess of heat was released. The solution was immersed in ice bath to control the temperature well below 20 °C. Hydrogen peroxide (6 ml) hydrated solution was used to terminate the oxidation process, and the obtained black power was washed (with HCl and H2O), centrifuged (8000 rpm, 10 min) and dried (60 °C, 12 h). The best way to remove the attached functional groups without destructing the layered structure of graphene is to reduce graphite oxide using solar radiation. The process of exfoliation was activated by focusing solar radiation upon prepared graphene oxide using convex lens of focal length 100 cm. The transition of light brown to dark black accompanied by the sudden increase in the volume ascertains the formation of solar exfoliated reduced graphene oxide [41]. Here the process of de-oxygenation in graphene oxide occurred due to localized thermal excitation (150–200 °C in 1–2 s) arising from the photoacoustic effect originated through focused solar radiation.

2.2 Preparation of CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite

The decoration of copper ferrite with different load contents upon reduced graphene oxide to form CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposites was achieved by a one-step hydrothermal method. Here, nitrates of copper and ferric (1:2 molar ratio) were used as precursor to form CuFe2O4. Upon reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with various contents (15, 25 and 40 wt%), copper ferrite metal oxide was formed. The oxygen functionalities on rGO sheets serve as nucleation sites to accommodate copper and ferrous oxides dissociating from the respective nitrates and thus forming CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposites. The reaction was carried out in an autoclave unit (volume of 150 mL) with rGO dispersed metal nitrate solutions being heated at 180 °C under ambient pressure. Solvable byproducts in the precipitate were removed with water washing and then dried in air atmosphere (60 °C, 24 h). The above procedure was carried out for 0, 15, 25, 40 wt% of rGO to attain pure CuFe2O4 nanoparticles and CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposites.

2.3 Z-scan experiment

Open aperture Z-scan experiments were carried out on CuFe2O4–(15, 25 and 40 wt%) rGO nanocomposite to study the nonlinear absorption at various input intensities. An excitation source of Ti:Sapphire laser oscillator (Chameleon, M/s Coherent) was used providing output at a wavelength of 800 nm, pulses with duration of 150 fs at 80 MHz repetition rate. The laser pulses were focused using 100-mm focus lens, and the corresponding beam waist was estimated to be ~ 25.5 µm at 800 nm, and all the experiments were performed with various input peak intensities (245–735 MW/cm2). From the recorded open aperture Z-scan data, the variation in normalized transmittance with respect to light fluence [F(z)] was derived using standard relations [22].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Preliminary confirmation and structural studies

Recorded XPS patterns of pristine and decorated GO are illustrated in Fig. 1a. For rGO, peaks that represent carbon (285.3 eV) and oxygen (529.7 eV) environment of the molecule are shown in Fig. 1a. C 1s XPS (Fig. 1b) pattern of reduced graphene oxide has peaks at 284.5 eV (C=C), 285.8 eV (C–O) and 288.6 eV (C=O) which represents different functional groups of reduced graphene oxide. The wide-scan XPS spectrum of CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO nanocomposite obviously depicts the characteristic peaks at 285.01 eV, 532.83 eV, 722. 99 eV, 710.10 eV and 932.80 eV, corresponding to the binding energy of C 1s, O 1s, Fe 2p and Cu 2p, respectively. Figure 1c (Fe) and Fig. 1d (Cu) represent the core-level XPS pattern for composite. Peaks at binding energies of 713.10 eV (Fe 2p1/2), 718.3 eV (Fe3+), 726.14 eV (Fe 2p1/2), 935.11 (Cu 2p3/2) and 944.25 eV (Cu 2p1/2) ensure the presence of metals (copper and ferrous) ions in the composite which is found to match well with the literature [42, 43].
Fig. 1

XPS spectra of a rGO and CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO nanocomposites, b C 1s XPS spectra of rGO and c Cu 2p, d Fe 2p core-level spectrum of CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO nanocomposites. The peaks in b were fitted with Gaussian curves, and the green lines represent the components of Gaussian fit made on C 1s XPS spectrum

X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded to confirm the formation of the support as well as the composite, and data are shown in Fig. 2. In the XRD of GO, the disappearance of graphite diffraction peak (2θ = 26°) and the formation of characteristic peak at lower angle (2θ = 10.6°) confirm the complete oxidation during Hummer’s method [22]. The expected reverse observation (graphene oxide turning themselves as graphene like structure) of no diffraction at lower angle and broad weak XRD peak at 24° that corresponds to (002) plane of rGO was observed in solar exfoliated product. For CuFe2O4-decorated rGO hetero-architecture, the presence of (200), (211), (422), (004), (312) and (224) reflection planes was ascribed to the tetragonal structure of CuFe2O4 [JCPDS: 34-0425]. In the CuFe2O4–rGO hetero-architecture, exfoliation of rGO occurred because of crystal growth of copper ferrite between the rGO sheets. In the recorded FTIR spectrum (Fig. 3), rGO shows broad vibrational band due to the stretching mode of hydroxyl groups (3420 cm−1). Upon decoration, rGO shows a decrease in absorption intensity of 3420 cm−1(O–H), 1725 cm−1,(C=O) and 1120 cm−1 (C–O) which indicate that rGO was further reduced to a great extent during the incorporation of CuFe2O4. New absorption bands observed at 545 cm−1 (Cu2+ stretching in the octahedral site) and 454 cm−1 (Fe3+ stretching in the tetrahedral site) belong to CuFe2O4 in the composite. For CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO sample, the FTIR spectrum showed peaks at 3427 cm−1 (O–H), 2928 cm−1 (–CH2), 1726 cm−1 (C–O), 1620 (C=C) and 1125 cm−1 (C–O), and in the case of (25 wt%) rGO, the peak at 2928 cm−1 (–CH2) vanished for the nanocomposite. The effective removal of functional groups in CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO was observed as many of the functional groups almost vanished in the IR spectra of the composite.
Fig. 2

XRD patterns of pure and decorated CuFe2O4–rGO composites

Fig. 3

Recorded FTIR of rGO, CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO, CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO, CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO and CuFe2O4

Raman spectroscopy is an essential experimental technique for identifying the defects states formed during functionalization of graphene. In recorded Raman spectra with 532 nm laser excitation (Fig. 4) of copper ferrite functionalized upon three rGO contents (15, 25 and 40 wt%), G band (1598 cm−1, 1598 cm−1 and 1590 cm−1) and D band (1300 cm−1, 1327 cm−1 and 1348 cm−1) of graphene were observed. Because of the reduction, ID/IG reduces to 0.78 (rGO) which is smaller compared with 0.99 (GO). Also, the CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite exhibited the characteristic CuFe2O4 Raman modes at 216, 281, 392 (E2g and T2g) and 597, 676 cm−1 (A1g). And ID/IG ratio of nanocomposite was estimated to be 5.06, 1.07 and 0.91, which emphasis the dominance of structural defects in the composite that can result in variation in optical properties. The perfect graphene domain (La) which is inversely proportional to ID/IG ratio was evaluated using the excitation energy (eV) by standard relation [44]. The crystallite sizes of CuFe2O4–(15, 25 and 40 wt%) rGO were calculated to be 1.38 nm, 6.53 nm and 7.76 nm, respectively. In fact, the change in ID/IG ratio along with La value emphasis the removal of oxygen element organic groups and the incorporation of bond between CuFe2O4 and rGO sheets during hydrothermal reaction. Altogether, chemical state (XPS), crystal structure (XRD), molecular structural (FTIR) and defect state (Raman) analysis confirms the successful synthesis of CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite through the hydrothermal treatment.
Fig. 4

Raman spectra of rGO, CuFe2O4, CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO, CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO and CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO

3.2 Textural, magnetic and linear optical properties

SEM and TEM techniques were used to analyze the structural morphology of rGO and CuFe2O4-decorated rGO hetero-architectures, which inveterate the versatile morphology of CuFe2O4–rGO nanostructures. It is manifesting to be observed that in rGO, exfoliated GO appears as transparent, ultrathin and distinguished sheets. Recorded SEM image (Fig. 5) showcases the existence of different morphologies for pure CuFe2O4 (clusters of platelets) and CuFe2O4 decorated upon 15 wt% rGO (spindle), 25 wt% rGO (aggregate of platelets and spindle) and 40 wt% rGO (well-distributed thin platelets). Here as graphene content increases, the nucleation formed on the surface of sheets preferred the formation of platelets like structures of CuFe2O4. TEM image (Fig. 6) of reduced graphene oxide illustrates curvy and wrinkled sheets of graphene attributed to solar exfoliation process. For pure CuFe2O4, the formation of nanoplatelets with 23 nm width was observed. A uniform distribution of nanoplatelets and nanospindles of copper ferrite functionalized upon rGO contents (15, 25 and 40 wt%) with size 9 nm, 17 nm and (67 × 28 nm), respectively, was witnessed. The increase in graphene content leads to the increase in the number of nucleation sites of CuFe2O4 and provides a transformation in the morphology from platelets to spindle aided from protrusions expanding with growth. The magnetic property of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles and CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) was investigated. Figure 7 illustrates the S-type curve (hysteresis loop) of room temperature magnetized (with an applied magnetic field) nanocomposite. Copper ferrite being the magnetization contributing entity, its size and morphology play a significant role in deciding the ordering and magnetization of the sample. The magnetic remanences of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles and CuFe2O4–rGO composites were found to be in the range 10−6 emu/g which is nearly zero, suggesting its superparamagnetic behavior. Higher saturation magnetization and lower coercivity were observed for pure copper ferrite (3.399 × 10−3 emu, 15.271 G) than for CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO (1.624 × 10−3 emu, 35.150 G). It is be noted that saturation magnetization of CuFe2O4 decreases upon loading in rGO. Similar superparamagnetism with higher coercivity due to increased magneto-crystallinity was reported for Fe–Al2O3 system [35, 45, 46]. Copper ferrites when scaled down to nanometer regime alter the surface/interface properties, electronic states and magnetic properties. Nanocomposites containing both magnetic and NLO properties can offer interactions between magnetic susceptibility and nonlinear absorption in the material, which can be utilized to realize magneto-controlled NLO materials. In such a case, by tuning the magnetic properties of the nanocomposites, the magnetic anisotropy of the magnetic ion at the interfaces can be reduced which leads to strong nonlinear optical response. Thus, with the application of external magnetic field it is possible to control the optical properties of the magnetic nanoparticles used in optical devices. Generally, the magneto-optical effect that transpires in magnetic fluids is believed to be the consequences of anisotropy in the dielectric constant (induced by the orientation of suspended particles). This induced anisotropy can also result in optical anisotropy either in the refractive index or absorbance or in both. A super paramagnetic behavior was observed mainly due to the contribution of copper ferrite nanoparticles, in which a fraction of Fe3+ is distributed out of the preferred octahedral A sites to tetrahedral B sites leading to the coupling between the cations. A larger extent of conjugation increases the chance for electron/energy transfer which leads to enhanced nonlinear optical response. Thus, functionalization of copper ferrite upon rGO has introduced the emergence of localized magnetic moment (super paramagnetic nature).
Fig. 5

SEM images of a rGO (layered structure), b CuFe2O4 (nanoplatelets), c CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO (nanoplatelets of copper ferrite upon rGO layers), d CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO (nanoplatelets of copper ferrite upon rGO layers), e CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO (nanospindle of copper ferrite upon rGO layers)

Fig. 6

TEM images of a rGO, b CuFe2O4, c CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO, d CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO, e CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO nanocomposite

Fig. 7

Room temperature M–H curves of the pure CuFe2O4, CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO, CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO and CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO nanocomposite

UV–visible absorbance data of the reduced graphene oxide, CuFe2O4 and CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite are shown in Fig. 8. Upon reduction to rGO, the absorption maximum of GO was red shifted to 278 nm (238 nm) and 388 nm (290 nm). The absorptions of CuFe2O4 were observed at 445 nm (ligand field transitions) and 537 nm (surface plasmon resonance (SPR), peak of Cu nanoparticle). The absorption peak of (CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite) at 260 nm, 394 nm, 436 nm and 541 nm is the indicative of CuFe2O4 deposition on rGO nanosheets. Compared to CdFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite [35], CuFe2O4–rGO shows higher absorbance at the chosen wavelength of excitation (800 nm) which makes them possible to observe near-resonant nonlinearity.
Fig. 8

UV–visible absorption spectra of a rGO, CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO, CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO, CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO and b pure CuFe2O4

3.3 Nonlinear refraction

It is known that the ground-state absorption and ESA together can induce intensity-dependent refractive index [16]. With high repetition rate intense IR laser pulses, it can be generally expected that NLR arises mainly due to thermal lensing effects. Here, since the closed aperture transmittance is affected by the nonlinear refraction and absorption, the determination of n2 is less straight forward from the closed aperture scans. It is necessary to separate the effect of nonlinear refraction from that of nonlinear absorption. A simple and effective method [47] to obtain purely effective n2 is to divide the closed aperture transmittance by the corresponding open aperture scans. Figure 9 presents the ratio of closed (CA) aperture by open aperture Z-scan profiles recorded with a peak intensity of 245 MW/cm2. Both pristine CuFe2O4 and CuFe2O4 functionalized upon (15, 25 and 40 wt%) rGO contents exhibit negative nonlinear refractive index-based self-defocusing nature. The value of n2 was evaluated through theoretical fitting of closed aperture normalized transmittance (TCA) [48]. As expected, pure rGO with its planar structure and capacity to dissipate heat quickly possesses stronger nonlinear refraction than pure CuFe2O4. Here rGO (− 2.8 × 10−16 m2/W) possesses two times higher n2 than CuFe2O4 (− 1.4 × 10−16 m2/W). In the CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite, the increase in the content of graphene boosts the nonlinear refractive index. The nonlinear refractive index of CuFe2O4–(15, 25 and 40 wt%) rGO nanocomposite was estimated to be − 1.7, − 3.3 and − 3.8 × 10−16 m2/W. The π-electron distribution and the free carriers of the sp2 domain in graphene sheets are the prime reason for the occurrence of NLR in rGO. Here excitation with ultrafast lasers on the sample leads to transfer of carriers in the NP’s state. Enhancement in carrier density is observed in the composite system due to the low lifetime of the excited carriers from the NP’s to the valence band of rGO leading to the improvement in NLR. Strong thermal conductivity due to the planar structure of rGO and high repetition rate fs laser excitation results in dominant thermal contribution and high n2. It is pertinent to note here that the excitation of the laser involves high repetition rate (80 MHz) which is much higher than the thermal diffusion time and there is a possibility that the cumulative thermal effects also contribute to the Z-scan signal. Excess energy from thermal dissipation redistributes within the solute molecules which turn them into intramolecular heat and may also further raise the solution temperature by dissipating eventually into the photon. Thus, the change of refractive index due to diffusion effect has considerable applications in optical communication systems that are operating at high repetition rate. As a result of the contribution of thermal nonlinearity, the NLO coefficients of the investigated materials were found to be higher than most of the earlier reports. Measurements with fs, kHz pulses will separate the thermal contribution, and these will be taken up in near future.
Fig. 9

CA Z-scan pattern of rGO, CuFe2O4–(15, 25 and 40 wt%) rGO and CuFe2O4 at an intensity of 245 MW cm−2 of Ti:Sapphire (800 nm, 150 fs and 80 MHz) laser. The scattered circles represent the experimental data, and the solid line is the theoretical fit as proposed by Sheik-Bahae

3.4 Intensity-dependent nonlinear absorption

Nonlinear optical absorption is broadly classified as two classes: Actual transitions give resonant nonlinearity which is slow and virtual transitions generate non-resonant nonlinearity that is fast in nature. Linear absorption is a predominant mechanism in the resonant region, while it is multi-photon processes in the non-resonant region. To understand the nonlinear absorption process of the prepared sample, the acquired data were fitted using the standard relation for open aperture normalized transmittance [49]. It is to be noted that the match found between numerical and experimental data just ascertains the reliability of the experiment performed and it does not confirm or indicate the occurrence of 2PA, to be genuine or sequential two-step ESA. Change in the nonlinear absorption coefficient corresponding with input intensity can provide information on the mechanism involved. Genuine 2PA occurs when β-value remains constant for varied input intensity as weak 2PA cannot drain the population of electrons in the ground state. However, in ESA process due to substantial depletion of ground-state population nonlinear absorption coefficient either will increase or decrease as function of peak intensity. The OA data recorded for rGO and CuFe2O4 (Fig. 10a–f) show RSA pattern with minimum transmittance at the focus. As depicted in the linear absorption spectrum, materials possess small absorption in the domain of excitation wavelength, and hence, the observed nonlinearity is expected to be of resonant type. The changes in input intensity on the interaction with the material play an important role in 2PA process [50]. The measured data were found to be fitting well with the theoretical 2PA equation. The possible mechanisms for 2PA in such materials process are depicted in Fig. 11. Here, for pure rGO and CuFe2O4 2PA coefficient was found to be increasing with input peak intensity. This clearly suggests that the observed nonlinearity arises due to ESA process, i.e., 1PA + ESA = 2PA. The source of the witnessed nonlinearity in rGO has occurred due to the process mentioned below: As witnessed in the ground-state (UV–Visible) absorption pattern of rGO and CuFe2O4, the materials possess considerable absorption in excitation region (800 nm, 1. 55 eV), and thus, the observed nonlinearity is of resonant type. Under NIR excitation (800 nm), electrons in the ground state absorb two photons (800 nm, 1.55 eV) through sequential process and transit to the excited state of rGO (388 nm, 3.2 eV) and pure copper ferrite (445 nm, 2.79 eV).
Fig. 10

Intensity-dependent OA Z-scan curve of pure a rGO, b CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO (245 MW/cm2), c CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO (245–735 MW/cm2), d CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO, e CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO and f CuFe2O4. The experimental OA data (represented as scattered circles) were fitted (solid line) with the theoretical equations as proposed by Sheik Bahae

Fig. 11

Possible electronic transitions for observed 1PA + ESA = 2PA in pure and decorated systems. Here 2PA involves n–π* transition state of rGO and CuFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite and SPR peak of Cu nanoparticles for pure CuFe2O4

The OA pattern in Fig. 10b, c of the 15 wt% decorated system shows a combined SA and RSA pattern (W-pattern) for low input intensity (Io = 245 MW cm−2). The W-pattern with the 2PA process is formed due to the additional hump peak (Z = 0) flanked between the two valleys representing SA peak. And the nonlinear absorption coefficient is affected by the existence of the two competing effects (RSA and SA). As the general open aperture equation for 2PA process cannot be modeled for W-type nonlinear absorption because of expected inhomogeneous broadening of transitions in these conditions, the 2PA coefficient is obtained by fitting the experimental data with following equations [51]
$$\beta \left( I \right) = \beta_{\text{RSA}} \left( I \right) + \beta_{\text{SA}} \left( I \right) = \frac{{\beta_{\text{RSA}} }}{{1 + \frac{I}{{I_{\text{S}}^{\text{RSA}} }}}} + \frac{{\beta_{\text{SA}} }}{{1 + \frac{I}{{I_{\text{S}}^{\text{SA}} }}}}$$
2PA coefficients obtained for the best fits to the experimental data are presented in Table 1. The experiments were performed on an automated Z-scan experimental setup. The errors in estimation of focal spot size, peak intensities, fitting procedures and calibration of intensity are major sources of error in the estimation of the NLO coefficients. Based on several measurements, the maximum error was estimated to be ± 5%. As the error correction is employed uniformly, the change in NLO coefficients of different samples was directly compared.
Table 1

Estimated nonlinear absorption coefficient and onset optical limiting threshold values

NLO parameters

800 nm, 150 fs, 80 MHz excitation

Nonlinear absorption coefficient (β2PA) × 10−10m/W

Onset optical limiting threshold (µJ/cm2)

Io = 245 MW/cm2

Io = 490 MW/cm2

Io = 735 MW/cm2

Io = 245 MW/cm2

Io = 490 MW/cm2

Io = 735 MW/cm2

rGO

2.1 ± 0.10

2.5 ± 0.12

2.7 ± 0.13

38.45

35.66

31.42

CuFe2O4

0.7 ± 0.03

1.0 ± 0.05

3.3 ± 0.16

57.50

54.12

27.53

CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO

0.17 ± 0.01

0.9 ± 0.04

1.1 ± 0.05

56.73

55.59

CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO

1.0 ± 0.05

1.4 ± 0.14

6.7 ± 0.33

57.50

45.22

22.29

CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO

1.3 ± 0.06

1.7 ± 1.70

12.7 ± 0.63

52.38

35.36

12.45

It is evident that since the sample shows negligible linear transmittance at 800 nm, the contribution of linear absorption coefficient (α0) is neglected. The dominance of RSA pattern was observed for the higher excitation intensity, thus providing stronger 2PA coefficient, while for copper ferrite-decorated (25 wt% and 40 wt%) reduced graphene oxide systems it displayed RSA (valley) at lower input intensity (Io = 245 MW cm−2). Therefore, it can be deduced that as the size of CuFe2O4–rGO increases, the effect of RSA increased suppressing SA behavior. This might be due to greater cross section of excited states than ground state for larger particles. For all higher intensities (Io = 490 MW cm−2 and 735 MW cm−2), decorated rGO systems exhibited reverse saturable absorption. Here the prepared reduced graphene oxide contains both sp2 (Pristine graphene honeycomb lattice) and sp3 (defects state and oxygen-containing functional groups) hybridized domains. sp3 hybridization in the carbon units of rGO leads to 2PA at different (Io = 245 MW cm−2, Io = 490 MW cm−2 and Io = 735 MW cm−2) intensities provided by ultrafast pulses. It is to be mentioned that decorated systems depict linear absorption maxima at 394 nm due to n–π* transition in the rGO. As the composites possess energy states near to excitation wavelength, the resonant nonlinearity gives rise to sequential 2PA (two photons were sequentially absorbed) rather than genuine 2PA. The incorporation of CuFe2O4 on the rGO system results in the participation of σ-states (sp3) in 2PA process. The increase in irradiation of input fluence to 735 MW/cm2 on the decorated system leads to very deep decrease in the transmittance as presented in Fig. 10e which is a sign of strong reverse saturable behavior. The present results of nonlinear absorption coefficient were compared with the other well-known system in Table 2 reported at same experimental setup. With increasing β for different samples considered, the difference between the valley depth and the peak height in nonlinear refraction varies. And the amplitude of the valley is almost as large as peak, referring the involvement of Kerr-type nonlinearity [52]. Thus, considering the above observation along with fact that the repetition rate of the laser that has been used in the experimental procedure is 80 MHz, the influence of thermal effects along with the electronic effects cannot be ignored.
Table 2

Comparison of the two-photon absorption coefficients obtained for the carbon and metal/semiconductor nanoparticles [Ti:Sapphire (~ 800 nm)]

Samples

Nonlinear absorption coefficient, β2PA (m/W)

CdFe2O4–rGO [26]

10−15

ZnFe2O4–rGO [48]

10−15

GO and rGO [55]

10−13

SiO2–Se [56]

10−15

CuS nanoparticles [57]

10−15

Ni–Ag [58]

10−15

CuO/f-HEG [59]

10−14

Fe2O3 [60]

10−15

3.5 Optical limiting behavior

The changes in transmission of the prepared hybrids were recorded against input fluence using open aperture Z-scan experiment. This experiment is capable of recording the variation in light fluence [F(z)] for corresponding beam radius ω(z) [53, 54]. The optical limiting threshold is defined as the incident fluence at which the transmittance falls to 50% of the linear transmittance. Here all the optical limiting curves were extracted from the open aperture Z-scan data and the fluence range (3–60 µJ/cm2) is limited to the designed Z-scan geometry. As direct measurement of output with change in input intensity is not measured, the curve has the limitation of extending (or extrapolating the data) until the transmittance falls off to 50%. Hence, as an alternate approach, onset optical limiting threshold is reported which is the incident fluence at which optical limiting activity starts. The OL curve derived from the open aperture pattern demonstrates the changes in transmittance value with respect to input fluence as represented in Fig. 12. The ability to deliver ultrafast pulses with controlled energy through flexible fibers can open up a host of possibilities toward developing robust ultrafast laser microsurgery systems. It is to be noted that as short pulse lasers allow high precision microsurgery with minimal invasiveness, high repetition rate femtosecond laser is under prime consideration. Hence, femtosecond laser microsurgery has emerged strongly in tissue ablation, studying neural injury, and cleaving microtubules which require energy pulses on the order of microjoules. Thus, the observed optical limiting of CuFe2O4-decorated (40 wt%) rGO with onset limiting threshold in the order of few µJ/cm2 is of potential use in biomedical applications. Here, all the samples exhibit optical limiting (due to 2PA and SDF) pattern expect CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO at 245 MW/cm2 due to the existence of dominant SA process (W-pattern). As the nonlinear absorption coefficient is intensity dependent, here 2PA coefficient increases with the increase in the number of photons used for excitation. Pure rGO possesses higher 2PA coefficient compared with pure copper ferrite. At 245 MW/cm2, copper ferrite possesses higher 2PA than rGO. This combination of two extreme 2PA absorbed resulted in the variation in 2PA coefficient with change in rGO content. Among the composite, higher 2PA coefficient was observed for (40 wt%) rGO followed by (25 wt% and 15 wt%) rGO. It is interesting to note that at lower input intensity excitation rGO possesses stronger 2PA coefficient compared with the nanocomposites. Here the lowest nonlinear absorption coefficient was witnessed for (15 wt%) rGO due to the combined presence of stronger SA and weaker RSA. As witnessed in TEM, higher content of CuFe2O4 upon rGO has suppressed the contribution of rGO and thus possesses lower nonlinear absorption coefficient compared to pure rGO and CuFe2O4. However, (25 wt% and 40 wt%) rGO has a stronger 2PA coefficient than its pure counterparts. The maximum 2PA coefficient was witnessed for CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO at 735 MW/cm2 excitation due to the combined contribution of rGO and CuFe2O4 which is four times higher than pure rGO and CuFe2O4. The presence of layer like CuFe2O4 nanoplatelets upon the layer rGO offers higher advantage in enhancing the nonlinear absorption coefficient. As discussed in the literature, similar tuning of NLO properties with respect to the grain size of the material was observed in CuCl nanocrystals, ZnO nanocolloids, ZnFe2O4 and CdO [61, 62, 63]. The decoration of copper ferrite with different concentrations upon rGO sheets with varied morphology results in acquiring tunability of NLO properties. Thus, nanoplatelet CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO can be potential energy-absorbing ESA-based optical limiters against Ti:Sapphire (150 fs, 800 nm and 80 MHz) laser pulses.
Fig. 12

Intensity-dependent OL pattern of pure rGO, CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO, CuFe2O4–(25 wt%) rGO, CuFe2O4–(40 wt%) rGO and CuFe2O4

4 Conclusions

CuFe2O4 was made to anchor upon (15, 25 and 40 wt%) rGO contents by hydrothermal method where electrostatic force plays an important role in distributing and holding various sizes of particles. The decoration of CuFe2O4 nanostructures upon rGO nanosheets was confirmed by analyzing their XPS, XRD, FTIR, VSM, Raman, SEM, TEM and UV–Vis absorption studies. Higher content of rGO with CuFe2O4 nanoplatelets exhibited superior self-defocusing (NLR) and 2PA (NLA) process than other lower rGO content hybrid structure. Intensity-dependent nonlinear absorption studies showcase the following features of CuFe2O4–rGO composites (1) CuFe2O4–(15 wt%) rGO at lower intensity of excitation exhibits W-pattern with dominant saturable absorption behavior arising from the influence of Pauli blocking rGO, (2) CuFe2O4–rGO composite exhibits near-resonant reverse saturable absorption and is ascribed to be sequential 2PA (1PA + ESA) process and (3) CuFe2O4 nanoplatelets decorated upon 40 wt% rGO exhibited superior self-defocusing (NLR) and 2PA (NLA) process than other lower rGO content hybrid structure due to the interaction between the layered morphologies of host and decorating molecules. The prepared CuFe2O4 nanoplatelet-decorated rGO hybrid layer structure provides an insight on the possible way to enhance NLO properties by anchoring layered complex oxides upon carbonaceous-layered materials.

Notes

Acknowledgements

TCS acknowledges financial assistance from CSIR-India [03(1375)/16/EMR-II] and S.V acknowledges the DRDO-India financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Dini D, Calvete MJ, Hanack M (2016) Nonlinear optical materials for the smart filtering of optical radiation. Chem Rev 116:13043–13233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zheng C, Chen W, Huang Y, Xiao X, Ye X (2014) Graphene oxide–noble metal (Au, Pt, and Pd) nanoparticle composites as optical limiters. RSC Adv 4:39697–39703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mamidala V, Polavarapu L, Balapanuru J, Loh KP, Xu QH, Ji W (2010) Enhanced nonlinear optical responses in donor-acceptor ionic complexes via photo induced energy transfer. Opt Express 18:25928–25935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu R, Hu J, Zhu S, Lu Zhu H (2017) Synergistically enhanced optical limiting property of graphene oxide hybrid materials functionalized with pt complexes, ACS Appl. Mater Int 9:33029–33040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krüger J, Meja P, Autric M, Kautek W (2002) Femtosecond pulse laser ablation of anodic oxide coatings on aluminium alloys with on-line acoustic observation. Appl Surf Sci 186:374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Debord B, Alharbi M, Vincetti L, Husakou A, Fourcade D, Hoenninger C, Mottay C, Gérôme E, Benabid F (2014) Multi-meter fiber-delivery and pulse self-compression of milli-Joule femtosecond laser and fiber-aided laser-micromachining. Opt Express 22:10735–10746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo Q, Yao Y, Luo ZC, Qin Z, Xie G, Liu M, Kang J, Zhang S, Bi G, Liu X, Qiu J (2016) Universal near-infrared and mid-infrared optical modulation for ultrafast pulse generation enabled by colloidal plasmonic semiconductor nanocrystals. ACS Nano 10:9463–9469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zheng X, Feng M, Zhan H (2013) Giant optical limiting effect in Ormosil gel glasses doped with graphene oxide materials. J Mater Chem C 1:6759–6766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Y, Song Y, Gan Y, Feng M, Zhan H (2015) Broadband nonlinear optical and optical limiting effects of partially unzipped carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem C 3:9948–9954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Recatala D, Llusar R, Barlow A, Wang G, Samoc M, Humphrey MG, Guschin AL (2015) Synthesis and optical power limiting properties of heteroleptic Mo3S7 clusters. Dalton Trans 44:13163–13172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Song W, He C, Dong Y, Zhang W, Gao Y, Wu Y, Chen Z (2015) The effects of central metals on the photophysical and nonlinear optical properties of reduced graphene oxide–metal(II) phthalocyanine hybrids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:7149–7157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qu B, Ouyang Q, Yu X, Luo W, Qi L, Chen Y (2015) Nonlinear absorption, nonlinear scattering, and optical limiting properties of MoS2–ZnO composite-based organic glasses. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:6036–6043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nuernberger P, Vogt G, Brixner T, Gerber G (2007) Femtosecond quantum control of molecular dynamics in the condensed phase. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:2470–2497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tang C, Zheng Q, Zhu H, Wang L, Chen SC, Ma E, Chen X (2013) Two-photon absorption and optical power limiting properties of ladder-type tetraphenylene cored chromophores with different terminal groups. J Mater Chem C 1:1771–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maya EM, Snow AW, Shirk JS, Pong RG, Flom SR, Roberts GL (2003) Synthesis, aggregation behavior and nonlinear absorption properties of lead phthalocyanines substituted with siloxane chains. J Mater Chem 13:1603–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalanoor BS, Gouda L, Gottesman R, Tirosh S, Haltzi E, Zaban A, Tischler YR (2016) Third-order optical nonlinearities in organometallic methylammonium lead iodide perovskite thin films. ACS Photonics 3:361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krishna MBM, Venkatramaiah N, Venkatesan R, Rao DN (2012) Synthesis and structural, spectroscopic and nonlinear optical measurements of graphene oxide and its composites with metal and metal free porphyrins. J Mater Chem 22:3059–3068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Du Y, Dong N, Zhang M, Zhang Y, Luan J, Lu Y, Zhang S, Sun N, Wang J, Wang G (2016) Porphyrin–poly(arylene ether sulfone) covalently functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes: synthesis and enhanced broadband nonlinear optical properties. RSC Adv 6:75530–75540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanusi K, Stone JM, Nyokong T (2015) Nonlinear optical behaviour of indium-phthalocyanine tethered to magnetite or silica nanoparticles. New J Chem 39:1665–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tolbin AY, Savelyev MS, Gerasimenko AY, TomilovaL G, Zefirov NS (2016) Thermally stable J-type phthalocyanine dimers as new non-linear absorbers for low-threshold optical limiters. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:15964–15971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang XL, Zhao X, Liu ZB, Shi S, Zhou WY, Tian JG, Xu YF, Chen YS (2011) Nonlinear optical and optical limiting properties of graphene oxide–Fe3O4 hybrid material. J Opt 13:075202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saravanan M, Sabari Girisun TC (2017) Enhanced nonlinear optical absorption and optical limiting properties of superparamagnetic spinel zinc ferrite decorated reduced graphene oxide nanostructures. Appl Surf Sci 392:904–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kavitha MK, John H, Gopinath P, Philip R (2013) Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide–ZnO hybrid with enhanced optical limiting properties. J Mater Chem C 1:3669–3676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang A, Yu W, Fang Y, Song Y, Jia D, Long L, Cifuentes MP, Humphrey MG, Zhang C (2015) Facile hydrothermal synthesis and optical limiting properties of TiO2-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Carbon 89:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muruganandi G, Saravanan M, Vinitha G, Raj MJ, Sabari Girisun TC (2018) Barium borate nanorod decorated reduced graphene oxide for optical power limiting applications. Opt Mater 75:612–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Al-Asadi AS, Hassan QM, Abdulkader AF, Mohammed MH, Bakr H, Emshary CA (2019) Formation of graphene nanosheets/epoxy resin composite and s tudy its structural, morphological and nonlinear optical properties. Opt Mater 89:460–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abdulkader AF, Hassan QMA, Al-Asadi AS, Bakr H, Sultan HA, Emshary CA (2018) Linear, nonlinear and optical limiting properties of carbon black in epoxy resin. Optik 160:100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bourlinos AB, Bakandritsos A, Liaros N, Couris S, Safarova K, Otyepka M, Zbořil R (2012) Water dispersible functionalized graphene fluoride with significant nonlinear optical response. Chem Phys Lett 543:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Feng M, Zhan H, Chen Y (2010) Nonlinear optical and optical limiting properties of graphene families. Appl Phys Lett 96:033107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jiang XF, Polavarapu L, Neo ST, Venkatesan T, XuQ H (2012) Graphene oxides as tunable broadband nonlinear optical materials for femtosecond laser pulses. J Phys Chem Lett 3:785–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kadhum AJ, Hussein NA, Hassan QM, Sultan HA, Al-Asadi AS, Emshary CA (2018) Investigating the nonlinear behavior of cobalt(II) phthalocyanine using visible CW laser beam. Optik 157:540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liaros N, Koudoumas E, Couris S (2014) Broadband near infrared optical power limiting of few layered graphene oxides. Appl Phys Lett 104:191112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nalla V, Polavarapu L, Manga KK, Goh BM, Loh KP, Xu QH, Ji W (2010) Transient photoconductivity and femtosecond nonlinear optical properties of a conjugated polymer–graphene oxide composite. Nanotech 21:415203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang H, Virally S, Bao Q, Ping LK, Massar S, Godbout N, Kockaert P (2012) Z-scan measurement of the nonlinear refractive index of graphene. Opt Lett 37:1856–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saravanan M, Sabari Girisun TC, Venugopal Rao S (2017) Super-paramagnetic and unusual nonlinear absorption switching behavior of an in situ decorated CdFe2O4–rGO nanocomposite. J Mater Chem C 5:9929–9942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wesner DA, Mertin M, Lupp F, Kreutz EW (1996) Cleaning of copper traces on circuit boards with excimer laser radiation. Appl Surf Sci 96:479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fu Y, Chen Q, He M, Wan Y, Sun X, Xia H, Wang X (2012) Copper ferrite-graphene hybrid: a multifunctional heteroarchitecture for photocatalysis and energy storage. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:1700–11709Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Faungnawakij K, Kikuchi R, Shimoda N, Fukunaga T, Eguchi K (2008) Effect of thermal treatment on activity and durability of CuFe2O4–Al2O3 composite catalysts for steam reforming of dimethyl ether. Angew Chem 120:9454–9457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Anand B, Kaniyoor A, Sai SSS, Philip R, Ramaprabhu S (2013) Enhanced optical limiting in functionalized hydrogen exfoliated graphene and its metal hybrids. J Mater Chem C 1:2773–2780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Meidanchi A, Akhavan O (2014) Superparamagnetic zinc ferrite spinel–graphene nanostructures for fast wastewater purification. Carbon 69:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Eswaraiah V, Aravind SSJ, Ramaprabhu S (2011) Top down method for synthesis of highly conducting graphene by exfoliation of graphite oxide using focused solar radiation. J Mater Chem 21:6800–6803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kumar A, Rout L, Achary LSK, Dhaka RS, Dash P (2017) Greener route for synthesis of aryl and alkyl-14H-dibenzo [aj] xanthenes using graphene oxide-copper ferrite nanocomposite as a recyclable heterogeneous catalyst. Sci Rep 7:42975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Matzen S, Moussy JB, Mattana R, Bouzehouane K, Deranlot C, Petroff F, CezarJ C, Arrio MA, Sainctavit P, Gatel C, Warot-Fonrose B (2011) Epitaxial growth and ferrimagnetic behavior of MnFe2O4 (111) ultrathin layers for room-temperature spin filtering. Phys Rev B 83:184402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kaniyoor A, Baby TT, Ramaprabhu S (2010) Graphene synthesis via hydrogen induced low temperature exfoliation of graphite oxide. J Mater Chem 20:8467–8469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kumar D, Narayan J, Kvit AV, Sharma AK, Sankar J (2001) High coercivity and superparamagnetic behavior of nanocrystalline iron particles in alumina matrix. J Magn Magn Mater 232:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Su J, Cao M, Ren L, Hu C (2011) Fe3O4–graphene nanocomposites with improved lithium storage and magnetism properties. J Phys Chem C 115:14469–14477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sheik-Bahae M, Said AA, Wei TH, Hagan DJ, Van Stryland EW (1990) Sensitive measurement of optical nonlinearities using a single beam. IEEE J Quan Elect 26:760–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Saravanan M, Sabari Girisun TC, Vinitha G, Rao SV (2016) Improved third-order optical nonlinearity and optical limiting behaviour of (nanospindle and nanosphere) zinc ferrite decorated reduced graphene oxide under continuous and ultrafast laser excitation. RSC Adv 6:91083–91092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ramakanth S, Hamad S, Venugopal Rao S, James Raju KC (2015) Magnetic and nonlinear optical properties of BaTiO3 nanoparticles. AIP Adv 5:057139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Torres TC, Bornacelli J, Can Uc B, Silva Pereyra HG, Rodríguez Fernández L, Avalos-Borja M, Labrada Delgado GJ, Cheang Wong JC, Rangel Rojo R, Oliver A (2018) Coexistence of two-photon absorption and saturable absorption in ion-implanted platinum nanoparticles in silica plates. JOSA B 35:1295–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Stewart AF, Bass M (1980) Intensity-dependent absorption in semiconductors. Appl Phys Lett 37:1040–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Palfalvi L, Hebling J (2004) Z-scan study of the thermo-optical effect. Appl Phys B 78:775–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    SheikBahae M, Ali Said A, Hagan DJ, Soileau MJ, Van Stryland W (1991) Nonlinear refraction and optical limiting in thick media. Opt Eng 30:1228–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Saravanan M, Sabari Girisun TC (2015) Nonlinear optical absorption and optical limiting properties of cadmium ferrite. Mater Chem Phys 160:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Perumbilavil S, Sankar P, PriyaRose T, Philip R (2015) White light Z-scan measurements of ultrafast optical nonlinearity in reduced graphene oxide nanosheets in the 400–700 nm region. Appl Phys Lett 107:051104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mary KA, Unnikrishnan NV, Philip R (2015) Cubic to amorphous transformation of Se in silica with improved ultrafast optical nonlinearity. RSC Adv 5:14034–14041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mary KA, Unnikrishnan NV, Philip R (2014) Role of surface states and defects in the ultrafast nonlinear optical properties of CuS quantum dots. APL Mater 2:076104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sridharan K, Endo T, Cho SG, Kim J, Park TJ, Philip R (2013) Single step synthesis and optical limiting properties of Ni–Ag and Fe–Ag bimetallic nanoparticles. Opt Mater 35:860–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Anand B, Kaniyoor A, Swain D, Baby TT, Rao SV, Sai SSS, Ramaprabhu S, Philip R (2014) Enhanced optical limiting and carrier dynamics in metal oxide–hydrogen exfoliated graphene hybrids. J Mater Chem C 2:10116–10123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Thomas P, Sreekanth P, Abraham KE (2015) Nanosecond and ultrafast optical power limiting in luminescent Fe2O3 hexagonal nanomorphotype. J Appl Phys 117:053103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Irimpan L, Nampoori VPN, Radhakrishnan P, Krishnan B, Deepthy A (2008) Size-dependent enhancement of nonlinear optical properties in nanocolloids of ZnO. J Appl Phys 103:033105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Thomas JJ, Krishnan S, Sridharan K, Philip R, Kalarikkal N (2012) A comparative study on the optical limiting properties of different nano spinel ferrites with Z-scan technique. Mater Res Bull 47:1855–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Thomas P, Sreekanth P, Philip R, Abraham KE (2015) Morphology dependent nanosecond and ultrafast optical power limiting of CdO nanomorphotypes. RSC Adv 5:35017–35025CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. C. Sabari Girisun
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Saravanan
    • 1
  • S. Venugopal Rao
    • 2
  1. 1.Nanophotonics Laboratory, Department of PhysicsBharathidasan UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia
  2. 2.Advanced Centre of Research in High Energy Materials (ACRHEM)University of HyderabadHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations