Advertisement

SN Applied Sciences

, 1:172 | Cite as

Fe–Ni Invar alloy reinforced by WC nanoparticles with high strength and low thermal expansion

  • Shiqi Zheng
  • Maximillian Sokoluk
  • Gongcheng Yao
  • Igor de Rosa
  • Xiaochun LiEmail author
Research Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. 5. Physics (general)

Abstract

Invar is a solid solution alloy that offers high-dimensional stability. It is challenging for traditional methods to strengthen Invar alloys without a significant increase in the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). In this work, WC nanoparticle-reinforced Invar nanocomposite was manufactured. The microstructures, mechanical properties, and thermal expansion behavior were investigated. It was found that the Invar alloy was effectively strengthened by WC nanoparticle reinforcement without significant elevation of its CTE. The Invar–WC nanocomposite exhibits an enhanced yield and tensile strength of 440 and 795 MPa, an increase of 60% and 77% from commercial Invar alloy, and a moderate ductility of 22.7% in annealed state. In cold-rolled state, The Invar–WC nanocomposite exhibits a high tensile strength of 1050 MPa, an increase of 46% from commercial Invar alloy, while retaining 4.5% ductility. A record low CTE value of 2.61 × 10−6/°C and an enhanced Young’s modulus of 185 GPa, up from 140 GPa, were also achieved. It was found that WC leads to a lower CTE at higher temperature compared to unreinforced Invar.

Keywords

Invar Thermal expansion High strength Nanocomposite 

1 Introduction

Invar is a binary solid solution alloy of Fe and Ni with a Ni content of around 36 wt.%. Invar possesses a uniquely low coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE, α25–100°C ≈ 1.5 × 10−6/°C) below its Curie temperature (Tc ~ 277 °C) [1]. For this reason, Invar alloys are frequently used in a wide range of applications that require high-dimensional stability, such as large telescopes, precision instruments, and core wires of long-distance power cable [2]. In recent years, Invar alloys with high mechanical strength have been subject to renewed interest for their application in aeronautic and aerospace industry, such as high-tolerance curing molds for composite materials and ultrahigh-stability structures for in-orbit and ground-and-orbit multi-satellite operations [3, 4]. Thus, the study of strengthening Invar alloy is of significance.

The strengthening of Invar alloy can be achieved primarily through three methods: grain refinement [5], plastic deformation (and severe plastic deformation, SPD) [6], and precipitation hardening [4, 7, 8, 9]. Vingradov et al. [8] reported that the tensile strength of Fe–36Ni Invar alloy can be increased to 912 MPa by refining the grain size to 180 nm using equal channel angular pressing (ECAP). Morikawa et al. [5] demonstrated that Invar alloy rolled to 90% thickness reduction at cryogenic temperature (77 K) can reach 1250 MPa in tensile strength due to the formation of deformation twins. The strengthening of Invar alloy through the precipitation of MC-type carbides, such as TiC, VC, and Mo2C, or intermetallics, such as γ’-type Ni3Ti and Ni3Al, was reported to be highly effective. Nakama et al. reported a Fe–Ni–V–C Invar alloy reaches a tensile strength of 1000 MPa after a combination of solutionization, aging, which produces VC precipitates, and cold working [7, 9]; the same author reported the strengthening of Invar alloy containing Ti, V, and C through TiC and VC precipitation, and achieved 1100 MPa tensile strength at peak aging condition [6]. Yahagi et al. reported a Fe–Ni–Co–Ti Invar alloy strengthened by the precipitation of γ’-type Ni3Ti intermetallics exhibits a tensile strength of 1313 MPa after cold working [10]. Sridharan et al. reported a similar strengthening strategy using Ni3(Al, Ti) precipitates. After cold working, 1300 MPa tensile strength was obtained [11].

It is notable that each of the aforementioned strengthening methods has its own drawback. As ultrafine-grained and nanograined Invar alloys are typically prepared by either deposition [12] or SPD [5], they typically exhibit relative low stability against grain growth [13] and have high equipment cost due to the use of processes like ECAP. While precipitation strengthening by MC-type carbides or intermetallics is proved to be highly effective, these methods typically result in an undesirable increase in the alloy’s CTE value, up to 3–4 × 10−6/°C [3, 10]. To this end, it is of interest to develop a simple method of strengthening Invar alloy effectively while preventing a significant increase in the CTE value.

Compared with conventional strengthening methods, the reinforcement of Invar alloy through nanosized low-thermal expansion ceramic particulates is not well studied. While using laser to process Invar alloy with ceramic microparticles, such as TiC [14], or joining Invar alloy with bulk ceramics, such as Si3N4 [4], was reported, the manufacturing of bulk Invar alloy nanocomposites has not been studied so far.

In the present work, tungsten carbide (WC) nanoparticles were used to reinforce Invar alloy, due to the combination of high hardness, low CTE, and commercial availability of WC nanoparticles. The methodology involves easy-to-achieve powder metallurgy practice combined with regular hot and cold working, since currently a good method of incorporating WC nanoparticles into molten Invar in a regular liquid metallurgy scenario has not been developed. The mechanical strength of the WC/Invar was measured with and without cold working. The CTE values of WC/Invar and regular Invar, manufactured by the same process, were measured for comparison.

2 Experimental

WC nanoparticles (APS 150 nm, US Research Nanomaterials) were used in this work. Its CTE is approximately 5.5 × 10−6/°C [15]. The Invar powder (325 mesh) used has a nominal composition of Fe–36.56 wt.%Ni–0.34 wt.%Si–0.016 wt.%C–0.03 wt.%Mn (ESPI Metals). The Invar powder was first blended with 10 vol.% WC nanoparticles, which are later referred to as “Invar-10WC.” A small quantity of acetone was then introduced to the powder mixture to create the slurry. The slurry was treated with a Misonix sonicator for 10 min in order to break apart the WC clusters. The acetone was subsequently evaporated in an 80 °C water bath. The powder was dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 2 h. The dried powder was cold-compacted in a 2.5-cm-diameter steel cylindrical mold at 400 MPa of pressure and was subjected to a pressureless sintering for 20 min at 1300 °C, under 1 atm argon protection, in an induction furnace. The sintered ingots were hot-forged at 1200 °C into about 2-mm-thick sheets and then cold-rolled by 25% thickness reduction to 1.5-mm-thick sheets.

Tensile bars were cut using electrical discharge machining (EDM). The tensile bars had a 10 mm × 4 mm × 1.5 mm (L × W × T) gage section. Prior to testing, a portion of the tensile bars was annealed at 1000 °C for 1 h and the rest were left as-rolled. The tensile tests were conducted on an Instron universal testing system equipped with a 10 kN load cell and a standard video extensometer. The tensile strain rate was 1 × 10−3/s.

Samples were prepared for scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Zeiss Supra 40VP) analysis using standard metallographic practice. CTE measurement was taken using ASTM E228 method in helium atmosphere from room temperature to 370 °C [16]. Prior to the measurement, the CTE samples were annealed at 1000 °C for 1 h. For comparison purpose, the CTE of unreinforced Invar alloy, prepared using the same method, was also measured.

3 Results

3.1 Microstructure of Invar-10WC

The representative SEM micrograph of as-sintered Invar-10WC sample is shown in Fig. 1a. In the Invar matrix, WC nanoparticles are well distributed, but appear as pseudo-clusters, where the nanoparticles are dispersed (separated from each other). The as-sintered sample also has numerous large pores and a region of poor sintering quality, as shown in Fig. 1a bottom left. Due to the relatively short sintering time of 20 min, no obvious growth is observed on the WC nanoparticles (Fig. 1a inset). The representative SEM micrograph of an as-forged Invar-10WC sample is shown in Fig. 1b. Compared to the as-sintered sample, the forging process is not able to alter the WC nanoparticle distribution in the Invar matrix. However, the forging process is effective in removing residual pores and breaking large WC nanoparticle pseudo-clusters into smaller ones. The relative density of the as-forged samples is around 99.3%, as determined by the Archimedes method, indicating the significant densification effect brought by the forging process.
Fig. 1

SEM micrograph of Invar-10WC sample sintered at 1300 °C. a As-sintered; b as-forged. The scale bar on the insets is 2 μm

3.2 Mechanical properties and CTE of Invar-10WC samples

Figure 2a shows the typical stress–strain curves of annealed and cold-rolled Invar-10WC samples. The annealed sample has a tensile strength of 800 MPa and an elongation of 22.7%. After cold rolling of 25% thickness reduction, a tensile strength of 1050 MPa is obtained, 31% higher than that of the annealed sample. The cold-rolled sample has an elongation of 4.5%.
Fig. 2

a Typical stress–strain curves of annealed and cold-rolled (25% thickness reduction) Invar-10WC samples. b CTE versus temperature curves of Invar-10WC (green filled circle) sample and control sample (blue filled square)

Figure 2b shows the CTE versus temperature curves of the Invar-10WC sample and the pure Invar sample as a control, herein named “Invar-0WC.” The CTE at any given temperature is calculated by dividing the change in length of the sample by the change in the temperature, given by Eq. 1,
$$\alpha_{\text{mean}} = \frac{{\frac{{L_{\text{T}} - L_{0} }}{{L_{0} }}}}{{T - T_{0} }}$$
(1)
where T0 is the starting temperature, 20 °C, L0 is the initial sample length, and LT is the length of the sample at given temperature T. The CTE value is 2.61 × 10−6/°C for the Invar-10WC sample and 1.65 × 10−6/°C for the Invar-0WC sample, in the temperature range of 20 to 100 °C.
The property combination of UTS and CTE of the Invar-10WC sample is plotted in an Ashby chart in comparison with other engineering alloys and high-strength Invar from the literature (Fig. 3). While the mechanical strength of the Invar-10WC is slightly lower than that of Fe–Ni–Co–Ti- and Fe–Ni–Co–Al-type high-strength Invar alloys, the CTE of the Invar-10WC is significantly lower. The outstandingly low CTE allows the Invar-10WC nanocomposite to occupy a unique property space on the Ashby chart.
Fig. 3

Ashby plot displaying the property combination of UTS versus CTE

4 Discussion

4.1 Microstructure of Invar-10WC

Based on the SEM micrographs (Fig. 1), the forged Invar-10WC sample consists of a dual-phase-like microstructure, in which densely packed, WC-rich clusters are randomly distributed throughout the WC nanoparticle-free austenite matrix. The insets in Fig. 1 indicate that the WC-rich clusters are well infiltrated by the matrix. This microstructure is likely the result of lack of ball milling during the powder preparation, as well as the drastic size difference between WC nanoparticles (APS 150 nm) and Invar powder (325 mesh). The literature has demonstrated that extensive ball milling processing will promote the dispersion of nanoparticles in the interior of metal powder, which, in turn, gives rise to a uniform dispersion of nanoparticles in the matrix after sintering [17, 18]. Without ball milling, the WC nanoparticles remained at the surface of Invar powder after mixing. During sintering and forging, the WC nanoparticles had very limited mobility and hence were unable to travel into the Invar grains. In this work, forging was shown to be effective in densification, removing the sintering defects, and mechanically breaking apart large WC-rich clusters to smaller ones. A thermodynamic study in the literature has demonstrated that WC has around 2 at% solubility in Fe and Ni matrix at 1200 °C and will react with molten Ni and Fe to form a M6C-type alloy carbide [19]. For these reasons, upon experimentation of different sintering times and temperatures, sintering was carried out at 1300 °C for a relatively short duration of 20 min, in which no obvious growth or reaction of WC nanoparticles was observed.

4.2 Mechanical behavior of Invar-10WC

The mechanical properties of Invar-10WC in comparison with a commercial Invar 36 alloy are summarized in Table 1. The Young’s modulus of the Invar-10WC sample is in close accordance with the volumetric rule of mixture when using EWC = 550 GPa [20] and EInvar = 140 GPa [21]. The yield strength and tensile strength of the annealed Invar-10WC are increased by 60% and 77%, respectively, compared with the commercial alloy, while for cold-rolled Invar-10WC, the values increased by 40% and 46%, respectively. This strengthening effect is primarily due to the combined effect of Orowan strengthening, in which the nanoparticles impede the dislocation motion, and load transfer effect, in which the load is transferred from the matrix to the nanoparticle via strong interfacial bonding [22, 23]. The salient strengthening is achieved at the expense of 35% of the material’s ductility in annealed state and 18% in cold-rolled state.
Table 1

Mechanical properties of Invar-10WC comparing with a commercial Invar 36 alloy

 

Young’s modulus (GPa)

σy (MPa)

σUTS (MPa)

Elongation (ε) (%)

Annealed

    

 Invar-10WC

180

440

795

22.7

 Commercial Invar 36 [21]

140

276

448

35

Cold-rolled

    

 Invar-10WC

185

950

1050

4.5

 Commercial Invar 36 [21]

145

679

717

5.5

4.3 Thermal expansion behavior of Invar-10WC

The CTE values of the Invar-10WC and the Invar-0WC, as a control, samples at selected temperatures are compared with a commercial Invar 36 alloy in Table 2 [21]. The Invar-0WC sample in this work exhibits slightly higher CTE value than that of the commercial alloy after the same heat treatment. This is likely the result of contamination and oxidation issues of powder metallurgical processing compared to the casting process in commercial production scale. The CTE value of the Invar-10WC sample is found to deviate slightly from the volumetric rule of mixture in the temperature range of 20–100 °C. This is likely due to the presence of some contaminants on the commercial WC nanoparticles as well as minor dissolution of WC into the Invar matrix [19] during sintering and forging, which was not directly observed in the SEM analysis. While the CTE of Invar-10WC is higher than that of unreinforced Invar-0WC from room temperature to 210 °C, a noticeable crossover between the two CTE versus temperature curves occurs around 210 °C, above which the CTE of the composite sample is lower than that of the unreinforced sample.
Table 2

CTE of Invar-10WC, Invar-0WC, and a commercial Invar 36 alloy at selected temperature

Temperature (°C)

CTE, α (× 10−6/°C)

 

Invar-10WC

Invar-0WC

Commercial Invar 36 [21]

100

2.61

1.65

1.50

150

2.68

2.12

2.11

260

3.39

4.48

4.18

370

6.06

7.70

7.60

Due to its hexagonal crystal structure, α-WC has two distinctive linear CTE values on its a-axis (αa) and c-axis (αc). The αa, αc, and mean linear CTE values of WC at elevated temperature are not reported in the literature. The volumetric CTE, αV, of WC at elevated temperature was reported by Reeber et al. [24]. It was reported that the volumetric CTE versus temperature curve follows a logarithmic pattern, in which the CTE value grows fast from 0 to 230 °C and slows down after 230 °C, eventually reaching a plateau above 800 °C [24]. To this end, the thermal expansion behaviors of Invar-10WC and Invar-0WC samples can be better understood. The CTE of the Invar-0WC sample follows that of commercial Invar 36, which show an increase in CTE when above its Curie temperature. The Invar-10WC sample only suffers a higher CTE value below 210 °C, but benefits from the lack of Curie point and the slow growing CTE of WC above 230 °C, which results in the overall lower CTE value of the nanocomposite sample, when compared to that of regular Invar 36 alloy.

5 Conclusions

In this work, Invar reinforced by WC nanoparticles with high strength, low thermal expansion, and moderate ductility was manufactured using a simple powder metallurgy method. It was found that the Invar-10WC nanocomposite reached the highest tensile strength of 1050 MPa, 4.5% ductility, together with a very low CTE value of 2.61 × 10−6/°C. This combination of UTS and CTE extends the low CTE alloy property space on the Ashby-type diagram, as displayed in Fig. 3, which is promising for significant applications. The Invar-10WC nanocomposite also had a lower CTE than that of regular Invar alloy above 210 °C, due to the incorporation of WC which has low CTE at elevated temperature, which could lead to potential high-temperature applications of Invar–WC nanocomposites.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support from the National Science Foundation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Martienssen W, Warlimont H (2005) Springer handbook of condensed matter and materials data. Springer, Berlin, p 783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salvo M, Casalegno V, Suess M, Gozzelino L, Wilhelmi C (2018) Laser surface nanostructuring for reliable Si3N4/Si3N4 and Si3N4/invar joined components. Ceram Int 44:12081–12087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu H, Sun Z, Wang G, Sun X, Li J, Xue F, Peng H, Zhang Y (2016) Effect of aging on microstructures and properties of Mo-alloyed Fe–36Ni invar alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 654:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen C, Ma B, Miao S, Liu B (2018) Effect of cobalt on microstructure and mechanical properties of invar alloy. In: Han Y (ed) Advances in materials processing. CMC 2017. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering, vol 2017. Springer, Singapore, pp 855–864Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morikawa T, Moronaga T, Higashida K (2006) Fine-grained structures associated with deformation twin and its influence on tensile behaviours in a cold-rolled Fe–Ni alloy. Mater Sci Forum 503:895–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakama K, Tatsutani S, Sugita K, Shirai Y (2014) Strengthening of Fe–36mass%Ni low thermal expansion alloy by additions of C, V, Ti, and Cr and the effect of reducing Ni on thermal expansion. J Jpn Inst Met Mater. 78(1):37–44 (in Japanese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakama K, Furuya S, Sugita K, Inoue K, Shirai Y (2013) Lattice defects of cold-drawn and aged Fe–36 wt%Ni alloys and effects of additions of C and V on hardness and thermal expansion. J Jpn Inst Met Mater 99(5):380–389 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vinogradov A, Hashimoto S, Kopylov VI (2003) Enhanced strength and fatigue life of ultra-fine grain Fe/36Ni invar alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 355:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakama K, Sugita K, Shirai Y (2013) Effect of MC type carbides on age hardness and thermal expansion of Fe–36 wt%Ni–0.2 wt%C alloy. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 2:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yahagi S, Kusaka K, Kato T (1980) Effect of Ni and Ti on the thermal expansion of Fe–Ni–Co–Ti alloys. Denki-Seiko 51(2):80–89 (in Japanese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sridharan K, Worzala FJ, Dodd RA (1992) Heat treatment and microstructure of an Fe–Ni–Co invar alloy strengthened by intermetallic precipitation. Mater Charact 29:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu Y, Liu L, Wu Z, Li J, Shen B, Hu W (2010) Grain growth and grain size effects on the thermal expansion properties of an electrodeposited Fe–Ni invar alloy. Scr Mater 63:359–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu Y, Liu L, Shen B, Hu W (2011) A study of thermal stability in electrodeposited nanocrystalline Fe–Ni invar alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528:5701–5705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Stampfl J, Prinz FB (2000) Mechanical and thermal expansion behavior of laser deposited metal matrix composites of Invar and TiC. Mater Sci Eng A 282:86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kurlov AS, Gusev AI (2013) Tungsten carbides: structure, properties and application in hardmetals. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM E228–17 (2017) Standard test method for linear thermal expansion of solid materials with a push-rod dilatometer. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karak SK, Dutta Majumdar J, Witczak Z, Lojkowski W, Manna I (2013) Microstructure and mechanical properties of nano-Y2O3 dispersed ferritic alloys synthesized by mechanical alloying and consolidated by hydrostatic extrusion. Mater Sci Eng A 580:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laurent-Brocq M, Legendre F, Mathon MH, Mascaro A, Poissonnet S, Radiguet B, Pareige P, Loyer M, Leseigneur O (2015) Influence of ball-milling and annealing conditions on nanocluster characteristics in oxide dispersion strengthened steels. Acta Mater 60:7150–7159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fernandes CM, Senos AMR (2011) Cemented carbide phase diagrams: a review. Int J Refract Metal Hard Mater 29:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cardarelli F (2008) Materials handbook: a concise desktop reference. Springer, Berlin, p 640Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CarTech Invar 36 Alloy Technical Datasheet, Carpenter Technology Corporation, Philadelphia, PA (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sanaty-Zadeh A (2012) Comparison between current models for the strength of particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites with emphasis on consideration of Hall–Petch effect. Mater Sci Eng A 531:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Casati R, Vedani M (2014) Metal matrix composites reinforced by nano-particles—a review. Metals 4:65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reeber RR, Wang K (1999) Thermophysical properties of alpha-tungsten carbide. J Am Ceram Soc 82(1):129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Technology AdvancementUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations